No edit summary |
|||
| (23 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
{{MariIdeology | {{MariIdeology | ||
|title=[[File:Psychlib.png]] Psychocommunism | |title=[[File:Psychlib.png]] Psychocommunism | ||
|image= | |image=PsychlibNewArt.png | ||
|caption=mfw the capitalist talks about freedom (i cant hurt their false private property rights) | |||
|aliases= | |aliases= | ||
'''Official aliases'''<br> | '''Official aliases'''<br> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
{{Info/LibLefts}}<br> | {{Info/LibLefts}}<br> | ||
{{Info/Communists}}<br><br> | {{Info/Communists}}<br><br> | ||
{{Template:DvIdeology/small|Psychocommunism| | {{Template:DvIdeology/small|Psychocommunism|77.1|77.1|11.8|83.3|75.0|11.8}} | ||
*'''Closest Match: ''' [[File: | *'''Closest Match: ''' [[File:Egocom.png]] [[Ego-Communism]] | ||
*'''Other Closest Matches''' {{Collapse| | *'''Other Closest Matches''' {{Collapse| | ||
**[[File:Libmarx.png]] [[Libertarian Socialism|Libertarian Marxism]] | |||
**[[File:Auton.png]] [[Autonomism]] | |||
**[[File:Xenofeminism.png]] [[Xenofeminism]] | |||
**[[File:Minsocf.png]] [[Minarcho-Socialism]] | **[[File:Minsocf.png]] [[Minarcho-Socialism]] | ||
**[[File: | **[[File:LeftBert.png]] [[Libertarian Socialism|Left-Libertarianism]] | ||
**[[File:AnSynd.png]] [[Anarcho-Syndicalism]] (montageous) | **[[File:AnSynd.png]] [[Anarcho-Syndicalism]] (montageous) | ||
**[[File: | **[[File:Councom.png]] [[Council Communism]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
|influences= | |influences= | ||
[[File: | *[[File:Ormarxf.png]] '''[[Marxism|Karl Marx]]''' | ||
*[[File: | **[[File:Com.png]] [[Communism]] | ||
**[[File:Anticap.png]] [[Marxism|Critique of Capitalism]] | **[[File:Anticap.png]] [[Marxism|Critique of Capitalism]] | ||
*[[File:Orengelsf.png]] [[Marxism|Friedrich Engels]] | *[[File:Orengelsf.png]] '''[[Marxism|Friedrich Engels]]''' | ||
*[[File:Fisher.png]] [[Acid Communism|Mark Fisher]] | *[[File:Fisher.png]] '''[[Acid Communism|Mark Fisher]]''' | ||
**[[File:CultIndust.png]] [[Neoliberalism|Cultural Effects of Capitalism]] | **[[File:CultIndust.png]] [[Neoliberalism|Cultural Effects of Capitalism]] | ||
***[[File:CapRealism.png]] [[Neoliberalism|Capitalist Realism]] | ***[[File:CapRealism.png]] [[Neoliberalism|Capitalist Realism]] | ||
***[[File:BusinessOntology.png]] [[Neoliberalism|Business Ontology]] | ***[[File:BusinessOntology.png]] [[Neoliberalism|Business Ontology]] | ||
**[[File:AntiNeoLib.png]] [[Neoliberalism|Anti-Neoliberalism]] | |||
[[File:AntiNeoLib.png]] | **[[File:NeoMarxProg.png]] [[Neo-Marxism|Marxist Progressivism]] | ||
*[[File: | ***[[File:CorpoMask.png]] [[Corporatocracy|Anti-CorpProg]] | ||
**[[File: | ***[[File:Intersectional_Communism.png]] [[Marxist Feminism|Intersectional Liberation]] | ||
* | **[[File:Neomarx.png]] [[Neo-Marxism|Futility of Old Methods]] | ||
**[[File: | |||
**[[File: | |||
|sub= | |sub= | ||
*[[File:Vistula3.png]] '''Apolitical Maritimeanism''' {{Collapse| | *[[File:Vistula3.png]] '''Apolitical Maritimeanism''' {{Collapse| | ||
| Line 105: | Line 104: | ||
}} | }} | ||
Psychocommunism (psychedelia + communism) is a [[File:Com.png]] [[Communism|communist]], [[File:Intersectional_Communism.png]] [[Marxist Feminism|intersectional]], and [[File:AntiParl.png]] [[Libertarian Socialism|anti-parliamentarian]] ideology created by Maritime. Here I criticise capitalism's [[File:DepressionMale.png]] {{PHB|Pessimism|bleakness}}, [[File:Individual.png]] [[Classical Liberalism|false individualism]], and how [[File:Com.png]] [[Communism|communism]] would liberate man from these undesirable ideas. | Psychocommunism (psychedelia + communism) is a [[File:Com.png]] [[Communism|communist]], [[File:Intersectional_Communism.png]] [[Marxist Feminism|intersectional]], and [[File:AntiParl.png]] [[Libertarian Socialism|anti-parliamentarian]] ideology created by Maritime. Here I criticise capitalism's [[File:DepressionMale.png]] {{PHB|Pessimism|bleakness}}, [[File:Individual.png]] [[Classical Liberalism|false individualism]], and how [[File:Com.png]] [[Communism|communism]] would liberate man from these undesirable ideas. My main influences are [[File:Fisher.png]] Mark Fisher, [[File:Marx.png]] Karl Marx, and probably some others who I've forgotten to write down. I am also very [[File:wholsum.png]] wholsum. (trve)<br>Here's my icons if you wish to add me: ([[File:Com.png|link=Communism]]/[[File:Acidcomf.png|link=Acid_Communism]]/[[File:Intersectional_Communism.png|link=Marxist_Feminism]]/[[File:AntiParl.png|link=Libertarian_Socialism]]) | ||
==[[File:Book.png]] My View== | |||
*[[File:Com.png]] Communism is a movement which can liberate man from the forces of capital which make their life mundane through constant oppression and theft of the products/rewards of their labour. | |||
*[[File:MoralNihil.png]] Morals are artificial products of the dominant system in place; our morality is still heavily based off of Christian ideas, as the curse of Christianity still lingers, even in secular society. | |||
*[[File:Antilib.png]] Liberalism comes with a lot of things, but it's main tenant is the subjugation of man under the forces of capital. It's idea of a pursuit of happiness can be seen as twisted and false, due to this subjugation. | |||
*[[File:NihilCom.png]] Communism is not a system to be established but rather the disestablishment of systems; it is the most extreme form of liberation. | |||
*[[File:Revolution.png]] Freedom is obtained (it shall never be given in "good will", only in "good plans") and so we must obtain it if we want it. | |||
*[[File:AntiEquality.png]] The idea that communism is "equality" which has emerged through degeneration/memeification of the term has changed public perception of communism in a way that has negatively affected it. Equality is likely to be viewed as something authoritarian by those who understand it can never happen. | |||
*[[File:Neolib.png]] The false idea of individualism and freedom through decentralism and worker "empowerment/representation" is a bunch of bullshit to convince us we're in a developed special capitalism, unlike the barbarism of the past eras. There is no capitalist development - it is communism or it is barbarism. | |||
*[[File:Soc.png]] The development of modern neoliberal capitalism has killed the previous forms; there exists a poignant control society, which connects capitalism and oppression together symbiotically; if we want freedom, we want communism. (Though it appears in the left, the reverse of this statement "If we want communism, we want freedom." sometimes does not apply.) | |||
*[[File:AntiPinkcap.png]] Integration is not enough; a self-respecting individual should never let themselves be integrated into a system whose core tenant is their oppression. (Using "who" for the system is quite a folly, for this system is not just about individuals; the oppression shall not disappear if we change who the oppressors are. As [[File:Marcuse.png]] Marcuse said, free election of masters does not abolish the masters or the slaves.) The idea of worker integration such as with election of bosses in business, and higher freedom of expression is blasphemous - it can even be considered fundamentally anti-proletarian. | |||
==Goals Thingy (WIP)== | ==Goals Thingy (WIP)== | ||
| Line 118: | Line 128: | ||
==[[File:Antilib.png]] Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness== | ==[[File:Antilib.png]] Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness== | ||
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness is a slogan oft associated with the classical liberal idea, so we shall take it as the 3 pillars of liberalism. Liberalism advertises itself here with this slogan as individualistic - allowing man to pursuit happiness. But, the liberal capitalist system does not suffice for this, for my pursuit of happiness lies outside of the worship of the deities of capital - this stance, the stance of the universally oppressed proletarian, is, despite it being majoritarian, considered an anomaly, and like in all systems, is thrown aside - the individual's liberty to pursuit their happiness is tossed. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness becomes merely a slogan worshipping the deities of capital, giving a false promise of self-liberation, trying to fit capitalism into the "liberation" slot when communism is in fact the social stage which belongs there. I see liberalism as merely a montage to subjugate the individual to the demands of capital. | Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness is a slogan oft associated with the classical liberal idea, so we shall take it as the 3 pillars of liberalism. Liberalism advertises itself here with this slogan as individualistic - allowing man to pursuit happiness. But, the liberal capitalist system does not suffice for this, for my pursuit of happiness lies outside of the worship of the deities of capital - this stance, the stance of the universally oppressed proletarian, is, despite it being majoritarian, considered an anomaly, and like in all systems, is thrown aside - the individual's liberty to pursuit their happiness is tossed. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness becomes merely a slogan worshipping the deities of capital, giving a false promise of self-liberation, trying to fit capitalism into the "liberation" slot when communism is in fact the social stage which belongs there. I see liberalism as merely a montage to subjugate the individual to the demands of capital. | ||
==[[File:NeolibAutocrat.png]] Liberalism and Freedom== | |||
Liberalism, or more specifically the new highest stage of capitalism - neoliberal capitalism, has co-opted the idea of freedom. Freedom no longer means man acting in their own free will, nor man being away from tyranny which stops them from achieving what they desire. Freedom now is comparable to being murdered but they'll pay for your funeral afterwards, or wrap you up in a little pink blanket afterwards. The bosses still exist, but in different forms - forms which comfort us. Ranks are decentralised, at heavy costs to efficiency (see the NHS, where decentralised roles has partly contributed to its decline), just to keep a façade of freedom. Neoliberal capitalism is incredibly good at re-inventing terms to fit the requirements of capital - the things which need to be patched within the capitalist system, and the term "freedom" is not a straggler, avoiding this everytime. Freedom through reform is already a lost idea; we need total liberation. | |||
==[[File:Party.png]] How Modern Capitalism killed the party-form== | |||
<s>WIP: Explanation of neoliberalism's discrete authoritarianism, the transformation of bourgeoise control being a main difference between modern and past capitalism, and what effect this had on the party-form</s> | |||
'''Note: This will be in-progress for a while, as I expect it to be quite long.''' | |||
==[[File:Mansphere.png]] Masculinity and Melancholia== | ==[[File:Mansphere.png]] Masculinity and Melancholia== | ||
A common strategy of the media is targeted melancholia e.g. postcolonial melancholia, in which the media causes distress upon those who feel inferior due to the collapse of the empires they used to hold in history making them rather irrelevant. The same can be said for the idea of masculinity. With contributors such as [[File:Fem.png]] feminism, and [[File:Sexual Revolution.png]] sexual liberation, traditional masculinity and those who espouse it feel as if their position on the throne of humanity has been taken from underneath them; capitalism of course enforces a hierarchy which it can culturally displace without actually displacing; women are still suffering more than men, immigrants still more than natives, and yet, many feel the case is the opposite. I believe this to be an example of what I just said. This form of "post-patriarchal" melancholia (though the patriarchy still exists) is widely promoted, such as with the rise in popularity of "masculinity" content on social media; a clear showcase that there is a demand in recent times. (this really is a surge; one day, it was nowhere, the next day, it was everywhere.) I feel this rise in masculine sentiment to be quite contrary to the [[File:CapAcceleration.png]] progressive nature of capitalism, as it seems more [[File:CapDeceleration.png]] regressive, but these terms are rather subjective. I haven't really made much of a point in this small snippet, other than maybe capitalism's ability to make a hierarchy appear shifted when it in fact is not at all shifted, but I felt like writing about this small observation. | |||
==[[File:Struct.png]] Superstructure in the Capitalist Mode of Production== | ==[[File:Struct.png]] Superstructure in the Capitalist Mode of Production== | ||
==[[File:CorpoMask.png]] How Corporate Pride Month shows our Infatuation with Superficial Imagery== | ==[[File:CorpoMask.png]] How Corporate Pride Month shows our Infatuation with Superficial Imagery== | ||
==[[File:Gay.png]] Queer Liberation and the Bourgeoise State== | ==[[File:Gay.png]] Queer Liberation and the Bourgeoise State== | ||
WIP: Queer assimilation vs Queer liberation, how Queer liberation is hindered by the bourgeoise state | WIP: Queer assimilation vs Queer liberation, how Queer liberation is hindered by the bourgeoise state | ||
==Opinions== | |||
===[[File:Yes.png]] Comrades in Arms=== | |||
===[[File:Kinda_Yes.png]] Agreeable=== | |||
*{{Template:RevFris}} - You're definitely the most agreeable reactionary on here, combining together your love for Frisia with a retainment of inclusivity, as well as your still socialist beliefs. I'd say I disagree mostly with the agrarianism. (Your view on the EU I read in your Relations section is also pretty agreeable.) | |||
===[[File:Meh.png]] Middle of the Road=== | |||
===[[File:Kinda_No.png]] Off-putting=== | |||
*{{Template:Supergnostic}} - I definitely would not consider you Machinery tier that's for sure. A monarchy to me is no better or no worse than a republic; it all looks exactly the same to me, the state continues a tool for class oppression either way, so I'm not exactly inclined to critique anybody based on that - single-issue politics like the Republican movement in the UK are simply proletarian suicide, as they affirm that capitalism can "get better." Anyways, I'm going off track, aren't I? I don't really understand the ideas of Nietzsche yet - he's someone I definitely should read considering how many times I've seen his name dropped. I'm disliking of the idea of a caste system, especially the barbaric one's seen in the Indian subcontinent - I mean the one today in India is disgusting, Stalinist decentralism applied to a caste system is something which disgusts me so, over 3,000 castes in India, and that excludes sub-castes. What do you think someone's soul type will be determined by? I'm against someone's birth deciding their entire fate, but my classification of this class system on the scale of Meh to Terrible very much depends on this. The Conservative Revolution is something I won't doubt as revolutionary; I think that's a silly argument; capitalism is an inherently progressive force, especially today where it clutches at every single-issue liberatory movement/folk politic demonstration it can get its hand on, turning it into a sludged poignant melancholy - I do not worship the past and I'm not exactly going to worship the future anymore, but I must say that I hate the systems of the past. Not sure what spiritual racism is, wonder if I can find that out sometime. Your anti-abrahamicism is agreeable to me, I am disgusted by Abrahamic faiths, but we likely are for different reasons, and I also am unsure of my position on non-abrahamic religions, which may be just as bad for all I know. We're both anti-liberal, again likely for different reasons? I don't take traditionalism as something bad, I wouldn't say its good, but there isn't bad inherent to Traditionalism, though I think I will need to understand the topic a lot more to make a better view on it. So in summary, I've got quite a few questions about this belief, and quite a few things I need to learn to understand it better. Hopefully once I learn more, I will be able to create a better opinion. | |||
===[[File:No.png]] Machinery=== | |||
*{{KK}} - I'll add you before you ask, because you will end up asking. This tier, Gato Matador, is for those whose views I heavily dislike; your distasteful liberalism, which has locked away the freedom for the workingman, in exchange for neofreedom, neofreedom being a disease, which upkeeps a problem, that being oppression by capital, and slowly changes that problems form until we are blindly convinced of our liberation. I hope you someday come around to understand the problem with liberal capitalism and the failure of the idea that someone can pursuit happiness with it; become free and embrace communism - the workingmen of all lands shall be liberated and finally we shall pursuit happiness, no longer under the wretched oppression of capital, in which our labour creations are sucked from us, stolen from our very hands, by an undeserving bourgeoisie class whom have been liberated at our expense for too long. You are proletarian - you must not fall to a bourgeoisie system's false promises any longer, Killer Kitty. | |||
*{{Template:DECBism}} - Refer to above. Also, please answer my questions in the comments 🙏 - I mean heck they are such questioning questions that me and Killer Kitty are seemingly on the same side in them, like holy fuck, that is NOT something you see everyday. | |||
==Reading List== | ==Reading List== | ||
| Line 164: | Line 195: | ||
*[[File:Unconditional Accelerationism.png]] Edmund Berger: Unconditional Acceleration and the Question of Praxis: Some Preliminary Thoughts | *[[File:Unconditional Accelerationism.png]] Edmund Berger: Unconditional Acceleration and the Question of Praxis: Some Preliminary Thoughts | ||
*[[File:Councom.png]] Otto Rühle: The Revolution Is Not A Party Affair | *[[File:Councom.png]] Otto Rühle: The Revolution Is Not A Party Affair | ||
*[[File:VentureCom.png]] Ian Wright: Venture Capitalism versus Venture Communism | *[[File:VentureCom.png]] Ian Wright: Venture Capitalism versus Venture Communism | ||
*[[File:AntiEgoCapitalism.png]] Dr. Bones: The "Stirner wasn't a Capitalist you Fucking Idiot" Cheat Sheet | *[[File:AntiEgoCapitalism.png]] Dr. Bones: The "Stirner wasn't a Capitalist you Fucking Idiot" Cheat Sheet | ||
| Line 179: | Line 200: | ||
*[[File:Bonanno.png]] Alfredo M. Bonanno: Why Insurrection? | *[[File:Bonanno.png]] Alfredo M. Bonanno: Why Insurrection? | ||
*[[File:EgoMarx.png]] Kristian Lamprecht: A Critique of Capitalism and other Established Systems: An Introduction to Stirnerite Marxism ☆<ref>I especially liked the last section Sexual Egoism: A Critique of Labels</ref> | *[[File:EgoMarx.png]] Kristian Lamprecht: A Critique of Capitalism and other Established Systems: An Introduction to Stirnerite Marxism ☆<ref>I especially liked the last section Sexual Egoism: A Critique of Labels</ref> | ||
*[[File:ML.png]] Joseph Stalin: Dialectical and Historical Materialism | |||
===Currently Reading=== | ===Currently Reading=== | ||
*[[File: | *[[File:MaoHair.png]] Mao Zedong: Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung | ||
**Current | **Current Segment: [[File:Revolution.png]] Classes and Class Struggle | ||
*[[File:Schumpeter.png]] Joseph Schumpeter: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy | |||
**Current Segment: [[File:Marxian.png]] The Marxian Doctrine | |||
*[[File:Stirner.png]] Max Stirner: The Unique and Its Property ☆ | |||
**Current Segment: [[File:Clib.png]] Political Liberalism | |||
===Want to Read=== | ===Want to Read=== | ||
| Line 225: | Line 251: | ||
====Left Opposition<ref>I likely won't read most of these critically, as they are still a good learning experience. e.g. Imperialism, The Highest Stage of Capitalism by Vladimir Lenin I've heard to be an incredible book.</ref>==== | ====Left Opposition<ref>I likely won't read most of these critically, as they are still a good learning experience. e.g. Imperialism, The Highest Stage of Capitalism by Vladimir Lenin I've heard to be an incredible book.</ref>==== | ||
*[[File:ML.png]] Joseph Stalin: Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR | *[[File:ML.png]] Joseph Stalin: Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR | ||
*[[File:Lenin.png]] Vladimir Lenin: What Is to Be Done? | *[[File:Lenin.png]] Vladimir Lenin: What Is to Be Done? | ||
*[[File:Lenin.png]] Vladimir Lenin: Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism | *[[File:Lenin.png]] Vladimir Lenin: Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism | ||
| Line 231: | Line 256: | ||
*[[File:Lenin.png]] Vladimir Lenin: The Tasks of the Proletariat in the Present Revolution | *[[File:Lenin.png]] Vladimir Lenin: The Tasks of the Proletariat in the Present Revolution | ||
*[[File:Lenin.png]] Vladimir Lenin: Left-Wing Communism: An Infantile Disorder | *[[File:Lenin.png]] Vladimir Lenin: Left-Wing Communism: An Infantile Disorder | ||
====Utopian Literature==== | ====Utopian Literature==== | ||
| Line 257: | Line 281: | ||
{{#css: | {{#css: | ||
img{image-rendering:pixelated; | img{image-rendering:pixelated;} | ||
/* Hide Google ads with no content (empty containers) */ | |||
ins.adsbygoogle:empty { | |||
display: none !important; | |||
} | |||
/* Hide Google ads with a minimum height (e.g., 1px) */ | |||
ins.adsbygoogle { | |||
min-height: 20px; | |||
} | |||
ins.adsbygoogle[style*="height: 1px;"], | |||
ins.adsbygoogle[style*="height: 0px;"] { | |||
display: none !important; | |||
} | |||
/* Additional styles to manage blank space */ | |||
.adsbygoogle iframe { | |||
display: none !important; | |||
} | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:56, 3 July 2024
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent NewMaritimeVistula's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
 |
Work in Progress "I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details. |
Communism for us is not a state of affairs to be established, an ideal to which reality have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement, which seeks to abolish the present state of things.
Karl Marx, The German Ideology[1]
Psychocommunism (psychedelia + communism) is a 
communist, 
intersectional, and 
anti-parliamentarian ideology created by Maritime. Here I criticise capitalism's 
bleakness, 
false individualism, and how communism would liberate man from these undesirable ideas. My main influences are 
Mark Fisher, 
Karl Marx, and probably some others who I've forgotten to write down. I am also very 
wholsum. (trve)
Here's my icons if you wish to add me: (
/
/
/
)
My View
- Communism is a movement which can liberate man from the forces of capital which make their life mundane through constant oppression and theft of the products/rewards of their labour.
Morals are artificial products of the dominant system in place; our morality is still heavily based off of Christian ideas, as the curse of Christianity still lingers, even in secular society.
Liberalism comes with a lot of things, but it's main tenant is the subjugation of man under the forces of capital. It's idea of a pursuit of happiness can be seen as twisted and false, due to this subjugation.
Communism is not a system to be established but rather the disestablishment of systems; it is the most extreme form of liberation.
Freedom is obtained (it shall never be given in "good will", only in "good plans") and so we must obtain it if we want it.
The idea that communism is "equality" which has emerged through degeneration/memeification of the term has changed public perception of communism in a way that has negatively affected it. Equality is likely to be viewed as something authoritarian by those who understand it can never happen.
The false idea of individualism and freedom through decentralism and worker "empowerment/representation" is a bunch of bullshit to convince us we're in a developed special capitalism, unlike the barbarism of the past eras. There is no capitalist development - it is communism or it is barbarism.
The development of modern neoliberal capitalism has killed the previous forms; there exists a poignant control society, which connects capitalism and oppression together symbiotically; if we want freedom, we want communism. (Though it appears in the left, the reverse of this statement "If we want communism, we want freedom." sometimes does not apply.)
Integration is not enough; a self-respecting individual should never let themselves be integrated into a system whose core tenant is their oppression. (Using "who" for the system is quite a folly, for this system is not just about individuals; the oppression shall not disappear if we change who the oppressors are. As 
Marcuse said, free election of masters does not abolish the masters or the slaves.) The idea of worker integration such as with election of bosses in business, and higher freedom of expression is blasphemous - it can even be considered fundamentally anti-proletarian.
Goals Thingy (WIP)
What is Discrete Authoritarianism?
WIP: Possibly explain the motives behind the bourgeoise to change their form, definitely explain how the market fits into authoritarianism, apparatuses of the bourgeoise state, religions upholding of private property, etc. etc.
Discrete authoritarianism is the cross-roads to libertarian totalitarianism - what I mean by this is a state of civilization in which a culture centered around a specific control society and a specific method of production is so prevalent that it has consumed all of its enemies - where indirect rule has become stronger than direct rule, or more specifically an indirect hegemony. It is like a cultural anarcho-totalitarianism, the most advanced stage of hegemony. Discrete authoritarianism can be found as an essential part of neoliberal capitalism's control society, which permeates at least slightly through everyone exposed to the rule of neoliberal(-adjacent) parties. Capitalist realism is in essence the cultural cult around the specific method of production (capitalism) and the control society which comes through the newest, "cushioned" capitalism - that being neoliberalism, the third way, and others.
A Brief on Bourgeoisie power
Let us imagine the bourgeoise as a familiar form - the party. We have been led to believe this party has been reduced in power over the years, we have been led to believe that the opposition (the proletariat) has gained a foothold within society. But this is far from the truth - this party has not been overthrown, not even slightly. The party has merely changed form for it has found more subtle ways of maintaining total control, ways other than direct rule - what we today would call “authoritarianism”. The party has molded itself into new institutions: the “free” market, or the “worker” unions (this mold is comparable to a virus, as it has co-opted a formerly proletarian institution). The party did not die, the party evolved. Now let us talk about authoritarianism. When you think of authoritarianism, you likely think of a 1984-esque setting - dark and gloomy, secret police and military all around, free speech dead. Very different to our western democracies, keeping this difference is a necessity to hold together a façade. Imagine authoritarianism as something different - cultural hegemony, silent destruction of opposing views through commodification and co-optation - all that is opposed doomed to become an ally. This is the reality we find ourselves in, under neoliberal capitalism. Whether it be the police state propelled by bayonets or the façade democracy, authoritarianism is central to all bourgeoise systems, for they are unnatural (despite how they love to pretend they aren’t).
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness is a slogan oft associated with the classical liberal idea, so we shall take it as the 3 pillars of liberalism. Liberalism advertises itself here with this slogan as individualistic - allowing man to pursuit happiness. But, the liberal capitalist system does not suffice for this, for my pursuit of happiness lies outside of the worship of the deities of capital - this stance, the stance of the universally oppressed proletarian, is, despite it being majoritarian, considered an anomaly, and like in all systems, is thrown aside - the individual's liberty to pursuit their happiness is tossed. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness becomes merely a slogan worshipping the deities of capital, giving a false promise of self-liberation, trying to fit capitalism into the "liberation" slot when communism is in fact the social stage which belongs there. I see liberalism as merely a montage to subjugate the individual to the demands of capital.
Liberalism and Freedom
Liberalism, or more specifically the new highest stage of capitalism - neoliberal capitalism, has co-opted the idea of freedom. Freedom no longer means man acting in their own free will, nor man being away from tyranny which stops them from achieving what they desire. Freedom now is comparable to being murdered but they'll pay for your funeral afterwards, or wrap you up in a little pink blanket afterwards. The bosses still exist, but in different forms - forms which comfort us. Ranks are decentralised, at heavy costs to efficiency (see the NHS, where decentralised roles has partly contributed to its decline), just to keep a façade of freedom. Neoliberal capitalism is incredibly good at re-inventing terms to fit the requirements of capital - the things which need to be patched within the capitalist system, and the term "freedom" is not a straggler, avoiding this everytime. Freedom through reform is already a lost idea; we need total liberation.
How Modern Capitalism killed the party-form
WIP: Explanation of neoliberalism's discrete authoritarianism, the transformation of bourgeoise control being a main difference between modern and past capitalism, and what effect this had on the party-form
Note: This will be in-progress for a while, as I expect it to be quite long.
Masculinity and Melancholia
A common strategy of the media is targeted melancholia e.g. postcolonial melancholia, in which the media causes distress upon those who feel inferior due to the collapse of the empires they used to hold in history making them rather irrelevant. The same can be said for the idea of masculinity. With contributors such as 
feminism, and 
sexual liberation, traditional masculinity and those who espouse it feel as if their position on the throne of humanity has been taken from underneath them; capitalism of course enforces a hierarchy which it can culturally displace without actually displacing; women are still suffering more than men, immigrants still more than natives, and yet, many feel the case is the opposite. I believe this to be an example of what I just said. This form of "post-patriarchal" melancholia (though the patriarchy still exists) is widely promoted, such as with the rise in popularity of "masculinity" content on social media; a clear showcase that there is a demand in recent times. (this really is a surge; one day, it was nowhere, the next day, it was everywhere.) I feel this rise in masculine sentiment to be quite contrary to the 
progressive nature of capitalism, as it seems more 
regressive, but these terms are rather subjective. I haven't really made much of a point in this small snippet, other than maybe capitalism's ability to make a hierarchy appear shifted when it in fact is not at all shifted, but I felt like writing about this small observation.
Superstructure in the Capitalist Mode of Production
How Corporate Pride Month shows our Infatuation with Superficial Imagery
Queer Liberation and the Bourgeoise State
WIP: Queer assimilation vs Queer liberation, how Queer liberation is hindered by the bourgeoise state
Opinions
Comrades in Arms
Agreeable
Revolutionary Frisianism - You're definitely the most agreeable reactionary on here, combining together your love for Frisia with a retainment of inclusivity, as well as your still socialist beliefs. I'd say I disagree mostly with the agrarianism. (Your view on the EU I read in your Relations section is also pretty agreeable.)
Middle of the Road
Off-putting
𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐧𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐦 - I definitely would not consider you Machinery tier that's for sure. A monarchy to me is no better or no worse than a republic; it all looks exactly the same to me, the state continues a tool for class oppression either way, so I'm not exactly inclined to critique anybody based on that - single-issue politics like the Republican movement in the UK are simply proletarian suicide, as they affirm that capitalism can "get better." Anyways, I'm going off track, aren't I? I don't really understand the ideas of Nietzsche yet - he's someone I definitely should read considering how many times I've seen his name dropped. I'm disliking of the idea of a caste system, especially the barbaric one's seen in the Indian subcontinent - I mean the one today in India is disgusting, Stalinist decentralism applied to a caste system is something which disgusts me so, over 3,000 castes in India, and that excludes sub-castes. What do you think someone's soul type will be determined by? I'm against someone's birth deciding their entire fate, but my classification of this class system on the scale of Meh to Terrible very much depends on this. The Conservative Revolution is something I won't doubt as revolutionary; I think that's a silly argument; capitalism is an inherently progressive force, especially today where it clutches at every single-issue liberatory movement/folk politic demonstration it can get its hand on, turning it into a sludged poignant melancholy - I do not worship the past and I'm not exactly going to worship the future anymore, but I must say that I hate the systems of the past. Not sure what spiritual racism is, wonder if I can find that out sometime. Your anti-abrahamicism is agreeable to me, I am disgusted by Abrahamic faiths, but we likely are for different reasons, and I also am unsure of my position on non-abrahamic religions, which may be just as bad for all I know. We're both anti-liberal, again likely for different reasons? I don't take traditionalism as something bad, I wouldn't say its good, but there isn't bad inherent to Traditionalism, though I think I will need to understand the topic a lot more to make a better view on it. So in summary, I've got quite a few questions about this belief, and quite a few things I need to learn to understand it better. Hopefully once I learn more, I will be able to create a better opinion.
Machinery
Brazilian Liberalism - I'll add you before you ask, because you will end up asking. This tier, Gato Matador, is for those whose views I heavily dislike; your distasteful liberalism, which has locked away the freedom for the workingman, in exchange for neofreedom, neofreedom being a disease, which upkeeps a problem, that being oppression by capital, and slowly changes that problems form until we are blindly convinced of our liberation. I hope you someday come around to understand the problem with liberal capitalism and the failure of the idea that someone can pursuit happiness with it; become free and embrace communism - the workingmen of all lands shall be liberated and finally we shall pursuit happiness, no longer under the wretched oppression of capital, in which our labour creations are sucked from us, stolen from our very hands, by an undeserving bourgeoisie class whom have been liberated at our expense for too long. You are proletarian - you must not fall to a bourgeoisie system's false promises any longer, Killer Kitty.
DECBism - Refer to above. Also, please answer my questions in the comments 🙏 - I mean heck they are such questioning questions that me and Killer Kitty are seemingly on the same side in them, like holy fuck, that is NOT something you see everyday.
Reading List
Read
☆ - My favorites
[2]
- Karl Marx: Theses On Feuerbach
- Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels: The Communist Manifesto ☆
Friedrich Engels: On Authority
Friedrich Engels: Principles of Communism
Mikhail Bakunin: What is Authority?
Vladimir Lenin: The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism
Vikky Storm: The Gender Accelerationist Manifesto
Vikky Storm: Egoist Agorism
Vikky Storm: It’s Time For “Mad Anarchism”
Oswald Mosley: Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered
Daniel De Leon: Syndicalism
TripleAmpersand: The Alt-Woke Manifesto
Murray Rothbard: Anatomy of the State
Mark Fisher: Capitalist Realism: Is there no alternative? ☆
Mark Fisher: Left Hyperstition 1: The Fictions of Capital- Mark Fisher: Left Hyperstition 2: Be Unrealistic, Change What's Possible
Mark Fisher: Terminator vs Avatar: Notes On Accelerationism- Mark Fisher: Exiting the Vampire Castle
Robert P. Murphy: Chaos Theory: Two Essays on Market Anarchy
D. Z. Rowan: A Brief Description Of Egoist Communism
Nick Land: A Quick and Dirty Introduction to Accelerationism- Alex Williams and Nick Srnicek: Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics
xenogothic: A U/Acc Primer
Bobby Whittenberg-James: Economic Nihilism
smartistone: Ads are everything, not AI- Vincent Garton: Unconditional accelerationism as antipraxis
- Edmund Berger: Unconditional Acceleration and the Question of Praxis: Some Preliminary Thoughts
Otto Rühle: The Revolution Is Not A Party Affair
Ian Wright: Venture Capitalism versus Venture Communism
Dr. Bones: The "Stirner wasn't a Capitalist you Fucking Idiot" Cheat Sheet
Alfredo M. Bonanno: Insurrection- Alfredo M. Bonanno: Why Insurrection?
Kristian Lamprecht: A Critique of Capitalism and other Established Systems: An Introduction to Stirnerite Marxism ☆[3]
Joseph Stalin: Dialectical and Historical Materialism
Currently Reading
Mao Zedong: Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung
- Current Segment: Classes and Class Struggle
- Current Segment:
Joseph Schumpeter: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
- Current Segment:
The Marxian Doctrine
- Current Segment:
Max Stirner: The Unique and Its Property ☆
- Current Segment:
Political Liberalism
- Current Segment:
Want to Read
Thesis
Louis Althusser: For Marx
Ernesto Laclau: Hegemony and Socialist Strategy
Ralph Miliband: The state and capitalist society- Karl Marx: A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy
- Karl Marx: Wage Labour and Capital
- Karl Marx: Value, Price and Profit
- Friedrich Engels: Anti-Dühring
- Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels: The German Ideology
- Karl Marx: The Civil War in France
- Friedrich Engels: The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State
- Friedrich Engels: Outlines of a Critique of Political Economy
Socialism: Utopian and Scientific
Group of International Communists: Fundamental Principles of Communist Production and Distribution- Antonie Pannekoek: Worker's Councils
- Karl Marx: Grundrisse
- Karl Marx: Contribution to a Critique of Political Economy
Isaac Deutscher: Socialist Competition
Marxism and Feminism
Alexandra Kollontai: The Social Basis of the Woman Question
Angela Davis: Women, Race and Class
Anti-thesis (Capitalism)
Henry Hazlitt: Economics in One Lesson
Benjamin Tucker: Individual Liberty
Milton Friedman: Capitalism and Freedom- Murray Rothbard: For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto
- Murray Rothbard: What Has Government Done to Our Money?
- Murray Rothbard: Man, Economy, and State
- Murray Rothbard: The Ethics of Liberty
Samuel Edward Konkin III: New Libertarian Manifesto- Samuel Edward Konkin III: Last Whole Introduction to Agorism
Anti-thesis (Fascism)
Benito Mussolini and 
Giovanni Gentile: The Doctrine of Fascism
Left Opposition[4]
- Joseph Stalin: Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR
Vladimir Lenin: What Is to Be Done?- Vladimir Lenin: Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism
- Vladimir Lenin: The State and Revolution
- Vladimir Lenin: The Tasks of the Proletariat in the Present Revolution
- Vladimir Lenin: Left-Wing Communism: An Infantile Disorder
Utopian Literature
G. D. H. Cole: Guild Socialism- G. D. H. Cole: Guild Socialism: A Plan for Economic Democracy
Victor Considerant: Manifesto of Democracy
Misc
Jules Joanne Gleeson: Abolitionism in the 21st Century: From Communization as the End of Sex, to Revolutionary Transfeminism
Justin Sotos: Alexander Dugin: Theorist of Communization?
Leigh Phillips: The People’s Republic of Walmart: How the World’s Biggest Corporations are Laying the Foundation for Socialism
Suggestions
(Suggest books here, and no Volker i'm not reading your programme)
- Templars of the Proletariat by Alexander Dugin
The Guattari Reader by Gary Genosko
The Other Russia by Eduard Limonov
things i want to write eventually
The Capitalist Nature of Comedy in Politics
On the Thatcherite Reforms in the United Kingdom
The European Union
The Brezhnevite in Britain
On Reactionary Socialism
- ↑ Haven't actually read this yet, but damn I need to.
- ↑ Ordered by author...mostly
- ↑ I especially liked the last section Sexual Egoism: A Critique of Labels
- ↑ I likely won't read most of these critically, as they are still a good learning experience. e.g. Imperialism, The Highest Stage of Capitalism by Vladimir Lenin I've heard to be an incredible book.