imported>Polcompbot m (Moved user templates) |
imported>Polcompbot m (Polcompbot moved page Talk:Keynesianism to Talk:Keynesian School: Renamed pages according to council votes) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
As capitalistic as you can get while still being tolerable. This is one of the only good forms of capitalism and it certainly has done good, even if it could move a bit to the left. - | As capitalistic as you can get while still being tolerable. This is one of the only good forms of capitalism and it certainly has done good, even if it could move a bit to the left. - | ||
{{User|Pantheon}} - While I am sceptical about the large spending programms, since these could get the state into too much debt and that type of Economics can lead to stagnation like it did in Japan (Capitalism always gets into a crisis when it cannot grow further) It did a pretty well job in building up Europe after WWII and I like how it makes Market worshippers mad. | {{User|Pantheon}} - While I am sceptical about the large spending programms, since these could get the state into too much debt and that type of Economics can lead to stagnation like it did in Japan (Capitalism always gets into a crisis when it cannot grow further) It did a pretty well job in building up Europe after WWII and I like how it makes Market worshippers mad. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Great back in it’s time, but antiquated nowadays== | ==Great back in it’s time, but antiquated nowadays== | ||
Don’t get me wrong, I’d use this as a transition system and it certainly has done good back then, and produced based figures like FDR. But nowadays it’s not really reliable and is way too milquetoast for my likings. We need [[Distributism]] or [[Market Socialism]] nowadays - | Don’t get me wrong, I’d use this as a transition system and it certainly has done good back then, and produced based figures like FDR. But nowadays it’s not really reliable and is way too milquetoast for my likings. We need [[Distributism]] or [[Market Socialism]] nowadays - | ||
Latest revision as of 18:48, 2 April 2023
As capitalistic as you can get while still being tolerable. This is one of the only good forms of capitalism and it certainly has done good, even if it could move a bit to the left. -
- While I am sceptical about the large spending programms, since these could get the state into too much debt and that type of Economics can lead to stagnation like it did in Japan (Capitalism always gets into a crisis when it cannot grow further) It did a pretty well job in building up Europe after WWII and I like how it makes Market worshippers mad.
Better than Chicagoan, Marxian or Austrotard. Still, too fiscally irresponcible.
Great back in it’s time, but antiquated nowadays
Don’t get me wrong, I’d use this as a transition system and it certainly has done good back then, and produced based figures like FDR. But nowadays it’s not really reliable and is way too milquetoast for my likings. We need Distributism or Market Socialism nowadays -