Talk:Titoism: Difference between revisions

Help

Latest revision as of 20:44, 22 March 2023

Ah other the definition of basedness and Titopilled

- United people regardless ethnic and etc, formed republic instead of monarchy after WW2, anti-fascism, freed yugoslavia from nazi occupation, being neutral during cold war, market socialist, and created non-alligned block? What can I say except "MEGABASED!"? although state atheism is cringe. Sadly that corrupted ethno-nationalist ruined the unity of Yugoslavia. Јебеш Милошевића!

The only based commie.

Tito had balls of Titonium

Standing up to Stalin, fighting off against the fascist-imperialist bandits, establishing good relations and helping to form the NAM with several third world chads, a pragmatic man accepting a market socialist system, and holding Yugoslavia together(only for so long, sadly), fucking based, sure 30% unemployment, IMF loan, brutality, and being rather too sympathetic to the west(albeit with understandable reasons) were rather bruh, but he's still great nonetheless -

"Overpraised Socialist leader" is pretty accurate

This dude was based in some aspects, but he really is overpraised, as his economic model was not perfect by any means.

- agreed high unemployment in Yugoslavia still one of the better ones and throwing fashoids in the pit was based

Sorry, bottleism is better

This ideology sucks. I rather have a bottleist society where people are free to shove bottles up their rectums without judgement or them having to break once you get them in.

Step 1: Be a Serbian man in 1985

Step 2: Forcefully insert a glass bottle into your hindquarters

Step 3: Blame it on two Albanian irredentists

Step 4: Laugh as the ethnic tensions you caused domino into a gruesome breakup of your nation

Don’t hate it but it’s not as based as I once thought

I still adore the market socialism and civic nationalism of this ideology, but the government should’ve cut itself off from the IMF entirely, and also there was too much state involvement in the co-ops. There should’ve been an economy mostly if not entirely based on co-ops, but with a more Keynesian style regulatory framework. As for authoritarianism, it was necessary to be honest, because of the [removed] state Yugoslavia was in early on, and if they didn’t end up being the ones taking power, purging ethnonationalists. -

Agreed^^^ -

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Ah other the definition of basedness and Titopilled==
-{{UserChirotesla}} - United people regardless ethnic and etc, formed republic instead of monarchy after WW2, anti-fascism, freed yugoslavia from nazi occupation, being neutral during cold war, market socialist, and created non-alligned block? What can I say except "MEGABASED!"? although state atheism is cringe. Sadly that corrupted ethno-nationalist ruined the unity of Yugoslavia. Јебеш Милошевића!
+ - United people regardless ethnic and etc, formed republic instead of monarchy after WW2, anti-fascism, freed yugoslavia from nazi occupation, being neutral during cold war, market socialist, and created non-alligned block? What can I say except "MEGABASED!"? although state atheism is cringe. Sadly that corrupted ethno-nationalist ruined the unity of Yugoslavia. Јебеш Милошевића!
 *The only based commie.
@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 ==Don’t hate it but it’s not as based as I once thought==
-I still adore the market socialism and civic nationalism of this ideology, but the government should’ve cut itself off from the IMF entirely, and also there was too much state involvement in the co-ops. There should’ve been an economy mostly if not entirely based on co-ops, but with a more [[File:Keynes.png]] Keynesian style regulatory framework. As for authoritarianism, it was necessary to be honest, because of the [removed] state Yugoslavia was in early on, and if they didn’t end up being the ones taking power, purging ethnonationalists. - {{UserShadowRaiden}}
+I still adore the market socialism and civic nationalism of this ideology, but the government should’ve cut itself off from the IMF entirely, and also there was too much state involvement in the co-ops. There should’ve been an economy mostly if not entirely based on co-ops, but with a more [[File:Keynes.png]] Keynesian style regulatory framework. As for authoritarianism, it was necessary to be honest, because of the [removed] state Yugoslavia was in early on, and if they didn’t end up being the ones taking power, purging ethnonationalists. -
-*Agreed^^^ - {{UserChirotesla}}
+*Agreed^^^ -