×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,522 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Talk:Maoism: Difference between revisions

imported>Aycee Lovelace
No edit summary
imported>Polcompbot
m (Removed comments)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Comment|[[File:Amdist.png]] ComradeGanyu|was a force of good in China before 1954. But afterwards the only good about him was industrialism, massacring landlords, and getting rid of feudal practices. Besides that he was a cringe totalitarian that destroyed Chinese culture and killed millions}}
 
    
    
{{Comment| [[File:LeninisBasedsmall.png]] Leninisbased556| "hE waS ToTalitsriaN" bro mao was based and literally redpilled}}


{{Comment|[[File:Admiralism_Icon.png]] NuohLamperouge| he would be if it wasn't for the shitshow that was post-1954 Mao, Chen Yun absolutely nailed his quote on him.}}
 
 


[[File:PATS.png]] ChineseSocialist: Judging by the material conditions of China of his time, having a strong hand to build up his country is necessary and in his early days, he was a great man, but after the GLF and the Cultural Revolution, what can one say, really?
[[File:PATS.png]] ChineseSocialist: Judging by the material conditions of China of his time, having a strong hand to build up his country is necessary and in his early days, he was a great man, but after the GLF and the Cultural Revolution, what can one say, really?
Line 9: Line 9:
^ my take on it as well though totalitarianism is a bit much even for such situations
^ my take on it as well though totalitarianism is a bit much even for such situations


{{Comment|{{UserMatteel}}|This dude starved millions of own people and set china back for decades. He's in the deepest pits of hell as we speak.}}


{{Comment|{{UserNyteulo}}|Despite his faults, China before Mao was far worse then anything experienced during the CPC’s rule. China was notorious for famines long before Mao, and it’s irrational to blame any peasant who died in China on him. China was an economically and materially backwards country for centuries, Mao had little to work with. That being said, several of Mao’s strategies proved to be failures and the leadership of the party had many alternatives. Mao’s greatest achievements where those of uniting the people, of the revolution and pf the defeating of the ROC, however once he was not a master economic planner, and some of the blame is to be attributed to him, but not “70,000,000” as conservatives will tell you. After Deng Xiaoping took leadership, he claimed Mao’s policies resulted in no more 15 million, in an attempt to attack the Maoist crevices of the party. In summary, I would rate Maoism (at least this version) with a 6/10.}}
 
 


[[File:PATS.png]] ChineseSocialist: Tbh I agree with what you said. He has made some grave and very severe mistakes, however, it's unfair to condemn him as being "literally le ebil communist totalitarian satan" considering how Chiang and the Japs razed down China and basically destroyed whatever China had along with the warlords. Other than Sun Yat Sen, I do agree pre-Mao China is horrible. Without Mao, China wouldn't have been able to stand up against centuries of Imperialist domination and wouldn't have been able to progress into the technological anti-atlanticist fortress it is today.
[[File:PATS.png]] ChineseSocialist: Tbh I agree with what you said. He has made some grave and very severe mistakes, however, it's unfair to condemn him as being "literally le ebil communist totalitarian satan" considering how Chiang and the Japs razed down China and basically destroyed whatever China had along with the warlords. Other than Sun Yat Sen, I do agree pre-Mao China is horrible. Without Mao, China wouldn't have been able to stand up against centuries of Imperialist domination and wouldn't have been able to progress into the technological anti-atlanticist fortress it is today.

Latest revision as of 20:36, 18 March 2023




ChineseSocialist: Judging by the material conditions of China of his time, having a strong hand to build up his country is necessary and in his early days, he was a great man, but after the GLF and the Cultural Revolution, what can one say, really?

^ my take on it as well though totalitarianism is a bit much even for such situations



ChineseSocialist: Tbh I agree with what you said. He has made some grave and very severe mistakes, however, it's unfair to condemn him as being "literally le ebil communist totalitarian satan" considering how Chiang and the Japs razed down China and basically destroyed whatever China had along with the warlords. Other than Sun Yat Sen, I do agree pre-Mao China is horrible. Without Mao, China wouldn't have been able to stand up against centuries of Imperialist domination and wouldn't have been able to progress into the technological anti-atlanticist fortress it is today.

Plus, love him or hate him, you have to admit that improving rights for women, helping the peasants, killing Imperialists, and building China into a torn country into a livable place is based. Chiang was the one that destroyed China while Mao fought for it.

Thonk

>"Culturally Far-Left"
>Anti-LGBT
🤔