imported>AnAnonBoi123 No edit summary |
Gato Matador (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 426011 by Person16384 (talk)) Tag: Undo |
||
| (28 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why is this movement supported by progressives? A reminder that colonists destroyed the past, while these people wanted to keep the traditional way of life. | Why is this movement supported by progressives? A reminder that colonists destroyed the past, while these people wanted to keep the traditional way of life. | ||
<b>I don't know, maybe because genocide of two whole continents of around the population of Europe and imperialism against innocent people simply for being different and to steal their land and is wrong? Just a thought.</b> | |||
It was wrong. But progressive is all about "remove the past".<br> | |||
<b>Your entire idea of progressivism is a deeply misunderstood strawman.</b> | |||
So you mean to say that western progressives go "it is okay to be traditional as long as you are a minority"? | |||
==GigaBased Ideology, Colonialshits keep crying== | ==GigaBased Ideology, Colonialshits keep crying== | ||
All that needs to be said | All that needs to be said | ||
==Based and R E A C T pilled== | |||
Like how is this at all progressive? It's literally as reactionary as you can get before you get to primitivism.<br> | |||
<s>Ignores Progressive-Traditionalism cultural view which many native advocates hold</s> | |||
*Bruh, it literally is about holding on to the past. It is in every way shape and form reactionary, which btw doesn't mean "gay bad," (Although often does) it means returning to a previous time. In this case being returning to a time in which Native Americans were the rulers of the Americas. | |||
*That isn't the same thing as unironically going to a time of tribalism you goofy goober and natives for a large part in history actively sought out new technology when they could. So your claim is based on a noble-savage lie. | |||
**"Actively sought out new technology," so that's why they used bows and arrows all the way up until the Europeans came. Even if they did, this ideology is still reactionary because most civilizations (especially in Europe) tried to get better technology and by your logic wanting a return to feudal Europe isn't reactionary because they "actively sought out new technology when they could." I'm not going to fight you anymore in the edit war because there's no point. | |||
***Holy [removed] you are giving me second-hand brain tumors. Please touch concrete. | |||
****Sorry man, if touching concrete will cure your newly acquired brain tumor, I'll do it. | |||
== Fucking retarded foreign policy == | |||
[[File:MATTball.png]] [[UserWiki:Matteel|Matteel]] - The land you lost is never coming back, if you unironically believe in this you are terminally ill. | |||
*<b>^I know... Unfortunately we are not going to be able to take back the Americas for the natives despite it being rightfully theirs... | |||
Which is why they are going to make their new homes by colonizing Europe from the Bri'ish Angl0ids and snail eating savages instead... SUNSET INVASION GANG WHERE YOU AT???</b> | |||
Latest revision as of 03:27, 6 January 2024
Why is this movement supported by progressives? A reminder that colonists destroyed the past, while these people wanted to keep the traditional way of life. I don't know, maybe because genocide of two whole continents of around the population of Europe and imperialism against innocent people simply for being different and to steal their land and is wrong? Just a thought.
It was wrong. But progressive is all about "remove the past".
Your entire idea of progressivism is a deeply misunderstood strawman.
So you mean to say that western progressives go "it is okay to be traditional as long as you are a minority"?
GigaBased Ideology, Colonialshits keep crying
All that needs to be said
Based and R E A C T pilled
Like how is this at all progressive? It's literally as reactionary as you can get before you get to primitivism.
Ignores Progressive-Traditionalism cultural view which many native advocates hold
- Bruh, it literally is about holding on to the past. It is in every way shape and form reactionary, which btw doesn't mean "gay bad," (Although often does) it means returning to a previous time. In this case being returning to a time in which Native Americans were the rulers of the Americas.
- That isn't the same thing as unironically going to a time of tribalism you goofy goober and natives for a large part in history actively sought out new technology when they could. So your claim is based on a noble-savage lie.
- "Actively sought out new technology," so that's why they used bows and arrows all the way up until the Europeans came. Even if they did, this ideology is still reactionary because most civilizations (especially in Europe) tried to get better technology and by your logic wanting a return to feudal Europe isn't reactionary because they "actively sought out new technology when they could." I'm not going to fight you anymore in the edit war because there's no point.
- Holy [removed] you are giving me second-hand brain tumors. Please touch concrete.
- Sorry man, if touching concrete will cure your newly acquired brain tumor, I'll do it.
Fucking retarded foreign policy
Matteel - The land you lost is never coming back, if you unironically believe in this you are terminally ill.
- ^I know... Unfortunately we are not going to be able to take back the Americas for the natives despite it being rightfully theirs...
Which is why they are going to make their new homes by colonizing Europe from the Bri'ish Angl0ids and snail eating savages instead... SUNSET INVASION GANG WHERE YOU AT???