×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,521 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Post-Marijuanarchy/Self Insert Relations: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
COMMENT HERE IF YOU WANT TO BE ADDED
COMMENT HERE IF YOU WANT TO BE ADDED


===The Ubermensch===
== Relations ==
*[[File:HMHIcon.png]] [[Haunted Mound Hauntology]] - I like this kind of schizophilosophy, even if many ideas may be incomprehensible if you are sober. When I will be stoned, I will complete it.  
*[[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]] [[HelloThere314ism]] - There is mostly nothing to disagree in your theory, putting aside obvious things like TAZ and approach to technology but we talked about it. Only thing I may dislike here is that your philosophy is overly intellectualized. Don't understand me wrong, knowledge and intellectualism is a very important values to me, but there is lack of creativity, kinda tasteless, you simply derive ideas from actually great philosophers but I prefer to make new things, even if they are seemingly contradictory.
 
*[[File:Nightshade.png]] [[Venatrixism]] - Okay ish. Still not creative enough. Add some schizo elements to your communization please.
===The Insurrectionaries===
*[[File:Shellshock.png]] [[Shellshocked Communism]] - Based because insane, still democratic confederalism influence is kinda repulsive. Point on capitalist realism is interesting though.  
*[[File:Rock icn.png]] [[Rocksism]] - I cannot judge you that badly, even if I dislike anarchISM at all. First of all I would avoid calling anything "democratic", even if your idea for organization isn't that bad, the term democracy is wicked from the very beginning - athenian democracy only for men, then "democratic centralism" being tyranny of the party, now corporate lobbed political parties acting in their spectacle for imbeciles. Economics isn't bad, even if unrealistic at bigger scale than a tribe, but except this planning thing I can agree with it. Good that you like post-civilization but solarpunk is kinda unrealistic, if post-civ will not evolve into warlord states it would probably be composed of rural communities and nomads scavenging the ruins of old cities and villages. I very like that you appreciate the concept of autonomous zones.  
*[[File:Rock icn.png]] [[Rocksism]] - You are like in between of classical and contemporary anarchists, that's not a bad thing. I like autonomous zones, the idea of squatting and community gardens is okay as well. But it all is temporary. Community either becomes disciplinary or collapses. That's a "natural" thing and all anarchists should accept and affirm it. Reliance on so called community is something that must be removed. No community will give me what I deserve, but I can use them, of course with respect toward other individuals. Ideological cooperation will always fail, from my own experience only cooperation that may survive is apolitical one.  Where there is an ideology there is war. Finally, social ecology is awful humanist garbage. Good that you are creative and you try to make your own concepts.
===The NPCs===
*[[File:StockMarketC.png]] [[Romantic Egoism]] - I strongly relate to your connection of traditional romantics, Stirner, Nietzsche and postmodernists or post-structuralists, this is great.  Mutualist economy is okay. Anti civ is great. I don't get why De Maistre but the rest is very nice.
 
===The Demiurge===

Latest revision as of 17:57, 13 March 2024

COMMENT HERE IF YOU WANT TO BE ADDED

Relations

  • HelloThere314ism - There is mostly nothing to disagree in your theory, putting aside obvious things like TAZ and approach to technology but we talked about it. Only thing I may dislike here is that your philosophy is overly intellectualized. Don't understand me wrong, knowledge and intellectualism is a very important values to me, but there is lack of creativity, kinda tasteless, you simply derive ideas from actually great philosophers but I prefer to make new things, even if they are seemingly contradictory.
  • Venatrixism - Okay ish. Still not creative enough. Add some schizo elements to your communization please.
  • Shellshocked Communism - Based because insane, still democratic confederalism influence is kinda repulsive. Point on capitalist realism is interesting though.
  • Rocksism - You are like in between of classical and contemporary anarchists, that's not a bad thing. I like autonomous zones, the idea of squatting and community gardens is okay as well. But it all is temporary. Community either becomes disciplinary or collapses. That's a "natural" thing and all anarchists should accept and affirm it. Reliance on so called community is something that must be removed. No community will give me what I deserve, but I can use them, of course with respect toward other individuals. Ideological cooperation will always fail, from my own experience only cooperation that may survive is apolitical one. Where there is an ideology there is war. Finally, social ecology is awful humanist garbage. Good that you are creative and you try to make your own concepts.
  • Romantic Egoism - I strongly relate to your connection of traditional romantics, Stirner, Nietzsche and postmodernists or post-structuralists, this is great. Mutualist economy is okay. Anti civ is great. I don't get why De Maistre but the rest is very nice.