|
|
| (19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Ideology
| | #REDIRECT [[Psychocommunism]] |
| |title=[[File:Psychlib.png]] Psychocommunism
| |
| }}
| |
| | |
| [[File:Psychlib.png]] Psychocommunism is a [[File:Neomarx.png]] neo-marxist and [[File:Proletkult.png]] culturally revolutionary political ideology believed in by Vistula. It combines together theories from different people such as [[File:Ormarxf.png]] Karl Marx, [[File:Lenin.png]] Vladimir Lenin, [[File:Luxem.png]] Rosa Luxemburg, [[File:Gramsci.png]] Antonio Gramsci, [[File:Vpered.png]] Alexander Bogdanov and [[File:Fisher.png]] Mark Fisher. On the issue of praxis, it takes a [[File:Impossible.png]] revolutionary stance, believing [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] liberal democracy to be inherently for the bourgeoise, marking it as merely an implementation of the "bourgeoise dictatorship" and therefore unable to be used to achieve [[File:Soc-h.png]] proletarian goals.
| |
| | |
| =={{BoldText|Core Tenants}}==
| |
| | |
| ===[[File:Luxem.png]] Internationalism===
| |
| Internationalism is a core tenant of Psychocommunism, as I believe [[File:Luxem.png]] Luxemburg to be correct on the national question rather than [[File:Lenin.png]] Lenin. I see nationalism as merely a tool of the upper class which can manipulate and divide us, hindering the exemplification of class struggle. Due to this, I argue that the revolution (led by the [[File:Vanguardism.png]] international vanguard party) should transcend national boundaries, with all nations merely being dictatorships of the bourgeoise anyways, which to me, renders them as enemies of the proletarian worldwide, who should not be compromised with.
| |
| | |
| ===[[File:Vanguardism.png]] Vanguard Party===
| |
| I am a firm believer in a proletarian (and therefore international) vanguard party, which should be the vehicle for the politicising of the proletariat, which can counter the bourgeoise. This international party should be composed of multiple factions and assume control of the state during and after the revolution, as the sole party. My arguments against the hatred towards one-party states is that all parties are currently of the bourgeoise class and so can be considered a single class entity, this proletarian party is simply the same idea, just organised differently and extremely majoritarian.
| |
