×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,528 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Polcompball Wiki
2,528Articles
  Recent changes
in:
Pages with broken file links, Pages using Tabber parser tag, Self-Insert,
and 2 more

Omegaism: Difference between revisions

VisualWikitext
(I don't want to be associated with this terminally online degeneracy)
m (Text replacement - "File:Libcon.png" to "File:Libertcon.png")
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 747: Line 747:
**[[File:Liberaltarianism.png]] [[Liberaltarianism]] and [[File:Socliber.png]] [[Social Libertarianism]] - Some of my favorites by far. Small government but with regulated Capitalism. Sounds pretty good.
**[[File:Liberaltarianism.png]] [[Liberaltarianism]] and [[File:Socliber.png]] [[Social Libertarianism]] - Some of my favorites by far. Small government but with regulated Capitalism. Sounds pretty good.


**[[File:Libcon.png]] [[Libertarian Conservatism]] - I mean, Conservatism combined with a "live and let live" mindset seems pretty respectful, but the Anti-Interventionism at the point of sympathizing with people like Assad and Putin (looking at Ron Paul) is really sussy for my tastes
**[[File:Libertcon.png]] [[Libertarian Conservatism]] - I mean, Conservatism combined with a "live and let live" mindset seems pretty respectful, but the Anti-Interventionism at the point of sympathizing with people like Assad and Putin (looking at Ron Paul) is really sussy for my tastes


**[[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]] - Like the above but worse
**[[File:Paleolib.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism]] - Like the above but worse
Line 1,442: Line 1,442:
**[[File:Scandnecon.png]] [[Nordic Model]]  
**[[File:Scandnecon.png]] [[Nordic Model]]  
**[[File:Obamium.png]] [[Third Way|Obamaism]]
**[[File:Obamium.png]] [[Third Way|Obamaism]]
**[[File:Progconf.png]] [[Progressive Conservatism]]
**[[File:Progcon.png]] [[Progressive Conservatism]]
**[[File:Progress.png]] [[Progressivism]]  
**[[File:Progress.png]] [[Progressivism]]  
**[[File:Reagan.png]] [[Neoconservatism|Reaganism]]
**[[File:Reagan.png]] [[Neoconservatism|Reaganism]]

Latest revision as of 10:34, 20 November 2024

Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Omega1065's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.



Userbox




My political journey

(//) -> (//) -> (////) -> (//) -> (///////)

  • 2016 and earlier

Just a (mostly) normal toddler with no political knowledge. Kind likes foreign cultures and being nice to other people but that's it.

  • 2017-2018 around

Got into Anti-SJW and History Kid Internet circles. Really liked Countryballs, History Memes, Mapping Videos, Dank/Edgy Memes and similiar stuff. Political literacy was still pretty low.

  • 2018-2020 around

Basically an evolution of the previous phase, pretty much a Right Wing Nationalist at this point, dubious of Progressivism and Globalism. Mostly supports Right Wing Populist parties in the West. Starts to get some grasp of political reality.

  • 2020-2021 around

Pretty much "deradicalized", political normie once again. Doesn't like political extemes and just wants to enjoy life

  • 2022-Now

Got more politically involved once again, but completely different at this point. The recent war in Ukraine contributed for this. Basically a Radical Centrist with positions from both Left and Right (generally lean more on the former), but strongly pro-Liberal Democracy and Anti-Extremist. And also pro-West, most of the times. Political Knowledge improved a lot

Ideologies of some IRL People that I know


(No names because privacy is based)

Quotes that I like

User Relationship Test

First Version

1: Diplomatic Policy

I believe in a mix of moderate Nationalism and moderate Internationalism. National identity and International ties are both important things for me. (+1)

I only agree with one/ I am a moderate Nationalist or a moderate Globalist (+0.5)

I am an Ultranationalist/Racial Nationalist/Ethnic Nationalist or a Hyper Globalist (+0)


2: Civic Policy

I strongly support a Liberal Democracy, with emphasis on free expression, free elections, human rights and civil liberties. In opposition to both Authoritarian/Totalitarian Regimes and Anarchism. (+1)

I support a Statist Democracy or a Libertarian State (+0.75)

I support an Authoritarian State or a Minarchist State (+0.5)

I support Anarchy (+0.25)

I support a Totalitarian society (+0)


3: Immigration

I am generally relaxed on immigration, but I support good border controls (especially regarding illegal immigration) and a general integration in the society. (+1)

I believe in a strictly and controlled immigration or an open borders policy (+0.50)

I completely oppose immigration or I want to abolish completely borders (+0)



4: Economic Policy

I am generally in favor of Free Market Capitalism and Free Trade, but with decent regulations and a robust Welfare State (+1)

I support a Mixed Economy system or I support Capitalism without too many regulations (+0.50)

I support more moderate forms of Socialism (Market Socialism, Democratic Socialism...) or I support Pure, Laissez-Faire Capitalism (+0.25)

I support Communism (+0)



5: Opposition to Russia

I oppose the current Russian political system and condemn the recent invasion of Ukraine, and I am willing to support the latter (through sanctions, weapons...). Regardless of my opinion of the US/Western Bloc (+1)

I oppose Russia but I think that the US/Western countries are worse or I am neutral on Russia (+0.50)

I support Russia (+0)



6: Opposition to China

I oppose the current Chinese political system and its actions (Debt traps, threats to Taiwan, Uyghur Genocide...) Regardless of what I think of the US/Western Bloc. (+1)

I oppose China but I think that the West is worse or I am neutral on China (+0.50)

I support China (+0)



7: Cultural Policy

I support Progressive Conservativism, as I believe that national traditions and social progress are both important. With opposition to SJW Culture, Revolutionary Progressivism, Bigotry and Reactionarism. (+1)

I am a moderate Progressive or a moderate Conservative (+0.50)

I am culturally Reactionary or Revolutionary (+0)



8: Religious Policy

I strictly believe in a separation of Church and State, but I also think that religious expression is a good thing (+1)

I support French-styled Laicism (+0.50)

I support a Theocratic state or a State Atheist society (+0)


9: Opposition to extremism

I am personally against any form of political extremism, such as Fascism, Communism, Anarchism, Reactionarism, Totalitarianism and others (+1)

I am not entirely against extremism but I still not support it (+0.50)

I am an extremist (+0)


10: Environmentalism

I believe that Environmental issues are important, and that we shall focus on issues such as pollution and climate change (through the use of better energy sources, such as nuclear energy, trying to reduce global pollution and other ways) (+1)

I care about the Environment but I don't give it too much importance or I am a radical environmentalist (+0.50)

I am an anti-environmentalist (+0)



Post your results here:

Omega1065 - 10/10
CynicalLibra - 3/10
Glencoe - 7.5/10
Template:Applethesky2021 - 8/10
 Pantheon - 8.5/10
SomeCrusader1224 - 8/10
Gabovaura - 6.5/10
Yelling Yowie - 7.75/10

Second Version

  • Civic Axis
    • Anarchist (+1)
    • Minarchist (+3)
    • Libertarian (+7)
    • Moderate (+10)
    • Statist (+6)
    • Authoritarian (+3)
    • Totalitarian (+0)
  • Type of Rule Axis
    • Representative Democracy (Can be Presidential, Parliamentary...) (+10)
    • Semi-Direct Democracy (+10)
    • Direct Democracy (+7)
    • People's "Democracy" (+0)
    • Authoritarian Democracy (+3)
    • Technocracy or Similiar (A.K.A. Rule by Experts) (+4)
    • Anti-Democracy (+0)
    • Totalitarian Democracy (+1)
  • Economic Axis
    • Communist (+0)
    • Socialist (+5)
    • Welfarist (+10)
    • Moderate (+10)
    • Economic Liberalism (+7)
    • Capitalist (+5)
    • Darwinist (+0)
  • Economic Freedom
    • Dirigisme (+4)
    • Regulated (+10)
    • Free Market (+7)
    • Laissez-Faire (+2)
  • Diplomatic Axis
    • World Federalist (+4)
    • Globalist (+4)
    • Cosmopolitan (+7)
    • Internationalist (+10)
    • Moderate (+10)
    • Patriotic (+10)
    • Nationalist (+7)
    • Chauvinist (+0)
    • Ethno-Nationalist/Racial Nationalist (+0)
  • Geopolitics
    • West (+10)
    • East (+0)
    • Other/Non-Aligned (+5)
  • Cultural Axis
    • Revolutionary (+0)
    • Progressive (+6)
    • Reformist (+10)
    • Moderate (+10)
    • Conservative (+6)
    • Traditionalist (+2)
    • Reactionary (+0)
  • Technological Axis
    • Primal (+0)
    • Primitivist (+0)
    • Pre-Industrial (+2)
    • Deceleration (+5)
    • Moderate (+10)
    • Acceleration (+7)
    • Automated (+5)
    • Transhumanist (+4)
    • Posthumanist (+0)
  • Environmental Axis
    • Human Extinction (+0)
    • Eco-Fascism (+0)
    • Deep Ecology (+3)
    • Environmentalist (+10)
    • Moderate (+10)
    • Industrialist (+8)
    • Anthropocentric (+5)
    • Pollution (+0)
    • Planetary Destruction (+0)
  • Neurological Axis
    • Utopian (+0)
    • Dogmatic (+2)
    • Idealist (+7)
    • Moderate (+8)
    • Realist (+10)
    • Pragmatist (+10)
    • Rational (+5)
    • Dystopian (+0)

Post your results here:

My Political/Ideological Opinions

Diplomatic Policy

My foreign policy is generally Pro-West, Pro-NATO, Pro-USA and Pro-EU. The Western Bloc is the one that gets the closest to the ideals of Liberal Democracy, and if compared to the alternatives (Theocratic Regimes like Iran, One Party Regimes like China or Cuba, Crony Kleptocracies like Russia or Belarus...), then the United States are a much more preferable superpower for the ideals of Liberalism.

However, it should be noted that certain foreign actions done by the Americans and other Western Nations can range from "Questionable" to "Absolutely Fucked Up", mostly done to protect Western interests and influence. We can mention the clusterfucks that were the War in Vietnam or the invasion of Iraq, the support for cronies and dictators such as Pinochet, Suharto, Batista and others, coups in non-Western aligned countries ( Operation Condor is a major example) and more. Obviously Neoconservative foreign policy can really dirty, and some of its actions only ended up being bad for the West's PR.

I'm pretty glad that more recent presidents, such as Biden, are less "hawkish" in terms of foreign policy, but without ditching Neoconservatism as whole.

That being said, I don't see this ideology as entirely bad. We can mention some positive contributes too, such as helping Europe recover Post-WW2 through the Marshall Plan, stopping Serbia's Ethnic Massacres in Yugoslavia, bringing back the order in countries like Panama ( Even though the Noriega shenanigans weren't the best before, mostly a Reagan thing ofc ), Grenada and Kuwait, generally supporting the ideals of Liberalism against its opponents and protecting Eastern European and Eastern Asian countries from Russian and Chinese soft power and hegemonic ambitions.

The United States should definitely find a balance in political toughness and peaceful diplomacy. As Theodore Roosevelt once said:

"Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far"

The US should try to improve the relationships with Non-Western aligned countries such as Latin American and African ones, possibly prefering Liberal Democracies. But also try to improve the relationships with more stable Anti-American countries, such as Cuba (ending the Embargo too) and Bolivia; by being more open about its past foreign policy too.

But at the same time, the Western Countries should maintain a tough line against countries such as Russia and China (these two in particular are a major threat to the Liberal Democratic Order). The latter country is definitely tougher, considering its economic soft power and better PRs, especially if compared to its neighbor post-2022.

To make it short: improve relationships with democracies and less powerful Authoritarian States (possibly incouraging for the latter ones a liberalization of the State, kind like how the USA did towards Francoist Spain), be tougher towards Authoritarian Regimes, especially the more powerful ones.

Economic Policy

I am supportive of Free Market Capitalism. While flawed, I still believe that this economic system, through Free Trade and Property Rights is able to make a society prosperous. This is also proved by the support of the free market in the Developing Countries [21] . That being said, I still find myself against the more unfettered forms of Capitalism, as I believe that they are not sustainable for Human living conditions. For example, regarding Neoliberalism, while I generally support global trade, which did improve living conditions in the world [22] , I am critical of the "deregulated, privatized economy" part of it, as it did lead to aspects like social inequalities, especially in countries like the United States and Italy [23], and environmental degredation. I would like to see economic intervention from the State, to fix some of the flaws of the Free Market, possibly reverting some Neoliberal policies, through slow reforms and also watching out for the economic deficit. I also support a major economic regulation in the Developing Countries in the world, to watch out for Neo-Colonialist policies from Corporations and other entities

Cultural Policy

While I lean Left, in terms of Culture, I generally seek a cultural balance. I personally see a Nation's culture (Folk traditions, language, history...) as its backbone, and I would like to see a world where the national identities of every population gets preserved. Personally, what I consider one of the main problems of Modern Globalization is the cultural homologation of every population. I don't want to entirely eliminate Globalization, but I want to watch out for these elements too.

But on the other side, I also value a lot Social Progress (Civil liberties, social equality...), as I believe that advancing as society is an important objective and that culture is dynamic, we don't go anywhere by keeping it static. I don't think that Tradition and Progress have to be polar opposites, and a balance between the two is possible and ideal. (Same discourse for Nationalism and Globalism). We should keep an eye both to the past and to the future, as society. Keep the past but also go forward.

For example, regarding the modern LGBT community, while I do have some criticism, such as the general Wokeness or the sympathesis for Far-Left ideologies (especially in the Trans community), I can understand a good number of demands and points. I wouldn't absolutely mind a legalization of LGBT marriage and adoption as well, as a sign of progress too.

And going in specific on the "T" of "LGBT", while I have a couple doubts about certain requests, such as transitioning for minors, I still believe that the community and its members should be helped. Bullying them is absolutely not the case.

Another particular issue is the abortion one. Let's see how Pro-Life people and Pro-Choice people think of this:

I don't think that an abortion is something to celebrate, and people should be more responsible in terms of sex. The use of contraceptives, when people aren't ready to have a child, should be more incouraged. That being said, I absolutely oppose an abortion ban, because it's an individual choice, not something up to the State. For the rest, I don't want to change too much the Status Quo in my country, regarding that matter.

A similiar stance is adopted on Pornography. It should be noted that the abuse of Porn and Masturbation can definitely cause addiction. I seek a better sexual education, regarding this matter and others. But I still oppose a ban of it, rather treat it as something like sweet foods: it's fine sometimes but don't abuse it. Regarding kinks, as long is something harmful and done in real life, like Pedophilia, people can and should keep those for themselves.

Another take of mine is the use of Federalism to expand Democracy at a local level. You are going to have both a Socially Progressive side and a Socially Conservative side of population in a Nation, a lot of times (Example: big cities VS rural areas), and that's fine for me, diversity of thought is generally a good thing for me (as long is not something really messed up like "murder is cool" ofc). Ideas like Conservatism, Nationalism or Religion can all be used as a force for good, especially when it's done by your own will, instead of being under the pressure of an external force, such as the State. For example, Christian moral values can be used as a vehicle for self improvement and to promote social responsibility.

Returning to the discourse of Federalism, I would give more autonomy to the regions to allow the people in that region to choose what they think it's best for them, while maintaining more important policies at a National level, to allow both social progress but at the same time maintain the support of the more Conservative population

Civic Policy

I am strongly in favor of Liberal Democracy. While flawed, I still consider it the best form of government that we have. I also value civil liberties such as freedom of expression a lot too, being strongly against "Hate Speech Bans" and similiar stuff. Authority check is also a good thing, I personally find the culture of "distrust towards the State/Government" ,which is common in the people, as healthy, and I absolutely seek to preserve that culture. My emphasis on Anti-Authoritarianism comes from the malevolence and/or incompentence of a lot of Authoritarian/ Totalitarian states. That being said, there are also cases of benevolent and competent Authoritarian states, such as Kemalist Turkey, Singapore, Tridemist China and various others. If there it was a hypothetical "Perfect and Incorruptible Authoritarian State", I would definitely side with it. However, with the good examples that we have in history, we can also find a lot of awful examples. We can mention Nazi Germany, Soviet Union under Stalin, Maoist China, Imperial Japan, Pol Pot's Cambodia and many others. It goes like this: Pure and Flawless Authoritarianism > Democracy > Corrupted Authoritarianism. This is why I seek to protect the Liberal Democratic system. Power easily corrupts, and it must be kept in check. Freedom must be protected from both the Communist Far-Left and the Fascist/Reactionary Far-Right, as both of them seek to destroy Liberal Democratic institutions and hurt and/or oppress the people, despite the general differences between the two groups.

I also support the use of Federalism, as expressed in the Cultural Policy part, to expand Democracy at a local level, not only regarding cultural issues but on issues in general.

Ideological Relationships

Based Department (Very Positive)

  • Radical Centrism - OMG he's literally me! Ok, seriously, a lot of ideologies have both positive and negative aspects (some more positive than negative and viceversa). Nuance and pragmatism are really important for political understanding, and taking the best from various views is really great indeed. Cheers for you, buddy.
  • Social Democracy - Reforming Capitalism and making it more human? Very wholesome, if you ask.
  • Liberalism - Life, Liberty, and Property the Pursuit of Happiness!
  • Internationalism - International relationships are really important indeed but I don't really believe in "uniting the world", unlike for Globalism. So you are perfect for me.
  • Democracy - Flawed, but still the best form of government

Mostly Positive

  • Moderatism - Nice and moderate, I like it. But you shouldn't be moderate on EVERYTHING, just saying.
  • Civil Libertarianism - Yes, live and let live. I like my civil liberties, such as Freedom of Speech. But some Paternalism is definitely needed in certain things, such as general self improvement.
  • Anti-Authoritarianism - DEMOCRACY IS NOT-NEGOTIABLE! Ok, slogans aside, there are also a lot of great Statist/Authoritarian in History, and you can be pretty unfair against them certain times. Less Authoritarian doesn't mean less bad, no? But I strongly agree about your opposition against oppression and power abuse around the World. You are still based for that matter.
  • Interculturalism - Nice, national integration is exactly what my Nation needs. Just allow some cultural expression for the minorities and you will become perfect.
  • Polyculturalism - Perfect ! This is exactly what I aim for: Unity and Integration in a Nation
  • Anti-Communism - Ain't Right Intensifies. Some of your variants, such as the Fascist and the Reactionary ones are awful tho.
  • Anti-Fascism - Bella Ciao Intensifies. Why are the majority of you Far-Leftists btw??
  • Individualism - Now, the single individual as a lot of fashion, and I like my own individuality. However, the groups are also important to make a society work.
  • Capitalism - Mostly good as economic system, you know very well how to make a society prosperous. But you absolutely need some regulations and checks, because some of your variants can be really bad.
  • Reformism - Most of the times you are good. Especially when done well, some slow change can work. Only in extreme situations you can be useless.
  • Federalism - More autonomy for regions and Democracy at a local level sound good for me. Still have a few doubts tbf.
  • Technoliberalism - Regulated markets, democracy, progress and merit. You have a great potential for me. I'm not a big Science Nerd tho
  • Europeanism and Atlanticism - For all their faults and problems, the European Union and NATO are pretty beneficial for Europe. For now, I'm willing to keep them here. I think that a Federal (or even Confederal) European State would work, but only after a certain period of integration between the Nation members, we are not ready yet for that. I still have a few doubts about this European Unification thing tho...
  • Progressivism - Some of your followers can be really annoying, but you still fight for good causes, and I can respect that. SJW and Hippie cultures are really cringe tho
  • Piratism - Freedom of speech, privacy and pirating from morally bankrupt corporations all sound great.
  • National Liberalism - Honestly, one of my favorite Nationalists. Not sure about the economic liberalism, but Nationalism put together with Liberalism can be a good combo. Also, the Revolutions of 1848 were based.
  • Radicalism - Outdated by now, but you did a great job back then.
  • Feuillantism and Girondism - The good ones during the French Revolution. Why does the first one support slavery??
  • Nordic Model - I don't see you really pratical outside of Scandinavia, but you did really good in your own Nations
  • Kemalism - Despite some questionable policies, you did improved a lot the social conditions in Turkey and paved the way for Liberal Democracy in the country. It's a shame Erdogan is trying to eliminate that.
  • Tridemism - Chinese equivalent of the above. The Three Principles of the People sound pretty good ngl. Again, it's a shame that Yuan Shikai, and then Mao ruined your vision.
  • Satirism - Ahhhhhh, memes the DNA of the Soul . But it depends from the type of meme and from my mood too

Mixed Bags/Neutral

  • Apoliticism - Like they say, ignorance is bliss. I don't blame you too much for wanting to ignore politics sometimes I envy you tbh but I still consider it an important thing to not ignore. One day, politics will get you, in a way or another.
  • Horseshoe Centrism - Oversimplification of political reality but you do have some points on the similiarity between political extremists
  • Conservatism - Look, nothing against your ideology in general, which is fine, but a good number of your followers can be really obnoxious. Some progress isn't the end of the world, no?
  • Nationalism - Your more moderate variants can be really good, but your more radical variants are really fucked up
  • Social Nationalism - Oh yeah, I remember when I used to identify myself as this. Now that I look back, however, it's not that bad. Basically National Conservatism but more Social regarding economics.
  • Neoconservatism - Now, I like NATO and I also like how you protect Eastern European and Eastern Asian Countries respectively from Russian and Chinese expansionist ambitions, your promotion of Liberal Values, as well as your opposition to Communism during the Cold War. And you do have some based followers. That being said, a lot of your actions, however, can go from questionable to purely awful. Such as Operation Condor, the whole Middle Eastern clusterfuck, various CIA bullcrap actions and your support for Right Wing dictators to screw with Non-Western aligned countries. And your entire ideology recks of Imperialism, Leftists and Non-Interventionists have a point on this. Don't worry, I still vastly prefer you over the other Ideological Blocs in the world. And NAFO are also based for trolling Vatniks
  • Neoliberalism - I like SOME of your policies, such as global trade, but I'm not really keen on the whole "deregulated, privatized economy" stuff. Also, economic globalization does have its negative aspects.
  • Third Way - Radical Centrist, balance between markets and regulations, a compromise between mainstream Conservatism and mainstream Progressivism and Pro-West. I should love you by this logic. And yet, you seem to share the same problems of both Neoconservatism and Neoliberalism. Sure, Clinton and Obama were ok as presidents but I'm don't like how you watered down the concept of "Social Democracy" and turned it in "Neoliberalism with some Welfare". And some of your foreign policy can be pretty bad. So you end up being...ok for me. Flawed but far away from the worst. Love your YouTube Channel btw
  • Globalism - Sure, International relationships definitely matter, but I am not sure, National identities and cultures are also important.
  • World Federalism - Basically Globalism but more straight forward with its final goals. You seem good hearted, but also a bit too utopian for my tastes. Still unsure about this "unification of Humanity" thing, like I said before.
  • Liberal Conservatism - Ok ideology and really chill Conservative, it's just that you are a bit...boring, so to say
  • Christian Democracy - Similiar as Liberal Conservatism. But you did mostly good in Italy even though you really fell down later on and Germany during the Cold War, so respect for that. And combining religious values with some social progress doesn't sound really bad.
  • Islamic Democracy - Could be the Islamic equivalent of the above, but a good number of times you can be a Trojan Horse for Islamic Fundamentalism (Looking at Erdogan)
  • Conservative Feminism - Well, if you want to be a Tradwife by yourself, then sure, go for it. I won't stop you. Some of your followers are really annoying
  • LGBT Conservatism - Similiar discourse as above. Yes, you can easily be LGBT, respect them and also respect Traditional values, nothing wrong with that. But again, you got some bad followers
  • Libertarians - Gotta rank some of the Libertarians, I guess:
    • Libertarianism - The most famous variant in America, I guess. While I like your "live and let live" mindset and emphasis on autonomy in life, I'm not sure about your Anti-Interventionism and your Laissez-Faire economy. And some of your followers are borderline Conservatives
    • Libertarian Socialism - The "Classical Libertarians" like they call themselves, I guess. Opposing Tankies is based, I guess, and a few variants of yours seem ok, but you are pretty much a borderline AnCom tbh
    • Libertarian Conservatism - I mean, Conservatism combined with a "live and let live" mindset seems pretty respectful, but the Anti-Interventionism at the point of sympathizing with people like Assad and Putin (looking at Ron Paul) is really sussy for my tastes
    • Neo-Libertarianism - Interventionist Libertarianism?! Odd.....Not sure about that Ben Shapiro guy tbh; but not the worst ideology
  • Protectionism - Come on bro, free trade is cool. Ok, I admit that local production also matters but still...
  • Eco-Capitalism - It could work, but again, you need regulations, because green-washing Corporations and that's it, doesn't solve anything.
  • Fiscal Conservatism - Sure, economic responsibility is indeed important, but why so hostile to economic intervention?
  • Cultural Nationalism - Culture is indeed the backbone of a Nation. I just wish you were a bit more laxer on this matter. Some cultural progress isn't evil.
  • Multiculturalism - Living friendly all together sounds nice, but you seem to focus too much on identity politics. And a lot of your followers are SJWs, which is cringy
  • Laicism - Keep religious influence out of the government, but banning religious expression is a bit too much. Your Anglo-American version is really good tho.
  • Socialism - To be fair, I'm not entirely hostile to your beliefs, and some of your movements did improve labor conditions back then in the days, but god, you have a lot of awful variants.
  • Authoritarianism - Maybe I have been a bit too dogmatic against you before. Sometimes Authority can be needed for certain cases, and you have some good Authoritarians in History. That being said, there are also a lot of brutal scumbags in many other cases that we can see. Don't take it too personal but I still consider Freedom an important thing.
  • Populism - Double-edged sword. While you can be used to push good causes, at the same times you can become a tool for opportunistic people to gain power by just shouting loud. And your extremist variants can fuck off already.
  • Left-Wing Populism and Alter-Globalization - Good points about the negative aspects of aspects of Modern Globalism, but I am not sure about the Socialism that a lot of your variants seem to advocate for.
  • Left-Wing Nationalism - I guess you are one of the most respectful Leftists, for my tastes. You too have fair points about the problems of Globalization. And you seem to protect local cultures from this. But I am still not sure about the whole Socialism stuff. But Garibaldi was pretty based ngl
  • Democratic Socialism - Better than both Tankies and Anarkiddies for sure, I guess. There are a few decent supporters, such as Orwell, but also a few "eh" ones, such as AOC.
  • Socialism of the 21st Century - Huh, so you are Democratic Socialism's Latin American child. Ok, sure, do what you want in your countries, I do not care too much tbh.
  • Liberal Feminism - First and Second Wave Feminism were pretty epic but Third Wave is really "eh". Focus on more important issues and maybe we can retalk
  • Right-Wing Populism - Please, believe in less moronic conspiracies and cool it down with your tones. You will become decent in this way.
  • Soft Euroscepticism - Believe it or not, I am pretty sympathetic to your ideas. I will admit that the EU has various issues, such as Austerity policies and an annoying bureaucracy. I am willing to collaborate with you, to a certain extant.
  • Zionism - I do support Israel's right to exist, and if compared to other nations in the region, you are definitely more Liberal Democratic, and I respect that. But you go a bit too far regarding the Palestinians. Seriously, your settlements in the Gaza strip are really bad, so is mistreating the Palestinians. Hamas is still a terrorist group, I will give you that too. And the fact that certain people want to tear you down is not good, the Arab countries don't help neither. But I'm still for a Two-State solution
  • Titoism - One of the few decent Marxist Leninists dictators. You did allow some expression and you weren't as regressive as other Communists at the time. Not sure how to feel about your economic system. Is constantly asking IMF loans an economic success? Not really. But pissing off Stalin was based regardless. Fuck you for your Foibe Massacres [24] in Istria and other areas against the local Italian population. Most of those were civilians, not even Fascist soldiers or collaborationists. I'm not defending the Axis occupation of Yugoslavia, which was horribily brutal, but two wrongs don't make a right.
  • Pink Capitalism - Pretty mediocre tbh. Unfettered Capitalism and Wokeness are not my cups of tea. And your activism feels hollow tbh. Triggering Nazbols and Traditionalists is gigabased tho
  • Social Authoritarianism - One of the most decent Authoritarians, I guess. Still prefer your democratic version. But I like Vargas, Ataturk, LBJ, Truman, Piłsudski, FDR and others
  • Technocracy - Another decent Authoritarian, I guess. Rule by merit sounds fine, but you seem like another Trojan Horse for an Authoritarian Oligarchy tbh
  • Anarcho-Individualism - Not a big fan of Anarchism, but your philosophy seems interesting tbh, even though impratical.
  • Distributism - Unsure about the Traditionalism but some of your economic ideas sound interesting, kind like the above one
  • Agrarianism - I guess that Agrarian production also matters
  • Collectivism - Needed for sure in the world and society, but I am more keen on the Individualism side
  • Georgism - Mhhhhhhhhh, taxing land, you say? I should inform me better, but it sounds good enough for me.
  • Bonapartism - At least you helped to bring an end to European Absolutism...
  • Transhumanism - Maybe you could help the disabled, but still unsure; I like my own humanity.
  • Police Statism & Stratocracy - The police and the army are both important aspects of a Nation, and I respect them, but having them control everything in a State is way too much. Can we avoid power abuse pls?
  • Irredentism - You are way too aggressive and moronic most of the times. But I wouldn't mind retaking back parts like Corsica and Istria ngl
  • Imperialism - A lot of times you can be really awful (especially Colonialism). But there are some empires that I like, such as Rome and Macedonia.

Pretty Cringe, ngl

  • Alt-Lite - God, I can't believe this used to be my ideology. Seriously, a lot of your ideology revolves around "OwNiNg Ze LiBtARdS ePic StYlE!1!1" and being an edgy contrarian. And a good number of your variants can be pretty crappy. You have a few points on Woke Culture tho
  • Conservative Socialism - I'm not big on Socialism and Social Conservatism in general, and it doesn't help that a lot of your variants are fanboys of the Soviet Union because "Nostalgia" and shills for Russia, China and other Anti-Western regimes. The Infrared community/PatSocs in particolar are horrible.
  • Welfare Chauvinism - Nationalism and Welfare are both cool but, holy shit, you take it waaaaay too far
  • Paleoconservatism - Bruh, Bigotry and Isolationism are both cringe. You also got some really bad supporters, such as the fucking Groypers. And your shilling for Russia and other "Based Trad Regimes" doesn't help
  • Traditionalism - Basically Conservatism but tougher, or moderate Reactionarism. Yeah, no
  • Authoritarian Capitalism - Unfettered Capitalism and Authoritarianism are both cringe. And a lot of you are US-backed corrupted cronies. At least there are a few decent variants such as Singapore and Rwanda.
  • Pinochetism - Aren't you just Authoritarian Capitalism but with helicopters?
  • Anarchism - Mother Anarchy seems to have a few dumb children...
  • Anarcho-Communism - Yeah no. Your ideology is impratical on large scale. Maybe it could work on a small, organized commune, but definitely not on an entire nation. And a lot of your modern followers are really out of touch with both the working class and minorities.
  • Anarcho-Capitalism - Like the above but with Laissez-Faire Capitalism instead. Who's supposed to applicate the NAP btw? The Corporate Overlords in your ideal society?
  • Anarcho-Pacifism - And how do you plan to abolish the state without violence, by asking "please" ?
  • Anarcho-Nihilism - Shut up, N*hilist Misanthrope! Life has still valid values. Is up to us humans to give life a meaning
  • Misanthropy - Toxic ideas, for most of the times. Reminds me of the above but more aggressive or passive-aggressive.
  • Anarcho-Egoism - Getting rid of morality as whole? Seriously? We both have a big Ego, ngl
  • Ego-Communism - Like the above but Commie too. How is this even supposed to work?
  • Soulism - And you want to get rid of "the laws of physics"? Ehhhhhhhh.....
  • Corporatocracy - THE FREE MARKET IS FOR EVERYONE, NOT JUST A FEW RICH ASSHOLES!!!
  • SJWism - Shut up! You only give a bad name for Progressivism!
  • Anti-SJW - And on the other side of the coin there's you. Even more annoying and more toxic than the ones above
  • Jacobinism - You had some right ideas but you went HORRIBLY wrong
  • Kleptocracy - A negative aspect for both Authoritarian Regimes and Liberal Democracies.
  • Isolationism - International relationships are good, actually.
  • Neoluddism - Sure, Industrialism does have its problems but I still don't give up modern progress and its positive aspects.
  • Marxism - 1800's Capitalism did have a lot of problems, but your "Classless, Stateless, Moneyless" society is ridiculously utopian. Even though your goal wasn't an Authoritarian Socialist society, a good number of your followers decided to turn the "Transitional State" bullcrap in Forever State".
  • FALGSC - Dumb, naive utopia. Sorry, not sorry.
  • Luxemburgism - Bruh, you literally tried to overthrow a democratic government. The hell you were expecting?!
  • Manosphere - Sure, self-improvement for men is nice, but doing that through misogyny isn't the way to go
  • Putinism - Слава Україні! Героям слава!
  • Dengism - 动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门 ( Getting rid of Maoism was really based )
  • Khomeinism - Hopefully the current protests will bring you down...
  • Ba'athism - The Mad Dog of Arabia, especially your Iraqi counterpart.
  • Chavismo - Congratulations! You successfully turned Venezuela into a Third World country, especially to Maduro.

CRINGE! (Worst Enemies)

  • Marxism–Leninism - Sorry buddy, but your Red Empire isn't coming back any time soon. Cope, seethe and dilate. But you have a few good variants too, such as Zhukov, Maurice Bishop, Sankara and Berlinguer.
  • Maoism - Completely screwed around with China with bullshit such as the Great Leap Forward (More like Great Leap Backward lmao gottem), the f*cking Cultural Revolution that destroyed centuries of Chinese History and the Four Pest Campaign. The fact that you got so many supporters both IRL and Online is seriously beyond me
  • Stalinism - Basically Marxism-Leninism at its worst. Purges, Lysenkoism, famines (such as the Holodomor), massive cult of personality, Totalitarianism.... Fighting against Nazi Germany is definitely great but still: Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact
  • Trotskyism - Just because you oppose the above, doesn't mean you are good. Seriously, global Communism sounds like a nightmare.
  • Fascism - I don't have to explain this one further...
  • Strasserism - Nazism but more Socialist. Still cringe regardless
  • Showa Statism - The Asian equivalent of Nazi Germany. Deranged on so many levels.
  • National Bolshevism - Literally the worst from two worlds. This ideology attracts many Teenage Edgelords for a reason. Nazbol Gang memes are kind funny
  • Juche - Ah yes, Korean National Bolshevism
  • Hoppeanism - Ever thought of physical removing yourself ?
  • National Capitalism - Because Nazism wasn't Darwinist enough....You are basically Authoritarian Capitalism but on steroids. ALL of your variants are awful, such as US-supported scumbags and the damn Wagner Group in Russia (Denazification my ass)
  • Fourth Theory - Reactionary, Socialist, Authoritarian, Anti-Liberal and Anti-Western. Literally my polar opposite. How's your daughter btw, Dugin?
  • Pol Potism - Le funny anti-glasses Gamer Pop Bob. Basically insanity as an ideology, stay away from my glasses!
  • Reactionarism - "Reject Modernity, Retvrn to Tradition, Muh Little Dark Age Edit" my ass. You wouldn't survive 5 seconds in the Middle Ages.
  • Revolutionary Progressivism - I swear, if you try to do a cultural revolution in my nation because "Muh ebil oppressive tradution!1!1", I will smash your head in a wall.
  • Totalitarianism - HELL NO! YOU'RE EVIL! While Authoritarianism doesn't go that far, you straight up want complete control. I can't mention any good Totalitarian society. So fuck off! You only brought pain to humanity.
  • Ethnic Nationalism - Ethno-Nationalism is a dangerous poison that every good person should reject
  • Ultranationalism - "Psychopathic Nationalism" ? I personally prefer "Moronic Nationalism" tbh
  • Alt-Right - Your movement is dying by now, you Neckbeard Neo Nazi. At least Alt-Lite tries to be moderate. I'm not falling in your pipelines ever again, anyway.
  • Posadism - How about nuking yourself, instead?
  • State Atheism - Just as bad as a Theocracy. Because you are just Atheistic Theocracy. Let people believe in what they want.
  • Crusadism - Aren't you just the Christian version of the above? But Deus Vult Memes aren't bad and Powerwolf is a pretty kickass band
  • Ottomanism - Lmao, Europe kicked your ass at Vienna. I'm glad that the Kemalists got rid of you.
  • Habsburgism - IL PIAVE MORMORÓ, NON PASSA LO STRANIERO
  • Proto-Omegaism - ... And this why you shouldn't allow kids on the Internet

Personal Ranking of Political/Historical Figures

Based! (75-100)

  • Seretse Khama (90/100) - Supported Liberal Democracy, improved a lot the social conditions in Botswana, fought against corruption, promoted a large economic developement, was able to resist the regimes in Apartheid South Africa and Rhodesia, and overall made his nation one of the most prosperous in the region. Extremely underrated leader.
  • Witold Pilecki (88/100) - A brave man that stood up for his nation, both against the Soviets and the Nazis. You went through wars and tortures and still hold on. It's a shame that you got killed by the Soviet Puppet Government in Poland. RIP
  • Władysław Sikorski (87/100) - Same as above. Protected his nation and promoted Democracy, against every form of oppression. RIP Legend.
  • George Washington (85/100) - The American Revolution was one of the few successful revolutions in history: no backsliding into Authoritarian oppression like it happened in France or Russia, and successfully made the United States into a Liberal and Democratic Nation, a rare thing for that period of history. But I am not too fond of your relations with Native Americans and how you were too moderate on slavery (even though slavery was common at the times, so I can understand why that). But for the rest, pretty good. You had a point on Political Parties, especially considering the Modern Duopoly in the USA ngl
  • Eleftherios Venizelos (85/100) - The Maker of Modern Greece. Fought against the Ottomans and promoted based liberal policies. Also, improving relationships with Kemalist Turkey was really impressive. Maybe Greece and Turkey would have been more friendly between each others following this road. But you did have a few questionable policies later on, such as being cozy with Mussolini and restricting and repressing civil liberties, unionism and left-wing political enemies. Bro, that's not what a Liberal society does. But overall, still based. Greece could benefit a lot from leaders like you, especially nowdays.
  • Franklin D. Roosevelt (84/100) - Based New Deal, improving the rights of African Americans and Native Americans, fighting against the Axis Powers and overall great foreign policy. Japanese internment camps were awful tho.
  • Theodore Roosevelt (83/100) - The Manly Bull Moose, my fellows. The Square Deal (Natural conservation, improvement of labor conditions, trust bust) was pretty epic. Just calm down with the whole Imperialism thing, but overall good. Btw, this guy took a bullet to the heart and he survived. Not everyday stuff.
  • Jozef Pilsudski (82/100) - A true national hero that built up the foundations of modern Poland, saved his Nation (and maybe all of Europe) from a Soviet takeover and was progressive for his time. Even though I am not a big fan of the Authoritarianism under the Sanation Regime, you were still based overall.
  • Konrad Adenauer (82/100) - Based founding father of Modern Germany and the European Union. Promoted a Social Market Economy and Liberal Democracy. Also integrated Germany in NATO and improved relations with other Western European countries. You have my respect. Well, expect for the forgiving Nazi war criminals thing...
  • Kim Gu (80/100) - Fought against Japanese occupation? Anti-Communism? United Korea? All based stuff for me. If you had the possibility to rule Korea, I'm sure we wouldn't have this whole shitshow of the two Koreas
  • Abraham Lincoln (80/100) - Fought against the Confederates and freed the slaves, nuff said. Also, the Gettysburg Address was pretty cool.
  • Vaclav Havel (80/100) - Based for standing up against Communist oppression and helping the Czech Republic in its democratic transition. Also a great ally of the NATO Bloc.
  • Lech Walesa (79/100) - Same as above. Your economic reforms helped a lot Poland, even though I am not really into Neoliberal Capitalism.
  • Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (78/100) - While I find some of your policies pretty questionable, such as your massive cult of personality, the treatment of certain minorities, and completely getting rid of the caliphate (that would lead to some problems in the Islamic World), you did modernize your nation and paved the way for Liberal Democracy there. Emphasis on Progressivism, Egalitarianism, Laicism, Feminism, Scientific Progress and Nationalism, all with the inspiration from Western Liberal Democracies is pretty based. Getting rid of the outdated Ottoman Empire was great indeed.
  • Sun Yat-sen (77/100) - Like the above but less successful. You tried to modernize your country, but it's a shame that Yuan Shikai pretty much ruined everything and put China in the Warlord Era. But I think that your policies and influence have been mostly good. I also like The Three Principles of the People. If only you could have been more successful, your vision would have been fully realized.
  • Chiang Ching-kuo (76/100) - Fought against corruption, brought economic development and brought back Democracy to Taiwan. Nice. You are the true successor to Sun Yat Sen.
  • Lee Kuan Yew (75/100) - Singapore is a prosperous nation only thanks to you. One of the few based AuthCaps, even though you had a good number of questionable policies.
  • Getulio Vargas (75/100) - Too Authoritarian but you did build up Brazil, fought against the Axis Powers and was a good friend of FDR. And your second government was democratic. Shame that you killed yourself. The type of leaders that modern day Brazil needs. Trolling and purging both the Far Left and the Far Right was epic ngl. Death penalty for the extremists turds

Mostly based (65-75)

Neutral/Mixed (45-65)

Eh... (30-45)

Cringe! (10-30)

KYS and rot in Hell (Negative Infinite-10)

Based! (75-100)

Mostly based (65-75)

Neutral/Mixed (45-65)

Eh... (30-45)

Cringe! (10-30)

KYS and rot in Hell (Negative Infinite-10

User Relationships/Personal thoughts on a few Users

Positive

  • Applethesky2021 (//) - Even though we have our good number of disagreements, you are still a respectful person with a respectful ideology, a great inspiration for me, and pretty much my major friend/ally on this wiki. Also thanks for helping me setting up my page and for your back up against the Tankies during the Edit Wars. You are a bro. Also, Anti-Communism, Progressive Conservatism (even though you lean more on Conservatism, while I lean more on Progressivism), Nationalism without cringe Xenophobia, combined with some Internationalism, opposition to Totalitarianism, opposition to modern Russia and modern China and your mixed Economy system are all based policies. Anti-Capitalism and Anti-Westernism are mega cringe tho. Also, some of your views are too contrarian for my tastes.
  • Pepsi Queen (//) - Seems a friendly person, even though your ideology is pretty odd.
  • Glencoe13 (//) - You seem really cool, from what I saw.
  • DerVampir666 (//) - Generally good buddy that I talk with, and decent ideology. A few of your takes make me feel uncomfortable ngl
  •  Pantheon (//) - Even though I'm not really into this "Monarcho-Socialist Pagan World Federalism" thing of yours, you seem to have some really based policies such as Federalism, Progressive Conservatism, emphasis on both Patriotism and Internationalism and opposition to Totalitarianism. And you seem to tolerate Regulated Capitalism, from what it seems. Also fellow shitposting buddy on r/GenZeendong (Anti-Tankie Parody Sub) and trolling MAGA Communists is also really based. Are you seriously a Gaddafiboo?
  • Template:UserNesanelF (//) - Thank you for making my icon! Even though I'm not really into Laissez-Faire economies, and Traditionalism and hostility to Democracy are a bit too far, you seem mostly cool, both as person and ideology-wise. Also based foreign policy (AKA Neoconservatism but still with a decree of criticism towards US/Western foreign history). And a fellow NATOwave enjoyer from what it seems
  • Mebrouk (//) - Thanks for accepting my friendship request. You too seem really nice.
  • YellingYowie (//) - Dude.... that's based! One of my closest Ideological match by this far.

Neutral/Mixed

  • SomeCrusader1224 (//) - Unsure about your ideology, but you seem mostly fine. Also, I like the memes that you got on Reddit, really spicy content ngl.
  • Nfan (//) - We didn't have a really great start (too policing with the editings certain times), but sometimes you can be definitely needed. You really grew on me and your ideology seems pretty good too. Hopefully we can improve our relationships. Calm down with the Ultranationalism part pls
  • Yoda8soup (//) - Doesn't seem that bad.... for a generic Progressive Leftist.
  • AshleyHere (//) - You seem interesting as a person, even though Anarcho-Communism is pretty cringy imo... Hold on, you don't call yourself an AnCom? Ok, I guess...

ITA: Un altro Italiano su questa Wiki, mi fa sempre piacere. Apprezzo i tuoi contributi qui, come il tuo intervento sulla cosa di Zeb89 su "Populism" (peccato che poi i Jannies l'hanno cancellato RIP). La tua ideologia in sé per sé non mi garba tanto però, ma non è troppo male per i miei gusti. E sembri una persona interessante e generalmente apposto, tutto sommato.

ENG: Another Italian on this Wiki, I like that. I appreciate your contributes here, such as the Zeb89 thing on Populism (RIP, got killed by the Jannies). I'm not really big into your ideology as whole though, but is nothing terrible for my tastes. And you seem pretty fine and interesting as person, after all

  • Buni (//) - Thanks for banning Kretk. Also, you seem fine personality-wise. Still too jannie and policing for my tastes tho. REEEEEEE Bunisoc!!!!!
  • █████ (//) - You are weird, very weird. Just saying this. I also heard that you are a pedo; if that is true, then yuck

Negative

  • CynicalLibra (//) - Seems ok as a person but your entire ideology is 💀💀💀💀💀💀
  • Yugo (//) - I don't even know you, but from what I heard you seem REALLY awful
  • Maria16 (//) - Can you quit it with the Fun Police stuff once in a while?????? Also, your ideology is pretty cringe, whiny ass Nihilist.
  • 2x2Master (//) - Ideologically pretty good, but also a massive asshole that constantly goes against my edits. Yes it's Pony references. Problem? At least seems to be blocked now. What a shame, we could have been allies...

Personal opinions on a few countries [25]

Perfect

  • None, lmao

Pretty Good

  • Austria
  • Czech Republic
  • Netherlands
  • Iceland
  • Norway
  • Finland
  • Lithuania
  • Estonia

Generally Decent

  • United States of America
  • Germany
  • France
  • Italy
  • Switzerland
  • Spain
  • United Kingdom
  • Australia
  • Canada
  • Malta
  • Poland
  • Bolivia
  • Chile
  • Uruguay
  • Panama
  • Mongolia
  • Singapore
  • Taiwan
  • Japan
  • South Africa
  • Botswana
  • Tunisia

Mediocre/Mixed Bag

  • Greece
  • Montenegro
  • Mexico
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Israel
  • Ukraine
  • Serbia
  • Kuwait
  • Morocco
  • Georgia
  • Armenia
  • India
  • Vietnam
  • Indonesia
  • Nigeria
  • Rwanda
  • South Korea

Pretty bad

  • Hungary
  • Turkey
  • Peru
  • Cuba
  • Nicaragua
  • Azerbaijan
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Qatar
  • Hong Kong
  • Most of Africa, to be fair

Revolution, now

  • Russia
  • China
  • Iran
  • Syria
  • Belarus
  • North Korea
  • Venezuela
  • Afghanistan
  • Yemen
  • Somalia
  • Burkina Faso
  • Haiti

Political Parties Relationships

Which Historical/Political Figure you think that I'm most similar to?

  • Apple - Sleepy Joe + Keith Starmer + Anthony Albanese

Best and Worst Parts of my ideology?

Some Media that I like

Music

Videogames

TV series/Movies

Books

Internet People

Comments

  • Apple - Hi, do you have discord?

- Omega - Oh hi Apple, I didn't see your message, sorry. My Discord is Omega#6438, in any case. Have a nice day

Glencoe- add me to user relations plz link to ideology: https://polcompballanarchy.miraheze.org/wiki/Glencoeism#Comments

  • Omega - Can you send me a friendship request?
  • TheElectricBomb - I'm not sure what you think of me (especially my political views), so add me?
  • Omega1065 - You seem ok, I guess, even though we seem really different ideology-wise. You have a cool icon I guess
  • Maria - I personally support new change about removing youtubers, these variants are just self insert ismism spam. Same about self inserts and fictional countries from internet. And I removed references to animations for little children because it has nothing to do with politics.
    • Omega - This wiki is supposed to be both satirical and informative. Not some sort of Pseudo-Wikipedia but with le funni balls. I personally don't like the way things are run here rn.
  • Omega - Can you send me a friendship request?
  • TheElectricBomb - Opinions on Humanism and Post-Modernism?
  • Amercom - Ad me libtard
  • KorwinFan1991 - Add me

Backup edits

Notes

  1. ↑ While I believe that culture is an important aspect of a Nation, I am not hostile towards Social Progress, generally talking
  2. ↑ Political Normie and proud of that
  3. ↑ I am generally supportive of NATO/the Western Bloc but I am still pretty critical of certain aspects of US/Western foreign policy (especially during the Cold War and the War on Terror). And I generally don't support regime changing
  4. ↑ Sympathetic in the sense that I don't really follow an ideology but still sympathize but some of its goals and/or ideas
  5. ↑ By Fascism I mean "Actual Fascism", not "Anything to the Right of Stalin"
  6. ↑ A lot of Anti Americans are either obnoxious leftists or straight up Far Right and/or Ultranationalistic scumbags. No, saying this doesn't mean that I defend any nasty shit the US did btw. Same talk for Anti-Westernism
  7. ↑ Yes, Rainbow Dash is Best Pony
  8. ↑ As I like to say: "Things could be much worse, things could be much better"
  9. ↑ A.K.A. My former self, 2017-2020 era
  10. ↑ While I tried to stay/present myself as politically moderate, hence why Alt-Lite, I definitely had contacts with Far-Right circles on the Internet (such as political 4Chan). And even a few ideas from them
  11. ↑ I had a phase where I hated Turkey and Turkish people, basically average Balkaner
  12. ↑ I was a Kaiserboo, not really proud of that
  13. ↑ LARPed about "defending Western Civilization" and Liked Deus Vult Memes
  14. ↑ I never was that religious but I still considered Christianity an important aspect of Western Culture. Still do it nowdays but I was more dogmatic back then
  15. ↑ Yes, I liked USSR Anthem Earrape Memes, forgive me for this sin. Also LARPed as a Communist for a while.
  16. ↑ Liked "Remove Kebab/Serbia Strong" Memes, even though I had little to no knowledge of the Yugoslav Wars.
  17. ↑ While generally not hostile to Non-White populations, I still considered Race an important thing, and I did buy into the Great Replacement conspiracy
  18. ↑ Love you dad, regardless of everything you are the best
  19. ↑ He likes Italian Culture, but he doesn't like the mentality of a lot of Italians
  20. ↑ He once voted for Berlusconi one time
  21. ↑ https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2014/10/09/emerging-and-developing-economies-much-more-optimistic-than-rich-countries-about-the-future/ (Old research but still pretty relevant)
  22. ↑ https://ourworldindata.org/a-history-of-global-living-conditions-in-5-charts (Obviously Capitalism isn't the only factor in this but still a major one)
  23. ↑ https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/povert%C3%A0#:~:text=Nel%202021%20il%2025%2C4,e%202019%20(25%2C6%25)
  24. ↑ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foibe_massacres
  25. ↑ Referring only to the political situation of these countries, not to the nation or the people as whole
  26. ↑ https://youtu.be/n_MnSpyQT8U (Minute 1:58)
Retrieved from "https://pcbwiki.net/index.php?title=Omegaism&oldid=528853"