×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,528 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Polcompball Wiki
2,528Articles
  Recent changes
in:
Ideologies, Libertarian Right, Libertarians,
and 3 more

Reactionary Libertarianism: Difference between revisions

VisualWikitext
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(111 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Stub}}{{Ideology
{{Ideology
|themecolor = #1A1939
|themecolor = #1A1939
|textcolor = #DAD16D
|textcolor = #DAD16D
|title = [[File:Reactlib-icon.png]] Reactionary Libertarianism
|aliases ={{Collapse|
[[File:Feudthar.png]] Anti-state Feudalism<br>
[[File:Tharact.png]] Anti-state Reactionarism<br>
Reactbert<br>
[[File:Anfeu.png]] Anarcho-Feudalism<br>
Anarcho-Reactionarism<br>
Feudalist Libertarianism<br>
Van Dunism<br>
[[File:Ancapfeud.png]] Ancap Feudalism [[File:AnCapFeud1.png]] <br>
Unironic Neo-Feudalism<br>
[[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism]] (by [[File:Ancom.png]] [[Anarcho-Communism]])<br>
Belgian Hoppeanism
}}
|caption = Rule without govern!
|caption = Rule without govern!
|image = Reactlib-ball.png
|image = Reactlib-ball.png
|alignments =
|alignments =
[[File: Libright-yellow.png]] [[:Category:Libertarian Right|LibRight]]<br>
[[File:Libright-yellow.png]] [[:Category:Libertarian Right|LibRight]]<br>
[[File: Trad.png]] [[:Category:Culturally Right|Culturally Right]]<br>
[[File:Cap.png]] [[:Category:Capitalists|Capitalists]]<br>[[File:InfReactionaryism.png]] [[:Category:Culturally Right|Culturally Reactionary]] <br>
[[File:Religious.png]] [[:Category:Religious|Religious]]<br>
[[File:Religious.png]] [[:Category:Religious|Religious]]<br>
[[File:Libertarian.png]] [[:Category:Libertarians|Libertarians]]
[[File:Libertarian.png]] [[:Category:Libertarians|Libertarians]]<br>
[[File:React.png]] [[:Category:Reactionary|Reactionary]]
|influences =
|influences =
[[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrolibertarianism|Austrolibertarianism]] <br>
[[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School|Austrolibertarianism]]<br>
[[File: Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Anarcho-Capitalism]]<br>
[[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Anarcho-Capitalism]]<br>
[[File: Feud.png]] [[Feudalism|Feudalism]]<br>
[[File:Feud.png]] [[Feudalism|Feudalism]]<br>
[[File:React.png]] [[Reactionarism|Reactionarism]]
[[File:React.png]] [[Reactionaryism|Reactionarism]]
|founder = [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Van_Dun Frank Van Dun]
|theorists =  
|likes = Church, Feudalism, Private law, Medieval system
*[[File:Pareto.png]] [[w:Vilfredo Pareto|Vilfredo Pareto]] (1848-1923) [[File:Cball-France.png]] France/[[File:Cball-Switzerland.png]] Switzerland
|dislikes = Monarchism, State/Government, Protestantism, Enlightenment
*[[File:FrankVanDun.png]] [[w:Frank Van Dun|Frank Van Dun]] (1947-) [[File:Cball-Belgium.png]] Belgium
|title =[[File:Reactlib-icon.png]] Reactionary Libertarianism
*[[file:Curtis Yarvin.png]] [[Neoreactionaryism|Curtis Yarvin]] (1973-) [[File:Cball-US.png]] United States
|aliases=Anti-state Feudalism <br>
*[[File:Kogos.png]] [[Anarcho-Monarchism|Paulo Kogos]] (1986-) [[File:Cball-Brazil.png]] Brazil
Anarcho-Feudalism <br>
*[[File:AltBert.png]] [[National Libertarianism#Alt-Libertarianism|Richard Storey]] (?-) [[File:Cball-UK.png]] UK
Feudalist Libertarianism <br>
|variants=
Van Dunism}}Reactionary Libertarianism or Reactbert, for short (Not to be confused with [[File:Reactlib.png]] [[Reactionary Liberalism|Reactionary Liberalism or Reactlib]]) is an economically far-right, Libertarian, and reactionary ideology inspired by Belgium political philosopher, Frank Van Dun, who, in the article "[https://misesuk.org/2017/08/31/the-reactionary-libertarianism-of-frank-van-dun/ The 'Reactionary' Libertarianism of Frank Van dun]", written by Richard Storey, is described as a "Reactionary Libertarian" and shows extracts from Frank's correspondence with him outlining the case that the Feudal system was stateless and that the Church was, in fact, and contrary to most's beliefs, the greatest limitator to the rise of states in Northern Europe.
*[[File:Pareto.png]] '''Vilfredoism''' {{Collapse|
**[[File:AntiDem.png]] Anti-Democracy
**[[File:Antisoc.png]] Anti-Socialism
**[[File:Clib.png]] [[Classical Liberalism]]
**[[File:Econlib.png]] [[Fiscal Conservatism|Economic Liberalism]]
**[[File:Oligarchy.png]] [[Oligarchy]]
**[[File:Proto Fash.png]] [[Fascism|Proto-Fascism]] (Accused)
}}
|likes = [[File:Christy.png]] Church<br>
[[File:Feud.png]] Feudalism<br>
[[File:Polylaw.png]] Private law<br>
[[File:React.png]] Medieval system
|dislikes =[[File:Abmon.png]] Absolute Monarchy<br>
[[File:Sec.png]] State/Government<br>
[[File:ProtTheo.png]] Protestantism<br>
[[File:Enlightenment.png]] Enlightenment
}}
<blockquote>''Not to be confused with [[File:Reactlib.png]] [[Reactionary Liberalism]]''</blockquote>
Reactionary Libertarianism, or Reactbert, for short is an economically far-right, Libertarian, and [[File:Reactcross.png]] [[Reactionaryism|Reactionary]] ideology inspired on the Belgian political philosopher,[[File:FrankVanDun.png]] Frank Van Dun, who, in the article "[https://misesuk.org/2017/08/31/the-reactionary-libertarianism-of-frank-van-dun/ The 'Reactionary' Libertarianism of Frank Van Dun]", written by Richard Storey, is described as a "Reactionary Libertarian". The article shows extracts from Frank's correspondence with him outlining the case that the [[File:feud.png]] [[Feudalism|feudal]] system was [[File:awaj.png]] [[anarchism|stateless]] and that the [[File:catheo.png]] [[Catholic Theocracy|church]] was, in fact, and contrary to most's beliefs, the greatest limitator to the rise of states in Europe.


==Beliefs==
==Beliefs==
It primarily believes that [[File:Christy.png]] [[Christian Theocracy|Christianity and the Christian church]], despite many believing it to be so, didn't bring about centralized government nor [[File:sec.png]] [[Authoritarianism|Statism]], but quite the opposite, it managed to be a huge hindrance to the growth of centralization for centuries.
Reactionary libertarianism, as a political ideology, argues that the traditional [[File:Feud.png]] [[Feudalism|feudal regimes]] and the [[File:Catheo.png]] [[Catholic Theocracy|catholic church]] were systems opposed to the development of [[File:sec.png]] [[Authoritarianism|statism]], and were so for centuries.


Frank says that, rather, centralization was brought about by the English system from the Conquest onward; it was virtually impossible to achieve on the continent. However, because royal absolutism did not last as long in England as it did on the Continent, “English freedom” became the model to follow in the 18th century and onward.
One of the libertarian thinkers that best exemplifies this position is Frank Van Dun. He argues that political centralization, which ultimately culminated with the development of the modern state, was brought about by the English system, from the Norman Conquest onward, centralization which was impossible to achieve in the continent. However, because royal absolutism did not last as long in England, and its fall coincided with the rise of absolutism in the continent, “English freedom” became the model to follow in the 18th century and onward.


It also criticizes the [[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]] and its tailor-made “ideology of Enlightenment”, which (as so much of later progressive ideology) had a vital interest in obliterating everything that was associated with the stateless order of the medieval period and the role of the church in formal education in said period of time.
He also criticizes the [[File:Enlightenment.png]] enlightenment, which (as so much of later [[File:Prog-u.png]] [[Progressivism|Progressive ideology]]) had a vital interest in obliterating everything that was associated with the "stateless order of medieval Europe" and the role of the church in formal education during the same period.


Among many things Frank criticizes in previously mentioned extracts, he criticized how [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Rothbardianism]] remained virtually silent on the statelessness of the medieval system, besides some very few mentions, while actively presupposing some form of (what he called) "Lutheran [[File:Indiv.png]] individualism", upon which is superimposed a structure of property and contract relations but which does not pay much, if any, to questions of responsibility and justificatory arguments.
These beliefs led him to criticize [[File:Ancapf.png]] [[Anarcho-Capitalism|Rothbardianism]] remaining virtually silent on the statelessness of the medieval system, besides some very few mentions, while actively presupposing some form of (what he called) "[[File:Lutheran Theocracy.png]] Lutheran individualism [[File:Indiv.png]]", upon which is superimposed a structure of property and contract relations but which does not pay much, if any, attention to questions of responsibility and justificatory arguments.


==The Origin of the State==
==The Origin of the State==
First we need to define what a ‘state’ is.
This ideology takes a specific approach on the explanation of waht is the state and how it evolved until its modern version.<br>‘State’ derives from the Latin ‘status’. In the 15th century, however, it began to be used in [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] Italian principalities and cities to refer to their “political economy” (the realm considered as a single household). However, even today there remains an ambiguity: the state as a single economy (now usually called ‘a society’) and the state as the apparatus of rule and government within society (which puts every inhabitant of a country inside or outside the state apparatus).
‘State’ derives from the Latin ‘status’. In the 15th century, however, it began to be used in [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] Italian principalities and cities to refer to their “political economy” (the realm considered as a single household). However, even today there remains an ambiguity: the state as a single economy (now usually called ‘a society’) and the state as the apparatus of rule and government within society (which puts every inhabitant of a country inside or outside the state apparatus).


Frank, though, believes that the term has been overly [mis]applied in the modern times, calling any system of rule a state, whether or not the rulers even claimed to have the right to govern anything but their household and whether or not they ruled by customary prerogative or governed by “the rights of conquest” (the former excluding, the latter including the “rights” to legislate and to tax at will).
Frank, though, believes that the term has been overly (mis)used in the modern times, calling any system of rule a state, whether or not the rulers even claimed to have the right to govern anything but their household and whether or not they ruled by customary prerogative or governed by [[File:imp.png]] [[Imperialism|“the rights of conquest”]] (the former excluding, the latter including the “rights” to legislate and to tax at will).


It is also important to define Statism. Frank defines it as the idea that the ruler should have not only the power to rule (as supreme commander in times of war, as diplomat, and as judge in some but not necessarily all disputes among his subjects) but also the power to govern. A medieval king ruled his realm but did not govern anything within it except his own household. Government (as distinct from rule) was a matter of private housekeeping.
It is also important to define [[File:sec.png]] [[Authoritarianism|statism]], which Frank defines as the 'idea that the ruler should have not only the power to rule (as supreme commander in times of war, as diplomat, and as judge in some but not necessarily all disputes among his subjects) but also the power to govern.' He says that medieval kings ruled their realm but did not govern anything within it besides his own household. "Government (as distinct from rule) was a matter of private housekeeping."


Frank Van Dun believes the state (in the west) was a gradual transition from medieval ''rule'' to the modern political ''government'', the latter reaching its full expression from the 16th century onwards (After the disasters and wars of the 14th century and the wars of the 15th century) when some major medieval kings became monarchs and the idea that the monarch's power to govern extended as far as imperium started becoming common.
Frank Van Dun believes the state (in the west) was rather a gradual transition from medieval ''rule'' to the modern political ''government'', the latter reaching its full expression from the 16th century onwards (After the disasters and wars of the 14th century and the wars of the 15th century) when some major medieval kings became [[File:abmon.png]] [[Absolute Monarchism|absolute monarchs]] and the idea that the monarch's power to govern extended as far as imperium became common.
 
This, then, lead to the formal organization of regular departments of government and their [[File:Regulationism.png]] bureaucratization, that is, the separation of the purely administrative aspects of government from the purely political aspects, previously intertwined. Thus the previous conceived idea that kings were first among equals with special prerogatives but no superior rights, was as good as dead.


This, then, lead to the formal organization of regular departments of government and their bureaucratization, in other words, the separation of the purely administrative aspects of government from the purely political aspects. Thus the previous coceived idea that kings were first among equals with special prerogatives but no superior rights, was as good as dead.
==Statelessness of the medieval system==
==Statelessness of the medieval system==
Frank raised the case of the Medieval system as being [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|Libertarian]] or, even, [[File:Awaj.png]] [[Anarchism|Anarchist]], saying that it was not only anarchistic in the sense that it was situated in a stateless environment but also in the sense that it was intended to be anti-state.
Frank raised the case of medieval political system as being [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism|libertarian]]. Being not only anarchistic in the sense that it was situated in a stateless environment but also in the sense that it was intended to be anti-state. And in arguing this, he stresses the political relevance of the church.
 
In the words of Frank Van Dun, the [[File:Catheo.png]] [[Catholic Theocracy|church]] was not only ''a protector'' of [[File:property.png]] [[Propertarianism|“private law systems”]] but rather ''the great protector'' of them. Without the church these systems wouldn't have been able to develop. Frank says that in medieval times, free cities, universities, mercantile associations, large estates, etc... developed their own systems of [[File:polylaw.png]] “private law-keeping” or, in other words, private systems of governance. These were more or less closed (private) economies (households or associations of households).


In the words of Frank Van Dun, the church was not only ''a protector'' of “private law systems” but rather ''the great protector'' of them. Without the church these systems wouldn't have been able to develop. Frank says that in medieval times, free cities, universities, mercantile associations, large estates, etc... developed their own systems of “private law-keeping” or, in other words, private systems of governance. These were more or less closed (private) economies (households or associations of households).
The Church insisted on their support for natural law, which kept those “private systems” compatible with each other as to what basic principles refer, preventing them from turning into separate collections of special-interest privileges.


The Church insisted on their support for natural law, which kept those “private systems” compatible with each other as to basic principles and prevented them from turning into separate collections of special-interest privileges.
In simpler terms, the Church oversaw the integrity of the system without interfering in the internal ordering of individual households or associations of households, unless they threatened to take over by forcefully eliminating the independence of other households.


To put it in simpler terms, the Church oversaw the integrity of the system without interfering in the internal ordering of individual households or associations of households, unless they threatened to take over by forcefully eliminating the independence of other households.
Not having an army of its own, the Church relied on the good will of others, i.e. on their moral and theological prestige and authority (its intellectual capital). By decreasing the Church’s authority, and by robbing it of much wealth and income (and by implication, bargaining power), the [[File:ProtTheo.png]] [[Protestant Theocracy|Protestant]] crisis certainly undermined the major pillar of support for these medieval “private systems of governance.”


Not having an army of its own, the Church had to rely on the good will of others, i.e. on her moral and theological prestige and authority (her intellectual capital). In diminishing the Church’s authority and by robbing it of much wealth and income (and by implication, bargaining power), the Protestant crisis certainly undermined the major pillar of support for the medieval “private systems of governance.”
==How to draw==
==How to draw==
[[File:Flag of Reactionary Libertarianism.png|thumb|right|201x201px|Flag of Reactionary Libertarianism]]
[[File:Reactionary Libertarian Flag.png|thumb|right|201x201px|Flag of {{PAGENAME}}]]
1. Draw a ball with eyes<br>
# Draw a ball
2. Fill it with #1A1939<br>
# Fill it with violet-blue
3. Draw a snake with #DAD47B and write "No step" below<br>
# Draw a golden snake with green grass below it
===Optional===
# Add golden text saying ''"DONT TREAD ON ME"''
4. Draw a helmet with a red plume
# Draw eyes
# '''(Optional)''' Draw a knight helmet with a red plume
You're done!
 
{{Flag-auto
|c1=Violet-blue |h1=#131237
|c2=Gold |h2=#FFE74C
|c3=Grass Green |h3= #104311
}}


==Relationships==
==Relationships==
===Friends===
===Friends===
* [[File: Nrx.png]] [[Neoreactionarism]] - Austrian economics and reactionary social views? BASED
*[[File:Nrx.png]] [[Neoreactionarism]] and [[File:Austrobert.png]] [[Austrian School|Austrian economics]] - Social views? BASED! Just be more feudal and less of an absolute monarchist.
* [[File:Reactlib.png]] [[Reactionary Liberalism]] - You are almost the same as me, only drop entirely the democracy stuff.
*[[File:Confess.png]] [[Confessionalism]] - "I was screamin' at my dad, he told me, "It ain't Christ-like"
* [[File:Nazcapf.png]] [[National Capitalism]] - Literally me <s>but statist</s>!
*[[File:Hoppef.png]] [[Hoppeanism]] - My best friend, though you should be more reactionary. Still based nonetheless.
* [[File:Korwinism-Pikselart.png]] [[Korwinism]] - '''LITERALLY ME! <s>but monarchist</s>'''
*[[File:Krit.png]] [[Kritarchy]] - ''<big>Literally Me!</big>''
* [[File:Confess.png]] [[Confessionalism]] - "I was screamin' at my dad, he told me, "It ain't Christ-like"
*[[File:Feud.png]] [[Feudalism]] - Rule without govern!
* [[File:Conserv.png]] [[Conservatism]] - Cool but you've got to REACT!
*[[File:React.png]] [[Reactionaryism]] - It's time to REACT!
*[[File:Reactlib.png]] [[Reactionary Liberalism]] - BROTHER! However you can be quite statist at times and simps toward absolute monarchy[[File:Korona.png]]...
*[[File:LiberMon.png]] [[Libertarian Monarchism]] - Pretty based!
*[[File:Anmona.png]] [[Anarcho-Monarchism]] - Good like the above but you must have nobles and clergy.
*[[File:Carlism.png]] [[Carlism]] - My federalist and traditionalist fellow.


===Frenemies===
===Frenemies===
WIP
*[[File:Xbert.png]] [[Paleolibertarianism#Christian Libertarianism|Christian Libertarianism]] - Your love for the church and anti-statism is based, but you are too soft.
*[[File:Conserv.png]] [[Conservatism]] - Cool n' all, but you've got to REACT!
*[[File:Nazcapf.png]] [[National Capitalism]] - Me but statist and darwinist.


===Enemies===
===Enemies===
WIP
*[[File:Reactsoc.png]] [[Reactionary Socialism]] - Just... how?
*[[File:Ancom.png]] [[Anarcho-Communism]] - Yes, I'm a neo-feudal and..?
*[[File:Abmon.png]] [[Absolute Monarchism]] -  You statist centralist scum!
*[[File:Enlightmon.png]] [[Enlightened Absolutism]] - Authoritarianism?! The enlightenment?! Absolute monarchism?! AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!
*[[File:World Federalism2.png]] [[World Federalism]] - Your [[File:AuthHumanRights.png]] "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" are more like "animal rights" which often conflicting with each other and many of these "rights" are only valid insofar as legislation of the government is not contradicting it, also it is fundamentally different to fundamental rights such as life, liberty and property!


==Further Information==
==Further Information==
===Articles===
===Wikipedia===
[https://misesuk.org/2017/08/31/the-reactionary-libertarianism-of-frank-van-dun/ The 'Reactionary' Libertarianism of Frank Van Dun] by Richard Storey
*[[w:Frank Van Dun|Frank Van Dun]]


[https://mises.org/library/natural-law-and-jurisprudence-freedom-0 Natural law and jurisprudence of freedom] by Frank Van Dun  
===Literature===
*[https://users.ugent.be/~frvandun/Texts/Articles/ All texts of Frank Van Dun]


[https://mises.org/library/natural-law-liberalism-and-christianity-0 Natural law:liberalism and christianity] by Frank Van Dun
===Articles===
 
*[https://mises.org/library/natural-law-liberalism-and-christianity-0 Natural Law, Liberalism and Christianity] by Frank Van Dun
'''<big>Books</big>''' 
*[https://misesuk.org/2017/10/14/libertarianism-is-going-medieval/ Libertarianism Is Going Medieval ] by Richard Storey
 
[https://books.google.nl/books?id=p6WazhqdnzYC&printsec=frontcover&hl=nl#v=onepage&q&f=false The fundamental principle of law (in Dutch)] by Franz Van Dun 


=== Websites ===
==Gallery==
[https://www.zerothposition.com/ The Zeroth Position]
<gallery>
Legend2T-9x9.png|Credit: [[File:Colmin.png]][[User:TheLegend2T|TheLegend2T]], [https://www.reddit.com/r/Polcompballanarchy/comments/mqcr2d/the_9x9_compass_of_famous_people/ Source]
Based and Jedpilled-ChristianCompass.png|Credit: [[File:Mondistli.png]] [[User:Based and Jedpilled|Based And Jedpilled]]
</gallery>


[https://users.ugent.be/~frvandun/ Frank Van Dun's website]{{Libright}} {{Libertarian}}{{Religious}}
==Navigation==
{{Navbox/Libright}}
{{Navbox/Libertarians}}
{{Navbox/Religious}}
[[Category:Culturally Right]]
[[Category:Culturally Right]]
[[Category:Reactionary]]
[[Category:Libertarians]]

Latest revision as of 17:39, 30 October 2024

Not to be confused with Reactionary Liberalism

Reactionary Libertarianism, or Reactbert, for short is an economically far-right, Libertarian, and Reactionary ideology inspired on the Belgian political philosopher, Frank Van Dun, who, in the article "The 'Reactionary' Libertarianism of Frank Van Dun", written by Richard Storey, is described as a "Reactionary Libertarian". The article shows extracts from Frank's correspondence with him outlining the case that the feudal system was stateless and that the church was, in fact, and contrary to most's beliefs, the greatest limitator to the rise of states in Europe.

Beliefs

Reactionary libertarianism, as a political ideology, argues that the traditional feudal regimes and the catholic church were systems opposed to the development of statism, and were so for centuries.

One of the libertarian thinkers that best exemplifies this position is Frank Van Dun. He argues that political centralization, which ultimately culminated with the development of the modern state, was brought about by the English system, from the Norman Conquest onward, centralization which was impossible to achieve in the continent. However, because royal absolutism did not last as long in England, and its fall coincided with the rise of absolutism in the continent, “English freedom” became the model to follow in the 18th century and onward.

He also criticizes the enlightenment, which (as so much of later Progressive ideology) had a vital interest in obliterating everything that was associated with the "stateless order of medieval Europe" and the role of the church in formal education during the same period.

These beliefs led him to criticize Rothbardianism remaining virtually silent on the statelessness of the medieval system, besides some very few mentions, while actively presupposing some form of (what he called) " Lutheran individualism ", upon which is superimposed a structure of property and contract relations but which does not pay much, if any, attention to questions of responsibility and justificatory arguments.

The Origin of the State

This ideology takes a specific approach on the explanation of waht is the state and how it evolved until its modern version.
‘State’ derives from the Latin ‘status’. In the 15th century, however, it began to be used in Italian principalities and cities to refer to their “political economy” (the realm considered as a single household). However, even today there remains an ambiguity: the state as a single economy (now usually called ‘a society’) and the state as the apparatus of rule and government within society (which puts every inhabitant of a country inside or outside the state apparatus).

Frank, though, believes that the term has been overly (mis)used in the modern times, calling any system of rule a state, whether or not the rulers even claimed to have the right to govern anything but their household and whether or not they ruled by customary prerogative or governed by “the rights of conquest” (the former excluding, the latter including the “rights” to legislate and to tax at will).

It is also important to define statism, which Frank defines as the 'idea that the ruler should have not only the power to rule (as supreme commander in times of war, as diplomat, and as judge in some but not necessarily all disputes among his subjects) but also the power to govern.' He says that medieval kings ruled their realm but did not govern anything within it besides his own household. "Government (as distinct from rule) was a matter of private housekeeping."

Frank Van Dun believes the state (in the west) was rather a gradual transition from medieval rule to the modern political government, the latter reaching its full expression from the 16th century onwards (After the disasters and wars of the 14th century and the wars of the 15th century) when some major medieval kings became absolute monarchs and the idea that the monarch's power to govern extended as far as imperium became common.

This, then, lead to the formal organization of regular departments of government and their bureaucratization, that is, the separation of the purely administrative aspects of government from the purely political aspects, previously intertwined. Thus the previous conceived idea that kings were first among equals with special prerogatives but no superior rights, was as good as dead.

Statelessness of the medieval system

Frank raised the case of medieval political system as being libertarian. Being not only anarchistic in the sense that it was situated in a stateless environment but also in the sense that it was intended to be anti-state. And in arguing this, he stresses the political relevance of the church.

In the words of Frank Van Dun, the church was not only a protector of “private law systems” but rather the great protector of them. Without the church these systems wouldn't have been able to develop. Frank says that in medieval times, free cities, universities, mercantile associations, large estates, etc... developed their own systems of “private law-keeping” or, in other words, private systems of governance. These were more or less closed (private) economies (households or associations of households).

The Church insisted on their support for natural law, which kept those “private systems” compatible with each other as to what basic principles refer, preventing them from turning into separate collections of special-interest privileges.

In simpler terms, the Church oversaw the integrity of the system without interfering in the internal ordering of individual households or associations of households, unless they threatened to take over by forcefully eliminating the independence of other households.

Not having an army of its own, the Church relied on the good will of others, i.e. on their moral and theological prestige and authority (its intellectual capital). By decreasing the Church’s authority, and by robbing it of much wealth and income (and by implication, bargaining power), the Protestant crisis certainly undermined the major pillar of support for these medieval “private systems of governance.”

How to draw

Flag of Reactionary Libertarianism
  1. Draw a ball
  2. Fill it with violet-blue
  3. Draw a golden snake with green grass below it
  4. Add golden text saying "DONT TREAD ON ME"
  5. Draw eyes
  6. (Optional) Draw a knight helmet with a red plume

You're done!

Color Name HEX RGB
Violet-blue #131237 19, 18, 55
Gold #FFE74C 255, 231, 76
Grass Green #104311 16, 67, 17


Relationships

Friends

Frenemies

Enemies

  • Reactionary Socialism - Just... how?
  • Anarcho-Communism - Yes, I'm a neo-feudal and..?
  • Absolute Monarchism - You statist centralist scum!
  • Enlightened Absolutism - Authoritarianism?! The enlightenment?! Absolute monarchism?! AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!
  • World Federalism - Your "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" are more like "animal rights" which often conflicting with each other and many of these "rights" are only valid insofar as legislation of the government is not contradicting it, also it is fundamentally different to fundamental rights such as life, liberty and property!

Further Information

Wikipedia

Literature

Articles

Gallery

Navigation

Retrieved from "https://pcbwiki.net/index.php?title=Reactionary_Libertarianism&oldid=526375"

Recent changes

  • Anti-N.Brioism
    Kradölf • 14 minutes ago
  • Anti-N.Brioism
    Kradölf • 26 minutes ago
  • Anti-N.Brioism
    Kradölf • 1 hour ago
  • Itapism
    Itapi • 1 hour ago