imported>FargothGares No edit summary |
FargothGares (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|textcolor = #fff | |textcolor = #fff | ||
|title = Proto-Fargothism | |title = Proto-Fargothism | ||
|image = | |image = Protofargothportrait.png | ||
|caption = | |caption = | ||
|aliases = [[File:HumanNat.png]] National Humanism<br> | |aliases = [[File:HumanNat.png]] National Humanism<br> | ||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[File:Proto-Fargoth.png]] '''Proto-Fargothism''', or [[File:HumanNat.png]] '''National Humanism''' as he called himself, were the beliefs that [[File:Fargothcap.png]] FargothGares held from the late 2021 to December of 2022. He was generally a [[File:Socdem.png]] social democrat with [[File: | [[File:Proto-Fargoth.png]] '''Proto-Fargothism''', or [[File:HumanNat.png]] '''National Humanism''' as he called himself, were the beliefs that [[File:Fargothcap.png]] FargothGares held from the late 2021 to December of 2022. He was generally a [[File:Socdem.png]] social democrat with [[File:Sec.png]] authoritarian leanings, as well as an [[File:Cball-Australia.png]] Australian chauvinist, [[File:Isolationist.png]] isolationist and [[File:UltraAntiAm.png]] hyper anti-American. He supported the [[File:Windsor.png]] Windsor monarchy, believing that abolishing it would drive Australia culturally closer to America. He wished for Australia to be defined by [[File:Bicult.png]] two primary cultural groups, the [[File:Cball-UK.png]] Anglo-Celts and the [[File:Cball-AustAbo.png]] Aboriginals. He was a [[File:Humanismpix.png]] humanist and [[File:Antthe.png]] anti-theist who supported [[File:Transh.png]] every effort to better the [[File:Materialism.png]] human condition, having no moral considerations for harm done towards the [[File:Envi.png]] environment or [[File:Animalfarm.png]] animals, besides how it might affect humans. | ||
==[[File:HumanNat.png]] National Humanism [[File:Culnat.png]] == | ==[[File:HumanNat.png]] National Humanism [[File:Culnat.png]] == | ||
Fargoth coined this term for himself to best describe his form of 'nationalism' which focuses on humans as the supreme group, making it [[File:Civnat.png]] civic, [[File:Antthe.png]] anti-theistic and [[File:Humanismpix.png]] anthropocentric in nature. Unlike [[File:HumanNat.png]] Human Nationalism (which he was not aware of), National Humanism did not advocate for [[File:Globe.png]] global unity but rather [[File:Cball-Australia.png]] Australian chauvinism, and maintained a [[File:Culnat.png]] cultural character. | Fargoth coined this term for himself to best describe his form of 'nationalism' which focuses on humans as the supreme group, making it [[File:Civnat.png]] civic, [[File:Antthe.png]] anti-theistic and [[File:Humanismpix.png]] anthropocentric in nature. Unlike [[File:HumanNat.png]] Human Nationalism (which he was not aware of), National Humanism did not advocate for [[File:Globe.png]] global unity but rather [[File:Cball-Australia.png]] Australian chauvinism, and maintained a [[File:Culnat.png]] cultural character. | ||
Latest revision as of 12:22, 3 September 2023
Proto-Fargothism, or 
National Humanism as he called himself, were the beliefs that 
FargothGares held from the late 2021 to December of 2022. He was generally a 
social democrat with 
authoritarian leanings, as well as an 
Australian chauvinist, 
isolationist and 
hyper anti-American. He supported the 
Windsor monarchy, believing that abolishing it would drive Australia culturally closer to America. He wished for Australia to be defined by 
two primary cultural groups, the 
Anglo-Celts and the 
Aboriginals. He was a 
humanist and 
anti-theist who supported 
every effort to better the 
human condition, having no moral considerations for harm done towards the 
environment or 
animals, besides how it might affect humans.
National Humanism 
Fargoth coined this term for himself to best describe his form of 'nationalism' which focuses on humans as the supreme group, making it 
civic, anti-theistic and anthropocentric in nature. Unlike Human Nationalism (which he was not aware of), National Humanism did not advocate for 
global unity but rather Australian chauvinism, and maintained a 
cultural character.