No edit summary |
Gato Matador (talk | contribs) (Shut up jew) Tag: Undo |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Marcus Carassius thought <br> | Marcus Carassius thought <br> | ||
Feel free to add more <br> | Feel free to add more <br> | ||
[[File:Qacc.png|link=User:Quark]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Napoléonian 'tism [[File:RBubble.png]] | |||
|alignments = | |alignments = | ||
[[File:Authunity.png]] [[:Category:Authoritarian Unity|Authoritarian Center]] <br> | [[File:Authunity.png]] [[:Category:Authoritarian Unity|Authoritarian Center]] <br> | ||
[[File:Prog.png]] [[:Category:Culturally Left|Culturally Left]]<br> | [[File:Prog.png]] [[:Category:Culturally Left|Culturally Left]]<br> | ||
[[File: | [[File:dem.png]] [[mh:polcompball:Democracy|Democratic]] <br> | ||
[[File:Dirigisme.png]] [[mh:polcompball:State Capitalism#France|Dirigismeists]] <br> | [[File:Dirigisme.png]] [[mh:polcompball:State Capitalism#France|Dirigismeists]] <br> | ||
[[File:Classnat.png]] [[mh:polcompball:Nationalism|Classical Nationalists]] <br> | [[File:Classnat.png]] [[mh:polcompball:Nationalism|Classical Nationalists]] <br> | ||
| Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
}}}} | }}}} | ||
|influences = | |influences = | ||
[[File:Orlib.png]] | [[File:Orlib.png]] [[Ordoliberalism]] <br> | ||
[[File:Bonaparte.png]] | [[File:Bonaparte.png]] [[Bonapartism]]<br> | ||
[[File:Nalib.png]] | [[File:Nalib.png]] [[National Liberalism|National Liberalism]] <br> | ||
[[File:Dem.png]] {{ PCB|Democracy}}<br> | [[File:Dem.png]] {{ PCB|Democracy}}<br> | ||
[[File:Dirigisme.png]] [[mh:polcompball:State Capitalism#France|Dirigisme]] <br> | [[File:Dirigisme.png]] [[mh:polcompball:State Capitalism#France|Dirigisme]] <br> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 37: | ||
[[File:European_Federalism.png]] {{ PCB | European Federalism}}<br> | [[File:European_Federalism.png]] {{ PCB | European Federalism}}<br> | ||
'''People'''<br> | '''People'''<br> | ||
[[File:Faragism.png]] | [[File:Faragism.png]] [[National Liberalism|Nigel Farage]]<br> | ||
[[File:Bonaparte.png]] | [[File:Bonaparte.png]] [[Bonapartism|Napoleon Bonaparte]]<br> | ||
[[File:NihalAtsiz.png]] [[Chumism|Efe "Chum" Cengiz]]<br> | [[File:NihalAtsiz.png]] [[Chumism|Efe "Chum" Cengiz]]<br> | ||
[[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Lee Goldson <br> | [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Lee Goldson <br> | ||
[[File:Macron.png]] | [[File:Macron.png]] [[Neoliberalism|Emmanuel Macron (partially)]] <br> | ||
|likes = (b)Rap <br> AAVe <br> 'Jakking <br> Jewish Hoes <br> 'Laws <br> Quarkism <br> Capitalising random Words for no reason <br> | |likes = (b)Rap <br> AAVe <br> 'Jakking <br> Jewish Hoes <br> 'Laws <br> Quarkism <br> Capitalising random Words for no reason <br> | ||
|dislikes = Coal <br> NAS Spam <br> Pacifists <br> Homosexuals <br> [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] "Patriotism" being the socially acceptable word for nationalism and fascists being called nationalists <br> Transvestites <br> Bitch ass niggas <br> | |dislikes = Coal <br> NAS Spam <br> Pacifists <br> Homosexuals <br> [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] "Patriotism" being the socially acceptable word for nationalism and fascists being called nationalists <br> Transvestites <br> Bitch ass niggas <br> | ||
| Line 59: | Line 60: | ||
<big>{{Bold|{{Color| #eaeaea | Table of Contents}}}}</big> | <big>{{Bold|{{Color| #eaeaea | Table of Contents}}}}</big> | ||
*{{Title|1. The basics of Carassian culture|||{{Bold|{{Color| #f4f4f4 |1. The basics of Carassian culture}}}}}} | *{{Title|1. The basics of Carassian culture|||{{Bold|{{Color| #f4f4f4 |1. The basics of Carassian culture}}}}}} | ||
*{{Title|2. Culture and political predispositions|||{{Bold|{{Color| #f4f4f4 |2. Culture and political predispositions}}}}}} | |||
*{{Title|3. On american "culture"|||{{Bold|{{Color| #f4f4f4 |3. On american "culture"}}}}}} | *{{Title|3. On american "culture"|||{{Bold|{{Color| #f4f4f4 |3. On american "culture"}}}}}} | ||
*{{Title|4. Carassian Europe|||{{Bold|{{Color| #f4f4f4 |4. Carassian Europe}}}}}} | *{{Title|4. Carassian Europe|||{{Bold|{{Color| #f4f4f4 |4. Carassian Europe}}}}}} | ||
| Line 87: | Line 88: | ||
However it is important to note, that those are not the categories of cultureS mentioned in the beggining, those categories are as follows: <br> | However it is important to note, that those are not the categories of cultureS mentioned in the beggining, those categories are as follows: <br> | ||
1st Category - The most advanced cultures of the world, those many of whose men defined history and permanently changed it's course, for better or for worse. A brilliant example of such a culture would be France, having existed for as long as Europe Itself (not the physical or geographical, but rather the cultural sphere, This will be further elaborated on in chapter 4) and other cultures of historical major powers <br> | 1st Category - The most advanced cultures of the world, those many of whose men defined history and permanently changed it's course, for better or for worse. A brilliant example of such a culture would be France, having existed for as long as Europe Itself (not the physical or geographical, but rather the cultural sphere, This will be further elaborated on in chapter 4) and other cultures of historical major powers <br> | ||
2nd Category - The slightly less advanced, but nevertheless noble cultures, Whom, though not quite history-defining to the extent of the 1st category, have made great contributions to the sciences (philosophy and politics included) and have still somewhat significantly impacted history. An example of such a culture would be Hungarian culture, which, though not geopolitically relevant for a significant portion of history, is extremely rich and can proudly call itself the culture of such great (in the scale of their impact on world history, but not nescessarily in the nature of that impact) men as Árpád and Horthy, and boasting some novel political concepts of it's own, such as the trianon syndrome or Horthy's contentious legacy. Many less historically relevant european and asian cultures fall | 2nd Category - The slightly less advanced, but nevertheless noble cultures, Whom, though not quite history-defining to the extent of the 1st category, have made great contributions to the sciences (philosophy and politics included) and have still somewhat significantly impacted history. An example of such a culture would be Hungarian culture, which, though not geopolitically relevant for a significant portion of history, is extremely rich and can proudly call itself the culture of such great (in the scale of their impact on world history, but not nescessarily in the nature of that impact) men as Árpád and Horthy, and boasting some novel political concepts of it's own, such as the trianon syndrome or Horthy's contentious legacy. Many less historically relevant european and asian cultures fall into this category <br> | ||
3rd Category - Not quite here or there. Cultures in this category tend to be relatively young or have only relatively recently started to make their impact on the world, having contributed only a handfull of historically relevant figures and not quite as politically and philosophically complex as those in previous categories. Examples of such cultures would include certain asian cultures such as the Mongols, whom, though having had a great empire, have not been of much relevance for most of history. <br> | 3rd Category - Not quite here or there. Cultures in this category tend to be relatively young or have only relatively recently started to make their impact on the world, having contributed only a handfull of historically relevant figures and not quite as politically and philosophically complex as those in previous categories. Examples of such cultures would include certain asian cultures such as the Mongols, whom, though having had a great empire, have not been of much relevance for most of history. <br> | ||
4th Category. Most cultures outside of Eurasia, as well as a handful in Eurasia, fall into this category. They are entirely undeveloped, have been historically irrelevant, and have at best produced one great person. Though they are still rather valuable, and seeing them go very much *would* be a loss, they have not yet had the time to prove themselves to the world, though with time they will eventually advance to at least the 3rd category. Most sub-saharan african, as well as native siberian and american cultures fall into this category for obvious reasons. <br> | 4th Category. Most cultures outside of Eurasia, as well as a handful in Eurasia, fall into this category. They are entirely undeveloped, have been historically irrelevant, and have at best produced one great person. Though they are still rather valuable, and seeing them go very much *would* be a loss, they have not yet had the time to prove themselves to the world, though with time they will eventually advance to at least the 3rd category. Most sub-saharan african, as well as native siberian and american cultures fall into this category for obvious reasons. <br> | ||
5th Category. The "parasites", Unlike cultures in previous categories, they are a liability to mankind, and should be destroyed as soon as possible, as they do not actually contribute anything of value to mankind, only parasitizing other cultures and claiming their achivements as their own, whilst also seeking to spread as wide as possible to as many people as possible, which results in losing what little identity and values it originally had. Only the american and canadian cultures fall into this category. | 5th Category. The "parasites", Unlike cultures in previous categories, they are a liability to mankind, and should be destroyed as soon as possible, as they do not actually contribute anything of value to mankind, only parasitizing other cultures and claiming their achivements as their own, whilst also seeking to spread as wide as possible to as many people as possible, which results in losing what little identity and values it originally had. Only the american and canadian cultures fall into this category. | ||
=={{Bold|2. Culture and political predispositions}}== | =={{Bold|2. Culture and political predispositions}}== | ||
But why? What was even the point of establishing terms in the previous section? Well this is it. As one might have inferred from the name of the section, those of different levels of cultural development have predispositions to supporting certain political ideologies. My source for this? It is self-evident. The predispositions of the various cultural tiers of the world are as follows: <br> | |||
1st Category: Parliamentary multi-party democracy. Not much to be said on this, it is the main form of political organization in almost all 1st category nations. The parties with the biggest amount of seats in the legislature might not be of the highest moral fiber, but that will be explored in the next section. <br> | |||
2nd Category: Nations in the 2nd category tend to have at times dubious but generally representative democracies, such as Hungary or Poland. <br> | |||
3rd Category: Though Nations in the 3rd category are, at least theoretically, capable of democracy, they oftentimes have authoritarian, and sometimes reactionary governments. An example of this would be Iran, which, though democratic on paper, is ruled by an extremely reactionary and quite undemocratic government. It is also worth noting that many cultures in this category do not have states of their own <br> | |||
4th Category: Cultures in this category are not yet capable of true democracy. They also tend to be quite unstable and reactionary. Examples of such regimes would include the nations of the Sahel, which recently suffered a series of military coups, and most nations of Central asia, which, for as long as they have existed, were led by authoritarian strongmen. <br> | |||
5th Category: people of these nations, knowingly or not, tend to support corporate rule, either fooling themselves into believing that what is going on in their nations now is not real corporate rule (it is) or being too brainwashed by the media and political pundits and distracted by "political" celebrity drama and indubitably extremely important hot-button political issues such as transsexuals in bathrooms and whether people should be arrested for supporting the wrong oligarchic clique. | |||
=={{Bold|3. On american "culture"}}== | =={{Bold|3. On american "culture"}}== | ||
WIP | WIP | ||
| Line 142: | Line 148: | ||
==[[File:No.png]]{{Bold|Coal tier}}== | ==[[File:No.png]]{{Bold|Coal tier}}== | ||
==[[File:Mega_No.png]]{{Bold| | ==[[File:Mega_No.png]]{{Bold|Rape Target Tier}}== | ||
|-| | |-| | ||
Latest revision as of 19:42, 28 September 2024
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Marcus Carassius's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
 |
Work in Progress "I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details. |
If you have any questions about my ideology, I really couldn't care less, However if you do understand it and have any serious objections, confront me on Discord (mcvrcvs) or Twitter (@mcvrcvs)
Neo-Soymvndism is the ideology of Marcus Carassius AKA Mcvrcvs. I am not going to summarize it here because I'm a selfish little fuck
Table of Contents
- 1. The basics of Carassian culture
- 2. Culture and political predispositions
- 3. On american "culture"
- 4. Carassian Europe
- 5. A deeper exploration of political swarth
- 6. Carassian Economics
- 7. on True Liberalism
- 8. on the Acquisition of Power
- Literature
- "User Test"
- Cultural-Ideological chart
- How to Draw
- Relationships
- Movements
- Gallery
- Comments
- Navigation
1. The basics of Carassian culture
It is first worth noting, that for the purposes of this page, cultures will be separated into several categories based on how advanced they are, Those categories however are intentionally quite loosely defined, as cultural development cannot be adequately measured, furthermore, It is possible for a culture to advance through the categories. That being said, what exactly *is* cultural development? And the answer to that question is rather simple, the cumulative achievement of the culture, all of it's great political, artistic and philosophical works, as well as the level of familiarity and understanding of said works by any given member of said culture. Cultural development can generally be separated into 4 categories:
Artistic - The great works of art, Novels, Paintings, Music and other such things, written by an author
Political - It is evident that a nation's political culture vastly defines most other aspects of it's culture, though this is by no means the most important aspect. It is represented by political traditions, political concepts relevant solely to the nationstate of said culture, be it a real one or merely a hypothetical one, as well as any widespread political ideologies originating in the nation
Philosophical - Though sometimes hard to tell apart from the political, the philosophical aspect is entirely different. It is represented by a nation's great minds, not only philosophers, but also scientists, economists and other thinkers tackling not the mundane questions, as that is the dominion of politics, but the very fundamentals of morality, ethics, metaphysics and other such fields.
Popular - by far the simplest one to understand, yet the hardest one to increase, it merely represents the familiarity of the nation's members with it's culture, after all, what good is a culture that remains unknown to it's populace? This also includes works of the popular imagination and folklore
However it is important to note, that those are not the categories of cultureS mentioned in the beggining, those categories are as follows:
1st Category - The most advanced cultures of the world, those many of whose men defined history and permanently changed it's course, for better or for worse. A brilliant example of such a culture would be France, having existed for as long as Europe Itself (not the physical or geographical, but rather the cultural sphere, This will be further elaborated on in chapter 4) and other cultures of historical major powers
2nd Category - The slightly less advanced, but nevertheless noble cultures, Whom, though not quite history-defining to the extent of the 1st category, have made great contributions to the sciences (philosophy and politics included) and have still somewhat significantly impacted history. An example of such a culture would be Hungarian culture, which, though not geopolitically relevant for a significant portion of history, is extremely rich and can proudly call itself the culture of such great (in the scale of their impact on world history, but not nescessarily in the nature of that impact) men as Árpád and Horthy, and boasting some novel political concepts of it's own, such as the trianon syndrome or Horthy's contentious legacy. Many less historically relevant european and asian cultures fall into this category
3rd Category - Not quite here or there. Cultures in this category tend to be relatively young or have only relatively recently started to make their impact on the world, having contributed only a handfull of historically relevant figures and not quite as politically and philosophically complex as those in previous categories. Examples of such cultures would include certain asian cultures such as the Mongols, whom, though having had a great empire, have not been of much relevance for most of history.
4th Category. Most cultures outside of Eurasia, as well as a handful in Eurasia, fall into this category. They are entirely undeveloped, have been historically irrelevant, and have at best produced one great person. Though they are still rather valuable, and seeing them go very much *would* be a loss, they have not yet had the time to prove themselves to the world, though with time they will eventually advance to at least the 3rd category. Most sub-saharan african, as well as native siberian and american cultures fall into this category for obvious reasons.
5th Category. The "parasites", Unlike cultures in previous categories, they are a liability to mankind, and should be destroyed as soon as possible, as they do not actually contribute anything of value to mankind, only parasitizing other cultures and claiming their achivements as their own, whilst also seeking to spread as wide as possible to as many people as possible, which results in losing what little identity and values it originally had. Only the american and canadian cultures fall into this category.
2. Culture and political predispositions
But why? What was even the point of establishing terms in the previous section? Well this is it. As one might have inferred from the name of the section, those of different levels of cultural development have predispositions to supporting certain political ideologies. My source for this? It is self-evident. The predispositions of the various cultural tiers of the world are as follows:
1st Category: Parliamentary multi-party democracy. Not much to be said on this, it is the main form of political organization in almost all 1st category nations. The parties with the biggest amount of seats in the legislature might not be of the highest moral fiber, but that will be explored in the next section.
2nd Category: Nations in the 2nd category tend to have at times dubious but generally representative democracies, such as Hungary or Poland.
3rd Category: Though Nations in the 3rd category are, at least theoretically, capable of democracy, they oftentimes have authoritarian, and sometimes reactionary governments. An example of this would be Iran, which, though democratic on paper, is ruled by an extremely reactionary and quite undemocratic government. It is also worth noting that many cultures in this category do not have states of their own
4th Category: Cultures in this category are not yet capable of true democracy. They also tend to be quite unstable and reactionary. Examples of such regimes would include the nations of the Sahel, which recently suffered a series of military coups, and most nations of Central asia, which, for as long as they have existed, were led by authoritarian strongmen.
5th Category: people of these nations, knowingly or not, tend to support corporate rule, either fooling themselves into believing that what is going on in their nations now is not real corporate rule (it is) or being too brainwashed by the media and political pundits and distracted by "political" celebrity drama and indubitably extremely important hot-button political issues such as transsexuals in bathrooms and whether people should be arrested for supporting the wrong oligarchic clique.
3. On american "culture"
WIP
4. Carassian Europe
WIP
5. A deeper exploration of political swarth
WIP
6. Carassian Economics
WIP
7. on True Liberalism
WIP
8. on the Acquisition of Power
WIP
Literature
Have Read
Grumpy cat: a very Grumpy book
Plan to Read
Nothing lol (no reccomendations 😢)
Suggestions
Nothing lol (this is where you suggest things, preferably with a link to a pdf of them)
"User Test"
WIP
Cultural-Ideological chart
WIP
How to Draw
like, try imitating the design in the infobox pic.
Relationships
WIP
{{Bold|Gemerald tier}
gem tier
Ruby Tier
Iron Tier
Rust Tier
Coal tier
Rape Target Tier
Gemerald Tier
Gem Tier
Ruby Tier
Iron Tier
Rust Tier
Coal Tier
Brimstone Tier
Movements
1st category tier
3rd category tier
Gallery
WIP
Comments
Call me a racial slur
WIP