No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The only way for you to realize morality as necessary would be personal experience. If you seriously think that because the bourgeoisie talked about liberty, fraternity and equality these concepts are just 'muh bad', I don't know if there's any hope. A concept existing in the minds of bourgeoisie does not make it a bourgeoisie product: | The only way for you to realize morality as necessary would be personal experience. If you seriously think that because the bourgeoisie talked about liberty, fraternity and equality these concepts are just 'muh bad', I don't know if there's any hope. A concept existing in the minds of bourgeoisie does not make it a bourgeoisie product: it inherently being something to manipulate, oppress and exploit others for capital does. By this logic of yours, would not postmodern capitalism being an idea of the bourgeoisie make postmodernism as a whole bad? Since morality, liberty, equality and fraternity are bad just because they are ideas bourgeoisie heavily involved themself in. | ||
Having no morality is a cage. "You can smash my ribcage in with a metal bar but I'm not pwomoting it!!! You can rape children but I'm not pwomoting it!!!" This kind of thing makes no sense at all. If people have the freedom to shatter another's will, as in your system, that is known as oppression and tyranny. | Having no morality is a cage. "You can smash my ribcage in with a metal bar but I'm not pwomoting it!!! You can rape children but I'm not pwomoting it!!!" This kind of thing makes no sense at all. If people have the freedom to shatter another's will, as in your system, that is known as oppression and tyranny. | ||
Latest revision as of 07:10, 27 January 2024
The only way for you to realize morality as necessary would be personal experience. If you seriously think that because the bourgeoisie talked about liberty, fraternity and equality these concepts are just 'muh bad', I don't know if there's any hope. A concept existing in the minds of bourgeoisie does not make it a bourgeoisie product: it inherently being something to manipulate, oppress and exploit others for capital does. By this logic of yours, would not postmodern capitalism being an idea of the bourgeoisie make postmodernism as a whole bad? Since morality, liberty, equality and fraternity are bad just because they are ideas bourgeoisie heavily involved themself in.
Having no morality is a cage. "You can smash my ribcage in with a metal bar but I'm not pwomoting it!!! You can rape children but I'm not pwomoting it!!!" This kind of thing makes no sense at all. If people have the freedom to shatter another's will, as in your system, that is known as oppression and tyranny.