×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,529 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Shellshocked Communism: Difference between revisions

m (Reverted edits by S (talk) to last revision by MEADOWSIN)
Tag: Rollback
No edit summary
 
(48 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Box
{{Box
|text = thank you so much, hysteria, for your beautiful art, I really don’t know how to thank you, you’re a fantastic artist}}{{Developing}}{{Self Insert Notice|MEADOWSIN}}
|text = ABANDONED, SEE [[Nyhilism]].}}{{Developing|MEADOWSIN}}{{Self Insert Notice|MEADOWSIN}}
{{Style
{{Style
|bannercolor    = #000000
|bannercolor    = #000000
Line 12: Line 12:
|footercolor    = #967bb6
|footercolor    = #967bb6
}}
}}
([[File:Bataille.png]]/[[File:Post-Thoreau.png]]/[[File:Demcon.png]]/[[File:Postpostmodern.png]]/[[File:LeftCounterEcon.png]]/[[File:EsotericAbsurd.png]]/[[File:BioSelfLeftVol.png]])
([[File:Batmarx.png]]/[[File:Absurd.png]]/[[File:Biomech.png]]/[[File:Cybercom.png]]/[[File:Semidirect.png]])
{{Ideology
{{Ideology
|themecolor = #000000
|themecolor = #000000
|textcolor = #ffffff
|textcolor = #ffffff
|title = [[File:Shellshock.png]] Shellshocked Communism
|title = [[File:Shellshock.png]] Shellshocked Communism [[File:Shellshock2.png]]
|image = [[File:Holgha.png]]
|image = [[File:Holgha.png]]
|caption = "the industrial revolutions' socioeconomic and sociopolitical consequences as they relate to the society of control have been a disaster for the human race- or in short, it isn't the technology's fault, it's yours."
|caption = "It is time to abandon the world of the civilized and its light. It is to late to want to be reasonable and learned, which has led to a life without attractions. Secretly or not, it is necessary to become other, or else cease to be." - Georges Bataille
|aliases = ''Add your own.''
|aliases = '''Degenerate Communism'''<br>
|alignments = just know i'm a leftie infected with postanarchic and pseudo-spiritually marxist ultra-pro-worker brain poison
'''Sacred Communism'''<br>
'''Bataillean Cybercommunism'''<br>
''Add your own.''<br>
|alignments = not a postie
|influences =
|influences =
|influenced = [[File:Genchalk0.png]] [[Generouschalk0 thought]] (Anti-humanism)
|influenced = [[File:Genchalk0.png]] [[Generouschalk0 thought]] (Anti-humanism)
|song =[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4Gz0EjOiyE Sematary and Ghost Mountain - Goodbye Horses]
|song =[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n1iW7tz9mo Ghost Mountain (ft. Sematary) - Pain]<br>
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xa2ANHa690E Omerta - Antiamorous]
|likes =  
|likes =  
|dislikes =
|dislikes =
|infoboxbackground= #161616
|infoboxbackground= #161616
}}
}}
=Primary Aspects=
=Revelry, Marx, Biomechanicalism=
*not giving a shit about capitalist realism because that shit makes politics less fun
To build a world is not the function- to build a world is not the intention, to fly the flag of some “greater” power is not the intention, but to reestablish the true speaking voice of the unity in a surrounding swarm of partyism and worship of individuals as above one. I ask for a republic system in which regularly the people are surveyed, and if any politician is below 40% popularity, they are ejected immediately. Alignment with any other politician should also be seen as a resignation  or disqualification immediately. No parties, by threat of nullification of right to run at all. You run on policies. Simple enough.
*ccru bullshit
*post-kaczynskism
*post-thoreau
*democratic confederalism in some ways
*being the single most annoyingly stunted creative on the site, not going to be on as often either
*genuinely just don't want my ideology to be dependant on others' opinions
*post-party libertarian communism, pseudo-voluntaryism, self-sufficiency, technophilia with purpose
*I love art so much, genuinely above all
*occultfag worshipping an animalistic machinic-natural godform (denoted as "The Deer God") as an essential sponsor


=Addendum 1.X=
<br>Biomechanical freedom-of-form. If you want to holster a camera into your eye and use it to supplant your eye and replay moments literally then feel free, if you want to turn your finger into a taser, feel free. Transportation should be emphasized on the user-end and not the producer-end. All economic processes should be the same, consumer-focused and primarily an economy of consumption and focusing on the sacred, as all want to do.  
To be the builder of the new point beyond and yet behind the factional division of postmodern insanity is not something I wish to be. I dislike the title of Meta-Modernism, as it seeks to find simplicity within “oscillation” or some organized formation of anti-formation, unstatic staticism- something which I see as highly pretentious if even manageable in the first place. Most of the time this justifies things that definitely don’t need to be justified- simply done, simply acted upon, simply said. So where I stand now is post-postmodernism, simply because I wouldn’t like to stand in the same room as acceleration or collapsists, or especially anarcho-nihilists, despite me being one before. I think that it honestly has given me fear for my future, and has made me insolently shut out those postmodernists that approached me before, at least as far as political advice goes. I find myself finding my own roads between the virulent nihil of Bataille and my own spiritual-religiosity based on absurdism, Bataillean spiritualism and the occult, discordianism, animism, pantheism, and a lens of the works by Ghost Mountain, who expressed an image of a Deer God.


The Deer God is my lens to selfhood, my lens to becoming, something that is not ontological but instead bestowed upon me, a biomechanical hope and love for The Deer God, which we can clearly nonsee in the some unprivileged beyond. I commune but do not expect omnipotence or the sacred, or some higher signified beyond, I expect a comrade in my journey, and an understanding inner spirit that makes me an object of desiring-production in a system of interlocked and webbed desiring-production. This is the origin of my esoteric Marxism-Voluntaryism, a communal expression of individual desiring- some individual-community of interflowing beings, something that should be allowed to be expressed in a way of civil war. This is how I approach Democratic Confederalism- in that I believe in voluntary communities that are shaped like interconnected viruses, like a central community and outsider self-sufficient individuals utilizing biomechanisms to build themselves a life they find independent and sufficient. The inner community would decide things organically among themselves in things very very similar to the systems implemented in direct democracy or democratic confederalism. That’s all there is to say, thank you for reading.
<br>You could see me as egoist-communist or simply degenerate communism, but I see this as a revelry, of form, function, and economics. We should allow for cybernetic decentralized planned economy, local representatives answering to survey and personal popular demand, assessed through cybernetics. The abolition of currency doesn’t need to exactly occur in order for the capital to become less emphasized, and the material and ethereal to become more valuable than value itself- we simply need to allow for those who have wished to revel to revel, and to allow for advance, and to extend our wants and loves and beliefs to those who we can provide with the means to build their own paths.


<br>I believe in international cooperation but anti-imperial structure, not producing any materials for warfare for other countries, and not releasing excess energy through warfare, simply being a benefactor to states with similar interests or states that pledge to use it for ascendancy and infrastructure to better the society as a whole. To be benevolent, to talk softly and carry nothing, is to be shot… only for your house, your bloodline, to hunt the other to death with the big stick.


=thinking out loud=
=!=
Restarting again<br>
The primary aspect of existence and everything cannot be summated, and nor can my ideals. It makes it really interesting and often hard to write about things now, especially as I learn dislike of other people and respect for naught but the transcendent and love. I am a child of Acephale, of Thoreau, and of modern Communizers. I believe in the right of the worker to be, the right of life to become its own making, and the belief in love mystical and transcendent. I believe that having it all gets often boring, and providing everyone with whatever they want simply embodies the libidinal desire that becomes apathy to the material in moments, and manufactures in the mind the ability to drown the material man and find love in the poetry of man, woman, and all else, the nonliteral copulation of two or (if so inclined) more people. (of age and of their own free will.) A government that asks for minimum engagement and maximum transparency, a populace fed and well off universally, no longer caring about money because it is so universally given and material begins to become unstigmatized and unfavored, and it gives way to a wobble-to-the-feet of the cohabitation of all.
<br>


The idea is simple: build the value-form a padded place to sleep until we can simply take it into the afterlife. To have natural community-forming with surgical (in turn, personalized) techno-natural materialism would be most essentially a dream, killing the worker-form, workerists denying the stratifier of work, but I frankly think we need to ensure that millions of disadvantaged people within our very real shitty systems now have somewhere to lay their head instead of letting things fall into disrepair and simply "letting collapse occur." Sure, it'll occur, but after what? What pedestal of privilege within the shitty modern systemic do you have that you can justify to yourself that collapse would be livable? What in the hell has convinced any of you that any of this shit is even relatively comparable to the experience of the true individual- the unatomized fleshmechs that occupy everything from woods to everything else? Why can't we simply have the communism of other animals intermeshed with techno-natural infusions? I understand it's hard to hear me with all the post-modern philosophy clogging up everyone's ears, but did we forget why we'd like to summon something to strike down and rip off the head of the beast-capital in the first place? Have we forgotten animalia? Have we forgotten how horribly collapse will effect humanity and everything we've forced to be subservient to us? Have we forgotten the dances that we used to do with those we loved, when we had intent to have some form of beauty in our lives? I'm a communizer for love, and I don't know about you, but I think utilizing technology as a summoning-tool rather than as a god in itself would be fantastic, and analyzing and realizing the points in regards to alienation and leftist martyrdom can lead us to something beyond the hitman-infused lands of modernity and deliver us to a land beyond, one that all of you keep blabbering and philosophizing about with nothing but words. Organize. I understand your philosophical-anti-ideology says something different, but I believe we can truly utilize the worker for our nigh-occultist ritual summoning, rather than excluding the worker and sitting on our shitty armchairs that we don't realize are turning us into harmless fucking corpses. <br>
Think back to your formative moments- did you ever feel as apathetic as you do now? did you ever feel like you needed to repeat some action or take advantage of some thing to feel better about your situation? Most people didn't, some did. The point of this being, why do you think you feel so burned and burned out now, so fried and broken and over-underwhelmed? Is our system not unintuitive and horrifically material? Did you ever care about the material when you were a child? Did you think of anything at all when you imagined faraway places and built up your relationships with peers and family? Did you imagine you would ever feel like you do now? Did you ever care? To be who you are you must release the burden of false identity that society is now placing upon you; you must release the burden of "modern man" by clawing the webbing of the internet off of your body and finding yourself talking to those around you, who need it as much as you do. Find love outside of the material "give them flowers and chocolate," give them unconventional gifts, give them things like small weeds you dug out of the ground, let it grow out of control in a pot and take care of these problem plants. Build your own idea of comfort, and make your own culture outside of product, build your own life in a way that makes you feel fulfilled, make your own gods and games.
<br>


Praise The Deer God, Summon The UnGod Communization, Technonaturalism/Biomechanicalism, Post-Thoreau, Post-Kaczynski, Fuck All Of You (generally,, except for a handful of you, like Rocks or Hood or Avian or Camel or Hysteria, especially Hysteria, but wtv :3)<br>
You don't owe anyone anything.
 
Frankly, I'm not looking for community or understanding here, and if you disagree, I get it. Live your life, but don't blame me when
*A. Collapse doesn't happen
*B. Whatever other bullshit you're waiting for doesn't happen
Thank you.


=questions=
''Please put questions below. I will answer as fast as possible.''
*
=Influences=
=Influences=
==Primary==
==Primary==
*The Deer God
*Various Metamodernists
*Novalis
*Bataille
*Marx
*Camus
*Ccru
*Derrida
*Derrida
*Deleuze
*Deleuze
*Bataille
*Guattari
*Guattari
*Ghost Mountain
*Ghost Mountain
*Thoreau
*Thoreau
*Kaczynski
*4lung
*4lung
*Rosa Luxemburg
*Rosa Luxemburg
*Marx
*Flower Bomb
*Flower Bomb
*Camus
*Fumiko Kaneko
*Fumiko Kaneko
*Hunter S. Thompson
*Hunter S. Thompson
Line 83: Line 81:
*Vonnegut
*Vonnegut
*H.P. Lovecraft
*H.P. Lovecraft
*Meadowsin's Basilisk
*Haunted Mound Hauntology
*Huey Long


=Relations=
=Relations=
==gooder==
*
==good==
==good==
*[[File:Nightshade.png]] [[Venatrixism]] [[File:LucyBHood.png]] - I like your ideology, even if we're growing apart a bit. I'm moving toward mixing postmodern ideas with more contemporary or workers-movement ideas, mixing the old and the new,, stewing up something perfect for myself.
*{{Rocksism}} - I like your ideals and thoughts a lot, while you do not fall completely into the Bataillean spirit of excess, I like your will to abolish that which causes issues for yourself and others, although I personally don't think negation like this is entirely possible, especially in a world with so much moving parts already. Anarchy was in demand, and now there's a plentiful enough supply of hot anarchy in the daily-life, but the demand has only tapered off. A rare gem among anarchists, but still an anarchist, which I absolutely acknowledge I very recently was.
*{{Rocksism}} - While you may not intend to do this, I feel like you take an approach that effectively understands my post-postmodern position. You incorporate some non-philosophical classic political resistance methods that are effective, while still building up an effective idea that allows for some play-room for ideas.
*[[File:Nightshade.png]] [[Venatrixism]] - It's hard to rate your ideology since it's just a page of books, but I know where you're coming from, and I do like a lot of what you enjoy as well, but I've seen myself sort of move past anarchism, so I can't tell you how deeply we agree. So welcome to good tier, comrade, sorry I can't move you further up.
*{{Romcom}} - I can't say I exactly align with your ideas, but we do have similar inspiration, and genuinely see ourselves as advocating for liberation of the self, whether that be through your methods or mine. I understand where you could potentially critique me, and I really do like your advocacy for the individual, despite the false hold of "individualism" and "being you" entailed by the modernity we find ourselves in. I also love your romantic and esoteric aspects, as I'm highly spiritual and a pseudo-transcendentalist (referring to the ideas of my Post-Thoreau,) a movement that owes a lot to romanticism. Overall, unique, beautiful, and delightful in many ways. I also like your economic theory, and I find myself being a lot of the same as far as economy goes. I like economic anarchy, and I may look into mutualism. I hope you understand I'm not just eating garbage as far as I'm calling myself a "post-postmodernist," I'm just trying to indicate a distaste for most postmodernist ideals, especially as they start to approach the singularity that is accelerationism. Thank you.
*{{Gbnl}} - '''King of The Anti-Nationalist Nationalist Club''' - Ah yes, Fisherite that doesn't really understand that the whole point of Fisher is the blunt futility of what he's attempting to do- which is precisely why I've come to the point of rejecting the "lost future" narrative. People try to "complete" the text on acid communism started by K-Punk, not realizing it is very much so a futile project. His death was a result of this "lost future" theory, at least in part, and your ideological existence is a paradox of pseudo-understanding and unintentional "metamodernism." Your ideology is a mess dressed up in the war-paints of the Fisher left- the accelerationists you don't care to even shake hands with. You pretend to be an intellectual, but find yourself suitably lacking of any interesting analysis. You are a situationist Corbynite techlover larping as a Fisherite. (no offense!) Where we agree is most definitely unintentional at worst and based in your very modernist analysis of Fisher at best. You find yourself not understanding Hauntology's roots, and not understanding your own supposed ideals.
*
 
==eh==
==eh==
*{{HelloThere314}} - I like the ideal of Rojava, moreso the ideas of DemConfed themselves rather than Rojava, its closest interpretation, a miming of DemCon in the most puppet-esque sense. I do have a lot of contradictions, but I'm not a nationalist, and a lot of the contentions are intentional. I ask people to let these ideas play in their head like they play in mine. I don't really like control, frankly, and I don't really see communities expanding if they see themselves as one cohesive community regardless. The point is moreso to let ideas play, and I understand you see myself as some form of false communization, but having phantom fixtures is more functionally operational than to allow for contemporary fixtures or to simply delete them and allow for a fascist to rally himself into whispering into the ears of those that demand a more fleshy-feeling overlord. I simply think that the structure I provide can very easily dissolve modernity and meld modernity into tapestries of something beyond that. Otherwise you're interesting, and I want you to know I completely understand your critique of me.
*
*[[File:ImpSoc.png]] [[Imperial Socialism]] - I don't like imperialism or socialism but you aren't trash and I wouldn't hate living under your system (I would just stir up copious amounts of civil unrest and cause violent protests in order to attempt a cessation to imperialist practice.)
 
==trash==
==trash==
*
==brimmy==
==brimmy==
*[[File:Nurisk.png]] [[Nuriskianism]] - No, just no. I appreciate the offer though. Duginite, Zizekian, et cetera.
*{{Evenoskyism}} - I could say the same about you, but I don't think you even present yourself well. Thank you for what little scrap you toss me though, didn't even expect that.

Latest revision as of 20:08, 13 September 2024

ABANDONED, SEE Nyhilism.
In Development
"I'll stop reading eventually." - Left Communism

This page is still in development due to ongoing reading by MEADOWSIN, multiple things may change drastically.

Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent MEADOWSIN's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

(Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination/Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination/Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination/Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination/Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination)

Revelry, Marx, Biomechanicalism

To build a world is not the function- to build a world is not the intention, to fly the flag of some “greater” power is not the intention, but to reestablish the true speaking voice of the unity in a surrounding swarm of partyism and worship of individuals as above one. I ask for a republic system in which regularly the people are surveyed, and if any politician is below 40% popularity, they are ejected immediately. Alignment with any other politician should also be seen as a resignation or disqualification immediately. No parties, by threat of nullification of right to run at all. You run on policies. Simple enough.


Biomechanical freedom-of-form. If you want to holster a camera into your eye and use it to supplant your eye and replay moments literally then feel free, if you want to turn your finger into a taser, feel free. Transportation should be emphasized on the user-end and not the producer-end. All economic processes should be the same, consumer-focused and primarily an economy of consumption and focusing on the sacred, as all want to do.


You could see me as egoist-communist or simply degenerate communism, but I see this as a revelry, of form, function, and economics. We should allow for cybernetic decentralized planned economy, local representatives answering to survey and personal popular demand, assessed through cybernetics. The abolition of currency doesn’t need to exactly occur in order for the capital to become less emphasized, and the material and ethereal to become more valuable than value itself- we simply need to allow for those who have wished to revel to revel, and to allow for advance, and to extend our wants and loves and beliefs to those who we can provide with the means to build their own paths.


I believe in international cooperation but anti-imperial structure, not producing any materials for warfare for other countries, and not releasing excess energy through warfare, simply being a benefactor to states with similar interests or states that pledge to use it for ascendancy and infrastructure to better the society as a whole. To be benevolent, to talk softly and carry nothing, is to be shot… only for your house, your bloodline, to hunt the other to death with the big stick.

!

The primary aspect of existence and everything cannot be summated, and nor can my ideals. It makes it really interesting and often hard to write about things now, especially as I learn dislike of other people and respect for naught but the transcendent and love. I am a child of Acephale, of Thoreau, and of modern Communizers. I believe in the right of the worker to be, the right of life to become its own making, and the belief in love mystical and transcendent. I believe that having it all gets often boring, and providing everyone with whatever they want simply embodies the libidinal desire that becomes apathy to the material in moments, and manufactures in the mind the ability to drown the material man and find love in the poetry of man, woman, and all else, the nonliteral copulation of two or (if so inclined) more people. (of age and of their own free will.) A government that asks for minimum engagement and maximum transparency, a populace fed and well off universally, no longer caring about money because it is so universally given and material begins to become unstigmatized and unfavored, and it gives way to a wobble-to-the-feet of the cohabitation of all.

Think back to your formative moments- did you ever feel as apathetic as you do now? did you ever feel like you needed to repeat some action or take advantage of some thing to feel better about your situation? Most people didn't, some did. The point of this being, why do you think you feel so burned and burned out now, so fried and broken and over-underwhelmed? Is our system not unintuitive and horrifically material? Did you ever care about the material when you were a child? Did you think of anything at all when you imagined faraway places and built up your relationships with peers and family? Did you imagine you would ever feel like you do now? Did you ever care? To be who you are you must release the burden of false identity that society is now placing upon you; you must release the burden of "modern man" by clawing the webbing of the internet off of your body and finding yourself talking to those around you, who need it as much as you do. Find love outside of the material "give them flowers and chocolate," give them unconventional gifts, give them things like small weeds you dug out of the ground, let it grow out of control in a pot and take care of these problem plants. Build your own idea of comfort, and make your own culture outside of product, build your own life in a way that makes you feel fulfilled, make your own gods and games.

You don't owe anyone anything.

questions

Please put questions below. I will answer as fast as possible.

Influences

Primary

  • The Deer God
  • Various Metamodernists
  • Novalis
  • Bataille
  • Marx
  • Camus
  • Ccru
  • Derrida
  • Deleuze
  • Guattari
  • Ghost Mountain
  • Thoreau
  • 4lung
  • Rosa Luxemburg
  • Flower Bomb
  • Fumiko Kaneko
  • Hunter S. Thompson
  • Discordianism

Secondary

  • Fisher
  • Locke
  • Land
  • Meta-Nomad
  • Vonnegut
  • H.P. Lovecraft
  • Haunted Mound Hauntology
  • Huey Long

Relations

gooder

good

  • Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Rocksism - I like your ideals and thoughts a lot, while you do not fall completely into the Bataillean spirit of excess, I like your will to abolish that which causes issues for yourself and others, although I personally don't think negation like this is entirely possible, especially in a world with so much moving parts already. Anarchy was in demand, and now there's a plentiful enough supply of hot anarchy in the daily-life, but the demand has only tapered off. A rare gem among anarchists, but still an anarchist, which I absolutely acknowledge I very recently was.
  • Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Venatrixism - It's hard to rate your ideology since it's just a page of books, but I know where you're coming from, and I do like a lot of what you enjoy as well, but I've seen myself sort of move past anarchism, so I can't tell you how deeply we agree. So welcome to good tier, comrade, sorry I can't move you further up.
  • Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Great British New Left - King of The Anti-Nationalist Nationalist Club - Ah yes, Fisherite that doesn't really understand that the whole point of Fisher is the blunt futility of what he's attempting to do- which is precisely why I've come to the point of rejecting the "lost future" narrative. People try to "complete" the text on acid communism started by K-Punk, not realizing it is very much so a futile project. His death was a result of this "lost future" theory, at least in part, and your ideological existence is a paradox of pseudo-understanding and unintentional "metamodernism." Your ideology is a mess dressed up in the war-paints of the Fisher left- the accelerationists you don't care to even shake hands with. You pretend to be an intellectual, but find yourself suitably lacking of any interesting analysis. You are a situationist Corbynite techlover larping as a Fisherite. (no offense!) Where we agree is most definitely unintentional at worst and based in your very modernist analysis of Fisher at best. You find yourself not understanding Hauntology's roots, and not understanding your own supposed ideals.

eh

trash

brimmy