Shellshocked Communism

ABANDONED, SEE Nyhilism.

In Development "I'll stop reading eventually." - Left Communism This page is still in development due to ongoing reading by MEADOWSIN, multiple things may change drastically.

Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent MEADOWSIN's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

(////)

Shellshocked Communism
"It is time to abandon the world of the civilized and its light. It is to late to want to be reasonable and learned, which has led to a life without attractions. Secretly or not, it is necessary to become other, or else cease to be." - Georges Bataille
Basic Information
Aliases	Degenerate Communism Sacred Communism Bataillean Cybercommunism Add your own.
Alignments	not a postie
Ideological Influences
Influenced	Generouschalk0 thought (Anti-humanism)
Character Information
Song	Ghost Mountain (ft. Sematary) - Pain Omerta - Antiamorous

Revelry, Marx, Biomechanicalism

To build a world is not the function- to build a world is not the intention, to fly the flag of some “greater” power is not the intention, but to reestablish the true speaking voice of the unity in a surrounding swarm of partyism and worship of individuals as above one. I ask for a republic system in which regularly the people are surveyed, and if any politician is below 40% popularity, they are ejected immediately. Alignment with any other politician should also be seen as a resignation or disqualification immediately. No parties, by threat of nullification of right to run at all. You run on policies. Simple enough.

Biomechanical freedom-of-form. If you want to holster a camera into your eye and use it to supplant your eye and replay moments literally then feel free, if you want to turn your finger into a taser, feel free. Transportation should be emphasized on the user-end and not the producer-end. All economic processes should be the same, consumer-focused and primarily an economy of consumption and focusing on the sacred, as all want to do.

You could see me as egoist-communist or simply degenerate communism, but I see this as a revelry, of form, function, and economics. We should allow for cybernetic decentralized planned economy, local representatives answering to survey and personal popular demand, assessed through cybernetics. The abolition of currency doesn’t need to exactly occur in order for the capital to become less emphasized, and the material and ethereal to become more valuable than value itself- we simply need to allow for those who have wished to revel to revel, and to allow for advance, and to extend our wants and loves and beliefs to those who we can provide with the means to build their own paths.

I believe in international cooperation but anti-imperial structure, not producing any materials for warfare for other countries, and not releasing excess energy through warfare, simply being a benefactor to states with similar interests or states that pledge to use it for ascendancy and infrastructure to better the society as a whole. To be benevolent, to talk softly and carry nothing, is to be shot… only for your house, your bloodline, to hunt the other to death with the big stick.

!

The primary aspect of existence and everything cannot be summated, and nor can my ideals. It makes it really interesting and often hard to write about things now, especially as I learn dislike of other people and respect for naught but the transcendent and love. I am a child of Acephale, of Thoreau, and of modern Communizers. I believe in the right of the worker to be, the right of life to become its own making, and the belief in love mystical and transcendent. I believe that having it all gets often boring, and providing everyone with whatever they want simply embodies the libidinal desire that becomes apathy to the material in moments, and manufactures in the mind the ability to drown the material man and find love in the poetry of man, woman, and all else, the nonliteral copulation of two or (if so inclined) more people. (of age and of their own free will.) A government that asks for minimum engagement and maximum transparency, a populace fed and well off universally, no longer caring about money because it is so universally given and material begins to become unstigmatized and unfavored, and it gives way to a wobble-to-the-feet of the cohabitation of all.

Think back to your formative moments- did you ever feel as apathetic as you do now? did you ever feel like you needed to repeat some action or take advantage of some thing to feel better about your situation? Most people didn't, some did. The point of this being, why do you think you feel so burned and burned out now, so fried and broken and over-underwhelmed? Is our system not unintuitive and horrifically material? Did you ever care about the material when you were a child? Did you think of anything at all when you imagined faraway places and built up your relationships with peers and family? Did you imagine you would ever feel like you do now? Did you ever care? To be who you are you must release the burden of false identity that society is now placing upon you; you must release the burden of "modern man" by clawing the webbing of the internet off of your body and finding yourself talking to those around you, who need it as much as you do. Find love outside of the material "give them flowers and chocolate," give them unconventional gifts, give them things like small weeds you dug out of the ground, let it grow out of control in a pot and take care of these problem plants. Build your own idea of comfort, and make your own culture outside of product, build your own life in a way that makes you feel fulfilled, make your own gods and games.

You don't owe anyone anything.

questions

Please put questions below. I will answer as fast as possible.

Influences

Primary

• The Deer God
• Various Metamodernists
• Novalis
• Bataille
• Marx
• Camus
• Ccru
• Derrida
• Deleuze
• Guattari
• Ghost Mountain
• Thoreau
• 4lung
• Rosa Luxemburg
• Flower Bomb
• Fumiko Kaneko
• Hunter S. Thompson
• Discordianism

Secondary

• Fisher
• Locke
• Land
• Meta-Nomad
• Vonnegut
• H.P. Lovecraft
• Haunted Mound Hauntology
• Huey Long

Relations

good

• Rocksism - I like your ideals and thoughts a lot, while you do not fall completely into the Bataillean spirit of excess, I like your will to abolish that which causes issues for yourself and others, although I personally don't think negation like this is entirely possible, especially in a world with so much moving parts already. Anarchy was in demand, and now there's a plentiful enough supply of hot anarchy in the daily-life, but the demand has only tapered off. A rare gem among anarchists, but still an anarchist, which I absolutely acknowledge I very recently was.
• Venatrixism - It's hard to rate your ideology since it's just a page of books, but I know where you're coming from, and I do like a lot of what you enjoy as well, but I've seen myself sort of move past anarchism, so I can't tell you how deeply we agree. So welcome to good tier, comrade, sorry I can't move you further up.
•  Great British New Left - King of The Anti-Nationalist Nationalist Club - Ah yes, Fisherite that doesn't really understand that the whole point of Fisher is the blunt futility of what he's attempting to do- which is precisely why I've come to the point of rejecting the "lost future" narrative. People try to "complete" the text on acid communism started by K-Punk, not realizing it is very much so a futile project. His death was a result of this "lost future" theory, at least in part, and your ideological existence is a paradox of pseudo-understanding and unintentional "metamodernism." Your ideology is a mess dressed up in the war-paints of the Fisher left- the accelerationists you don't care to even shake hands with. You pretend to be an intellectual, but find yourself suitably lacking of any interesting analysis. You are a situationist Corbynite techlover larping as a Fisherite. (no offense!) Where we agree is most definitely unintentional at worst and based in your very modernist analysis of Fisher at best. You find yourself not understanding Hauntology's roots, and not understanding your own supposed ideals.

brimmy

• Nuriskianism - No, just no. I appreciate the offer though. Duginite, Zizekian, et cetera.
• Evenoskyism - I could say the same about you, but I don't think you even present yourself well. Thank you for what little scrap you toss me though, didn't even expect that.