User:MaîtreCorbeau: Difference between revisions

Help

Revision as of 03:20, 4 February 2021

Français. Anarchiste de droite.

247.997x247.997px

Open-minded. Confirmation bias is the worst enemy. I do not yet have a precise ideology.

Mutualism Distributism : Excellent economic and societal ideas.
Aristocracy Noocracy Technocracy : The best leaders.
Cultural Nationalism Classical Conservatism : The best for society and my country. Values based on ancient Greece and Catholicism.
Transhumanism Environmentalism Agrarianism : Preservation of nature, farmers, traditional landscapes and ecology combined with technological progress. Eugenism is great if it's for improvement only.

Traditionalism : Long live traditional societal and social values, refinement, virtue, language, and art, but not death penalty, coercion, unwarranted authority, populism, or religious dogmatism. I don't necessarily like social conventions, but they are important to maintain a healthy social structure.
Nationalism : Vive la France, but not chauvinism, racism or ultranationalism.
Integral Nationalism : Many good ideas. Great system overall. Not sure about the King.
National-Anarchism Anarcho-Conservatism : Almost me !
Guild Socialism Georgism : Great ideas.

Anarchism : Very great ideas but too populist and ideologically progressive. Not all hierarchies and authorities are bad, especially for the mob. Uncertain about the total abolition of the state.
Libertarian Socialism : Good, perhaps too egalitarian and collectivist, especially anarcho-communism, which is also too progressivist.
Market Socialism : Incomplete and perfectible.
Conservative Liberalism National Liberalism : The least worst among the most realistic at the moment. France has a very bad administration and too many taxes, especially for small entrepreneurship.
Democracy : Better than an oligarchy or a corrupt dictatorship, but inefficient if the people are not educated enough, and presents the problem of the tyranny of the majority. Direct democracy is superior to representative democracy, which is often corrupt and demagogic.
File:Enlightnenment.png Enlightenment : In spite of all the bad aspects and what came out of it, gave birth to very great philosophers and a positive return to reason and some progressive and emancipatory aspects.
Bonapartism : Vive l'Empereur !

Fascism : Some good ideas but present risks of corruption, censorship and excessive tyranny and coercion, and sometimes too populist and violent. Too extreme.
Capitalism : Private property and small businesses is a good thing, not monopolies, wages, bullshit jobs, consumerism, nihilism and the pursuit of profit and distractions rather than achievement. Will probably collapse.
Marxism–Leninism : Good analysis but too egalitarian, want to abolish private property and presents risks of dictatorship. Gave birth to the USSR.
Progressivism : Some good ideas (like the legalization of euthanasia and basic tolerance towards LGBT and non-white people, also the importance of rehabilitation), but remains the founder of nihilism, post-modernism and mediocrity. Most of them abandoned the proletariat in favor of cultural marxism. Also hypocritically defended by the bourgeois.
Neoconservatism : All the bad aspects of conservatism. Stupid and dogmatic.
Alt-Right : Stupid, biased, populist, vulgar and falsely virile. Still better than antifas, and the redpill ideology is not bad for the actual system.
Republicanism : Mediocre, leftist, populist and corrupted.
Laicism : Not all religions correspond to the culture of my country, and some are even incompatible with the values of my country. At least it is incompatible with Islamism and it prevent religious obscurantism.
Jacobinism : The worst.

Oligarchy : The current system, the reign of corruption.
State Capitalism : Collectivist dystopia.
Antifa : Degenerate.
Ochlocracy : No.
Zionism Islamic Theocracy : Not in my country. I want only pagans, catholics and Primordial Tradition. Paganism is better than christianism since it worships nature and not an illusory higher world, but it can be problematic if it overshadows science. Catholicism can also be too intolerant, or based on slave morality.

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 *[[File:Fash.png|link=https://polcompball.fandom.com/wiki/File:Fash.png]] [[Fascism]] : Some good ideas but present risks of corruption, censorship and excessive tyranny and coercion, and sometimes too populist and violent. Too extreme.
-*[[File:Cap.png|link=https://polcompball.fandom.com/wiki/File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism]] : Private property and small businesses is a good thing, not monopolies, wages, bullshit jobs, consumerism, nihilism and the pursuit of profit and distractions rather than achievement.
+*[[File:Cap.png|link=https://polcompball.fandom.com/wiki/File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism]] : Private property and small businesses is a good thing, not monopolies, wages, bullshit jobs, consumerism, nihilism and the pursuit of profit and distractions rather than achievement. Will probably collapse.
 *[[File:ML.png|link=https://polcompball.fandom.com/wiki/File:ML.png]] [[Marxism–Leninism]] : Good analysis but too egalitarian, want to abolish private property and presents risks of dictatorship. Gave birth to the USSR.
 * [[File:Prog.png|link=https://polcompball.fandom.com/wiki/File:Prog.png]] [[Progressivism]] : Some good ideas (like the legalization of euthanasia and basic tolerance towards LGBT and non-white people, also the importance of rehabilitation), but remains the founder of nihilism, post-modernism and mediocrity. Most of them abandoned the proletariat in favor of cultural marxism. Also hypocritically defended by the bourgeois.