imported>Tomjazzy mNo edit summary |
imported>BeryAb No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*{{Comment|Tomjazzy|Is it though? I'll give you, the examples given are pretty incoherent, but I think it's technically possible (at least in theory) for someone to try and achieve Socialism without going outside the bounds of a liberal democracy; give more tax breaks and subsidies to coops, only nationalize as far as you're average soc dem would, ect. Probably wouldn't work tho}} | *{{Comment|Tomjazzy|Is it though? I'll give you, the examples given are pretty incoherent, but I think it's technically possible (at least in theory) for someone to try and achieve Socialism without going outside the bounds of a liberal democracy; give more tax breaks and subsidies to coops, only nationalize as far as you're average soc dem would, ect. Probably wouldn't work tho}} | ||
**{{Comment|{{UserBeryAb}}|The ideology itself is no contradiction. It would work in practice, it's essentially a brand of democratic socialism. But it simply wouldn't be "liberal" any longer. A core liberal value is the right to property, something that socialists aren't known to value.}} | |||
Revision as of 03:48, 30 December 2021
What's the actual difference between this and Socdem anyways? - Neoconfemboy