Am m Refutes All Your Points

Try to convince me of anything and I will try to refute your point, feel free to suggest categories in the comments

Example

• - I believe in x opinion.
  • - Why x opinion is bad.
    • - Ok

Economics

• - Refute all of my Economic Policies
  • - Neoliberalism maximises suffering and decadence more than any other time or country in human history (except maybe Pol Pot Cambodia or Maoist China), therefore, it is an objectively terrible economic system
    • - Have you actually read my economic policies? i know that Neoliberalism isn't aways good, that's why i would use Essential regulations, Better Land management and Welfare to minimize it's bad effects while maintaning it's good parts.

Social

• - chud rights are human rights
  • - Human rights are not implicit within even any religion or atheist beliefs therefore they don’t exist therefore nothing can be human rights
    • - All humans (whites) are children of God and as such should be treated with grace and dignity also, chud power!!!!!!
      • - Grace and dignity aren’t human rights
•  Comrade Phil Thought - Progressivism is bourgeiose and capitalist. I mean look at companies during pride month (and in recent years, year round). Social progressivism is capitalism decaying.
  • - I agree with you, but I have to refute your point so: Communist countries such as Maoist China were revprog, so progressivism isn't inherently capitalistic.

Philosophical

• - God never existed.
  • - I’d say this would go more in “Religious” but whatever. Everything must come from something, which leads to the natural conclusion that there is an infinitely powerful force which everything came from - a God.

Religious

• - Jews le bad
  • - I have met Jews in real life and they are not le bad
    • - But but Jews control world governments n sheet
      • - There are two Jew world leaders out of 212 (including unrecognised countries) as far as I know, which is 0.94% of world governments
• - Perennialism is true
  • - If multiple religions claim to be the singular correct religion, then they can't all be correct, by definition

Other

• File:FemtopiaIcon.png - I am actually female, and I am not 16384. 16384 is not rejoining fpcb ever.
  • - I mean it's already been proven that you are 16384 so it's not really an arguable point to say that you're not. Although, I wouldn't be surprised if KK started larping as you, but you for sure are an alt of someone.
    • File:FemtopiaIcon.png - Where is the proof that I am 16384? I am not an alt of anyone.
      • - You already admitted as such, you added the LARP and Joke templates to your original page under your original account, with your name on the templates (e.g. This is a LARP made by Person16384).
        • File:FemtopiaIcon.png - How do you not know 16384 was not just putting the larp and joke templates on there to make people think I am 16384?
          • - There is no rational reason that you would do that.
            • File:FemtopiaIcon.png - 16384 could be doing it for the lulz. And besides, how can you tell that 16384 isn't a woman?
              • - You have said you are a man, and I believe you, 16384ism seemed real and legitimate. Anyway, two other things I found that give you away: 1. How would you know that you're not coming back and 2. Your pfp on Starbucks Nationalism is so obviously AI-generated it's not even funny. And besides all that - you've never been known to do anything for the lulz. And why wouldn't you revert it anyway?
                • File:FemtopiaIcon.png - How do you know 16384 doesn't do anything for the lulz? Also, explain how my portrait was supposedly ai-generated. And just because 16384 SAID he was a man does not mean he is a man. Do you think 16384 acts masculine or smth like that? Because I do not act masculine one bit.
                  • - 1. I know you, you can’t fool me 2. If you look even for 5 seconds it clearly isn’t real 3. You, do, in fact, act masculine, just not on this account. Also address my other two points.
• File:FemtopiaIcon.png - Anyway, 1. 16384 is not coming back.because he said it. And 2, you need actual proof it isn't real, instead of saying "lOoK, iT's An Ai" 3. We barely met and you accuse me of being someone I am not. 4. I do not, in fact, act in any way like a man. (I have to start a new bullet hierarchy because it was running out of room.)
  • - 1. KK left and came back 2. No one can provide physical proof but I am using common sense 3. I like my wikis without larping and unfunny trolls 4. You do in your 16384 persona
    • File:FemtopiaIcon.png - Honestly, I am done with your MANSPLAINING, and you need to learn to become more empathic to women like me, and not accuse them of being men larping as women.
•  Comrade Phil Thought - If America can invade Iraq twice for no reason, and Israel occupy Palestine, then Russia is completely right and justified to perform a special military operation in Ukraine.
  • - I agree with you but I have to refute your point, so: Wars doesn't justify other wars, the pretext for war can't be another war but a valid and legitimate reason, besides Ukraine isn't the USA even though they are allies
• File:FemtopiaIcon.png - Men all have an iq of 15.
  • - Not to brag but my father (a man) has an IQ of ~140, also the majority of the smartest recorded people in human history are men.
    • File:FemtopiaIcon.png - OK, but your mother's iq is probably like 175 or smth. Also, most sub-70 iq people are men.