(→State) |
(→State) |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
**[[File:AmmGlowup.gif]] - Smelling bad is bad therefore they should not run the government | **[[File:AmmGlowup.gif]] - Smelling bad is bad therefore they should not run the government | ||
*{{Merid}} - my gay uncle, Benjamin Hood should lead the entire world under a one world am m government | *{{Merid}} - my gay uncle, Benjamin Hood should lead the entire world under a one world am m government | ||
**[[File:AmmGlowup.gif]] - He would get inevitably couped and replaced with a shit world leader, therefore this would be bad | |||
==Nation== | ==Nation== |
Revision as of 05:08, 11 October 2023
Try to convince me of anything and I will try to refute your point, feel free to suggest categories in the comments. Also all alts are hereby banned.
Example
Economics
- - Refute all of my Economic Policies
- - Neoliberalism maximises suffering and decadence more than any other time or country in human history (except maybe Pol Pot Cambodia or Maoist China), therefore, it is an objectively terrible economic system
- - Have you actually read my economic policies? i know that Neoliberalism isn't aways good, that's why i would use Essential regulations, Better Land management and Welfare to minimize it's bad effects while maintaning it's good parts.
- - Neoliberalism maximises suffering and decadence more than any other time or country in human history (except maybe Pol Pot Cambodia or Maoist China), therefore, it is an objectively terrible economic system
State
- - The government should be run by those who smell the worst
- Venatrixism - my gay uncle, Benjamin Hood should lead the entire world under a one world am m government
Nation
Social
- - chud rights are human rights
- Comrade Phil Thought - Progressivism is bourgeiose and capitalist. I mean look at companies during pride month (and in recent years, year round). Social progressivism is capitalism decaying.
- - I agree with you, but I have to refute your point so: Wannabe communist countries such as Maoist China were revprog, so progressivism isn't inherently capitalistic.
- Borker >Communists
>Mao
lol- - Dengism isn't Maoism, Mao actually implemented some communist policies such as collective meals, ofc he wasn't perfectly communist but closer than most and that was his goal
- Borker He wasn’t really ever a communist, the 1954 Chinese Constitution explicitly protects private property and ownership over the means of production.
- - Dengism isn't Maoism, Mao actually implemented some communist policies such as collective meals, ofc he wasn't perfectly communist but closer than most and that was his goal
- Borker >Communists
- - I agree with you, but I have to refute your point so: Wannabe communist countries such as Maoist China were revprog, so progressivism isn't inherently capitalistic.
- - Gives an argument against my Philosophy
Technology
Philosophical
Religious
Other
- Comrade Phil Thought - If America can invade Iraq twice for no reason, and Israel occupy Palestine, then Russia is completely right and justified to perform a special military operation in Ukraine.