×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,519 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Hysteria Thought: Difference between revisions

Line 89: Line 89:
===Why market?===
===Why market?===


The following information will be based mainly on Hayekism and on several more ideas of thought of Austrian economics, however my actual views are slightly different and will be described in other points, but this is enough to understand why I generally support right-wing economics. The first argument for me can be considered that the market provides a synthesis of ultimate knowledge with an abstract limit. First, individual knowledge of the peculiarities of the conditions of time, place and course of action is understood. The passing part of such information is unformalized and non-verbalizable, and cannot be expressed in words or any other symbols. Remaining implicit, it includes practical skills and abilities, experience and craftsmanship, professional techniques and habits. Another one provides “local” knowledge - its transience: many favorable opportunities open to an individual who exists only here and now, and if they are not taken advantage of immediately, they will be missed forever.
The following information will be based mainly on Hayekism and on several more ideas of thought of Austrian economics, however my actual views are slightly different and will be described in other points, but this is enough to understand why I generally support right-wing economics. The first argument for me can be considered that the market provides a synthesis of ultimate knowledge with an abstract limit. First, individual knowledge of the peculiarities of the conditions of time, place and course of action is understood. The passing part of such information is unformalized and non-verbalizable, and cannot be expressed in words or any other symbols. Remaining implicit, it includes practical skills and abilities, experience and craftsmanship, professional techniques and habits. Another one provides “local” knowledge - its transience: many favorable opportunities open to an individual who exists only here and now, and if they are not taken advantage of immediately, they will be missed forever. But it is the ability to take advantage of the unique opportunities of time and place that ultimately determines success in any business and provides individual advantages in labor productivity. The market creates conditions for the effective use of all this personal knowledge, giving the right to dispose of it to its bearers themselves. This, however, is not enough. It is also necessary to create conditions for coordinating disparate knowledge scattered among many individuals, which is impossible without providing them with generalized information about the state of the entire system. Prices act as clusters of such abstract information. In a condensed form, they contain information about the preferences, production capabilities and future plans of market participants, thereby helping each of them to fit their specific knowledge into the general knowledge sharing system.Although the coordination achieved through price signals is far from flawless, it is accomplished well enough to be considered a “miracle.” This word need to emphasize that no other mechanism - including the mechanism of central planning - is capable of producing the results provided by the market. The decisive argument in favor of capitalism is epistemological: a competitive market allows for more efficient use of a greater amount of knowledge dispersed among members of a modern complex society who, as a rule, have no idea about each other than any alternative system. Next I would like to say that To make rational economic decisions (that is, achieve the best results at the lowest cost), you need to know the prices (mind assistants). Without prices, it is impossible to calculate profits and costs, and therefore it is impossible to know whether a particular set of resources produces a product that has the highest value. “Where there is no market, there is no price system, and where there is no price system, there can be no economic calculation.” In the absence of prices and a common denominator in which they can be expressed, society is doomed to “calculation chaos.” The experience of Soviet “war communism” became a kind of experimental confirmation of this thesis.Besides “planometric” scheme is untenable primarily because it leaves unanswered the question of how the entire relevant amount of knowledge is supposed to be concentrated in the center. After all, the “imitation” of the work of the market by planning authorities could begin only after receiving all the information necessary for this. But its most important part is tacit, personal knowledge. Such knowledge, by definition, cannot be formalized and transferred. In addition, agile solutions are required to adapt to constantly changing conditions. But there can be no question of any efficiency when information about the changes that have taken place will first have to be transmitted to the top, and then wait for instructions on how to act.

Revision as of 22:42, 13 December 2023

Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Hysteria's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

Work in Progress
"I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism

This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details.




Hysteria Thought or Hysteriaism t̂hͧ̒ǐͬs ̫̚is̰̍ ͍̆̌a̬n̑ͪ ̯ͫ͌ö́͆m̘niͅ-̂͊of̒f̗̐-א͕ͮ-̅̂c̰ȍ͊mͮ̉p̻a͊̇s̈̓s̆ ͬs̺̋̄c̝h͋ͨiz̥̈̂oͯͭ-̞̌iͦ̉d̜̒e̫o̗l̩ő̎g͔y̥̓ ̳̈͛t̗ͫ̄ĥͤa͉ͨt͎͂̾ ̐̓i̔ͅs̄ ̺͆be͈y̬̑̀on͇ͧd ̾ͦa̘̓ͨl͚ͮ̎l̈̑ ͋p͇ͥoͦ̔ss̖i͙̎̾b̚l̲ͮ̾ẽ̓ ̖̋ͤḁͨn̟d̦ͯ̒ ͔̏i͓̅mp̲ö́ŝ̻ͭs̀͋ȋ͚b̅͋l̪ḙ l͈i̙mị͂ts͍ ͎ͨ̚o͇ͯf̟ ͚poͣ̋ḻi̿ͤt͍̽͂ḯ͈c̎a̺̔̆l ̪ex̻͒ͮi̲ͪs̆͒t̳͂e͑̚n̪cͯ́e̯̓, ̱ͯ͐b̼e͚ÿ́̚o̽nͧ̏d̳ ̗t̬ḧ͂e̔ ͦͧun̫͗d̜͌ͦerͫst̄a̰n̑̅d̊i̲ͭn̯g̅ ͫ̽oͦf̹͛ ̌͗e̿̐v͒e͕ͥͣn ͋͋m̓ul̬̒t̬i̝d̟i͆̐m̱̑enͧ̔s̄i͙o̚nal͍ ͊ḃ̟e͂̂ȋngͧ̿sͤ.̩̅ͨ

overview

PERALIPSYS

The ideas of Hysteria are as absurd as they are indescribable. For indescribability and inaccessibility to the occupation of other people's thoughts makes it itself. Hysteria thought is afraid of foreign intrusion of words and ideas into infinite consciousness, so one can only guess what goals command this essence...However, it can be said that the Thought of Hysteria stands for the absolute hypothetical creative and for the abolition of familiarity in all its understanding.

Thassaria

Thassaria or Thassaria Hypothesis represents macroextension global relativity theory of logic by Jean Da Faldier. According to the doctrine, she is nothing more than rational astilla, powerful and timeless comfort system. It is distinguished by the "shadow of ideas", abstract but at the same time free in interpretation and somehow reproduced in our world through a prism. This distinguishes it from other more fundamental features of ideology because by definition they cannot be realized even so.

Epaliph of Mind

This is something that evokes purely associative feelings... it seems to me that a m̸̡ͮ̋ͦ̿̀ͣͭͪ̾̀͘͢͠͡͝͝ú̴̦͎̠̞͈͍͉̠̠̞̰̤̃̀ͬ͒̄ͨ̌ͅl̸̴̵̢̦̲̯ͯ͂͗ͫ̾̊̈́̈́͊̏ͤ͒̃̉ͭͥ̉̄̀́̚̕͜͟͢͝͡͏̢̡ṭ̷̨̘̭̻̠̗̮̳̮̤͉̠̹̟̂̅͒̃̑̈ͭ͛̕͜͡͝͝͞ͅ͏̀i̤̳̥͚̟̞̝̪̺̰͉̯̳̬̦̅ͧ̽̀́͝͞҉͘҉̷̴́̀͠ḏ̴̸̴̷̡̡͖͔͙̬̼̫̜͇̟̩̝̽̔̽̊̌ͦ͌̽̂͑̇̌̀͘̕͜͢͠͡͡͝ḭ̵̧̧̙̥̩̰̱̟̤̻̦̩̯̈́̏ͦ̑̿̊̏̋̀̓̋̈̆͂̕͟͜͞͠͝͝͏̵͡͞͡m̵̸̷̸̵̡̧̢̟̱͙͖̭̮̰̫̼̫̰̙̜̙̙̖̮̼͈ͨͮ̿ͫ͂̃͂ͯ̒ͭ́̾̅̈́̅ͯ͐́́̀͘͡͞͝͠e̸͚̟̝͔͚̫̝̺̗̺̭̼̹͈̝͔͇̪̓̆̔ͤͮ̓̅̇͐ͨͯ̆̿͘ͅ҉̵̵̴̛͟͢͝͡͏̵̸́͡n̴̸̷̷̶̸̸̡̢̛̛̪̭̖̰͚̥̝̞̹͓͙̱̹͉̳ͤͬ͗ͦ̂ͩ͊͛ͥ͆̕͟͢͞s͓̹̯̻̦͕͙͍͖̼͙͚̎̒̋ͣͯ̄ͭ̈ͯ͑͌̐̔͆ͤḭ̶̴̷̧͉̼̤̞͍͎͎̲̫̜̫̽ͫ͋͂̃ͮ̃̽ͮ̂̓̑̓̀͢͞͠͡͏͟͝͝҉̀ó̴̵̻͉̻̗̬̘̗̘̠̬̫̘̮̉̓͌̇̄̄ͫ̂̈́ͅ҉̵̡̛͢͟͏̷̨͏̶́̀͘͟͝͡n͕͖͓̝͎̳̣̞͚̟̞̥̦̥̓̆ͮ̽̎ͤ̃͋̈ͩͭͩ͛ͣ̈́ͫ̌͌ͅ͏̡̀ă̸̷̗͍̻͔̟̠̼̭̠̭̠̰ͮ̾̿͋̅͑͐̎ͧ̀̽͑̄ͥ̾̽́͢͡l̘̮͉̥̭̹̫͚̝̹̭̪̥̰̤͍̹̫̜ͤͮ̈̈́̓̑̽ͫ͋̎̆ͮ̂͂͐̀̚͟҉͠҉̵͜ ̶̴̸̷̨̗̱̜̯͉͍̹̠̠̱̰ͣ̂̿̓̆ͤ̑͒̊ͣ̊͊͒͊̚͟͜͠ͅ͏̶̷̛̕̕͠͞͡ entity has started up in my in my mind...I hear a voice calling for action and coercion... and it seems to me that now this multidimensional one is in my power and it breeds in the diversity and singularity of ideas.

Oh... If only I knew what it was, if only someone other than me could feel her presence in head...What is this? A new disease, an astral parasite or a broken fabric of existence that is exactly like the singularity of the melting sky, marking the end of everything familiar...

Continitalism

Every person interested in politics or philosophy is in one way or another interested in politics and philosophy. But if he has a sufficient number of understandable particles within himself, in the long term he could still be adherent of the same psychosystem. At the same time, there is...another path, which lies in the plane of heavy substances and sincere fantasy. It is when a person dissolves and begins to devote himself to the search for new knowledge in the fundamentally previously unknown, he becomes a continintalist. Fundamentally, a person stands at a fork in ever-increasing paths of thinking and new ideas, eventually until they absorb him completely. But having curbed this power, you will clearly be unattainable in the circulation of the mind and hypothetical generation

Chuchareanic Theocracy

An ideology that has emerged from the crowds of sick minds, the purpose of which is to establish a serene and theoretically endless creative absolute, the power given by the Mother of the All-Containing Being, in the territories of the entire space of space and the extermination in a bloody battle of all the creations of the wormhole. Using ideas that are described in the dream diaries of those enslaved by fantasy, she rejects the postulates of religions in the usual sense, instead giving preference to freedom of expression in all the glory of its manifestation, be it the psychosis of a sick schizophrenic or the systematic dissertation of a scientist. Here structure and post-structure, ideas and thoughts, logic and surrealism, war concept and enslavement of hakuna are intertwined, changing to the chaotic songs from the palaces of distant, indescribable Lidyah. In different years of its existence, this term united both creative circles and entire terrorist sects. But despite all the differences that, like an abyss, do not allow the Chucharians to be united, there is only one similarity between them - their faith, which lies in identifying the very act of creating, in all its indescribable power, with something that is precisely beyond terms, but in the same time, for us, in a simplified way, is called the living mind or Mother and which is opposed to the Wormhole, some form of the complete opposite of Chucha, or absolute destructiveness. The Chucharean society is a society of creative creators who in this can raise their sword against the actions of any other driving force that can disrupt or completely destroy humanity in the event of a centuries-old creative process that occurs naturally. The difference in the Chucharians' approaches to responding to aggression is fundamentally different; everyone believes that it is necessary to accept humility, and they are ready to declare endless war on all their enemies with their faith. Culturally, the Chuchareans are also heterogeneous, because in religion there is no framework and, as such, a moral basis, thus giving the opportunity to their different branches to produce what they consider best for themselves and their loved ones. Chucharenism believes that cultures, like the eternal battlefield of thought, are constantly changing and taking on previously unseen forms, but at the same time constantly progressing, thus constantly abolishing the concept of the “dark age”, leading humanity to victory through art.The Chucharean Church advocates in the long term for the complete destruction of the economy and the transition to creating everything that a person can imagine out of nothing, but in the short term they see salvation in a form of economy that will not interfere with their personal lives, but at the same time give absolute will, This understanding may include various types of libertarian schools of thought, including their synthesized versions or new reinterpreted ones. For most Chucharians, the market is like a canvas, where every creative person can receive a well-deserved reward, because the market itself is a kind of art.

Hypsoleptic thought

On the day when the Grail protocol is launched, the sun will fall from the sky and lead us through the boring swamps. Passing edge after edge, she will take us to Tocheon alive, where we part with the flesh of thoughts. And when the steps dissolve in this madness of the march of souls and minds of people. This is a hymn, the apogee of tachestic and psychoanalytic ideas that in the end achieves development and detachment from everything that came before. The sword will hit the river Gamora and the garden of unprecedented plants will fall into small fragments. This is how the whole world will be. Ethereal but full of struggle and will alien to us today and thoughts inconceivable oceans.

The web of dreams will spread with the march of the Gods, the march of the fatherland. With her the flames of pride will dissolve and the banners will fly. Every sighted person will be beheaded and every blind person will be enlightened. Farther and farther the formidable campaign goes, dissolving the hungry walls into a mad rush of lines and reason.

Economy

Overview

My economic views are based mainly on the works of the neoclassical school, as well as the Austrian, as well as several others, but I am not used to associating myself with any of them to specifically. I prefer to take inspiration from there and change it in my head, but on the basis I believe that the market is one of the keys to freeing a person from the shackles of existence. There can be no individual freedom without economic freedom. Therefore, I absolutely do not tolerate all left-wing forms of economics, except perhaps //left-wing market anarchists or lovers of the gift economy. However, in a developed society nothing else can exist except a stateless market.

Why market?

The following information will be based mainly on Hayekism and on several more ideas of thought of Austrian economics, however my actual views are slightly different and will be described in other points, but this is enough to understand why I generally support right-wing economics. The first argument for me can be considered that the market provides a synthesis of ultimate knowledge with an abstract limit. First, individual knowledge of the peculiarities of the conditions of time, place and course of action is understood. The passing part of such information is unformalized and non-verbalizable, and cannot be expressed in words or any other symbols. Remaining implicit, it includes practical skills and abilities, experience and craftsmanship, professional techniques and habits. Another one provides “local” knowledge - its transience: many favorable opportunities open to an individual who exists only here and now, and if they are not taken advantage of immediately, they will be missed forever. But it is the ability to take advantage of the unique opportunities of time and place that ultimately determines success in any business and provides individual advantages in labor productivity. The market creates conditions for the effective use of all this personal knowledge, giving the right to dispose of it to its bearers themselves. This, however, is not enough. It is also necessary to create conditions for coordinating disparate knowledge scattered among many individuals, which is impossible without providing them with generalized information about the state of the entire system. Prices act as clusters of such abstract information. In a condensed form, they contain information about the preferences, production capabilities and future plans of market participants, thereby helping each of them to fit their specific knowledge into the general knowledge sharing system.Although the coordination achieved through price signals is far from flawless, it is accomplished well enough to be considered a “miracle.” This word need to emphasize that no other mechanism - including the mechanism of central planning - is capable of producing the results provided by the market. The decisive argument in favor of capitalism is epistemological: a competitive market allows for more efficient use of a greater amount of knowledge dispersed among members of a modern complex society who, as a rule, have no idea about each other than any alternative system. Next I would like to say that To make rational economic decisions (that is, achieve the best results at the lowest cost), you need to know the prices (mind assistants). Without prices, it is impossible to calculate profits and costs, and therefore it is impossible to know whether a particular set of resources produces a product that has the highest value. “Where there is no market, there is no price system, and where there is no price system, there can be no economic calculation.” In the absence of prices and a common denominator in which they can be expressed, society is doomed to “calculation chaos.” The experience of Soviet “war communism” became a kind of experimental confirmation of this thesis.Besides “planometric” scheme is untenable primarily because it leaves unanswered the question of how the entire relevant amount of knowledge is supposed to be concentrated in the center. After all, the “imitation” of the work of the market by planning authorities could begin only after receiving all the information necessary for this. But its most important part is tacit, personal knowledge. Such knowledge, by definition, cannot be formalized and transferred. In addition, agile solutions are required to adapt to constantly changing conditions. But there can be no question of any efficiency when information about the changes that have taken place will first have to be transmitted to the top, and then wait for instructions on how to act.

Recent changes

  • Nebeler • 6 minutes ago
  • Nebeler • 14 minutes ago
  • Nebeler • 16 minutes ago
  • Nebeler • 16 minutes ago