Abacus13072 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Abacus13072 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
'''I will not add anyone until I have completed my description.''' | '''I will not add anyone until I have completed my description.''' | ||
([[File: | ([[File: AnCom.png]]) <br> <br> Due to lack of reading so far, my entire and total political view is [[file: kropotkin.png]] Kropotkin, however when I get round to reading more political theory, I will update this page. If I get around to doing that. <br> <br> '''This page is unfinished and needs improvement later on''' <br> <br> <br> | ||
I believe in a form of mutual-aid anarchism, and wish to establish a society based on cooperation, decentralization and the rejection of authority. | I believe in a form of mutual-aid anarchism, and wish to establish a society based on cooperation, decentralization and the rejection of authority. | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
I argue for the [[File: awaj.png]] abolition of the state, as a [[File: unitary.png]] centralized state necessarily perpetuates injustice and hinders individual freedoms. Instead, a believe in a form of decentralized self-governance through [[File: local.png]] local, autonomous communities. This is called "[[File: awaj.png]] [[Anarchism}}". <br> <br> | I argue for the [[File: awaj.png]] abolition of the state, as a [[File: unitary.png]] centralized state necessarily perpetuates injustice and hinders individual freedoms. Instead, a believe in a form of decentralized self-governance through [[File: local.png]] local, autonomous communities. This is called "[[File: awaj.png]] [[Anarchism}}". <br> <br> | ||
One key problem with a [[File: Unity.png]] centralized state is it means the power is concentrated in the hands of a few: meaning, necessarily, people would be unfairly represented and decisions would be made in the favour of a few rather than for everyone. Not only that, this leads to the exploitation of those below | One key problem with a [[File: Unity.png]] centralized state is it means the power is concentrated in the hands of a few: meaning, necessarily, people would be unfairly represented and decisions would be made in the favour of a few rather than for everyone. Not only that, this leads to the exploitation of those below to remain in power (since the state is a hierarchy), and the entire system can easily be exploited resulting in injustices, particularly against those not needed to stay in power. Not only that, the state either/both relies on coercion or force that leads to the restriction of individual freedoms by imposing a strict set of rules and regulations that sometimes does not align with the diverse need and values of communities. <br> <br> | ||
Even more, usually the state particularly serve the [[File: pluto.png]] [[File: plutocrat.png]] ruling elite and therefore contributing to economic inequality. Through a variety of systems, the state helps in perpetuating inequality, also limiting individual systems (a poor person cannot afford luxuries, therefore cannot do as they want) | |||
Revision as of 00:11, 3 January 2024
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Abacus13072's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
 |
Work in Progress "I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details. |
I will not add anyone until I have completed my description.
(File:AnCom.png)
Due to lack of reading so far, my entire and total political view is 
Kropotkin, however when I get round to reading more political theory, I will update this page. If I get around to doing that.
This page is unfinished and needs improvement later on
I believe in a form of mutual-aid anarchism, and wish to establish a society based on cooperation, decentralization and the rejection of authority.
BELIEFS
MUTUAL AID
Mutual aid is a fundamental principle for human societies, and cooperation / solidarity among humans, and a number of animals, were crucial for survival and process. As Kropotkin shows in his book Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution, mutual aid was a core factor for evolution rather than ruthless competition (which 
Social Darwinists argue was the core factor of evolution.)
Despite this, I also believe that survival of the fittest, while not the only factor, was also a large factor of evolution: roughly equally as large as mutual aid. For example, while early tribes did work on an egalitarian basis, they also developed and survived through conflict: as one tribe sought to top the other, they evolved quickly (despite this, the evolution could not have happened if not everybody within the tribe agreed to help, and if they did not also gather supplies from other tribes when in need). Not only that, intertribal and interspecies conflicts have existed, and also played a valuable and important role to evolution, despite (and oftentimes along with) the value of mutual aid.
Despite this I believe mutual aid across humanity is not only possible but important for the further progression of human society: I believe we are at a stage where the elimination of 
Darwinist ideas is not only possible, but essential.
MUTUAL AID IN NATURE
In Kropotkin's book Mutual Aid, he highlights a number of cases in nature where mutual aid existed and animals collaborated within the animal kingdom, and concluded that the general concept of "survival of the fittest" was not the main factor in evolution: and I agree with the idea that mutual aid was one of the main factors of evolution. My evidence for his claim is in his book. However I also argue that, throughout evolution, conflict between species, and, even, between "primal tribes" (groups of animals co-operating for a reward: examples of mutual aid) was an equally important reason for evolution.
HISTORICAL EXAMPLES
Further in Kropotkin's Mutual Aid, he looked at historical and anthropological evidence towards his theory of mutual aid, which I believe is far less refutable and I believe that, in the medieval era, mutual aid was the main source of evolution, I believe within the pre-medieval eras, intertribal conflicts were still large factors, however. While mutual aid will always foster social harmony and prosperity (themselves leading to evolution within medieval and modern environments), within the earlier stages of human development where humanity did not have access to technology to test and experiment with traditions and traditional laws, intertribal conflicts were essential to promote the breaking of traditions as a rushed attempt to fight against the opposing tribe (although, to gather the resources required to do this required the tribe to peacefully communicate with others, and to co-operate among themselves to produce the experiments, or even the might to topple the opposing tribe).
CRITIQUE OF CAPITALISM
I dislike the 
capitalist system as it simply perpetuates inequality and exploitation, so I believe in a system based upon mutual aid, as I believe that would lead to a more just and equitable social order. More on that in the next part, I am just mentioning how the fundamental of my philosophy runs of a desire to have a society run off mutual aid.
Anarcho-Communism
I advocate for a system of 
Anarcho-Communism, as outlined by authors such as Kropotkin, but also 
Nestor Makhno and the 
Free Territory, along with a large number of others. I define Anarcho-Communism as a society without a 
centralized government or private property. I believe people should organize themselves in a 
decentralized manner, and meet their needs through voluntary co-operation.
I believe kropotkin's answer to the question of luxuries is the greatest.
ABOLITION OF THE STATE
I argue for the abolition of the state, as a centralized state necessarily perpetuates injustice and hinders individual freedoms. Instead, a believe in a form of decentralized self-governance through 
local, autonomous communities. This is called " [[Anarchism}}".
One key problem with a File:Unity.png centralized state is it means the power is concentrated in the hands of a few: meaning, necessarily, people would be unfairly represented and decisions would be made in the favour of a few rather than for everyone. Not only that, this leads to the exploitation of those below to remain in power (since the state is a hierarchy), and the entire system can easily be exploited resulting in injustices, particularly against those not needed to stay in power. Not only that, the state either/both relies on coercion or force that leads to the restriction of individual freedoms by imposing a strict set of rules and regulations that sometimes does not align with the diverse need and values of communities.
Even more, usually the state particularly serve the File:Pluto.png 
ruling elite and therefore contributing to economic inequality. Through a variety of systems, the state helps in perpetuating inequality, also limiting individual systems (a poor person cannot afford luxuries, therefore cannot do as they want)
PCB STUFF
Mutualist or not?
Despite the name of my ideology, I have not read 
Proudhon, nor been influenced by 
mutualist philosophy. So, to look at the name, we must look at where the term 'mutualism' comes from: and it finds it's origins from mutual aid, a topic I find very important thanks to Kropotkin's work, and fundimental to an anarchist society to run: without the we, we would starve individually while the powerful (those who gained a great harvest) would sit upon a pile of wealth: an 
anarcho-capitalist system, where everybody suffers except from the rich.
Being that an emphasis on mutual aid is an essential and large component of my philosophy, it makes sense to include it in the name. You could also argue I share a number of traits with Mutualists, although nothing that isn't also shared by a number of 
Anarchists: decentralization, voluntary cooperation and opposition to hierarchical structures.
Relations
MEGABASED
BASED
Positive
Positive-Leaning
Negative-Leaning
Negative
CRINGE
MEGACRINGE
Literature Read
Main
Peter Kropotkin - The Conquest For Bread
Peter Kropotkin - Fields, Factories and Workshops
Peter Kropotkin - Memoirs of a Revolutionist
Peter Kropotkin - Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution
Recommendations
Place your recommendations here!
Other
The Peter Kropotkin Anthology (Also contained An Appeal to the Young and The Life of Kropotkin)
Stephen King - Pet Sematary (Favourite fiction book)
Stephen King - The Dark Half
Stephen King - The Dead Zone
Lao Tzu - Tao Te Ching
Mark Haddon - The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time
Jostein Gaarder - Sophie's World
George Orwell - 1984
Upcoming
Stephen King - Cujo
Darren Shaw - Wolf Island
Stephen King - Bag of Bones
Richard Crisp - The Social Brain
Darren Shan - Cirque du Freak
+ A bunch of Private Eye Newspapers
Music Rated
Currently looking for old ratings.
Tankard - The Hair of the Dog
7.77/10 - Decent album, no large problems.