No edit summary |
LordCompost (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
[[File:mfaicon.png]] [[Mindform Anarchism|{{Color|#BDF1FF|'''Xx godisfaithful xx'''}}]]<br> | [[File:mfaicon.png]] [[Mindform Anarchism|{{Color|#BDF1FF|'''Xx godisfaithful xx'''}}]]<br> | ||
They don't like postmodern anarchism simply because it critiques more than just the state: self-domination and external domination due to morality, religion, culture, etc., are even more pernicious and oppressive than just the state. Additionally, they think they have finally solved the riddle of epistemology and postmodernity; it is merely the reification of subjective, practical thought. | |||
=Notes= | =Notes= | ||
Revision as of 08:33, 12 January 2024
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent LordCompost's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
‟Through the heaven of civilization, the human being seeks to isolate himself from the world, to break its hostile power.”
– The Unique and Its Property,Max Stirner
Howdy, I'm 
LordCompost.
TL:DR, I believe that [insert issue here] is simply due to our servile and religious relation towards [said issue] treating it as sacred, necessary, unquestionable, etc., - Instead I see these [issues] as merely transitory, revisable, pragmatic, and contingent phenomena which individuals, groups, or even 'societies' are able to "freely" transform.
Writings
Links to my Substack.
The Cultural Industrial Complex
Relations
CarrotsRppl2
How is 'The State and Its Property' illegitimate? If you truly held to the principle that property is individual protection, then isn't the state currently the most powerful entity that protects its property? As such, according to you, it is your perfect society already.
Bourgeoisie Destroyer
I am sure you have read something, but merely returning and subscribing to 'ancient' philosophy does not make one intelligent, nor does it advance any knowledge or let one overcome modern problems simply because thought has developed and overcome older philosophy.
Killer Kitty
Question: Why are Brazillian's superior? If politics was a net negative on your country would you overcome it and bring politics into its nullity? Or would you hold close to it and always remain bound to your highest truth? 'No,' you would say, 'politics cannot be done away with; it is necessary, it is fundamental, it is more important than us.'
Kosciuszkovagr
No writings...
Xx godisfaithful xx
They don't like postmodern anarchism simply because it critiques more than just the state: self-domination and external domination due to morality, religion, culture, etc., are even more pernicious and oppressive than just the state. Additionally, they think they have finally solved the riddle of epistemology and postmodernity; it is merely the reification of subjective, practical thought.
Notes
Comments
LordCompost - Please comment below if you have questions.