m (→Suggestions) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
I reject the idea of a [[File:Natmarx.png]] "national proletariat" for it assumes that we are more similar to our oppressors than to our oppressed brothers across the world merely because of [[File:Nation.png]] our nation. Class to me is the [[File:ArmchairClass.png]] most important categoriser of humanity - you are either oppressor or oppressed, you are not British oppressed and Malaysian oppressed then British oppressor and Malaysian oppressor, you are simply part of the [[File:ClassismPoor.png]] two aforementioned classes [[File:Plutocrat.png]], no matter [[File:GeoBall.png]] geographic location, [[File:Lingnat.png]] language or [[File:Trad.png]] tradition. | I reject the idea of a [[File:Natmarx.png]] "national proletariat" for it assumes that we are more similar to our oppressors than to our oppressed brothers across the world merely because of [[File:Nation.png]] our nation. Class to me is the [[File:ArmchairClass.png]] most important categoriser of humanity - you are either oppressor or oppressed, you are not British oppressed and Malaysian oppressed then British oppressor and Malaysian oppressor, you are simply part of the [[File:ClassismPoor.png]] two aforementioned classes [[File:Plutocrat.png]], no matter [[File:GeoBall.png]] geographic location, [[File:Lingnat.png]] language or [[File:Trad.png]] tradition. | ||
=={{BoldText| | =={{BoldText|[[File:HegelMarx.png]] Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis}}== | ||
'''Note: I'm still in the process of learning about this stuff. If this is inaccurate as fuck, please tell me, I would like to know if its wrong.'''<br><br> | |||
Hegel believed in the frameworks of thesis, antithesis and synthesis. The current thesis is the current system i.e. capitalism and the antithesis is our anger and rightful greed. Whereas we are wanted to consider neoliberalism a synthesis to end the problems of capitalism, it should be considered as the new thesis which went against a different antithesis, that being lack of control. Now we must turn this antithesis to class consciousness - we must become a problem and communism must be the only accepted solution. | |||
=={{BoldText|Political Evolution}}== | =={{BoldText|Political Evolution}}== | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
Revision as of 23:18, 4 March 2024
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent NewMaritimeVistula's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
 |
In Development "I'll stop reading eventually." - Left Communism This page is still in development due to ongoing reading by Someone, multiple things may change drastically. |
We live in a contradiction, a brutal state of affairs, profoundly inegalitarian – where all existence is evaluated in terms of money alone – is presented to us as ideal. To justify their conservatism, the partisans of the established order cannot really call it ideal or wonderful. So instead, they have decided to say that all the rest is horrible. Sure, they say, we may not live in a condition of perfect Goodness. But we’re lucky that we don’t live in a condition of Evil. Our democracy is not perfect. But it’s better than the bloody dictatorships. Capitalism is unjust. But it’s not criminal like Stalinism. We let millions of Africans die of AIDS, but we don’t make racist nationalist declarations like Milosevic. We kill Iraqis with our airplanes, but we don’t cut their throats with machetes like they do in Rwanda, etc..
Alain Badiou
Introduction
Socialism is a movement of both economic and 
social liberation. Class is not merely based on 
poor vs 
rich but it is a manifestation of oppressor and oppressed. With the 
discrimination which comes without necessary social liberation, we result in a class based on this aforementioned discrimination. Even if we were all to be equal in every other way, this boundary would still divide us. We would not be able to add 
economic reform to side-line the social mishaps within the nation, that would not be socialist, it'd be merely "half liberatory" which isn't liberatory at all
I reject the idea of a 
"national proletariat" for it assumes that we are more similar to our oppressors than to our oppressed brothers across the world merely because of 
our nation. Class to me is the 
most important categoriser of humanity - you are either oppressor or oppressed, you are not British oppressed and Malaysian oppressed then British oppressor and Malaysian oppressor, you are simply part of the two aforementioned classes , no matter 
geographic location, 
language or 
tradition.
Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis
Note: I'm still in the process of learning about this stuff. If this is inaccurate as fuck, please tell me, I would like to know if its wrong.
Hegel believed in the frameworks of thesis, antithesis and synthesis. The current thesis is the current system i.e. capitalism and the antithesis is our anger and rightful greed. Whereas we are wanted to consider neoliberalism a synthesis to end the problems of capitalism, it should be considered as the new thesis which went against a different antithesis, that being lack of control. Now we must turn this antithesis to class consciousness - we must become a problem and communism must be the only accepted solution.
Political Evolution
 Apolitical |
 +  + 
|
 Stupid Communism Lover |
 +  + 
|
 This Corbyn Fella looks based |
 +  +
|
 Rojava, eh? |
 +  + 
|
 Wait its the state that causes unfair markets?. |
 +  + 
|
 Cooperatives are based |
 + + 
|
 Hugely influenced by  Finn Tylerwhen learning about Guild Socialism with him |
 +  + 
|
 Current beliefs which I'm still working on |
 + + 
|
Reading[2]
Finished
Reading
The National Bolshevist Manifesto (2006, Karl Otto Paetel)
- Current chapter: The Nation as the ‘Highest Value’
Capitalist Realism - Is there no alternative? (Mark Fisher)[3]
- Current chapter: All that is solid melts into PR: Market Stalinism and bureaucratic anti-production
Plan to Read
Chaos Theory : Two Essays on Market Anarchy
National Anarchist Manifesto
Myth and Reality (Mircea Eliade)- The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion (Mircea Eliade)
The Individual and the Becoming of the World (1926, Julius Evola)
Selections from Prison Notebooks (Antonio Gramsci)
Suggestions
