Shellshocked Communism

thank you so much, hysteria, for your beautiful art, I really don’t know how to thank you, you’re a fantastic artist - TOTAL REWORK INCOMING (DELARPIFICATION)

In Development "I'll stop reading eventually." - Left Communism This page is still in development due to ongoing reading by Someone, multiple things may change drastically.

Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent MEADOWSIN's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

(////)

Shellshocked Communism
"comrad"
Basic Information
Aliases	Degenerate Communism Sacred Communism Bataillean Cybercommunism Add your own.
Alignments	not a postie
Ideological Influences
Influenced	Generouschalk0 thought (Anti-humanism)
Character Information
Song	Ghost Mountain (ft. Sematary) - Pain Omerta - Antiamorous

Revelry, Marx, Biomechanicalism

To build a world is not the function- to build a world is not the intention, to fly the flag of some “greater” power is not the intention, but to reestablish the true republic in a swarm of partyism and worship of individuals as above one. I ask for a republic system in which regularly the people are surveyed, and if any politician is below 40% popularity, they are ejected immediately. Alignment with any other politician should also be seen as a resignation or disqualification immediately. No parties, by threat of nullification of right to run at all. You run on policies. Simple enough.

Biomechanical freedom-of-form. If you want to holster a camera into your eye and use it to supplant your eye and replay moments literally then feel free, if you want to turn your finger into a taser, feel free. Transportation should be emphasized on the user-end and not the producer-end. All economic processes should be the same, consumer-focused and primarily an economy of consumption and focusing on the sacred, as all want to do.

You could see me as egoist-communist or simply degenerate communism, but I see this as a revelry, of form, function, and economics. We should allow for cybernetic decentralized planned economy, local representatives answering to survey and personal popular demand, assessed through cybernetics. The abolition of currency doesn’t need to exactly occur in order for the capital to become less emphasized, and the material and ethereal to become more valuable than value itself- we simply need to allow for those who have wished to revel to revel, and to allow for advance, and to extend our wants and loves and beliefs to those who we can provide with the means to build their own paths.

I believe in international cooperation but anti-imperial structure, not producing any materials for warfare for other countries, and not releasing excess energy through warfare, simply being a benefactor to states with similar interests or states that pledge to use it for ascendancy and infrastructure to better the society as a whole. To be benevolent, to talk softly and carry nothing, is to be shot… only for your house, your bloodline, to hunt the other to death with the big stick.

questions

Please put questions below. I will answer as fast as possible.

Influences

Primary

• The Deer God
• Novalis
• Bataille
• Marx
• Camus
• Ccru
• Derrida
• Deleuze
• Guattari
• Ghost Mountain
• Thoreau
• Kaczynski
• 4lung
• Rosa Luxemburg
• Flower Bomb
• Fumiko Kaneko
• Hunter S. Thompson
• Discordianism

Secondary

• Fisher
• Locke
• Land
• Meta-Nomad
• Vonnegut
• H.P. Lovecraft
• Meadowsin's Basilisk

Relations

good

• Venatrixism - I like your ideology, even if we're growing apart a bit. I'm moving toward mixing postmodern ideas with more contemporary or workers-movement ideas, mixing the old and the new,, stewing up something perfect for myself.
• Rocksism - While you may not intend to do this, I feel like you take an approach that effectively understands my post-postmodern position. You incorporate some non-philosophical classic political resistance methods that are effective, while still building up an effective idea that allows for some play-room for ideas.
•  Romantic Egoism - I can't say I exactly align with your ideas, but we do have similar inspiration, and genuinely see ourselves as advocating for liberation of the self, whether that be through your methods or mine. I understand where you could potentially critique me, and I really do like your advocacy for the individual, despite the false hold of "individualism" and "being you" entailed by the modernity we find ourselves in. I also love your romantic and esoteric aspects, as I'm highly spiritual and a pseudo-transcendentalist (referring to the ideas of my Post-Thoreau,) a movement that owes a lot to romanticism. Overall, unique, beautiful, and delightful in many ways. I also like your economic theory, and I find myself being a lot of the same as far as economy goes. I like economic anarchy, and I may look into mutualism. I hope you understand I'm not just eating garbage as far as I'm calling myself a "post-postmodernist," I'm just trying to indicate a distaste for most postmodernist ideals, especially as they start to approach the singularity that is accelerationism. Thank you.
• Post-Marijuanarchy - I like a lot of this, but I don't like post-praxis. I don't feel like you're going to get anywhere kicking your feet like I used to. I hope you don't entirely succumb to the ideas of nothing being worth doing etc... it's a pit, and this iteration of me is just crawling out of it kicking and screaming.

eh

• HelloThere314 - I like the ideal of Rojava, moreso the ideas of DemConfed themselves rather than Rojava, its closest interpretation, a miming of DemCon in the most puppet-esque sense. I do have a lot of contradictions, but I'm not a nationalist, and a lot of the contentions are intentional. I ask people to let these ideas play in their head like they play in mine. I don't really like control, frankly, and I don't really see communities expanding if they see themselves as one cohesive community regardless. The point is moreso to let ideas play, and I understand you see myself as some form of false communization, but having phantom fixtures is more functionally operational than to allow for contemporary fixtures or to simply delete them and allow for a fascist to rally himself into whispering into the ears of those that demand a more fleshy-feeling overlord. I simply think that the structure I provide can very easily dissolve modernity and meld modernity into tapestries of something beyond that. Otherwise you're interesting, and I want you to know I completely understand your critique of me.
• Imperial Socialism - I don't like imperialism or socialism but you aren't trash and I wouldn't hate living under your system (I would just stir up copious amounts of civil unrest and cause violent protests in order to attempt a cessation to imperialist practice.)
• Schumacherianism (////) - You would probably be a segmented part of my system, although I would never particularly enjoy interacting with you, if that makes sense. Carry on, though, and I do like your book.

brimmy

Distributist Reactionaryism - No.