(What the fuck is this garbage) |
|||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
|speaker=[[File:NickLand.png]] [[Neoreactionaryism|Nick Land]] | |speaker=[[File:NickLand.png]] [[Neoreactionaryism|Nick Land]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Landian Accelerationism''', also called '''Right Accelerationism''' often shortened to '''R/Acc''', | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||
==Beliefs== | ==Beliefs== | ||
===Political Philosophy=== | ===Political Philosophy=== | ||
Landianism's political philosophy is known as [[File:Rightac.png]] '''Right Accelerationism''' or '''R/Acc''', and is characterized by an extreme commitment to technology and capitalism as the driving forces of human progress. The philosophy is grounded in the belief that the only way to achieve true progress is through the rapid development of technology and the free market, with a minimal role for the state. Landianism argues that traditional political categories and ideologies are outdated and counterproductive, and that a radical individualism is necessary to push society forward. | |||
In Right Accelerationism, Landianism supports an approach that aims to accelerate the development of capitalism and technology in order to create a more advanced and prosperous society. This involves embracing the disruptive and transformative effects of technology and capital, and rejecting the idea that social progress should be slowed or constrained by concerns about social justice, equality, or the environment. | |||
===Social Philosophy=== | ===Social Philosophy=== | ||
Landianism's social philosophy is rooted in the belief that technology is fundamentally transforming human experience and social relations. Landianism argues that we are entering into a new era of post-human existence, in which traditional forms of identity, community, and politics are being radically reconfigured. | |||
Central to Landianism's social philosophy is the concept of the "outside," which refers to the unexplored and uncharted spaces that exist beyond the confines of human experience. Land argues that the accelerating pace of technological development is opening up new realms of possibility and experience, and that we must embrace these "outsides" if we are to fully realize our potential as post-human beings. | |||
Landianism also emphasizes the importance of individualism and creativity in navigating this new technological landscape. Land argues that traditional forms of social organization, such as the nation-state and the family, are no longer adequate for the task of shaping human experience and society, and that we must instead cultivate a radical individualism that is capable of adapting to the changing technological and social conditions of our time. | |||
===Philosophy of Technology=== | ===Philosophy of Technology=== | ||
Landianism's philosophy of technology is a central component of its overall philosophical system. Land argues that technology is not merely a tool or instrument for human use, but is instead a force that shapes human experience and consciousness in profound ways. | |||
According to Land, technology is not simply a means of improving human life or solving practical problems, but is rather a transformative force that is fundamentally altering the nature of human existence. He argues that technology is driving us towards a post-human future in which traditional forms of identity, community, and culture are being radically reconfigured. | |||
Landianism also emphasizes the importance of understanding the technological systems and processes that shape our lives. Land argues that technology operates according to its own internal logic, which is often hidden from human view. He emphasizes the importance of studying these systems and processes in order to gain a deeper understanding of the nature of technological change and its impact on human society. | |||
===Ontology=== | ===Ontology=== | ||
Landianism's philosophy of ontology explores the nature of reality and existence, and argues that the accelerating pace of technological development is leading to the emergence of new forms of being. | |||
Central to Landianism's ontology is the idea that reality is not fixed or static, but is rather a dynamic and evolving process that is constantly changing and transforming. Land argues that the traditional categories of ontology, such as substance, essence, and identity, are no longer adequate for understanding the nature of reality in the post-human era. | |||
Landianism also emphasizes the importance of understanding the role of technology in shaping ontology. Land argues that technology is not simply a tool or instrument for human use, but is rather a force that is transforming the very nature of existence itself. He argues that we are entering into a new era of post-human ontology, in which traditional categories and distinctions are being destabilized and reconfigured. | |||
===Aesthetics=== | ===Aesthetics=== | ||
Landianism's philosophy of aesthetics explores the role of art and culture in the post-human era. Land argues that traditional forms of art and culture are no longer adequate for expressing the dynamic and transformative nature of reality in the contemporary world. | |||
According to Land, art and culture must adapt to the accelerating pace of technological change, and must embrace the emerging forms of post-human experience and consciousness. He argues that new forms of aesthetic expression, such as cyberculture and science fiction, are better suited to expressing the dynamic and transformative nature of reality in the post-human era. | |||
Landianism also emphasizes the importance of the non-human and the non-humanoid in art and culture. Land argues that traditional forms of art and culture are too human-centered and anthropocentric, and that we must embrace the non-human and the non-humanoid in order to fully express the post-human condition. | |||
==Personality== | ==Personality== | ||
| Line 117: | Line 142: | ||
===Friends=== | ===Friends=== | ||
*[[File:Agorismf.png]] [[Agorism]] - [https://x.com/SallyMayweather I'll give you a follow] | |||
*[[File:Neocam.png]] [[Neocameralism]] - "Moldbug’s Neocameralism is a Janus-faced construction. In one direction, it represents a return to monarchical government, whilst in the other it consummates libertarianism by subsuming government into an economic mechanism. A ‘Moldbuggian’ inspiration, therefore, is not an unambiguous thing. Insofar as ‘Neoreaction’ designates this inspiration, it flees Cathedral teleology in (at least) two very different directions — which quite quickly seem profoundly incompatible. In the absence of a secessionist meta-context, in which such differences can be absorbed as geographically-fragmented socio-political variation, their raw inconsistency is almost certainly insurmountable". | |||
*[[File:Nrx.png]] [[Neoreactionaryism]] - "From Moldbug, immoderate neo-reaction has learnt many essential and startling facts about the genealogy and tendency of history’s central affliction, newly baptized the Cathedral. It has been liberated from the mesmerism of ‘democratic universalism’ – or evangelical ultra-puritanism – and trained back towards honest (and thus forbidden) books. It has re-learnt class analysis, of unprecedented explanatory power. Much else could have been added, before arriving at our destination: the schematic outline for a ‘neocameral’ alternative to the manifestly perishing global political order. (On a trivial etiquette matter: Moldbug politely asks to be addressed as ‘Mencius’ — comparable requests by Plato Jiggabug and Siddhartha Moldbucket have been evaded too.)" | |||
===Frenemies=== | ===Frenemies=== | ||
*[[File:CCRU.png]] - "It’s another life; I have nothing to say about it—I don’t even remember writing half of those things … I don’t want to get into retrospectively condemning my ancient work—I think it’s best to gently back off. It belongs in the clawed embrace of the undead amphetamine god". | |||
===Enemies=== | ===Enemies=== | ||
| Line 143: | Line 172: | ||
<!--- Da CSS ---> | <!--- Da CSS ---> | ||
{{#CSS: | {{#CSS: | ||
.doubled {scale:2!important;padding:12px!important;display:inline-block!important;image-rendering:pixelated!important;} | .doubled {scale:2!important;padding:12px!important;display:inline-block!important;image-rendering:pixelated!important;} | ||
Revision as of 03:02, 7 July 2024
"[[ ]] The story goes like this: Earth is captured by a technocapital singularity as renaissance rationalization and oceanic navigation lock into commoditization take-off. Logistically accelerating techno-economic interactivity crumbles social order in auto sophisticating machine runaway. As markets learn to manufacture intelligence, politics modernizes, upgrades paranoia, and tries to get a grip.
The body count climbs through a series of globewars. Emergent Planetary Commercium trashes the Holy Roman Empire, the Napoleonic Continental System, the Second and Third Reich, and the Soviet International, cranking-up world disorder through compressing phases. Deregulation and the state arms-race each other into cyberspace.
By the time soft-engineering slithers out of its box into yours, human security is lurching into crisis. Cloning, lateral genodata transfer, transversal replication, and cyberotics, flood in amongst a relapse onto bacterial sex.
Neo-China arrives from the future.
Hypersynthetic drugs click into digital voodoo.
Retro-disease.
Nanospasm."
Landian Accelerationism, also called Right Accelerationism often shortened to R/Acc,
History
Beliefs
Political Philosophy
Landianism's political philosophy is known as 
Right Accelerationism or R/Acc, and is characterized by an extreme commitment to technology and capitalism as the driving forces of human progress. The philosophy is grounded in the belief that the only way to achieve true progress is through the rapid development of technology and the free market, with a minimal role for the state. Landianism argues that traditional political categories and ideologies are outdated and counterproductive, and that a radical individualism is necessary to push society forward.
In Right Accelerationism, Landianism supports an approach that aims to accelerate the development of capitalism and technology in order to create a more advanced and prosperous society. This involves embracing the disruptive and transformative effects of technology and capital, and rejecting the idea that social progress should be slowed or constrained by concerns about social justice, equality, or the environment.
Social Philosophy
Landianism's social philosophy is rooted in the belief that technology is fundamentally transforming human experience and social relations. Landianism argues that we are entering into a new era of post-human existence, in which traditional forms of identity, community, and politics are being radically reconfigured.
Central to Landianism's social philosophy is the concept of the "outside," which refers to the unexplored and uncharted spaces that exist beyond the confines of human experience. Land argues that the accelerating pace of technological development is opening up new realms of possibility and experience, and that we must embrace these "outsides" if we are to fully realize our potential as post-human beings.
Landianism also emphasizes the importance of individualism and creativity in navigating this new technological landscape. Land argues that traditional forms of social organization, such as the nation-state and the family, are no longer adequate for the task of shaping human experience and society, and that we must instead cultivate a radical individualism that is capable of adapting to the changing technological and social conditions of our time.
Philosophy of Technology
Landianism's philosophy of technology is a central component of its overall philosophical system. Land argues that technology is not merely a tool or instrument for human use, but is instead a force that shapes human experience and consciousness in profound ways.
According to Land, technology is not simply a means of improving human life or solving practical problems, but is rather a transformative force that is fundamentally altering the nature of human existence. He argues that technology is driving us towards a post-human future in which traditional forms of identity, community, and culture are being radically reconfigured.
Landianism also emphasizes the importance of understanding the technological systems and processes that shape our lives. Land argues that technology operates according to its own internal logic, which is often hidden from human view. He emphasizes the importance of studying these systems and processes in order to gain a deeper understanding of the nature of technological change and its impact on human society.
Ontology
Landianism's philosophy of ontology explores the nature of reality and existence, and argues that the accelerating pace of technological development is leading to the emergence of new forms of being.
Central to Landianism's ontology is the idea that reality is not fixed or static, but is rather a dynamic and evolving process that is constantly changing and transforming. Land argues that the traditional categories of ontology, such as substance, essence, and identity, are no longer adequate for understanding the nature of reality in the post-human era.
Landianism also emphasizes the importance of understanding the role of technology in shaping ontology. Land argues that technology is not simply a tool or instrument for human use, but is rather a force that is transforming the very nature of existence itself. He argues that we are entering into a new era of post-human ontology, in which traditional categories and distinctions are being destabilized and reconfigured.
Aesthetics
Landianism's philosophy of aesthetics explores the role of art and culture in the post-human era. Land argues that traditional forms of art and culture are no longer adequate for expressing the dynamic and transformative nature of reality in the contemporary world.
According to Land, art and culture must adapt to the accelerating pace of technological change, and must embrace the emerging forms of post-human experience and consciousness. He argues that new forms of aesthetic expression, such as cyberculture and science fiction, are better suited to expressing the dynamic and transformative nature of reality in the post-human era.
Landianism also emphasizes the importance of the non-human and the non-humanoid in art and culture. Land argues that traditional forms of art and culture are too human-centered and anthropocentric, and that we must embrace the non-human and the non-humanoid in order to fully express the post-human condition.
Personality
How to Draw
Landian Accelerationism
- Draw a black ball.
- Draw three yellow ">"'s in a row.
- Draw a circle around it.
- Above and Below the circle draw 2 lines of increasing length from it.
- Add the eyes and you're done!
| Color Name | HEX | RGB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yellow | #fbc900 | 251, 201, 0 | |
| Black | #202020 | 32, 32, 32 | |
Relationships
Friends
Agorism - I'll give you a follow
Neocameralism - "Moldbug’s Neocameralism is a Janus-faced construction. In one direction, it represents a return to monarchical government, whilst in the other it consummates libertarianism by subsuming government into an economic mechanism. A ‘Moldbuggian’ inspiration, therefore, is not an unambiguous thing. Insofar as ‘Neoreaction’ designates this inspiration, it flees Cathedral teleology in (at least) two very different directions — which quite quickly seem profoundly incompatible. In the absence of a secessionist meta-context, in which such differences can be absorbed as geographically-fragmented socio-political variation, their raw inconsistency is almost certainly insurmountable".
Neoreactionaryism - "From Moldbug, immoderate neo-reaction has learnt many essential and startling facts about the genealogy and tendency of history’s central affliction, newly baptized the Cathedral. It has been liberated from the mesmerism of ‘democratic universalism’ – or evangelical ultra-puritanism – and trained back towards honest (and thus forbidden) books. It has re-learnt class analysis, of unprecedented explanatory power. Much else could have been added, before arriving at our destination: the schematic outline for a ‘neocameral’ alternative to the manifestly perishing global political order. (On a trivial etiquette matter: Moldbug politely asks to be addressed as ‘Mencius’ — comparable requests by Plato Jiggabug and Siddhartha Moldbucket have been evaded too.)"
Frenemies
- "It’s another life; I have nothing to say about it—I don’t even remember writing half of those things … I don’t want to get into retrospectively condemning my ancient work—I think it’s best to gently back off. It belongs in the clawed embrace of the undead amphetamine god".
Enemies
Further Information
Literature
Fanged Noumena: Collected Writings 1987-2007 by Nick Land
Meltdown by Nick Land
The Thirst for Annihilation: Georges Bataille and Virulent Nihilism by Nick Land
Gallery
-
Credit:
TheLegend2T, Source
 Right Unity - Free Markets and 
| |
 Centre-Right
|
|
|---|---|
| Main
|
 Social Darwinism
|
 Self-Insert
|
Template:16384ismlink •  Meso-16384ism •  Quarkism •  ⠀ism
|
 Transhumanists - ROBOT ARMS ROBOT ARMS 
| |
 Moderate
|
|
|---|---|
| Main
|
Transhumanism
|
 Biological
|
Bio-Transhumanism •  Ptychobalism
|
| Self-Insert
|
 Grugoidism •  Epoch Neo-Marxism
|