×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,524 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Noocracy: Difference between revisions

imported>Coindorni
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
|dislikes = Democracy <br> People making dumb decisions <br> Poor color schemes
|dislikes = Democracy <br> People making dumb decisions <br> Poor color schemes
}}
}}
'''Noocracy''' is a non-quadrant ideology that wants a society that is ruled by the wise (usually philosophers). The society could be ruled by a "philosopher [[File:Monarch.png]] [[Monarchism|king]]". Noocracy is very wise and loves to read philosophy.
'''Noocracy''' ('<nowiki/>'''rule of the wise'<nowiki/>''') also called '''epistocracy''' ('<nowiki/>'''rule of the knowledgeable'''')<ref>[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/epistocracy Epistocracy], Wiktionary</ref><ref>[https://www.bookforum.com/print/2303/-16504 Votes of No Confidence] by Jerediah Purdy</ref> is a system of government within which authority is delegated to people based on their knowledge, those people traditionally being philosopher. The concept has it's origins in Ancient Greek philosophy and the concept of 'The Philosopher [[Monarchism|King]]'. A notable example of a noocracy was the [[Caesarism|Roman Empire]] during the reign of Marcus Aurelius, who contributed towards the philosophy of Stoicism.
 
 


== History ==
== History ==
Line 64: Line 66:
=== Literature ===
=== Literature ===
*[https://ryanfb.github.io/loebolus-data/L237.pdf The Republic] by Plato
*[https://ryanfb.github.io/loebolus-data/L237.pdf The Republic] by Plato
*[https://1lib.uk/book/2835385/005233 Against Democracy] by Jason Brennan
=== Wikipedia ===
=== Wikipedia ===
*[[wp:Noocracy|Noocracy]]
*[[Wp:Noocracy|Noocracy]]
*[[wp:Philosopher king|Philosopher King]]
*[[Wp:Philosopher king|Philosopher king]]
*[[wp:Geniocracy|Geniocracy]]
*[[Wp:Geniocracy|Geniocracy]]
*[[Wp:Noosphere|Noosphere]]


{{Nonquad}}
=== Citations ===
<references />{{Nonquad}}
{{Monarch}}
{{Monarch}}
[[Category:Canon ideologies]]
[[Category:Canon ideologies]]
[[Category:Pre-Enlightenment Ideologies]]
[[Category:Pre-Enlightenment Ideologies]]
[[Category:Government Systems]]
[[Category:Government Systems]]

Revision as of 17:52, 16 March 2021

Noocracy ('rule of the wise') also called epistocracy ('rule of the knowledgeable')[1][2] is a system of government within which authority is delegated to people based on their knowledge, those people traditionally being philosopher. The concept has it's origins in Ancient Greek philosophy and the concept of 'The Philosopher King'. A notable example of a noocracy was the Roman Empire during the reign of Marcus Aurelius, who contributed towards the philosophy of Stoicism.


History

The first attempt to implement Noocracy was Pythagoras' city of the wise that he planned to build in Italy together with his followers. Another example of Noocracy is philosopher kings, examples of philosopher kings are Dion of Syracuse, Marcus Aurelius, Khosrow I, and Matthias Corvinus.

Beliefs

Noocracy believes in a system of governance where decision making is in the hands of philosophers, these philosophers could be philosopher kings. Philosopher kings are rulers who possesses both a love of wisdom, as well as intelligence, reliability, and a willingness to live a simple life. Noocracy also criticize democracy for the irrationality of voters and that the average voter doesn't have the necessary knowledge to decide on means to achieve their political aims.

Personality and Behavior

  • They usually represent whatever philosopher you want to represent in your comic,
  • They love to read works on philosophy,
  • They despise the Roman emperor Commodus.

How to Draw

Flag of Noocracy
  1. Fill in the ball with yellow
  2. Draw a circle with a space on its bottom connected to two vertical lines on its upper half.
  3. Draw the same shape but inverted on its bottom half

Template:Flag-color

Relationships

Friends

Frenemies

  • Ingsoc - I think you took the "the average citizen can't make the right decision" idea too far.
  • Aristocracy - They're pompous and foolish, but they do have the right idea about who shouldn't rule.
  • Cyberocracy - They're smart, but too unwise to actually hold power. They need to grow older and gain more experience before they are a worthy heir.
  • Cosmicism - You are wise my child and filled with such a desire for philosophy and progress but you are filled with so much dread.

Enemies

  • Democracy - I find your system too flawed to be sufficient for the people.
  • Kakistocracy - By what basis do you believe the mentally daft to be just rulers of a state?
  • Senatorialism - Eldritch abomination. Conceptual impossibility. Your very existence violates the laws etched into the universe.
  • Ochlocracy - Your system is an abomination.

Further Information

Literature

Wikipedia

Citations

  1. Epistocracy, Wiktionary
  2. Votes of No Confidence by Jerediah Purdy

Template:Nonquad

Template:Monarch

Recent changes

  • JAcket • 25 minutes ago
  • JAcket • 27 minutes ago
  • JAcket • 28 minutes ago
  • JAcket • 1 hour ago