×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,475 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Anti-Humanism: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Anti-Humanism is an ideology that is critical of traditional humanism and traditional ideas about humanity and the human condition. Central to Anti-Humanism is the view that philosophical anthropology and its concepts of "man", "human nature" or "humanity" should be rejected as historically relative.[[File:Antihumanism.png|thumb|Anti-Humanism|alt=|300x300px]]
[[File:Antihumanism.png|thumb|300x300px|Anti-Humanism]]
Anti-Humanism is an ideology that is critical of traditional humanism and traditional ideas about humanity and the human condition. Central to Anti-Humanism is the view that philosophical anthropology and its concepts of "man", "human nature" or "humanity" should be rejected as historically relative.
 





Revision as of 00:26, 9 April 2021

Anti-Humanism

Anti-Humanism is an ideology that is critical of traditional humanism and traditional ideas about humanity and the human condition. Central to Anti-Humanism is the view that philosophical anthropology and its concepts of "man", "human nature" or "humanity" should be rejected as historically relative.




History

In the late 18th and 19th centuries, the philosophy of humanism was a cornerstone of the Enlightenment. Human history was seen as a product of human thought and action, to be understood through the categories of "consciousness", "agency", "choice", "responsibility", "moral values". Human beings were viewed as possessing common essential features. From the belief in a universal moral core of humanity, it followed that all persons were inherently free and equal. For liberal humanists such as Immanuel Kant, the universal law of reason was a guide towards total emancipation from any kind of tyranny.

Criticism of humanism as over-idealistic began in the 19th century. For Friedrich Nietzsche, humanism was nothing more than an empty figure of speech – a secular version of theism. Max Stirner expressed a similar position in his book The Ego and Its Own, published several decades before Nietzsche's work. Nietzsche argues in Genealogy of Morals that human rights exist as a means for the weak to constrain the strong; as such, they do not facilitate the emancipation of life, but instead deny it.