imported>DragonRed No edit summary |
imported>DragonRed No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{DragonRed}} | {{DragonRed}} | ||
Religious institutions are based on expropriating the properties of religious communities. Religion; The religious should not be free anywhere outside of their own home. | Religious institutions are based on expropriating the properties of religious communities. Religion; The religious should not be free anywhere outside of their own home. | ||
Religious people should show their faith not to everyone but to their own god. This state is very suitable for atheism. | Religious people should show their faith not to everyone but to their own god. This state is very suitable for state atheism. | ||
Revision as of 01:07, 10 February 2022
Even if I'm secular myself, this ideology is absolutely soulless, cringe.
--Magicpeartree (talk) 17:39, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
SomeCrusader - What I thought the Democrats were as a kid 😅.
I mean atheism is based but this ideology is hot garbage
Matteel - Hard nope. I wouldn't even want to live under this being an atheist because being an atheist does not mean being culturally progressive, it just means not believing in god. Countries like the USSR were state atheist under joseph stalin and still very conservative. And being atheist didn't change that, so very soy and cringe ideology.
KRINJ
Even I'm secular myself, I found this ideology is absolutely worse and cringe. Plus, it is also theocracy..
Template:DragonRed Religious institutions are based on expropriating the properties of religious communities. Religion; The religious should not be free anywhere outside of their own home. Religious people should show their faith not to everyone but to their own god. This state is very suitable for state atheism.