imported>Pantheon No edit summary |
imported>Nfan No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{UserPantheon}} - While I am sceptical about the large spending programms, since these could get the state into too much debt and that type of Economics can lead to stagnation like it did in Japan (Capitalism always gets into a crisis when it cannot grow further) It did a pretty well job in building up Europe after WWII and I like how it makes Market worshippers mad. | {{UserPantheon}} - While I am sceptical about the large spending programms, since these could get the state into too much debt and that type of Economics can lead to stagnation like it did in Japan (Capitalism always gets into a crisis when it cannot grow further) It did a pretty well job in building up Europe after WWII and I like how it makes Market worshippers mad. | ||
Better than Chicagoan, Marxian or Austrotard. Still, too fiscally irresponcible. |
Revision as of 13:49, 15 April 2022
As capitalistic as you can get while still being tolerable. This is one of the only good forms of capitalism and it certainly has done good, even if it could move a bit to the left. - Template:UserGeneralGanyu
Pantheon - While I am sceptical about the large spending programms, since these could get the state into too much debt and that type of Economics can lead to stagnation like it did in Japan (Capitalism always gets into a crisis when it cannot grow further) It did a pretty well job in building up Europe after WWII and I like how it makes Market worshippers mad.
Better than Chicagoan, Marxian or Austrotard. Still, too fiscally irresponcible.