imported>Chcknwngs No edit summary |
imported>ShadowRaiden No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==nah== | ==nah== | ||
Pan-slavists can piss off - [[User:Chcknwngs|Chcknwngs]] ([[User talk:Chcknwngs|talk]]) 16:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC) | Pan-slavists can piss off - [[User:Chcknwngs|Chcknwngs]] ([[User talk:Chcknwngs|talk]]) 16:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
==Bringe== | |||
On one hand I support unity between people of similar cultures, but on the other hand I support national and cultural sovereignty - {{UserGeneralGanyu}} | |||
Revision as of 22:37, 1 May 2022
Based ngl
Can help people of a similar culture unite and be more powerful together. And I’m kinda this when it comes to the Slavic world, a Pan-Slav Federation would be nice (provided it’s done through the will of the people) - Template:UserComradeGanyu
ummm
It seems interesting… we shouldn’t ally with ethnonats and ultranats. As I’m Asian, a Pan-Asian also would be interesting and good except Japanese Empire style. So I’m kind of this. Nah I’m just civic nationalist. - Template:UserChirotesla
Amazing
Template:KaiserKlausMouse: Except for pan-Africanism, that would never work, too many cultures.
I mean...
Template:UserMatteel - Maybe if the unification was under a democratic referendum and if the ethno and racial nats were booted out. But still quite the stretch
CELTICS UNITE
A unified celtic federal republic would be so based.
More like a radical neoliberal capitalist tax heaven federation.
nah
Pan-slavists can piss off - Chcknwngs (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Bringe
On one hand I support unity between people of similar cultures, but on the other hand I support national and cultural sovereignty - Template:UserGeneralGanyu