imported>ShadowRaiden No edit summary |
imported>Polcompbot m (Moved user templates) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Amazing== | ==Amazing== | ||
{{KaiserKlausMouse}}: Except for pan-Africanism, that would never work, too many cultures. | {{User|KaiserKlausMouse}}: Except for pan-Africanism, that would never work, too many cultures. | ||
== I mean... == | == I mean... == | ||
{{ | {{User|Matteel}} - Maybe if the unification was under a democratic referendum and if the ethno and racial nats were booted out. But still quite the stretch | ||
==CELTICS UNITE== | ==CELTICS UNITE== |
Revision as of 04:26, 22 March 2023
Based ngl
Can help people of a similar culture unite and be more powerful together. And I’m kinda this when it comes to the Slavic world, a Pan-Slav Federation would be nice (provided it’s done through the will of the people) - Template:UserComradeGanyu
ummm
It seems interesting… we shouldn’t ally with ethnonats and ultranats. As I’m Asian, a Pan-Asian also would be interesting and good except Japanese Empire style. So I’m kind of this. Nah I’m just civic nationalist. - Template:UserChirotesla
Amazing
- Except for pan-Africanism, that would never work, too many cultures.
I mean...
- Maybe if the unification was under a democratic referendum and if the ethno and racial nats were booted out. But still quite the stretch
CELTICS UNITE
A unified celtic federal republic would be so based.
More like a radical neoliberal capitalist tax heaven federation.
nah
Pan-slavists can piss off - Chcknwngs (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Bringe
On one hand I support unity between people of similar cultures, but on the other hand I support national and cultural sovereignty - Template:UserGeneralGanyu