×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,496 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Am m Refutes All Your Points: Difference between revisions

Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 66: Line 66:
***{{NBorker}} >Communists<br>>Mao<br>lol
***{{NBorker}} >Communists<br>>Mao<br>lol
****[[File:AmmGlowup.gif]] - Dengism isn't Maoism, Mao actually implemented some communist policies such as collective meals, ofc he wasn't perfectly communist but closer than most and that was his goal
****[[File:AmmGlowup.gif]] - Dengism isn't Maoism, Mao actually implemented some communist policies such as collective meals, ofc he wasn't perfectly communist but closer than most and that was his goal
*****{{NBorker}} He wasn’t really ever a communist, the 1954 Chinese Constitution explicitly protects private property and ownership over the means of production.


==Technology==
==Technology==

Revision as of 02:57, 11 October 2023


Try to convince me of anything and I will try to refute your point, feel free to suggest categories in the comments. Also all alts are hereby banned.

Example

  • - I believe in x opinion.
    • - Why x opinion is bad.
      • - Ok

Economics

  • - Refute all of my Economic Policies
    • - Neoliberalism maximises suffering and decadence more than any other time or country in human history (except maybe Pol Pot Cambodia or Maoist China), therefore, it is an objectively terrible economic system
      • - Have you actually read my economic policies? i know that Neoliberalism isn't aways good, that's why i would use Essential regulations, Better Land management and Welfare to minimize it's bad effects while maintaning it's good parts.
        • - I haven't read your page in a while and when you just link Third Way as your economic system it's not very helpful for criticism. Anyway, even in capitalist countries with all these regulations, such as Canada, there is still massive wealth inequality and hedonism, so these regulations don't help

State

  • - The government should be run by those who smell the worst
    • - Smelling bad is bad therefore they should not run the government

Nation

Social

  • - chud rights are human rights
    • - Human rights are not implicit within even any religion or atheist beliefs therefore they don’t exist therefore nothing can be human rights
      • - All humans (whites) are children of God and as such should be treated with grace and dignity also, chud power!!!!!!
        • - Grace and dignity aren’t human rights
  •  Comrade Phil Thought - Progressivism is bourgeiose and capitalist. I mean look at companies during pride month (and in recent years, year round). Social progressivism is capitalism decaying.
    • - I agree with you, but I have to refute your point so: Communist countries such as Maoist China were revprog, so progressivism isn't inherently capitalistic.
      • Borker >Communists
        >Mao
        lol
        • - Dengism isn't Maoism, Mao actually implemented some communist policies such as collective meals, ofc he wasn't perfectly communist but closer than most and that was his goal
          • Borker He wasn’t really ever a communist, the 1954 Chinese Constitution explicitly protects private property and ownership over the means of production.

Technology

Philosophical

  • - God never existed.
    • - I’d say this would go more in “Religious” but whatever. Everything must come from something, which leads to the natural conclusion that there is an infinitely powerful force which everything came from - a God.

Religious

  • - Jews le bad
    • - I have met Jews in real life and they are not le bad
      • - But but Jews control world governments n sheet
        • - There are two Jew world leaders out of 212 (including unrecognised countries) as far as I know, which is 0.94% of world governments
  • - Perennialism is true
    • - If multiple religions claim to be the singular correct religion, then they can't all be correct, by definition

Other

  •  Comrade Phil Thought - If America can invade Iraq twice for no reason, and Israel occupy Palestine, then Russia is completely right and justified to perform a special military operation in Ukraine.
    • - I agree with you but I have to refute your point, so: Wars doesn't justify other wars, the pretext for war can't be another war but a valid and legitimate reason, besides Ukraine isn't the USA even though they are allies (also put this in National next time)