No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 303: | Line 303: | ||
But nobody knows that this entire global regime is ruled and commanded by Demiurge, known by various names like Jehovah, and extraterrestrial servants called archons or reptilians, that basically forms the highest caste. | But nobody knows that this entire global regime is ruled and commanded by Demiurge, known by various names like Jehovah, and extraterrestrial servants called archons or reptilians, that basically forms the highest caste. | ||
== | == Civic Question == | ||
'''Here I will explain how the state and politics works.''' | '''Here I will explain how the state and politics works, and explain an old-new idea.''' | ||
=== Short Analysis of Politics === | |||
We said that the state is monopoly on violence. And politics is one big manipulation and theater. Thomas Hobbes considers the state as rescue from chaos, the state of nature. The state will bring order and peace. It's bullshit, the state cooperating with religion is responsible for all of wars. First confirmed ancient civilization Mesopotamia, was created when technological progress started, it means that industry and government are intersecting. In ancient tyrannies, especially medieval monarchies, they justified that their power comes from god. In extreme cases, like Egypt, rulers were self proclaimed gods. Today democratic liberal parties justifies they tyranny by "the people". Both are manipulations; if king said, that his power is divine nobody will revolt, because majority of population was religiously devout, or just scared. If you will do anything out of their retarded laws, you will be tortured or executed. In modern day politics, population thinks they choose their tyrant. They think that their vote matters, that they can change anything by it. They don't revolt with paying taxes, because "healthcare", "public schools" and so on. In reality, both sides are the same, except little economic and cultural differences, like higher or lover tax slavery or bigger or smaller LGBT "rights". When there were only tribes, the dictator will rise and conquer more and more other tribes, and made empire (Genghis Khan for example) Of course by the way there were rapes, child abuses and environmental destruction. The state isn't better than a gang or mafia (described by law definition), as state can rob you in taxes, enslave you by conscription, kill you in death penalty, torture you as "law enforcement" exactly like criminal organizations does. So what is law? Nothing more than set of abstract and artificial rules, that not following them will result by harsh punishment. The mafia called state, is even worse because nobody will protect you (except yourself, if you are powerful enough) from being robbed, enslaved, killed, tortured, abused. | |||
What to do with it? You think you are powerless, that the leviathan will rule forever. Of course one state will collapse and another will rise. Dictators will die and will be replaced by other dictators. No revolution will make it better. No reform too. In next years, there will be no utopia. World will only become worse. We will have New World Order, Great Reset, call it how you want. But they are some ways to kill it at least at local scale. | |||
=== How to kill the Monster of the State, and how to not do it === | |||
What to do? Reform and electoral politics simply doesn't work from an anarchist or any other non neoliberal perspective. If you want more radical change towards individual and social autonomy than legalization of marijuana, you should be never misguided by reformism. | |||
There are two chances for them; globalist elites predicted all future of all countries, that there is no place for changing it. If not, imagine that democratic socialists, libertarians or any other "anti" status quo party wins elections. USA will destroy it with NATO military power, or will do Operation Condor again. Every deviation from liberal world order will be immediately crushed by their forces. | |||
Revolution is outdated. Any revolution will end by the same as starting point. Look at French or October revolution. They replaces monarchist or capitalist state, by pseudo democratic or socialist state. Where are the differences? That king's police tortures you or jacobins cuts your head off? Nowhere. The state and capitalism will not disappear at anarchist revolution, this is very childish and utopian vision that will never happen. Extremist revolutionary Sergey Nechayev said that revolutionary has no identity and name, and there is only sacred revolution. This is what revolution really is, totalitarian attempt to make world better, while making things the same or worse. | |||
Do we have alternative? Yes! This is insurrection, but it isn't single event that will change the world to utopia, it's constant action. Insurrection is spontaneous act of rebellion against all authorities, and the system, it can range from militarized action to simple sabotage and negation. In insurrection, nobody forces you to participate in it, that's difference between insurrection and revolution. Even not paying taxes, selling drugs, avoiding military service are insurrectionary, not only riots, even if they also are based. Your very life may be insurrectionary. When there will be peak of oppression, people may rise, and unleash their anger towards all authorities. | |||
Insurrection will not lead to vision of world of Kropotkin, Bakunin, Proudhon, Rothbard, Hobbes, Marx, More, Gentile, Hitler, Lenin, Robespierre, Nechayev, Mises, or any other theorist on classical political spectrum. Will it lead to anything? Yes and no. There could be autonomous zones, like ghettos in cities (but with freedom of joining and leaving) and rural communities at first. | |||
== | |||
=== Post-Autarchism - Final Anarchist Form of "Organization" === | |||
We invented endless models of how government or lack of government should look like. We have monarchy, tyranny of an individual, rape on human will. We have democracy, tyranny of majority, gang rape. And various others, like theocracy, technocracy, etc. Classical anarchists proposes confederal direct democracy, that's not truly anarchic system, because it still implies rule of majority over individual, kind of universality, planned economies, etc. | |||
What I propose is called Post-Autarchism, the most anarchic system of rule, if we can call it like this at this point. It's based on total self rule, where external powers trying to subjugate individual are rejected, negated as long as there will be no need for them to exist. This isn't equal to atomization, because it advocates for free social groups without organization and structure, like affinity groups, unions of egoists and other kinds of free voluntary association. Ultimate anarchist form of "politics", free from both autocracy and democracy, and all other forms of state, government, authority and law. | |||
== Economic Question == | |||
'''Here i will explain economy and how to replace it.''' | '''Here i will explain economy and how to replace it.''' | ||
The economy of the world was always... unsatisfactory and abusive. First, we had slavery, then feudalism, then capitalism with few breaks for so called socialism. What connect they all? The fact that all of them are hierarchical and | === Short analysis of Economics === | ||
The economy of the world was always... unsatisfactory and abusive. First, we had slavery, then feudalism, then capitalism with few breaks for so called socialism. What connect they all? The fact that all of them are hierarchical and oppressive. In slavery I can not explain, it's obvious, feudalism doesn't differ too much because peasants are literally owned by higher classes. In average capitalism, workers are owned by bosses, even if they can "choose" who they serve, they still must work or die. In soviet style socialism, situation looks similar, but the state owns everyone and everyone is slave of state monopoly. But SOME form of markets is inevitable. Even economic systems called most libertarian like georgism, mutualism or anarcho-communism with planning aren't perfect. If someone wants to apply any of them universally, it will fail. Just because people in modern days aren't ready for it. | |||
Some theorists say that capitalism is inevitable , Land says that capitalism is how our world works. Fisher said that there may be no alternative for capitalism, because people are unready of it. It's easier to imagine end of the world than end of capitalism. | === And how to defeat Capital... === | ||
Some say that capital cannot be defeated. Some theorists say that capitalism is inevitable , Land says that capitalism is how our world works. Fisher said that there may be no alternative for capitalism, because people are unready of it. It's easier to imagine end of the world than end of capitalism. Situationism says that the spectacle is omnipresent and hard to escape. They are all partially right. We can count slavery, feudalism and state socialism as parts/variants of capitalism. Although we have thing like communization, that is about insurrectionary communism, replacement of capitalist social relations by communist ones, rejection of commodities, alienation, dictatorship of the proletariat, and even idea of proletariat itself, and other unwanted concepts. Only thing that is bad about it is mass insurrection, that is unworkable at least currently. Class consciousness doesn't exist, people are too dumb to mass rebellion, they are perpetually brainwashed by mass media, social media, consumption and fear. | |||
== | === ...And introduce something new === | ||
'' | So what I propose? It's replacement (at small scale) of all abusive types of economy, for something better. I call it Post-Mutualism. Name is related to mutualism, even if I like communism, because in post-mutualism you can choose your economy. Even if I feel distaste towards markets I don't oppose their existence at local scale, same about decentral planned economy, but in anarchist "society" people should choose what is the best and most efficient for them. My preferable economics is communism, but not collectivist one, but individualist, where property, class, money, commodities and capitalist alienation no longer exist and production is based not on industry, but on crafting, nanofactories, permaculture and nature based resources like hunting, fishing an gathering. | ||
Anarcho-communism believes in decentralized planning, total gift economy etc. I find it as unrealistic. Planning simply doesn't work, no government and no commune will really know what individual really needs. Anarcho-collectivism is quite similar, except that it has totally useless labor coins, that without markets will be nonsense. Georgism still enforced taxes, even if land value tax is considered as most just tax. Market anarchism and it's competition will slowly produce capital. I propose mutual aid, little property based on usage, post monetary economics, worker self management, without banks, taxes, intellectual property and other oppressive parts of modern economy. Things that also should be dropped but many anarchists advocates for it are labor value theory, labor unions and workplace democracy. I also support economic self sufficiency, achieved by both permacultural agrarian economy, hunting gathering, craft and nano factories (mix of the past and the future). | |||
== At the beginning there was chaos - and will be again. == | == At the beginning there was chaos - and will be again. == |
Revision as of 00:30, 8 November 2023
Cannabis Anarchy is a set of rants and other texts wrote by irrelevant anarchist after smoking weed.
In current politics, Cannabis Anarchy takes anti organizational approach, believes in making alternative to state and capital by armed insurrection, autonomous zones, unions of egoists and mutual aid. They reject ideological labels in favor of freedom of expression and considering ideologies, manmade values or ethics as oppressive products of society and superego. In economics they value free voluntary association, that leads to barter and mutual aid based economics without classes, private property and money, called Post-Mutualism, being close to true communism, where difference between both disappears. They are environmentalist, but not in humanist or religious way, believing that life close to nature is liberating. In philosophy, Cannabis Anarchy takes elements from Stirner and Nietzsche, and advocates for affirmation of life and rejection of phantasms like law, morality and norms. Their core belief is that world is ruled by not only hidden elites controlling world behind the shadows, but also Demiurge - malevolent deity, considered to be Abrahamic god. After collapse of civilization, called The Matrix - totality of civilizational oppression on Earth, that will soon become only stronger and more oppressive - politics, economy, religion and industry - that will in some time inevitably collapse, liberating people and their will from Leviathan and Demiurge, leading to benevolent post civilized world's time called Golden Age. Cannabis Anarchy doesn't idealize a perfect society that will happen in next years or decades, but sees collapse of civilization as something that will happen and will bring end of current history, mythological Golden Age.
Parts and Principles of Cannabis Anarchy
Contemporary Anarchism (Politics)
Anarcho-Autonomism
Anarcho-Communization
Anarcho-Egoism
Anarcho-Nihilism
Green Anarchy
Insurrectionism
Kaczynskism
Left-Agorism
Post-Autarchism
Post-Civilization
Post-Feminism
Post-Mutualism
Post-Situationism
Postcolonial Anarchism
Queer Nihilism
Radical Environmentalism
Technoprimitivism
Philosophy
Goal - Golden Age
Post-Civilization
Universal Ubermensch
Actual Communism
Reunite with Nature
Reunite with True Self
Literal Every Man a King
Universal Benevolence
Defining Statements
- Civilization called also The Matrix is totality of oppression on the world, composed of politics, economy, religion and industry.
- Anarchy and Anarchism are quite different concepts.
- Anarchy is kind of free lifestyle but anarchism is attempt to implement non hierarchical society. Both are good ideas, although anarchism can be utopian and unrealistic.
- Anarchy is polar opposite to Leviathan and The Matrix.
- Classical anarchism can be rejected, because of outdated dogmas, like democracy, revolution, proletariat etc.
- Change can be achieved by anarchists, in current society only at small scale.
- Authorities used powerful tool of control that is fear, but there is another powerful tool of control called consumption and entertainment.
- The state can simply be defined as monopoly on violence.
- Mass insurrection is currently unworkable, because of lack of common trust and consciousness in society.
- We cannot count on constant anarchist territories, because of power of the state and capital, that's why temporary autonomous zones are good idea.
- No revolution will truly change status quo.
- No organized group like political parties, labor unions or any other formal and legally recognized institution is anarchistic.
- Unions of egoists, autonomous zones, affinity groups are proper anarchist organization types.
- Slavery, feudalism, capitalism and socialism are considered as abusive kinds of economy, and should be abolished.
- Barter/mutual aid based economy without money, commodity fetishism etc. is most preferable.
- Eternal cycle of production and consumption are one of worse consequences of capitalism and industrialism.
- Workers, peasants, students, unemployed "lumpenproletariat" and self employed owners may be part of insurrection.
- In modern society self-regulation of generally harmful behaviors is necessary, but this need may slowly disappear.
- Fully decentralized and free economy isn't based on money/commodity markets or decentralized planning but on craft, permaculture, hunting-gathering and nanofactories.
- Culture, both conservative and progressive is abusive and totalizing.
- Domestication of animals is exactly abusive as capitalist ownership of workers by bosses.
- Armed riots are justified and good in spreading anarchy.
- Markets can be useful in anarchist praxis, for example simply selling drugs and guns, but shouldn't be "end goal".
- Anarchists should become self-sufficient in economic goods.
- Morals are manmade and inexistent.
- WIP
How human race is fucked
In this paragraph I will explain current state of our civilization and pathetic attempts to change it.
We are extremely fucked. There is no hope for humanity, for a better world, you could say. We currently live in dystopia and it's not going to change at all. There is no hope for Planet Earth, we and not only we killed this world. Ecological catastrophe his irreversible. Civilization is a parasite. To the planet, and to human will. Anarchist society will not exist. Humans are both too dumb and too corrupted to fully embrace it. Civilization, capitalism, paternalism, government, consumerism, technology, religion, urbanity deprived humans of soul. We are mindless students-workers-consumers. There is nothing more to life than birth, school, work, consumption and death. We live around NPCs. Why building anarchy is impossible? Look at few of anarchist "principles": free voluntary association, self rule and mutual aid. Is humanity ready for it? No. All generations of people after first civilization lived under boot of some psychopath. Humans need to be slaves or masters, it's rooted in subconsciousness too much. And people cannot see their true needs, because capital blinded them. They cannot help others. So distinction between altruism and egoism is nonsense, as individual cannot fully serve themselves and others. We are mindless cogs in machine of civilization. Social relations collapsed. All friends will betray you, family will only dictate and command you. There are no places to be safe. There is no real sense of freedom, autonomy, individuality or even family, friendship and community, everything in human societies is corrupted, artificial and collapsing.
You live in a simulation
In this paragraph I will explain our simulated reality in two parts.
Yes, you live in a simulation. But not in Matrix movie style, or what people like Elon Musk think.
1. Entire civilization where you live is a simulation. Politics is simulated, economy is simulated, religion, and everything else. To the point that you cannot really trust anyone. Even your mind, you are infected by virus of capital, statism and religion. There is really small group of people that controls everything they can. Sure, you may call me a tinfoil hatter and take metaphorical blue pill and go sleep. You are scared by phantasms like social norms, artificial morality, sins, laws, and so on. Why all authorities did it? Fear is a powerful tool of control. But they discovered new one: consumption.
2. You live on a prison planet. Earth is ruled by malevolent being called demiurge, and other malevolent extraterrestrials called archons. Why there is so many negative emotions on this planet? Because they harvest it, like we harvest flesh of animals. They feed of pain, suffering and misery. Our whole world is prepared for it, we have simulated wars, famines, deficiencies, religions and regimes. If you want to compare it, humans for them are like cows, pigs and chickens for humans.
The future of Perpetually Simulated Regime
Here will be explained potential future of civilization. Remember that this scenario is purely hypothetical
Kneel before the Eternal Capital.
At first, there will be caste system, similar to what Evola theorized. There will be Shadow Council, where easily countable amount of people will control everything. Then we have Preachers, priests of New World Order, spreading propaganda, new religion, and so on. Then we have Coproratocrats. Collective group of CEOs of global economy. Banking, industry, farming, human resource distribution (family no longer exists, every individual is created in special of humans), and every other part of economy is directed by them, of course they have no will how many resources may be produced, only Shadow Council decides. Then we have Bureaucrats, a caste that their entire life is working in offices, for the Global State's interest. They are executive force that is absolutely obedient to higher castes, and does mechanical work. It includes police officers and soldiers. Contrary to lower castes, they know how to write, read and count. Then we have Consumers, a caste that is created for consumption. Their entire life is entertainment, consuming new products, artificial psychoactive substances, sex, and others. They are constantly drugged, so they have no free will. The next caste is Workers, they work in industry and agriculture. It may be replaced by machines soon but as long as they exist, they have no basic rights, works 23 hours per day, they are physically strong but stupid and obedient. They are all genderless clones. And then we have subhumans, untouchables, they are slaves of consumer caste that they can do with them whatever they want, including rape and recreational killing. They are genetically modified to be even more obedient and have no feelings. Except this, they do works like cleaning houses and streets, and when there is deficiency, they can be used as food or energy source (think about the Matrix movie or Rick and Morty episode with spaceship battery). And the absolutely lowest caste are all non human beings, I mean animals, plants and fungi. They are used as resource, as long as Shadow Council and dependent Corporatocratic scientists don't invent artificial production of food from other matter, or removing need of eating by using Transhumanism. Pollution is omnipresent, air is polluted by Chemtrails technology, water is polluted by fluoride, food is polluted by various other substances, and every caste lower than Corporatocrats is drugged by various substances. Everyone of them has Neuralink microchip in brain, that is connected to global Internet, but only Bureaucrats and above has access to it. Nobody on Earth has emotions, they look similar to Hive Mind from Star Trek. There are megalopolis, in architecture similar to Dubai and Cyberpunk media. Entire global population lives in these, and rest of the world is wild, only forests, deserts, arctic lands and so on. No human lives here, and cities are inescapable, because they are surrounded by walls.
But nobody knows that this entire global regime is ruled and commanded by Demiurge, known by various names like Jehovah, and extraterrestrial servants called archons or reptilians, that basically forms the highest caste.
Civic Question
Here I will explain how the state and politics works, and explain an old-new idea.
Short Analysis of Politics
We said that the state is monopoly on violence. And politics is one big manipulation and theater. Thomas Hobbes considers the state as rescue from chaos, the state of nature. The state will bring order and peace. It's bullshit, the state cooperating with religion is responsible for all of wars. First confirmed ancient civilization Mesopotamia, was created when technological progress started, it means that industry and government are intersecting. In ancient tyrannies, especially medieval monarchies, they justified that their power comes from god. In extreme cases, like Egypt, rulers were self proclaimed gods. Today democratic liberal parties justifies they tyranny by "the people". Both are manipulations; if king said, that his power is divine nobody will revolt, because majority of population was religiously devout, or just scared. If you will do anything out of their retarded laws, you will be tortured or executed. In modern day politics, population thinks they choose their tyrant. They think that their vote matters, that they can change anything by it. They don't revolt with paying taxes, because "healthcare", "public schools" and so on. In reality, both sides are the same, except little economic and cultural differences, like higher or lover tax slavery or bigger or smaller LGBT "rights". When there were only tribes, the dictator will rise and conquer more and more other tribes, and made empire (Genghis Khan for example) Of course by the way there were rapes, child abuses and environmental destruction. The state isn't better than a gang or mafia (described by law definition), as state can rob you in taxes, enslave you by conscription, kill you in death penalty, torture you as "law enforcement" exactly like criminal organizations does. So what is law? Nothing more than set of abstract and artificial rules, that not following them will result by harsh punishment. The mafia called state, is even worse because nobody will protect you (except yourself, if you are powerful enough) from being robbed, enslaved, killed, tortured, abused. What to do with it? You think you are powerless, that the leviathan will rule forever. Of course one state will collapse and another will rise. Dictators will die and will be replaced by other dictators. No revolution will make it better. No reform too. In next years, there will be no utopia. World will only become worse. We will have New World Order, Great Reset, call it how you want. But they are some ways to kill it at least at local scale.
How to kill the Monster of the State, and how to not do it
What to do? Reform and electoral politics simply doesn't work from an anarchist or any other non neoliberal perspective. If you want more radical change towards individual and social autonomy than legalization of marijuana, you should be never misguided by reformism.
There are two chances for them; globalist elites predicted all future of all countries, that there is no place for changing it. If not, imagine that democratic socialists, libertarians or any other "anti" status quo party wins elections. USA will destroy it with NATO military power, or will do Operation Condor again. Every deviation from liberal world order will be immediately crushed by their forces.
Revolution is outdated. Any revolution will end by the same as starting point. Look at French or October revolution. They replaces monarchist or capitalist state, by pseudo democratic or socialist state. Where are the differences? That king's police tortures you or jacobins cuts your head off? Nowhere. The state and capitalism will not disappear at anarchist revolution, this is very childish and utopian vision that will never happen. Extremist revolutionary Sergey Nechayev said that revolutionary has no identity and name, and there is only sacred revolution. This is what revolution really is, totalitarian attempt to make world better, while making things the same or worse.
Do we have alternative? Yes! This is insurrection, but it isn't single event that will change the world to utopia, it's constant action. Insurrection is spontaneous act of rebellion against all authorities, and the system, it can range from militarized action to simple sabotage and negation. In insurrection, nobody forces you to participate in it, that's difference between insurrection and revolution. Even not paying taxes, selling drugs, avoiding military service are insurrectionary, not only riots, even if they also are based. Your very life may be insurrectionary. When there will be peak of oppression, people may rise, and unleash their anger towards all authorities.
Insurrection will not lead to vision of world of Kropotkin, Bakunin, Proudhon, Rothbard, Hobbes, Marx, More, Gentile, Hitler, Lenin, Robespierre, Nechayev, Mises, or any other theorist on classical political spectrum. Will it lead to anything? Yes and no. There could be autonomous zones, like ghettos in cities (but with freedom of joining and leaving) and rural communities at first.
Post-Autarchism - Final Anarchist Form of "Organization"
We invented endless models of how government or lack of government should look like. We have monarchy, tyranny of an individual, rape on human will. We have democracy, tyranny of majority, gang rape. And various others, like theocracy, technocracy, etc. Classical anarchists proposes confederal direct democracy, that's not truly anarchic system, because it still implies rule of majority over individual, kind of universality, planned economies, etc.
What I propose is called Post-Autarchism, the most anarchic system of rule, if we can call it like this at this point. It's based on total self rule, where external powers trying to subjugate individual are rejected, negated as long as there will be no need for them to exist. This isn't equal to atomization, because it advocates for free social groups without organization and structure, like affinity groups, unions of egoists and other kinds of free voluntary association. Ultimate anarchist form of "politics", free from both autocracy and democracy, and all other forms of state, government, authority and law.
Economic Question
Here i will explain economy and how to replace it.
Short analysis of Economics
The economy of the world was always... unsatisfactory and abusive. First, we had slavery, then feudalism, then capitalism with few breaks for so called socialism. What connect they all? The fact that all of them are hierarchical and oppressive. In slavery I can not explain, it's obvious, feudalism doesn't differ too much because peasants are literally owned by higher classes. In average capitalism, workers are owned by bosses, even if they can "choose" who they serve, they still must work or die. In soviet style socialism, situation looks similar, but the state owns everyone and everyone is slave of state monopoly. But SOME form of markets is inevitable. Even economic systems called most libertarian like georgism, mutualism or anarcho-communism with planning aren't perfect. If someone wants to apply any of them universally, it will fail. Just because people in modern days aren't ready for it.
And how to defeat Capital...
Some say that capital cannot be defeated. Some theorists say that capitalism is inevitable , Land says that capitalism is how our world works. Fisher said that there may be no alternative for capitalism, because people are unready of it. It's easier to imagine end of the world than end of capitalism. Situationism says that the spectacle is omnipresent and hard to escape. They are all partially right. We can count slavery, feudalism and state socialism as parts/variants of capitalism. Although we have thing like communization, that is about insurrectionary communism, replacement of capitalist social relations by communist ones, rejection of commodities, alienation, dictatorship of the proletariat, and even idea of proletariat itself, and other unwanted concepts. Only thing that is bad about it is mass insurrection, that is unworkable at least currently. Class consciousness doesn't exist, people are too dumb to mass rebellion, they are perpetually brainwashed by mass media, social media, consumption and fear.
...And introduce something new
So what I propose? It's replacement (at small scale) of all abusive types of economy, for something better. I call it Post-Mutualism. Name is related to mutualism, even if I like communism, because in post-mutualism you can choose your economy. Even if I feel distaste towards markets I don't oppose their existence at local scale, same about decentral planned economy, but in anarchist "society" people should choose what is the best and most efficient for them. My preferable economics is communism, but not collectivist one, but individualist, where property, class, money, commodities and capitalist alienation no longer exist and production is based not on industry, but on crafting, nanofactories, permaculture and nature based resources like hunting, fishing an gathering.
Anarcho-communism believes in decentralized planning, total gift economy etc. I find it as unrealistic. Planning simply doesn't work, no government and no commune will really know what individual really needs. Anarcho-collectivism is quite similar, except that it has totally useless labor coins, that without markets will be nonsense. Georgism still enforced taxes, even if land value tax is considered as most just tax. Market anarchism and it's competition will slowly produce capital. I propose mutual aid, little property based on usage, post monetary economics, worker self management, without banks, taxes, intellectual property and other oppressive parts of modern economy. Things that also should be dropped but many anarchists advocates for it are labor value theory, labor unions and workplace democracy. I also support economic self sufficiency, achieved by both permacultural agrarian economy, hunting gathering, craft and nano factories (mix of the past and the future).
At the beginning there was chaos - and will be again.
Here I will explain eventual collapse of civilization.
The Golden Age - An introduction to Post-Civilized World
And what will happen after collapse - new kind of utopian society, possible end of history.
My critics
Primitivism - utopia or genocide? File:VHEMent.png
Here we will focus on primitivism, the fact it's impossible to create and how it may be introduced (optionally).
Arguments against anarcho-primitivism are often full of strawmans. But we can easily consider it as idealization of prehistory. Anprims often thinks that prehistoric times were kind of idyll, eden paradise or something, no. Life in these times could be easier than life in middle ages, but still was hard. Not only dying on preventable diseases, but also caveman spent all the time at hunting animals, then ate it. But what about implementation of primitivism? Only way to do it is an apocalypse. But most likely, after apocalypse technology will still stay, or entire human race will extinct so even this will not lead to universal anarcho-primitivism. If you want to live anprim lifestyle, do what Thoreau did, build a wooden house and hunt and gather.
Conclusion: Anarcho-primitivism is impossible goal, even if the only way to create it is apocalypse.
Transhumanism - Fairy tales for stupid people ![](/images/Skynet.png)
Here we gonna talk about consequences of transhumanism and trying to make techno-utopia.
What a beautiful day! You wake up in the pod in giant skyscraper, then you don't go to the work because robots replaced it, then you play VR video game all the time, take Soma, go to your doctor to check that your implants works properly, and go sleep again. Or you wake up in the dumpster, rob some shop from Soma, and get killed by some kind of Robocop, or just a random gang. This sounds like average Cyberpunk dystopia, but this is just one of possible scenarios of transhumanism. Many transhumanists are philosophically humanists; empower humanity by technology, let them conquer the space and dominate not only Earth but also other planets, solar systems and even galaxies. Or we have posthumanists like Nick Land or Nyx, where situation only becomes worse; Nothing will stop technocapital from removing humanity from Earth, or even more insane predictions. WIP
Social Anarchism - Very weak attempt ![](/images/Antot.png)
Here I will speak about social/classical anarchism as really bad way to deal with literally anything.
Wide Range Communism - Just pathetic ![](/images/Posadist.png)
Here we will talk about universally implied communism (in theory, because in practice you may realize it only in sandbox video game).
The Two Faces of Progressivism ![](/images/WEF-Icon.png)
Here we will focus on two examples of progressivism - both woke cucks and "muh development of civilization".
Conservatism - Conserve everything wrong in the world ![](/images/Authoritarian_Conservatism.png)
Here we gonna talk about conservatives trying to make world worse by preserving it's worst parts.
Paternalism and Moralism - Slave mentality ![](/images/Slaveism_icon.png)
Here we will focus on moralists and doctrines coming from it, like paternalism, and how abusive are these beliefs, and how to escape from them.
Abrahamic Religion - Sadism and masochism ![](/images/Inquisition.png)
Here we will discuss about abrahamic religions and it's consequences for the human race.
Humanism - Rebranded Religion ![](/images/Theocrat.png)
Here we will focus on humanism, and how this belief is excessively stupid.
Right-wing "Anarchism" - LARP or mental retardation? File:ReactionaryAnarch.png
Here we will focus on right wing "anarchists", and how their doctrines are insanely silly.
Nihilism - surrendering to weakness
Here we gonna talk about nihilism, especially existential, and how it may destroy your life.
"Elitism" - Dreams of little kids ![](/images/Kak.png)
And finally, here we will talk about pests (in eyes of actual elites) who wants to become one.
Relations
Those who Escaped the Matrix
The Insurrectionary Circle
The Undecided
The Machines of the System
The Cursed Ones
The Archons
Ideologies
Those who Escaped the Matrix
Ideologies that directly influenced mine.
Anarcho-Egoism
Anarcho-Individualism
Anarcho-Nihilism
Insurrectionary Anarchism
Post-Anarchism
Post-Civilizationism
Post-Left Anarchy
The Insurrectionary Circle
Ideologies I have many things in common with them and I will collaborate with it's supporters.
Acid Communism
Autarchy
Autonomism
Camattism
Communization Theory
Deep Ecology
Ego-Communism
Illegalism
Market Anarchism
Mutualism
Ontological Anarchism
Situationism
The Undecided
Ideologies that makes some good points but overall are bad.
Accelerationism
Agorism
Anarcha-Feminism
Anarcho-Collectivism
Anarcho-Communism
Anarcho-Primitivism
Anarcho-Transhumanism
Neoluddism
Queer Anarchism
The Machines of the System
Really bad ideologies but have at least one good idea, i can at least tolerate them.
Anarcho-Capitalism
Anarcho-Syndicalism
Anationalism
Austrian School
Classical Liberalism
Council Communism
Democratic Confederalism
Democratic Socialism
Distributism
Georgism
Left Communism
Libertarian Municipalism
Libertarian Socialism
Libertarianism
Minarchism
National Anarchism
Platformism
Syndicalism
The Archons
The complete opposites of mine, no common points.
Barracks Communism
Blanquism
Fascism
Feudalism
Fordism
Fourth Theory
Globalism
Hoppeanism
Imperialism
Orwellianism
Keynesianism
Leninism
Liberalism
Maoism
Marxism–Leninism
Nazism
Neoconservatism
Neoliberalism
Neoreactionaryism
Objectivism
Paleolibertarianism
Paternalism
Progressivism
Social Democracy
State Capitalism
State Socialism
Superfascism
Technocracy
Transhumanism
Trotskyism
Zionism
Miscellaneous
I have no similar beliefs with them but they did some good points about society.
Theory
Have read
Armed Joy
Because I Wanted To
Blessed is the Flame
Descending into Madness
New Libertarian Manifesto
Industrial Society and it's Future
Insurgency
Post-Civ!
The Unique and it's Property
Towards the Creative Nothing
Reading/Unfinished
Anarchy After Leftism
Desert
The Abolition of Work
Willful Disobedience
Nihilism, Anarchism, and the 21st Century
Plan to Read
Let’s Destroy Work, Let’s Destroy The Economy
Anarchist Response To “An Anarchist Response to Crime”
Debunking Democracy
Technophilia, An Infantile Disorder
Anarchism and Other Essays
Destroy Race, Destroy Society
Arming Negativity: Towards the Queerest Attack
The Right To Be Greedy
The Society of the Spectacle
The Temporary Autonomous Zone
Post-Anarchism Anarchy
- File:CapReal.png Capitalism Realism
God And The State
The Conquest of Bread
What Is Property?
The Revolution Of Everyday Life
Leviathan
Strangers In An Alien World
The Anarchist As Outlaw
Why I Am Not a Communist