LordCompost (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
= Comments = | = Comments = | ||
{{LordCompost}} - Please comment here if you have questions.<br> | {{LordCompost}} - Please comment here if you have questions.<br> | ||
{{UserAm}} - Guess what, Neo-Killer Kittyism was a troll apparently, he was testing our gullibility I think | |||
{{#css: | {{#css: | ||
.cs-comments{display:none;} | .cs-comments{display:none;} | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:52, 13 January 2024
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent LordCompost's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
‟Through the heaven of civilization, the human being seeks to isolate himself from the world, to break its hostile power.”
Howdy, I'm LordCompost.
TL:DR, I believe that [insert issue here] is simply due to our servile and religious relation towards [said issue] treating it as sacred, necessary, unquestionable, etc., - Instead I see these [issues] as merely transitory, revisable, pragmatic, and contingent phenomena which individuals, groups, or even 'societies' are able to "freely" transform.
Summary
See my Philosophy page.
Writings
Links to my Substack.
The Cultural Industrial Complex
Relations
CarrotsRppl2
How is 'The State and Its Property' illegitimate? If you truly held to the principle that property is individual protection, then isn't the state currently the most powerful entity that protects its property? As such, according to you, it is your perfect society already.
Bourgeoisie Destroyer
I am sure you have read something, but merely returning and subscribing to 'ancient' philosophy does not make one intelligent, nor does it advance any knowledge or let one overcome modern problems simply because thought has developed and overcome older philosophy.
Killer Kitty
Question: Why are Brazillian's superior? If politics was a net negative on your country would you overcome it and bring politics into its nullity? Or would you hold close to it and always remain bound to your highest truth? 'No,' you would say, 'politics cannot be done away with; it is necessary, it is fundamental, it is more important than us.'
Kosciuszkovagr
No writings...
Xx godisfaithful xx
Your similarity to postmodern/post-anarchism with your rejection of an 'Arche' or grounding principle is fascinating. This is why I am surprised you disagree with postmodernism so much. To complement this, I suggest reading 'Romantic Anarche: The Philosophical and Literary Anarchism of William Godwin'. However, in your thought, I find the assurance of human rights to be the primary ground of politics; it seems to be a slight contradiction?
Notes
Comments
LordCompost - Please comment here if you have questions.
Amism - Guess what, Neo-Killer Kittyism was a troll apparently, he was testing our gullibility I think