No edit summary |
|||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
.portable-infobox {width: 346px;} | .portable-infobox {width: 346px;} | ||
}}<no-comment-streams /> | }}<no-comment-streams /> | ||
{{#css: | |||
body *, .mw-body * { | |||
font-family: 'Sylfaen', monospace; | |||
} | |||
#mw-content a:not(.new) { | |||
font-family: 'Sylfaen', monospace; | |||
} | |||
body #mw-content { | |||
font-family: 'Sylfaen', monospace; | |||
} | |||
}} | |||
Revision as of 06:34, 14 January 2024
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Baxist Manifesto is my manifesto. Mi ideology is Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Baxism. You can comment in here about this.
Introduction
For years, revolutionaries have made several mistakes, but the biggest one was turning capitalist. The entire world has become capitalist. Is there another option? Yes! What is that option? I would like to say that this book offers a solution, but I don't like lying too much. A “solution,” you could say, would be Directed Socialism,[1] but it’s just theory.
The Folkish Syndicalism of Alstūd and Fargoth, but it's very traditionalist, and I’m looking for huge social changes.
This manifesto will only talk about my boring ideas and about my homeland, Chile, and how its problems could be “resolved.” I remember creating with my friend Rodrigo the National-Laborism, but at that time, we knew nothing about economics and believed in a synthesis between social democracy and strasserism[2] unironically.
Let this manifesto be my garbage in a can.
The National Revolution Part One
I am a Revolutionary Nationalist. I believe in a nationalist revolution where the proletarians, socialists, of course, rebel against the capitalists. This is utopian because Chile is a capitalist state where the proletarians are mistreated and continue to want to be mistreated. Just as Daniel Sansón[3] once said: “The poor are like dogs: they guard the mansion and sleep outside.” Sansón was right: the poor are like dogs who unconditionally care for their masters.
The damned bourgeoisie robs us, and the proletarians are blind to it. Proletarians are blindfolded. When a proletarian removes the blindfold and rebels, they end up in prison. We urgently need a nationalist revolution similar to that of the Jacobins, but Marxist and with socialism.
These ideas make me utopian and idealistic. I am not very pragmatic, but I am more realistic because, even though I consider myself optimistic, I live entirely in pessimism: I hate my life; I want to rebel, and I can’t. It might not be pessimism but fatalism.
See? I’m crazy: I just changed the topic easily. I look in both directions, I always change. That makes me contradictory. I can say yes to something once and no to the same thing later.
But well, continuing with the topic, the proletarian must rebel in a nationalist way. But how are they going to rebel if, for example, on September 4, 2022, they voted against a constitution that guaranteed bread, housing, and water? That’s the problem with the proletarians: they are blind.
Moreover, the left formed a coalition for the Rechazo. That shows how treacherous the current left is, only stealing and lying, just like the right. They are all rats and do not understand the proletarian.
But let’s leave the revolutionary and nationalist idea for later, as I will now criticize everything from the comfort of my chair.
Critique of everything
Enlightenment
The Enlightenment is the most critiquable thing imaginable, not because of the Jacobins, but due to some serious issues, like the desire to know everything. Although I am an Enlightenment thinker, it doesn’t mean I defend it wholeheartedly.
Damn Enlightenment thinkers, without them, we wouldn't have Rousseau, my idol!
But not everything in the Enlightenment is bad; there are some good ideas—though few—like Rousseau’s ideals. Even though I see flaws in Rousseau, that’s why I consider myself “Post-Rousseauian”.
I love reason, but it’s wrong to always be right. One can think, but one must think well! If one thinks, they shouldn’t feel superior to others. If one thinks—you can think however you want—they should be open to others’ ideas. That’s what I criticize about the Enlightenment because both Counter-Enlightenment and Enlightenment try to impose something on you. That’s why I like Romanticism, even though it is, well, Counter-Enlightenment, Romanticism is still good. I like Romanticism, but there are points about it that I must criticize, and I will, even though I don’t fully understand Romanticism.
References
Opinions
- Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Baxism - Hi.
- Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination - hi.
- Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Neosyndicalism - Banger.
