LordCompost (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
Howdy, I'm {{LordCompost}}. | Howdy, I'm {{LordCompost}}. | ||
Unlike what my influences describe, my thought is grounded not in [[File:PolNil.png]] [[phil:Political Nihilism|Political Nihilism]] nor [[File:AnindnoI.png]] [[Anarcho-Individualism|Egoist/Individualist Anarchism]], but rather in a [[File:AntiAnarchy.png]] [[Authoritarianism|Non-Anarchist]] interpretation of [[File:Anticiv.png]] [[phil:Anti-Civilization|Anti-Civilization]] and [[File:Postciv.png]] [[phil:Post-Civilization|Post-Civilization]] philosophy; seeing the state as just another of the same phenomenon which underpins modern civilisation. I see [[File:Krit.png]] [[Communitarianism|civilisation]], [[File:Sec.png]] [[Authoritarianism|the state]], [[File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism|capitalism]], [[File:Trad.png]] [[Traditionalism|traditions]], or any other [[File:HistPhil.png]] [[phil:Historicism|contingent historical phenomenon]], etc., as neither desirable nor regrettable; they are simply existent, and our relation to such phenomena underpins societal ills. | |||
I see civilisation, capital, culture, ideology, etc., as part of a domesticating process through which individuals find themselves under subjectification. However, this does not create oppression by itself but rather leads to opportunities, social relations, and the possibility of fixity and ideological domination. My response to such domestication is simply the constant renegotiation of [[File:Indiv.png]] [[phil:Individualism|individuals]], [[File:Struct.png]] [[phil:Structuralism|institutions]], [[File:Social.png]] [[phil:Social_Orgamism|societies]], etc., to themselves and their values through the questioning and revision of values as a form of [[File:Postciv.png]] [[Ultraprogressivism|decadence]] and [[File:Pragmat.png]] [[phil:Pragmatism|pragmatism]]. | |||
My Icons: ([[File:Postciv.png]]/[[File:Pragmat.png]]/[[File:EgoNihil.png]]) | |||
= Summary = | = Summary = | ||
See my '''[[phil:UserWiki:LordCompost86|Philosophy]]''' page. | See my '''[[phil:UserWiki:LordCompost86|Philosophy]]''' page. | ||
= Theory = | |||
'''W.I.P''' | |||
= Writings = | = Writings = | ||
| Line 128: | Line 135: | ||
[[File:Weedium.png]] [[Gualguainism|{{Color|#272e38|'''Weedium'''}}]] <br> | [[File:Weedium.png]] [[Gualguainism|{{Color|#272e38|'''Weedium'''}}]] <br> | ||
You have no idea what you are talking about, do you? Also, please try to improve your writing skills. | You have no idea what you are talking about, do you? Also, please try to improve your writing skills. | ||
=Notes= | =Notes= | ||
| Line 136: | Line 142: | ||
= Comments = | = Comments = | ||
{{LordCompost}} - Please comment here if you have questions.<br> | {{LordCompost}} - Please comment here if you have questions.<br> | ||
*[[File:Weedium.png]] Partially do, in "Might as Runs" it was a mimic of Meltdown which is why it had a strange wrting style, intellect is maybe smth to acquire later and not rushing <s>why am I wanting to fully read stuff now because of this</s> in what ways can I improve in my writing skills? | |||
**{{LordCompost}} - I don't know; to me, and not just ''Might as Runs'' is readable sure, but it is not very reader-friendly; nor does it add your cryptic combination of ideology and excessive creating of non-existent ideologies. | |||
{{#css: | {{#css: | ||
.cs-comments{display:none;} | .cs-comments{display:none;} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 14:27, 14 January 2024
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent LordCompost's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
‟Through the heaven of civilization, the human being seeks to isolate himself from the world, to break its hostile power.”
– The Unique and Its Property,Max Stirner
Howdy, I'm 
LordCompost.
Unlike what my influences describe, my thought is grounded not in 
Political Nihilism nor 
Egoist/Individualist Anarchism, but rather in a 
Non-Anarchist interpretation of 
Anti-Civilization and 
Post-Civilization philosophy; seeing the state as just another of the same phenomenon which underpins modern civilisation. I see 
civilisation, 
the state, 
capitalism, 
traditions, or any other 
contingent historical phenomenon, etc., as neither desirable nor regrettable; they are simply existent, and our relation to such phenomena underpins societal ills.
I see civilisation, capital, culture, ideology, etc., as part of a domesticating process through which individuals find themselves under subjectification. However, this does not create oppression by itself but rather leads to opportunities, social relations, and the possibility of fixity and ideological domination. My response to such domestication is simply the constant renegotiation of 
individuals, 
institutions, 
societies, etc., to themselves and their values through the questioning and revision of values as a form of decadence and 
pragmatism.
My Icons: (//
)
Summary
See my Philosophy page.
Theory
W.I.P
Writings
Links to my Substack.
The Cultural Industrial Complex
Relations
CarrotsRppl2
How is 'The State and Its Property' illegitimate? If you truly held to the principle that property is individual protection, then isn't the state currently the most powerful entity that protects its property? As such, according to you, it is your perfect society already.
Bourgeoisie Destroyer
I am sure you have read something, but merely returning and subscribing to 'ancient' philosophy does not make one intelligent, nor does it advance any knowledge or let one overcome modern problems simply because thought has developed and overcome older philosophy.
Killer Kitty
Question: If politics was a net negative on your country would you overcome it and bring politics into its nullity? Or would you hold close to it and always remain bound to your highest truth? 'No,' you would say, 'politics cannot be done away with; it is necessary, it is fundamental, it is more important than us.' Liberalism, Fascism? Politics...
Kosciuszkovagr
No writings...
Xx godisfaithful xx
Your similarity to postmodern/post-anarchism with your rejection of an 'Arche' or grounding principle is fascinating. This is why I am surprised you disagree with postmodernism so much. However, in your thought, I find the assurance of human rights to be the primary ground of politics; it seems to be a slight contradiction?
HysteriaThought
It is quite strange that through all your insights and some I agree with quite earnestly, post-rationalism is a particular favourite; one then runs into your quite tame and sacred economics. Economic freedom is the same as 'religious freedom' - not freedom from the economy, but the freedom of the economy.
Anthony Bax
I am still yet to understand the existence of altruistic egoism. Where does Stirner oppose altruism? When egoists are social, supportive, associative, etc., why does this entail the conclusion that sharing is a moral ought, and that collectivisation is a sacred duty? It is alien to my will, something that can always be separated from the social ego.
StockMarketCrash
I appreciate the critique of capitalism; I, too, agree that it is a stifle of individuality and creativity. However, I do not support socialism for the same reasons. Additionally, anarchy, even as expression or lifestyle, is still a mode for me to exist within; why can I not act freely and have a me-ism? Why label it and put rules on what I can and can't do; if I idly protested and violently resisted at other times, shall I be shunned as false to the cause?
Borker
Who is the nation existing for? If it is for the nation, then it can do its own work to benefit itself; if it is for the people of that nation, then why are we supporting the nation and not the people? Additionally, if it is voluntary whether people identify with that nation, then it can hardly be said to be a universal shared value. If individuals stop identifying, they can hardly be said to oppose the nation's interests because they no longer accept the nation itself.
Weedium
You have no idea what you are talking about, do you? Also, please try to improve your writing skills.
Notes
Comments
LordCompost - Please comment here if you have questions.
Partially do, in "Might as Runs" it was a mimic of Meltdown which is why it had a strange wrting style, intellect is maybe smth to acquire later and not rushing why am I wanting to fully read stuff now because of thisin what ways can I improve in my writing skills?
LordCompost - I don't know; to me, and not just Might as Runs is readable sure, but it is not very reader-friendly; nor does it add your cryptic combination of ideology and excessive creating of non-existent ideologies.