No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
}} | }} | ||
Philosophy {{Collapse| | Philosophy {{Collapse| | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 74: | Line 68: | ||
[[File:Anti-Nih.png]] Anti-Nihilism <br> | [[File:Anti-Nih.png]] Anti-Nihilism <br> | ||
[[File:Transphobia.png]] Anti-Transgenderism <br> | [[File:Transphobia.png]] Anti-Transgenderism <br> | ||
}} | |||
People {{Collapse| | |||
}} | |||
Sympathetic {{Collapse| | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 02:54, 15 January 2024
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Rob's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
 |
Work in Progress "I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details. |
Overview
Neo-Robespierrisme is a nationalistic, socialistic and revolutionary ideology based on the thought of user “Rob” on FPCB. He believes that to create the purest form of governance and society, we must return to the Jacobin tradition of direct democracy and revolutionary mob action in the pursuit of the interests of the people. He is opposed to capitalism, seeing it as a system that in its liberal forms only leads to the downfall of nations. He is militaristic, believing that the people of a nation should be prepared to fight for the values of their country even whilst not being traditional combatants.
Revolutionary Nationalism
When I say revolutionary nationalism, I mean that the nation is trapped under many layers of establishment liberalism that we must rip through to reclaim our culture and our patriotism, whilst all being able to do what all great societies have done, and go further with it. Not merely stay as is. Not stay frozen. But to stay forever moving. Like a mass. A crowd.
Ethnic Pluralism
I believe that a nation should have homogeneity to ensure that it’s people have clearest clarity in vision for what they want, not what foreign nationals with different interests want in their nation, therefore allowing them to make decisions to benefit their nation. I want ethnic homogeneity because the ethnic peoples of a land will almost always have the most attachment to it. If someone wishes to only have a nation benefit for the time they stay there they will never be able to look at it in the same way as someone truly from it, and in the end that person is usually ethnically of the land, and of the nation.
Relations
Fantastique
Bien
Hysteria Thought - Interesting, quite avant-garde aesthetics which I really do love, however your politics are not so favourable. Fantastic page nonetheless.
Baxism - I disagree with your social stances and your philosophy quite heavily it seems, but I do appreciate your politics, quite similar to mine in some places.
Mal
Romantic Egoism - Well written and laid out. Almost solely philosophical, some of which I feel unqualified to talk about as it would not do service, however of what I do understand and of what I can see, I do not agree very much.
Schumacherianism - You’re a very nice person but I don’t like your politics all too much to be honest.
Terrible
Brazilian Liberalism - Face down to the basket.
Sapismo - Sickening liberal nonsense.