×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,438 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

CommentStreams:00a87846177449bfa2009caea14683b5: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The old model of revolution is dead, there can be no reproduction of power through the conquest of the state as previous communists have proposed in the transitional period, because the proletarian is not a fixed and universal revolutionary subject at all anymore thanks to its stratification and inter-dependence by and to Capital through Tronti’s conception of the social factory. There can be no affirmation of the proletarian subject, of the misery and shamefulness of its condition. This is where we derive our theory of insurrection, something definitely close to but still different to the insurrection of Stirner. Our insurrection is based upon Tiqqun and The Invisible Committee's conception of it, the active living of the struggle against Capital and against all forms of power vested by it in its apparatuses, the active affirmation against the biopower of Capital which create the modern subject we so wish to negate. The egoist may participate in such active struggle against Capital if they so wish to, but we do not impose on them any causes to follow, we do not so beg them to partake in such action.
The old model of revolution is dead, there can be no reproduction of power through the conquest of the state as previous communists have proposed in the transitional period, because the proletarian is not a fixed and revolutionary subject at all anymore thanks to its stratification and inter-dependence by and to Capital through Tronti’s conception of the social factory. There can be no affirmation of the proletarian subject, of the misery and shamefulness of its condition. This is where we derive our theory of insurrection, something definitely close to but still different to the insurrection of Stirner. Our insurrection is based upon Tiqqun and The Invisible Committee's conception of it, the active living of the struggle against Capital and against all forms of power vested by it in its apparatuses, the active affirmation against the biopower of Capital which create the modern subject we so wish to negate. The egoist may participate in such active struggle against Capital if they so wish to, but we do not impose on them any causes to follow, we do not so beg them to partake in such action.

Latest revision as of 06:13, 16 January 2024

The old model of revolution is dead, there can be no reproduction of power through the conquest of the state as previous communists have proposed in the transitional period, because the proletarian is not a fixed and revolutionary subject at all anymore thanks to its stratification and inter-dependence by and to Capital through Tronti’s conception of the social factory. There can be no affirmation of the proletarian subject, of the misery and shamefulness of its condition. This is where we derive our theory of insurrection, something definitely close to but still different to the insurrection of Stirner. Our insurrection is based upon Tiqqun and The Invisible Committee's conception of it, the active living of the struggle against Capital and against all forms of power vested by it in its apparatuses, the active affirmation against the biopower of Capital which create the modern subject we so wish to negate. The egoist may participate in such active struggle against Capital if they so wish to, but we do not impose on them any causes to follow, we do not so beg them to partake in such action.

Recent changes

  • R34lLibt4rd • 1 minute ago
  • Moxogeni • 49 minutes ago
  • Moxogeni • 1 hour ago
  • TIIKKETMASTER • 1 hour ago