×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,438 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Polcompball Wiki
2,438Articles
  Recent changes
in:
Self-Insert, Ideologies

Ultroneism: Difference between revisions

VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:
[[File:Libunity-yellow.png]] [[:Category:Libertarian_Unity|Lib Unity]]<br>
[[File:Libunity-yellow.png]] [[:Category:Libertarian_Unity|Lib Unity]]<br>
[[File:UltraProg.png]] [[:Category:Culturally_Far-Left|Culturally Far-Left]]<br>
[[File:UltraProg.png]] [[:Category:Culturally_Far-Left|Culturally Far-Left]]<br>
[[File:Decentral.png]] [[:Category:Anarchists|Anarchists]]<br>
[[File:Indiv.png]] [[:Category:Individualists|Individualists]]<br>
[[File:Indiv.png]] [[:Category:Individualists|Individualists]]<br>
[[File:Nihil.png]] [[:Category:Nihilists|Nihilists]]<br>
[[File:Nihil.png]] [[:Category:Nihilists|Nihilists]]<br>
[[File:Gay.png]] [[:Category:LGBT|Queer]]<br>
[[File:Gay.png]] [[:Category:LGBT|Queer]]<br>
|influences=
|civics =
*[[File:Philan.png]] '''[[Philosophical Anarchism]]'''
*[[File:SCT.png]] '''[[phil:Social_Contract_Theory|Voluntary Government]]'''
*[[File:Directdem.png]] '''[[Democracy#Direct Democracy|Unanimous Direct Democracy]]'''<ref>In my opinion, consensus democracy, or a complete collective will, can only function with the addition of individual succession and in limited circumstances.</ref>
*[[File:AntiConsti.png]] '''[[Anarchism|Non-Constitutionalism]]'''
*[[File:Republicanismpix.png]] '''[[Republicanism]]'''
*[[File:Sep.png]] '''[[Separatism|Individual Succession]]'''
|philosophy =
*[[File:Anticiv.png]] '''[[phil:Anti-Civilization|Anti-Civilization]]'''
*[[File:Anticiv.png]] '''[[phil:Anti-Civilization|Anti-Civilization]]'''
*[[File:Antwork.png]] '''[[w:Critique of work|Anti-Work]]'''
*[[File:CountEn.png]] '''[[Counter-Enlightenment|Counter Enlightenment]]'''
*[[File:CountEn.png]] '''[[Counter-Enlightenment|Counter Enlightenment]]'''<ref>A collection of figures, including: [[File:Joseph-Marie.png]] Joseph de Maistre, [[File:Nietzsche alt.png]] Friedrich Nietzsche, [[File:Junger.png]] Ernst Jünger, [[File:PrusSoc.png]] Oswald Spengler, [[File:Superfash.png]] Julius Evola, [[File:Theocrat.png]] Mircea Eliade, [[File:Cioran.png]] Emil Cioran. And of course more broad Anti-Enlightenment figures such as: [[File:Stirner.png]] Max Stirner, [[File:Freud.png]] Sigmund Freud, [[File:Lacan.png]] Jacques Lacan, [[File:Barthes.png]] Roland Barthes, [[File:Lyotard.png]] Jean-François Lyotard, [[File:Foucault.png]] Michel Foucault, [[File:Zerzan.png]] John Zerzan, [[File:Newman.png]] Saul Newman.</ref>
*[[File:Anego.png]] '''[[Anarcho-Egoism|Egoism]]'''<br>
*[[File:Pragmat.png]] '''[[phil:Pragmatism|Pragmatism]]'''
*[[File:Pragmat.png]] '''[[phil:Pragmatism|Pragmatism]]'''
*[[File:Postciv.png]] '''[[phil:Post-Civilisationism|Post-Civilisationism]]'''
*[[File:Postciv.png]] '''[[phil:Post-Civilisationism|Post-Civilisationism]]'''
Line 63: Line 71:
*[[File:Poststruct.png]] '''[[phil:Post-Structuralism|Post-Structuralism]]'''
*[[File:Poststruct.png]] '''[[phil:Post-Structuralism|Post-Structuralism]]'''
*[[File:Freud.png]] '''[[phil:Freudianism|Psychoanalysis]]'''
*[[File:Freud.png]] '''[[phil:Freudianism|Psychoanalysis]]'''
|social =
*[[File:Postciv.png]] '''[[Ultraprogressivism|Decadence]]'''<br>
*[[File:Fem.png]] '''[[Feminism]]''' <br>
*[[File:Gay.png]] '''[[:Category:LGBT|Pro-LGBTQ+]]''' <br>
*[[File:Anti-Racism.png]] '''[[Multiculturalism|Racial Equality]]''' <br>
*[[File:AntiTheism.png]] '''[[Secularism]]'''
|anti =
*[[File:AntiOrg.png]] '''[[Post-Left Anarchy|Anti-Organisation]]'''
*[[File:Antwork.png]] '''[[Post-Left Anarchy|Anti-Work]]'''
*[[FIle:Antifeud.png]] '''[[Feudalism|Anti-Feudalism]]'''
*[[File:Anticap.png]] '''[[Anti-Capitalism]]'''
*[[File:Antisoc.png]] '''[[Anti-Communism|Anti-Socialism]]'''
*[[File:AntiReact.png]] '''[[Revolutionary_Progressivism|Anti-Reactionarism]]'''
|influences=
{{Collapse|
*[[File:Gorgias.png]] Gorgias (483–375 BC)
*[[File:Plato.png]] Plato (428-348 BC)
*[[File:Bud.png]] Nagarjuna (150-250)
*[[File:Hobbes.png]] Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679)
*[[File:SocialEgoism.png]] Bernard Mandeville (1670-1733)
*[[File:Kant.png]] Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
*[[File:Joseph-Marie.png]] Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821)
*[[File:Fichteanism.png]] Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762-1814)
*[[File:Hegel.png]] Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831)
*[[File:Humanismpix.png]] Ludwig Feuerbach (1804-1872)
*[[File:Revolution.png]] Edgar Bauer (1820-1886)
*[[File:Stirner.png]] Max Stirner (1806-1856)
*[[File:Kierkegaard.png]] Søren Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
*[[File:EgoNihil.png]] Dmitry Pisarev (1840-1868)
*[[File:Nietzsche alt.png]] Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)
*[[File:Utsoc.png]] Edward Carpenter (1844-1929)
*[[File:Freud.png]] Sigmund Freud (1854-1949)
*[[File:Social.png]] Émile Durkheim (1858-1917)
*[[File:NeoKant.png]] Ernst Cassirer (1874-1945)
*[[File:PrusSoc.png]] Oswald Spengler (1880-1936)
*[[File:Strauss.png]] Leo Strauss (1899-1973)
*[[File:Lacan.png]] Jacques Lacan (1901-1981)
*[[File:PostHegel.png]] Alexandre Kojève (1902-1968)
*[[File:Analytic.png]] Nelson Goodman (1906-1998)
*[[File:Theocrat.png]] Mircea Eliade (1907-1986)
*[[File:Analytic.png]] Willard Van Orman Quine (1908-2000)
*[[File:Cioran.png]] Emil Cioran (1911-1995)
*[[File:Barthes.png]] Roland Barthes (1915-1980)
*[[File:EpistConstruct.png]] Ernst von Glasersfeld (1917-2010)
*[[File:StructMarx.png]] Louis Althusser (1918-1990)
*[[File:Libsoc.png]] Cornelius Castoriadis (1922-1997)
*[[File:Lyotard.png]] Jean-François Lyotard (1924-1998)
*[[File:HistPhil.png]] Joseph Margolis (1924-2021)
*[[File:Foucault.png]] Michel Foucault (1926-1984)
*[[File:Struct.png]] Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002)
*[[File:Pragmat.png]] Richard Rorty (1931-2007)
*[[File:AnMarx.png]] Robert Paul Wolff (1933-)
*[[File:Zerzan.png]] John Zerzan (1943-)
*[[File:Newman.png]] Saul Newman (1972-)
}}
|likes=
|likes=
*[[File:Self.png]] [[phil:Stirnernism|Uniqueness]]
*[[File:Self.png]] [[phil:Stirnernism|Uniqueness]]
Line 84: Line 148:
I am influenced by a variety of schools, most notably by [[File:Postanalytic.png]] Post-Analytic Philosophy, [[File:Freud.png]] Psychoanalysis, German [[File:IdealismPhil.png]] Idealism & [[File:RomanticismAlt.png]] Romanticism, [[File:PolNil.png]] Political Nihilism, and by various [[File:Poststruct.png]] Post-Structuralist thinkers.   
I am influenced by a variety of schools, most notably by [[File:Postanalytic.png]] Post-Analytic Philosophy, [[File:Freud.png]] Psychoanalysis, German [[File:IdealismPhil.png]] Idealism & [[File:RomanticismAlt.png]] Romanticism, [[File:PolNil.png]] Political Nihilism, and by various [[File:Poststruct.png]] Post-Structuralist thinkers.   


Unlike what my influences describe, my thought is grounded not in [[File:PolNil.png]] [[phil:Political Nihilism|Political Nihilism]] nor [[File:AnindnoI.png]] [[Anarcho-Individualism|Egoist/Individualist Anarchism]], but rather in a very broad [[File:AntiAnarchy.png]] [[Authoritarianism|non-anarchist]] interpretation of [[File:Anticiv.png]] [[phil:Anti-Civilization|anti-civilization]] and [[File:Postciv.png]] [[phil:Post-Civilization|post-civilization]] philosophy; seeing the state as just another of the same phenomenon which underpins modern civilisation. I see [[File:Krit.png]] [[Communitarianism|civilisation]], [[File:Sec.png]] [[Authoritarianism|the state]], [[File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism|capitalism]], [[File:Trad.png]] [[Traditionalism|traditions]], or any other [[File:HistPhil.png]] [[phil:Historicism|contingent historical phenomenon]], etc., as neither desirable nor regrettable; they are simply existent, and our relation to such phenomena underpins societal ills.  
Unlike what my influences describe, my thought is grounded not in [[File:PolNil.png]] [[phil:Political Nihilism|Political Nihilism]] nor [[File:AnindnoI.png]] [[Anarcho-Individualism|Egoist/Individualist Anarchism]], but rather in a very broad [[File:Philan.png]] [[Philosophical Anarchism|philosophically anarchist]] interpretation of [[File:Anticiv.png]] [[phil:Anti-Civilization|anti-civilization]] and [[File:Postciv.png]] [[phil:Post-Civilization|post-civilization]] philosophy; seeing the subjects relation to the state as just another of the same phenomenon which underpins modern civilisation. I see [[File:Krit.png]] [[Communitarianism|civilisation]], [[File:Sec.png]] [[Authoritarianism|the state]], [[File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism|capitalism]], [[File:Trad.png]] [[Traditionalism|traditions]], or any other [[File:HistPhil.png]] [[phil:Historicism|contingent historical phenomenon]], etc., as neither desirable nor regrettable; they are simply existent, and our relation to such phenomena underpins societal ills.  


I see civilisation, capital, culture, ideology, etc., as part of a domesticating process through which individuals find themselves under subjectification. However, this does not create oppression by itself but rather leads to opportunities, social relations, and the possibility of fixity and ideological domination. My response to such domestication is simply the constant renegotiation of [[File:Indiv.png]] [[phil:Individualism|individuals]], [[File:Struct.png]] [[phil:Structuralism|institutions]], [[File:Social.png]] [[phil:Social_Orgamism|societies]], etc., to themselves and their values through the questioning and revision of values as a form of [[File:Postciv.png]] [[Ultraprogressivism|decadence]] and [[File:Pragmat.png]] [[phil:Pragmatism|pragmatism]].  
I see civilisation, capital, culture, ideology, etc., as part of a domesticating process through which individuals find themselves under subjectification. However, this does not create oppression by itself but rather leads to opportunities, social relations, and the possibility of fixity and ideological domination. My response to such domestication is simply the constant renegotiation of [[File:Indiv.png]] [[phil:Individualism|individuals]], [[File:Struct.png]] [[phil:Structuralism|institutions]], [[File:Social.png]] [[phil:Social_Orgamism|societies]], etc., to themselves and their values through the questioning and revision of values as a form of [[File:Postciv.png]] [[Ultraprogressivism|decadence]] and [[File:Pragmat.png]] [[phil:Pragmatism|pragmatism]].  


My Icons: ([[File:Postciv.png]]/[[File:Antwork.png]]/[[File:CountEn.png]]/[[File:Pragmat.png]]/[[File:PostHegel.png]])
My Icons: ([[File:Philan.png]]/[[File:Postciv.png]]/[[File:CountEn.png]]/[[File:Pragmat.png]]/[[File:PostHegel.png]])


= Summary =
= Summary =
Line 153: Line 217:
= Comments =  
= Comments =  
{{LordCompost}} - Please comment here if you have questions.<br>
{{LordCompost}} - Please comment here if you have questions.<br>
*[[File:AnWeed1.png]] - Religion is organized, monopolized, commodified and arborescent system of beliefs, based on worship. Spirituality is individual form of belief, intuitive perceiving, mean of self-development and discovering mysterious world, that is not necessarily true but what really is truth? You are right that mostly everything is a belief, but what's wrong about it? Reason is a belief too, experiment is also based on belief. Except people who understand complex mathematical equations and theorems, and directly experienced some phenomenon, science is also a belief, religion. My spirituality doesn't have rules to enforce. It's purely my opinion.
**{{LordCompost}} - We are not disagreeing here; yes, everything is belief; it is acceptance of something alien as 'true.' It is the limitation of the self towards something external. Either way, I, nor you cannot remove it. However, my point is not that religion is 'organized, monopolized, commodified and arborescent' because those only exist again because most religions are believed in without pragmatic effect, believed to be sacred, true, and unquestionable. And spirituality can be just as sacred for each individual. <br><br> Additionally, the identification of the self with merely the soul and opposition to the body is splitting the self into an essential and non-essential dichotomy that alienates me from myself and is a direct consequence of your spiritual beliefs. I prefer not be dominated by a thought that forces me to reject parts of myself.


{{#css:
{{#css:
.cs-comments{display:none;}
.cs-comments{display:none;}
}}
}}

Revision as of 10:22, 23 January 2024

Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent LordCompost's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.




‟Through the heaven of civilization, the human being seeks to isolate himself from the world, to break its hostile power.”

– The Unique and Its Property, Max Stirner


Howdy, I'm LordCompost.

I am an Egoist, Pragmatist, Post-Civilisationist, Iconoclast, and Anti-Humanist.

I am influenced by a variety of schools, most notably by Post-Analytic Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, German Idealism & Romanticism, Political Nihilism, and by various Post-Structuralist thinkers.

Unlike what my influences describe, my thought is grounded not in Political Nihilism nor Egoist/Individualist Anarchism, but rather in a very broad philosophically anarchist interpretation of anti-civilization and post-civilization philosophy; seeing the subjects relation to the state as just another of the same phenomenon which underpins modern civilisation. I see civilisation, the state, capitalism, traditions, or any other contingent historical phenomenon, etc., as neither desirable nor regrettable; they are simply existent, and our relation to such phenomena underpins societal ills.

I see civilisation, capital, culture, ideology, etc., as part of a domesticating process through which individuals find themselves under subjectification. However, this does not create oppression by itself but rather leads to opportunities, social relations, and the possibility of fixity and ideological domination. My response to such domestication is simply the constant renegotiation of individuals, institutions, societies, etc., to themselves and their values through the questioning and revision of values as a form of decadence and pragmatism.

My Icons: (////)

Summary

See my Philosophy page.

Writings

Links to my Substack.

The Shears of “Civilization”

The "Origin" of Civilisation

On Decline in Relation to Decadence

The Cultural Industrial Complex

On the Issue of Negation

Totality and Autonomy

Postmodern Paganism

Relations

CarrotsRppl2
How is 'The State and Its Property' illegitimate? If you truly held to the principle that property is individual protection, then isn't the state currently the most powerful entity that protects its property? As such, according to you, it is your perfect society already.

Bourgeoisie Destroyer
I am sure you have read something, but merely returning and subscribing to 'ancient' philosophy does not make one intelligent, nor does it advance any knowledge or let one overcome modern problems simply because thought has developed and overcome older philosophy.

Killer Kitty
Question: If politics was a net negative on your country would you overcome it and bring politics into its nullity? Or would you hold close to it and always remain bound to your highest truth? 'No,' you would say, 'politics cannot be done away with; it is necessary, it is fundamental, it is more important than us.' Liberalism, Fascism? Politics...

Kosciuszkovagr
No writings...

Xx godisfaithful xx
Your similarity to postmodern/post-anarchism with your rejection of an 'Arche' or grounding principle is fascinating. This is why I am surprised you disagree with postmodernism so much. However, in your thought, I find the assurance of human rights to be the primary ground of politics; it seems to be a slight contradiction?

HysteriaThought
It is quite strange that through all your insights and some I agree with quite earnestly, post-rationalism is a particular favourite; one then runs into your quite tame and sacred economics. Economic freedom is the same as 'religious freedom' - not freedom from the economy, but the freedom of the economy.

Anthony Bax
I am still yet to understand the existence of altruistic egoism. Where does Stirner oppose altruism? When egoists are social, supportive, associative, etc., why does this entail the conclusion that sharing is a moral ought, and that collectivisation is a sacred duty? It is alien to my will, something that can always be separated from the social ego.

StockMarketCrash
I appreciate the critique of capitalism; I, too, agree that it is a stifle of individuality and creativity. However, I do not support socialism for the same reasons. Additionally, anarchy, even as expression or lifestyle, is still a mode for me to exist within; why can I not act freely and have a me-ism? Why label it and put rules on what I can and can't do; if I idly protested and violently resisted at other times, shall I be shunned as false to the cause?

Borker
Who is the nation existing for? If it is for the nation, then it can do its own work to benefit itself; if it is for the people of that nation, then why are we supporting the nation and not the people? Additionally, if it is voluntary whether people identify with that nation, then it can hardly be said to be a universal shared value. If individuals stop identifying, they can hardly be said to oppose the nation's interests because they no longer accept the nation itself.

Weedium
You have no idea what you are talking about, do you? Also, please try to improve your writing skills.

Rocksmanylobsters
A collection is not synonymous with collectivism; one is the aggregate of individuals, or merely a multitude of them more so than a total, while the other remains an organisational principle of interests that relate individuals to a supposed shared value. In reality, individuals are connected into a 'collective' through a web of values. Ultimately, if any individual no longer valued what others valued, would you side with the individual or the multitude?

Weedman
Oppositional to religion, and yet spiritual; As a firm believer that everything is basically religion (belief), you and I are basically limited to either effective practical belief or fixed sacred belief. Is your spirituality doing anything for 'all of you', or is it prescribing rules for only parts of you? The answer to this question is yours.

Notes

  1. ↑ In my opinion, consensus democracy, or a complete collective will, can only function with the addition of individual succession and in limited circumstances.

Comments

LordCompost - Please comment here if you have questions.


Retrieved from "https://pcbwiki.net/index.php?title=Ultroneism&oldid=473208"