m (Cyb3rklev moved page Neo-Vilfredoism to Cyber Thought) |
|||
| Line 236: | Line 236: | ||
<!----> | <!----> | ||
===Culture=== | <!--===Culture=== | ||
*[[File:TradPrgess.png]] Right-wing Progressivism: I believe in the idea that social progress is the movement of society towards maximizing its social and biological competitive value for the purposes of efficiency and cohesion, based on the definitions of technological and biological progress, or "True Progressivism", as opposed to the left's [[FIle:SJW.png]] "False Progressivism", which is based on the idea that social progress is the movement of society towards equality of outcome and inclusion, which is a false progressivism because the methods through which its goal is achieved minimize social and biological competitive value, as they are [[File:Biolen.png]] inherently dysgenic. This progressivism ought to be achieved through the upholding of [[File:Lockeanism.png]] Natural Rights and Equality of Opportunity, [[File:Libeugen.png]] Voluntary Eugenics, and a [[File:Paleolib.png]] "Conservative" Morality that promotes social cohesion, hard work, and creativity, which ought to be enforced by civil society and [[File:Polylaw.png]] Private law-keeping, rather than the government, for reasons i explain below. | *[[File:TradPrgess.png]] Right-wing Progressivism:I believe in the idea that social progress is the movement of society towards maximizing its social and biological competitive value for the purposes of efficiency and cohesion, based on the definitions of technological and biological progress, or "True Progressivism", as opposed to the left's [[FIle:SJW.png]] "False Progressivism", which is based on the idea that social progress is the movement of society towards equality of outcome and inclusion, which is a false progressivism because the methods through which its goal is achieved minimize social and biological competitive value, as they are [[File:Biolen.png]] inherently dysgenic. This progressivism ought to be achieved through the upholding of [[File:Lockeanism.png]] Natural Rights and Equality of Opportunity, [[File:Libeugen.png]] Voluntary Eugenics, and a [[File:Paleolib.png]] "Conservative" Morality that promotes social cohesion, hard work, and creativity, which ought to be enforced by civil society and [[File:Polylaw.png]] Private law-keeping, rather than the government, for reasons i explain below. | ||
**[[File:Paleolib.png]] Paleolibertarianism: I am culturally Paleolibertarian, i believe that a "conservative" morality should be enforced by civil society and [[File:Polylaw.png]] Private law-keeping rather than the state, because enforcing it through the state would create a legal precedent that can be (and actually was) exploited by [[File:SJW.png]] Cultural Marxists to enforce their anti-morality and take away our freedom. Disparate Impact Law (the thing that enabled the cultural marxists to take over the west's academia, bureaucratic apparatus, corporations etc.) wouldn't exist if they didn't have the legal precedent to back it up. | **[[File:Paleolib.png]] Paleolibertarianism: I am culturally Paleolibertarian, i believe that a "conservative" morality should be enforced by civil society and [[File:Polylaw.png]] Private law-keeping rather than the state, because enforcing it through the state would create a legal precedent that can be (and actually was) exploited by [[File:SJW.png]] Cultural Marxists to enforce their anti-morality and take away our freedom. Disparate Impact Law (the thing that enabled the cultural marxists to take over the west's academia, bureaucratic apparatus, corporations etc.) wouldn't exist if they didn't have the legal precedent to back it up. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 244: | Line 244: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
*[[File:Rural.png]] Peri-urbanism: As [[File:TIIKKET.png]] TIIKKETMASTER has pointed out, the worst-off poors are the ones in urban areas, because you can't hunt, forage or farm in those areas, which means your survival is inevitably going to depend upon precarious jobs/government handouts/goodwill of passerbys. I support deurbanization, and the scattering of the population into peri-urban settlements (small town/village-sized settlements with urban infrastructure and amenities), because having the local clinic, grocery shop, bar, train station, countryside and wilderness all within the same walking distance from your house is pretty fucking cool, and so is being able to have a vegetable garden in your backyard. | *[[File:Rural.png]] Peri-urbanism: As [[File:TIIKKET.png]] TIIKKETMASTER has pointed out, the worst-off poors are the ones in urban areas, because you can't hunt, forage or farm in those areas, which means your survival is inevitably going to depend upon precarious jobs/government handouts/goodwill of passerbys. I support deurbanization, and the scattering of the population into peri-urban settlements (small town/village-sized settlements with urban infrastructure and amenities), because having the local clinic, grocery shop, bar, train station, countryside and wilderness all within the same walking distance from your house is pretty fucking cool, and so is being able to have a vegetable garden in your backyard.--> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 16:18, 27 January 2024
Hello, i'm Cyb3rklev, and this is my ideology.
Organization
Formalism: Democracy (and republican dictatorship) doesn't work. The disconnect between actual power and recognised power (i.e. people in government don't have a stake in the country) leads to demagogic crooks taking power by promising to help people, only for them to use their power to sack the wealth of productive citizens and/or give special privileges to lobbyists in exchange for large sums of money in the form of "campaign donations" and/or a high ranking position in one of the lobbyist companies, precisely because they have no stake in the country and are accountable to no one, unlike a board of directors and its appointees (CEOs, CFOs, CTOs etc.), who are accountable to the shareholders that elected them. As such, i support the establishment of city-states ruled by timocratically elected for-profit corporate governments elected by citizen-shareholders. Citizenship (and therefore the right to elect and be elected) would be tied to ownership of stock in the company and residence within its jurisdiction. A Board of Directors (or BoD for short) elected by shareholders would supervise the activities of the corporation and appoint a CEO, who would be in charge of the activities that the BoD supervises. Due to the predominance of the executive branch, one could say that my system of governance is presidentialist, almost dictatorial, even.
Confederacies:
Law
Private Law-keeping:
Trial by Combat:
Indentured Servitude:
Debt Payment:
Prison Labor:
Rehabilitation:
Tabula Rasa:
Dry Laws:
Economics
Regulation: Minimal regulation is the key to a prosperous economy and wealthy populous; which is why i support very limited government regulation of the economy, stuff like anti-trust, product safety standards, consumers' rights protection laws, union protection laws, as well as special provisions aimed at public utility and infrastructure companies (Public utilities and infrstructure are companies that are allowed to operate at monopoly scale because they offer essential services that you can’t function in modern society without) .
Monetary policy: Free banking, while not necessary, is still the best monetary policy, as it keeps the value of the currency stable and high.
Georgism: I support Georgism, as it is unfair that people profit off things they didn't create, like land, the commons (natural materials such as air, water, and a habitable Earth) and natural resources, often times only being able to do so through improvements created by other people, and thus profits from these should be "taxed" (though it could be argued that LVT and Pigouvian Taxes are not actually taxes, but rather reappropriation of stolen investment value and compensation for damages to the commons and extraction of resources which belong to us all, respectively). The advantages to these are the following:
- Incentivizing efficient land usage.
- Turning rent from a form of extortion into just another race to the bottom to provide a service for the lowest price while still turning a profit, as well as incentivize landlords to make money through additional services like protection, cleaning and repairs.
- Increasing urban density, which has a large slew of benefits such as reduced urban sprawl (which protects the environment), less obesity, lower crime rates, shorter commutes and stronger local businesses.
- Lowering the tax burden on improved property and agricultural soil, and increasing it on unused land, thereby making land speculation unprofitable.
- Giving back to the productive members of society who made the land valuable in the first place, and compensating them for pollution of the commons and resource exploitation, through a
Citizen's Dividend.
LVT and Pigouvian Taxes: Because of all the benefits i listed above (and the fact that they could be argued to not even be taxes), i support LVT and Pigouvian taxes. A portion of the revenue would go to the state (as it too, like productive members of society, creates improvements without which many wouldn't be able to profit off of land, the commons and natural resources, is impacted by the pollution of the commons and is part-owner of the natural resources of the country) while the rest would be distributed to all citizen-shareholders and non-citizen residents who are still employed by the end of the fiscal year or were employed for a majority of it (a total of 183 days or more) through a Citizen's Dividend.
(Mostly) Private Welfare: I, outside of the Citizen's Dividend (which technically isn't welfare but compensation for a variety of different things, as i explained in the Georgism section), oppose government welfare, and instead support private fraternal benefit societies, which were very widespread and extremely effective until governments regulated them out of existence. And the way they work prevents freeloading, as only those who've paid into the system would be allowed to cash out, thereby solving the main problem of open borders i.e. 
useless sand niggers coming in droves to the Yurop to leech off of welfare, refuse to integrate and form ethnic enclaves.
Neomercantilism: Tariffs and protectionism are a double-edged sword, it protects local industries, but also makes them less competitive, and the price increase the tariffs cause to imports has negative effects on domestic prices. The solution? Neomercantilism, reduce barriers to entry and increase incentives as much as possible, that will make domestic industries stay and attract foreign investment.
Foreign Policy
Patriotism, Non-alignment and Global Trade: I love my country 
, I am nationalist, albeit a moderate one. I don't have any sorts of 
Imperialist Ambitions (though i do have some 
irredentist ones KOSOVO IS ALBANIA). I do not wish to side with any particular geopolitical bloc, and simply want to do global trade.
Philosophy
Monism:
Stoic Virtue Ethics:
