No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|aliases= | |aliases= | ||
'''Add them here (pls)'''<br> | '''Add them here (pls)'''<br> | ||
[[File:Arrows.gif]] [[File:DozenValues.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] [[File:Soctrans.png]] Transhumanist Socialism [[File:RBubble.png]] | |||
|economics= | |economics= | ||
{{ViAlignment|Ormarxf.png|Marxism|Marxists|#E50000}} | {{ViAlignment|Ormarxf.png|Marxism|Marxists|#E50000}} |
Revision as of 21:02, 3 March 2024
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent NewMaritimeVistula's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
In Development "I'll stop reading eventually." - Left Communism This page is still in development due to ongoing reading by Someone, multiple things may change drastically. |
We live in a contradiction, a brutal state of affairs, profoundly inegalitarian – where all existence is evaluated in terms of money alone – is presented to us as ideal. To justify their conservatism, the partisans of the established order cannot really call it ideal or wonderful. So instead, they have decided to say that all the rest is horrible. Sure, they say, we may not live in a condition of perfect Goodness. But we’re lucky that we don’t live in a condition of Evil. Our democracy is not perfect. But it’s better than the bloody dictatorships. Capitalism is unjust. But it’s not criminal like Stalinism. We let millions of Africans die of AIDS, but we don’t make racist nationalist declarations like Milosevic. We kill Iraqis with our airplanes, but we don’t cut their throats with machetes like they do in Rwanda, etc..
Introduction
Socialism is a movement of both economic and social liberation. Class is not merely based on poor vs rich but it is a manifestation of oppressor and oppressed. With the discrimination which comes without necessary social liberation, we result in a class based on this aforementioned discrimination. Even if we were all to be equal in every other way, this boundary would still divide us. We would not be able to add economic reform to side-line the social mishaps within the nation, that would not be socialist, it'd be merely "half liberatory" which isn't liberatory at all
I reject the idea of a "national proletariat" for it assumes that we are more similar to our oppressors than to our oppressed brothers across the world merely because of our nation. Class to me is the most important categoriser of humanity - you are either oppressor or oppressed, you are not British oppressed and Malaysian oppressed then British oppressor and Malaysian oppressor, you are simply part of the two aforementioned classes , no matter geographic location, language or tradition.
Detailed Beliefs
Political Evolution
Apolitical | + + |
Stupid Communism Lover | + + |
This Corbyn Fella looks based | + + |
Rojava, eh? | + + |
Wait its the state that causes unfair markets?. | + + |
Cooperatives are based | + + |
Hugely influenced by Finn Tyler when learning about Guild Socialism with him |
+ + |
Current beliefs which I'm still working on | + + |
Reading[2]
Finished
Reading
- The National Bolshevist Manifesto (2006, Karl Otto Paetel)
- Current chapter: The Nation as the ‘Highest Value’
- Capitalist Realism - Is there no alternative? (Mark Fisher)[3]
- Current chapter: All that is solid melts into PR: Market Stalinism and bureaucratic anti-production
Plan to Read
- Chaos Theory : Two Essays on Market Anarchy
- National Anarchist Manifesto
- Myth and Reality (Mircea Eliade)
- The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion (Mircea Eliade)
- The Individual and the Becoming of the World (1926, Julius Evola)
- Selections from Prison Notebooks (Antonio Gramsci)