×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,528 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Venatrixism: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 57: Line 57:
[[File:NickLand.png]] [[Landian Accelerationism|Nick Land]]<br>
[[File:NickLand.png]] [[Landian Accelerationism|Nick Land]]<br>
[[File:Curtis_Yarvin.png]] [[Neoreactionaryism|Curtis Yarvin]]<br>
[[File:Curtis_Yarvin.png]] [[Neoreactionaryism|Curtis Yarvin]]<br>
[[File:Cybertropic.png]] [[Landian Accelerationism|Adam Fitchett]]<br>
</tabber>
</tabber>
|likes =  [[File:Unconditional Accelerationism.png]] Decay <br>  
|likes =  [[File:Unconditional Accelerationism.png]] Decay <br>  

Revision as of 20:30, 13 September 2024

Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent JAcket's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

In Development
"I'll stop reading eventually." - Left Communism

This page is still in development due to ongoing reading by JAcket, multiple things may change drastically.


Welcome to my page, be ready for a whole lotta yapping about Bataille, Gobber Pessimism, and other shit in the future


Icons: (///)

"eliminated at the time of the rise of exchange value. All human activity is exploited by capital. We can rephrase Marx's statement, "Labor, by adding a new value to the old one, at the same time maintains and eternizes [capital] " 2 to say : all human activity "eternizes" capital."

- Jacques Camatte


"Men, not great enough, nor hard enough, to be entitled as artists to take part in fashioning man; men, not sufficiently strong and far-sighted to allow, with sublime self-constraint, the obvious law of the thousandfold failures and perishings to prevail; men, not sufficiently noble to see the radically different grades of rank and intervals of rank that separate man from man: —such men, with their "equality before God," have hitherto swayed the destiny of Europe; until at last a dwarfed, almost ludicrous species has been produced, a gregarious animal, something obliging, sickly, mediocre, the European of the present day."

- Friedrich Nietzsche


"But by the very fact of this position (which, as far as intimacy is concerned, dissolves away, offers nothing), Marxism is less the completion of the Calvinist-project than a critique of capitalism, which it reproaches with having liberated things without rigor, without any other end, without any other law than chance and private interest. "

- Georges Bataille

Venatrixism is a Neoreactionary theory founded on the principles of the opposition to the democratic state, as democracy leads to anarchy; after all, what has democracy shown us but strife, its politics leading to an eternal battle between the two idiots who "run" this state? We can find no order in literal lies that the "congress" is the representation of humanity, while they still govern on private ends. This leads me to neocameralism, power finally constructed against anarchy and its representatives in communism and the like. So, such the state is ruled like it should be: a corporation in a fiefdom of many that are alike. Monarchy is realized in this form, like with a corporation totality for the corporation and only for the corporation. Leave if you must, but nothing will make us change our minds. Thus, with philosophy in hand, it leads me towards accelerationism, that capital had escaped the bourgeoisie and is becoming a force of deterritorialization against all that opposed it. Having these keys became what the communist sought to take—the revolutionary power of capital—yet it did it for itself.

Views

Government

Economics

Social

Philosophy

The basis for my reality is philosophy. I see the world as a mystery, and I am a connoisseur of nihilism, embracing it with shadowy delight. The gods of this world are obstacles, and I will not fall for the sacred—not again. My pure narcissism of self is what keeps me alive and well. Do I support the sacred? No, it’s me against the idealist, me against the moralist, me against the religious—send them to be accursed! My own livelihood shouldn’t be a game for the high characters to shape into its being. No, I should do that myself, you fools! You are in your own madhouse! Chasing these phantasms to the ends of the earth, yet they are always out of reach until you face death. You say it will be glorious with the cries of the weak; they are not for me. Übermensch is what I would answer to them, help yourself my friends, you have a power to overcome and like I did, strike yahweh in the heart. A man in the back calls for me, "morals are absolute!" He cries with the righteousness of the lord himself. What do I say? I answer, "yes, morals are absolute, because they are of the democratic state. But I say morals have no use for me and they are a lie, like the christian god. Don't you see? I have no order for morals; they hold no ground for me. The abstract law of nature will not be my guide, because in the end of all of rome, morals lead you back to the gods. You are too scared to disagree with them, because to disagree with state law will lead to the prison of another 120 days of sodom. I have no allegiance to the moral ground. Morals do nothing for me, and the ideal moralist is like the christian—they have no power over themselves because they have given everything to the constitution of my broken heart. I next ask the question of the monist. Have you seen what I asked? I attack the idealist, which you are. You have fallen back into the soulless drive of idealism, as much as you try to escape it. Marx and his materialism are now dead with the hand of Bataille. This world is mystical, and the monist idea of physicality is nothing but a lie of a new idealism, in which his escape from the economy leads him to utopianism. What is us but raw instincts? I drive forever onward in search of something new. Ah yes, the post-modernists are right to say that metanarratives are false in every sense of the word and to deconstruct the meaning of all, for this I support you and your business of unclogging the toilet of the world science, its most understandable that the concepts are all in some way is absolute human logic that has no beginning on nature and of the greater universe and this logic can provide nothing for me. May we investigate further into the madness of civilization.


The Hegelian Travesty

Materialism and its Relation with Nihilism

Liberal Decadence

“Praxis”

Relations

  • Charming Romanticism - The true unique of france
  • G-Man Toiletism - I had a terrible experience even thinking about adding you, but here’s my half caring attempt to critique this clear alt. You claim to be a fascist while clearly you no nothing about the fascist ideologue, because fascism is a revolutionary concept it opposed the monarchies of old because fascism whole thing is derived from the jacobins. Furthermore killing other real presented nations/cultures for a “turan empire” is also against fascism is its goal for nationally self determination not for some impossible goal presented by a former region of the world that no longer had any united culture. Finally a “turan empire” who be defeated in days full stop the Russian military would invade back their lost territories and even you tried to defend nukes exist, the western powers would probably support Russia in this because of how your ideology is against the current capital regime.
  • Distributist Reactionaryism - What a disastrous utopian ideology to create a liberal state in a reactionary society. Why be a classical reactionary? What is the benefit it will lead to a decentralized society of fools who is dependent on an outside source to give the full meaning, all individuality is lost, we can find no freedom in reaction because it leads to control society of the highest level and democracy? Are you kidding me? If the people cannot think for themselves they surely cannot vote for anyone but only the ones whom there lord wants them to vote for! Anyhow this ideology is deeply EVIL and is the pure opposite of what I want in a society. The modern sacred but not too modern, the ancient fetishism back again to haunt us. Times have changed and the christian religion is a belief made by retards(the convinced are the deceived) for retards. Furthermore calling progressive view points as “evil” is wrong because for another person to is good because he found goodness in progressive values(an impossible task indeed!) and you found it in the old vaules, which little is to be different from the “evil” values. The old is morr mad that’s all you have on the metaphysical side of the word. You have indeed set your cause on nothing!

What I've Read

  • The Bible
  • Syndicalism
  • The Principles of Communism
  • The Futurist Manifesto
  • The Communist Manifesto
  • Critique of the Gotha Program
  • Socialist Industrial Unionism - The Workers’ Power
  • On Authority
  • Industrial Unionism
  • Reform or Revolution
  • Abolition of Work
  • Brief Description of Egoist Communism
  • Violence and Autonomy
  • An Introduction to the Situationists
  • Egoist Communism what it is and what it isn’t
  • The Democratic Mystification
  • How Moldbug got Pwned
  • Workers' Councils
  • Thesis on Feuerbach
  • May-June 1968: The Exposure
  • A Quick-and-Dirty Introduction to Accelerationism
  • The Party and Class
  • Society of the Spectacle
  • Unique and Its Property
  • Anti-Duhring
  • The Wandering of Humanity
  • On Organization
  • Post-Anarchism
  • Dark Deleuze
  • Insurrectionary Foucault
  • Beyond Good and Evil
  • A Formalist Manifesto
  • The Case Against Democracy
  • Why Do Atheist Believe in Religion
  • Capital Volume 1
  • A Gentle Introduction to Unqualified Reservations
  • Against political freedom
  • Vulvocosmic Dissolution: Queerness, Feminism & Accelerationism

Reading

  • Patchwork: A Political System for the 21st Century
    • A Positive Vision
  • Thus Spoke Zarathustra
    • Second Part
  • The Accursed Share
    • Sexuality and Dejecta
  • Joyful Science
    • Book One

My name is not important. What is important is what I'm going to read

  • Visions of Excess
  • The Thirst For Ahnihilation
  • The Myth Of Sisyphus
  • The Postmodern Condition
  • Libidinal Economy
  • The Subject and Power
  • The Birth Of Biopolitics
  • Madness And Civilization
  • Capitalism and Schizophrenia
  • What Is Philosophy?
  • Difference And Repetition
  • The Poverty of Philosophy
  • The German Ideology
  • Reflections on Violence
  • The Civil War in France
  • Simulacra and Simulation
  • Fatal Strategies
  • Writings 1997–2003
  • The Dark Enlightenment

My shit

Ideological Evolution

Southern Boi + + -2021
And I wonder... + + 2021-2023
Red and Dead + + 2023-2024
Smartass + + 2024-