No edit summary |
imported>Famicomguy m (Changed the flag template) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
== How to Draw == | == How to Draw == | ||
{{Flag|Noocracy_flag.svg}} | |||
# Draw a horizontal and vertical line with a circle in the middle | # Draw a horizontal and vertical line with a circle in the middle | ||
# Draw each open space with blue, gray, green, and red. | # Draw each open space with blue, gray, green, and red. | ||
Revision as of 04:05, 15 November 2020
Noocracy is a non-quadrant ideology that wants a society that is ruled by the wise (usually philosophers). The society could be ruled by a philosopher king. Noocracy is very wise and loves to read philosophy.
History
The first attempt to implement Noocracy was Pythagoras' city of the wise that he planned to build in Italy together with his followers. Another example of Noocracy is philosopher kings, examples of philosopher kings are Dion of Syracuse, Marcus Aurelius, Khosrow I, and Matthias Corvinus.
Beliefs
Noocracy believes in a system of governance where decision making is in the hands of philosophers, these philosophers could be philosopher kings. Philosopher kings are rulers who possesses both a love of wisdom, as well as intelligence, reliability, and a willingness to live a simple life. Noocracy also criticize democracy for the irrationality of voters and that the average voter doesn't have the necessary knowledge to decide on means to achieve their political aims.
Personality and Behavior
- He usually represents whatever philosopher you want to represent in your comic
- He loves to read works on philosophy
- He despises the roman emperor Commodus
How to Draw
- Draw a horizontal and vertical line with a circle in the middle
- Draw each open space with blue, gray, green, and red.
- Draw black nails in each color
- Adding a crown on top is optional
- Draw eyes and then you're done!
Relationships
Friends
Technocracy - My beloved son and heir.
Absolute Monarchism - The system my philosopher kings use.
Enlightened Absolutism - A benevolent monarch seems like a good idea.
Transhumanism - Can be used to make people wiser.
Frenemies
Ingsoc - I think you took the "the average citizen can't make the right decision" idea too far.
Aristocracy - He is a pompous, foolish man, but has the right idea about who shouldn't rule.
Cyberocracy - He is smart, but too unwise to actually hold power. He needs to grow older and gain more experience before he is a worthy heir.
Enemies
Democracy - I find your system too flawed to be sufficient for the people.
Kakistocracy - By what basis do you believe the mentally daft to be just rulers of a state?
Senatorialism - Eldritch abomination. Conceptual impossibility. Your very existence violates the laws etched into the universe.
