Am m Refutes All Your Points

Try to convince me of anything and I will try to refute your point, feel free to suggest categories in the comments

Example

• - I believe in x opinion.
  • - Why x opinion is bad.
    • - Ok

Philosophical

• - God never existed.
  • - I’d say this would go more in “Religious” but whatever. Everything must come from something, which leads to the natural conclusion that there is an infinitely powerful force which everything came from - a God.

Other

• File:FemtopiaIcon.png - I am actually female, and I am not 16384. 16384 is not rejoining fpcb ever.
  • - I mean it's already been proven that you are 16384 so it's not really an arguable point to say that you're not. Although, I wouldn't be surprised if KK started larping as you, but you for sure are an alt of someone.
    • File:FemtopiaIcon.png - Where is the proof that I am 16384? I am not an alt of anyone.
      • - You already admitted as such, you added the LARP and Joke templates to your original page under your original account, with your name on the templates (e.g. This is a LARP made by Person16384).
        • File:FemtopiaIcon.png - How do you not know 16384 was not just putting the larp and joke templates on there to make people think I am 16384?
          • - There is no rational reason that you would do that.
            • File:FemtopiaIcon.png - 16384 could be doing it for the lulz. And besides, how can you tell that 16384 isn't a woman?
              • - You have said you are a man, and I believe you, 16384ism seemed real and legitimate. Anyway, two other things I found that give you away: 1. How would you know that you're not coming back and 2. Your pfp on Starbucks Nationalism is so obviously AI-generated it's not even funny. And besides all that - you've never been known to do anything for the lulz. And why wouldn't you revert it anyway?
                • File:FemtopiaIcon.png - How do you know 16384 doesn't do anything for the lulz? Also, explain how my portrait was supposedly ai-generated. And just because 16384 SAID he was a man does not mean he is a man. Do you think 16384 acts masculine or smth like that? Because I do not act masculine one bit.
                  • - 1. I know you, you can’t fool me 2. If you look even for 5 seconds it clearly isn’t real 3. You, do, in fact, act masculine, just not on this account. Also address my other two points.