Leerderism

Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Dr. Occo's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

Leerderism

„I am perfectly content with just my small spot on this world, and so should everyone else.“

Basic Information

Aliases

Leerderismus

Frisian Left-Nationalism
Neo-Peasants' Republicanism
User Aliases
The "good" guys in my fiction
Me but with less baggage
File:JonahTalk.png Jonah talker
// Liberal
Capitalist Consumerist Anti-Marxist Liberal

Alignments

Dozen Values:

Dr. Occo's Results

61.8%

38.2%

69.4%

30.6%

53.5%

46.5%

63.9%

36.1%

63.9%

36.1%

51.4%

48.6%

Closest is Labourism

Dr. Occo's Custom Results

70%

30%

65%

35%

55%

45%

65%

35%

99%

50%

Gangs

Artel Gang

Ideological Influences

Influenced by

Preceded	Succeeded
	National Fracturism

Character Information

Likes

East Frisia

Frisian Freedom
Frisian Culture
Nature
Equality
Friendly, Reasonable Discourse
Internet Humour

Dislikes

Tyrants

Imperialism
Violence
The Neoliberal Status Quo
Parallel Societies
Prussia (to an extent)
FUCKING DISNEY
The Stock Market
The Culture War

Song

Bottermelk Tango

Rechtsupweg und Linksintschloot
Ami, Go Home!

Leerderism is the current ideology of polcompball contributor Dr. Occo. It unites a strong interest in old Frisian culture and political structure with the more Socialist, Progressive and Statist leanings of its creator, seeking to establish a reformed, but recognizable Frisian Identity within an independent East Frisian State and a socialist economy. It is essentially a less authoritarian, more esoteric form of National Fracturism.

The Five core principles of Leerderism

Preservation of Culture
Preservation of the Environment
The Strengthening of Communities of land and people
The Universal improvement of living conditions and the pursuit of happiness
Equality of all people

Beliefs

Overview

I am a General Center-Leftist, mostly aligned with Agrarian Socialism and Market Socialism. Smaller influences on my ideology are Local Patriotism, Frisian Cultural Nationalism, Progressive Conservatism, Reactionaryism, and Cosmicism. I am opposed to any form of Dogmatism and Campism, as well as Black-and-White worldviews, and I do not believe that people can be inherently good or evil. My ideology is flexible, since I do not want to sacrifice my values for being ideologically consistent, and I take influence from many different ideologies, while also questioning everything so I do not fall into an echo-chamber.

Government

The State should be governed by a combination of The Workers Guilds on the economic side and a Non-Partisan Legislative body for state policy. The Workers Guilds should organize the economy, while still not making it so that it is completely planned, while the legislature should provide things like peoples‘ police, Emergency Services, Foreign and Domestic policy, etcetera. The Legislature would be made up of representatives of the localities of the Land, like it was in the peasants republic of the Frisian Sealands, and the representatives would be decided upon on a local level, by the people in their municipality. The State should be highly decentralized, so as to allow for most decisions to be made, and services to be provided, on a purely local level. The Legislature and the Guilds should only handle the necessary services that hold a country together, like Economic Regulations, some essential foreign relations and the military and secret services^[1].
I would also propose a Defensive Democracy, in which the legislature would pass laws which prohibit Anti-Democratic Strongmen from tearing the whole system down. This would also be made easier by supporting groups such as ANTIFA, who already try to fight strongman populism and stochastic terrorism where they pop up.

Economy

First: Capitalism is a blight and should be abolished. It accelerates climate change and gives an unfair amount of power to unelected lobbyists and industrialists, not to mention that it makes everyone under it a pawn in an exploitative game against the poor. Capitalism enables the exploitation of any and all workers, allowing the owning class to basically steal the surplus value that workers create from them. In a conventional company, the Capitalists have complete control, and are immune from the consequences of their actions. If they mismanage something, and the company loses money, they are never the ones whose money is taken away. No, the low-rank employees, the workers, they are the ones being punished for what managers and company boards decided. After a possible revolution, or through intense reforms (in government and out of it), I would propose the installation of a highly decentralized, localist market socialist economy. Farms and businesses should be seized and their means of production redistributed to the workers, but the government should not directly control the economy. Instead, it should be regulated and controlled by workers' guilds, institutions that cooperate with the government, but are made up of the workers of different small businesses. I am also in favor of Workplace Democracy for specific workplaces that have to contain a power structure for whatever reason.
Second: I am a Left-Nationalist. This means I oppose economic globalization, because it is the biggest contributor to climate change and exploitation. Everything that can be manufactured or harvested in the homeland, must be harvested, manufactured and consumed in that homeland.
Third: Local Markets must be strenghthened. This is the most reactionary part of my ideology. A farmer should not have his potatoes shipped off to Egypt, but directly distributed to his own community through local markets, which would strengthen community bonds and reduce emissions from tranport. We know this system "works", because it has been in place for aeons before globalization was even possible. Obviously, some products can not be grown or manufactured locally, and those products have made society way better. But my system obviously wouldn't be universal. A country that can not, by using its own goods, manufacture life-saving medicine, should be able to import the materials for that medicine from other countries, so that the people don't die needlessly. So, I would be pro-worldwide distribution of resources, just not in this system and not nearly as much as we do now.

Welfare

I am a staunch welfarist. While I recognize that financial stability is very important in the long run, it is equally important not to leave the helpless and vulnerable in the mud just to get ahead.
Firstly, while working must obviously still be rewarded with more money, the people who are not able to work should still be able to live a good life. A good way to achieve this would be a Universal Basic Income, a certain amount that everyone, no matter if employed or not, would be guaranteed. This would simultaneously eliminate many peoples concerns about poverty and create an easy frame for workplaces to set their wages.
I also want a significant boost to efforts of integration of neurodivergent, disabled and similarly disadvantaged people. Since I myself am neurodivergent, this should not be surprising. It would be great if we could create a framework where any workplace is ready to accommodate for anyone who might not have the same capacities as other workers, or has special needs that need to be met.
Our public sector needs funding, all parts of it. No healthcare office, no post office, no care facility, no hospital, no library, no theater, no museum should be ignored. Especially institutions that preserve history and identity are more important than they first may seem.

Environment

Nation

In my ideal world, Germany should be a confederacy again. The federal government should be relatively small, it should only provide the basic laws of the nation and act as a unified in case of emergency. Basically like the EU, but a bit stronger. Most policies, I believe, should be carried out on a local state level, with the well-being of the local communities as the first concern of any state official. Government services, cooperation with interest groups, bureaucracy, specific economic policy, and even some diplomacy should be in the hand of more localized governments, with East Frisia as my focus, since I am a proud Frisian.^[2]
I would still refer to myself as a Frisian Nationalist and separatist, firstly since my particular kind of nationalism is more concerned with the Frisian people and their lands than with the actual country I technically live in, and secondly because Frisian autonomy is a comparatively more reachable and more immediately desirable goal than a return of the HRE. With that said, let me move on to my favourite talking point: National Cultural Identity. Yes, I am a Cultural Nationalist. I believe that a National Cultural Identity, a Shared collection of cultural views and traditions, should form the backbone of a nations society. Since the multicultural principle of different and separate cultural groups in the same society often leads to parallel societies, isolated cultural outgroups with little connection to wider society, which are a breeding ground for crime, especially when they are neglected by the government. Immigrants should still be welcome in East Frisia, as long as we can physically provide for them without sacrificing the well-being of our own citizens, but they should not form a Split-off parallel society hostile to the dominant one. This could be encouraged by the government with good and well-thought out welfare benefits for struggling immigrant families as well as an effort to guide them into becoming fully functional members of Frisian society and at least being willing to accept its culture. If migrants prove to be completely unwilling or unable to conform to Frisian Culture, they need to be dealt with effectively, and if necessary, they need to be expelled from the country before they become a liability.
Plus, Culture is just nice to have, and it strengthens the community.

Diplomacy

I despise Hegemony, and hold the view that autonomy is a nations highest right. I believe in the concept of the right to self-determination of all peoples, and I would want it to be applied to every people with an identity of their own (for example: Kurds, Basques, Frisians). I am also not willing to brutally invade other nations with little legitimization to impose my arbitrary beliefs on them, as the US and Russia like to do. Of course, I want my nation to intervene in wars, for example by shipping supplies to the better side, since I do not want to passively support Imperialist great powers. But all in all, I am mostly for Non-Alignedism.
I am also not a fan of the overly idealistic and liberal-ideological foreign policy that much of the West has adopted over time. The biggest offenders by far have to be the Schröder and Merkel administrations, who somehow believed (or claimed to believe anyway) that by buying the gas of Putin’s pet company Gazprom they could democratize Russia, which has predictably led to Germany being caught off-guard by the Invasion of Ukraine. Now, the people who need gas to survive are rightfully angry, and the new government (with Merkels former finance minister in charge) is struggling to handle this crisis as well as all the other crises that have cropped up. While I am not supporting Machiavellian Powerplays to achieve German supremacy, I am very much in favor of a more realistic and pragmatic approach to foreign policy. Sometimes, it is better to immediately make hard choices than to endlessly kick the can down the road, especially if that road leads to catastrophe.

Social Policy

Culture

As explained in the „Nation“ paragraph, I believe in the concept of a unifying National Cultural Identity. This Cultural Identity would be one of traditional Frisian culture. The Frisian and Low German languages are a part of it, as is a strong communitarian bond, some typical regional food and drinks like cabbage, beans or tea, and a general quiet rural atmosphere.
I am heavily opposed to cultural Artifism, Futurism and Foreign Cultural Hegemony, specifically that of the USA. Their art, their sayings, their culture have been exported to the entire world, oftentimes threatening to change local cultures not through conquest, but through gradual Americanization. This all must be opposed if we are to preserve our own cultural heritage.

Religious Policy

I am generally in favor of Religious freedom and tolerance, as long as religions stay out of government. The separation of church and state is extremely important.
All people should be free to practice whatever religion they believe in. I can understand how it may be hard for someone to accept that other people believe in different religious concepts than themself, but that does not make religious supremacy or terror against other religious groups okay. In fact, if there exists a religious community that is based on preaching hate, like, unfortunately, many already do, the state should have the authority to investigate them. We can not accept Cult-like behavior or zealous bigotry to grow in our society and form the dreaded parallel society.
Personally, I was raised by a Catholic mother and a Protestant (but very irreligious) father, I was baptized in the Catholic Church, I am mostly Atheist and I philosophically align most with Pastafarism and Lovecraftianism. I also like the Old Cultural implications of original Paganism. But none of those tendencies should be mandated for anyone but me. I am perfectly comfortable with the personal religious identity being completely separate from the National Cultural Identity.

Religious Philosophy

If there is a god, and they are all-knowing, all-powerful and all-loving, it logically follows that we must live in the world that god considers perfect. This means that any argument about the state of things which involves the notion of „gods will“ must be obsolete, since god must always will every situation exactly as it is. If this is not the case, surely god can not be all-knowing, all-powerful and all-loving all at once, because if they were, and the situation were not as they desire, they would have changed that situation with their all-power before it even was perceived by us. Either this, or the gods that exist must do so on such a different level that their thoughts and plans are not even imaginable by the human mind. The Gods would be such alien and unknowable entities that even a second-long glance at their perceptions would drive any person mad. In this case, arguing about the will of the gods is even more pointless, since the will of the gods can not even be understood, let alone acted on, by us.

Philosophy

I am existentially Nihilist. I do not really believe that anything possesses any inherent values, virtues, morals or purpose. I believe in a strictly scientific and evolutionary interpretation of the world. However, this does not mean I believe values, virtues, morals and purpose are somehow „stupid“ concepts, and I do not think being a Nihilist must imply dismissing anything and everything as not important. Morals are made up, but that doesn’t mean we should not follow them. If Society has decided that stealing is wrong, that means, for all intents and purposes, that stealing is wrong in society. Just because we made something up, that does not mean that that thing is completely worthless. We made up money, and it still obviously has a worth.
I also do not believe in the concept of inherent evil. When a person does something, no matter how vile that thing may be, they always have a reason for it, and that reason is never „because I am evil!“. It may be an extremely petty, non-proportionate or unsympathetic motivation, but there always is one. Most criminals do not see themselves as evil, they either see themselves as desperate people who need to commit crimes to survive, or they believe that what they are doing is not actually a crime or even immoral. Everyone has reasons, everyone is complicated. Learn empathy, and you will come far.

Military and Civil Service

While Frisia is located far in the European Union, so is very unlikely to be dragged into a war, I still believe the military is necessary, not only for national defense, but also to give people work. I am in favor of mandatory military/civil service, to give young people a perspective after they leave school. The civil service should be an equal option to military service, since I believe both to be equally as necessary. Military spending is important, but should not have priority over any other type of government spending, as it does in the US. Welfare, meanwhile, should get as much support from the government as possible, guaranteeing a good life for the sick and disabled, no matter their wealth or standing.

Justice System

I am opposed to the death penalty and police militarization, and I like the Nordic prison system. I completely believe in a rehabilitative justice system, and believe punitive justice to be mostly unnecessary.
I would also propose reworking the police force into a people's police of sorts, since the modern police is mostly being used by capital to reinforce their power, however if the people seize the mean of production and capital is overthrown, that would not be a problem anymore.

CULTURE WAR!!!!

The whole Greater Frisia thing

As you may have noticed, I have sometimes in this article used the terms „Frisia“ and „East Frisia“ interchangeably, even though they are not the same thing. East Frisia is a smaller part of the greater region of Frisia, which also includes the Dutch Province Friesland and North Frisia. You might also notice that I put a note of sympathy for „Pan-Frisianism“ into my „Components“ section.
Now, my loyalty is to East Frisia, I see myself as an East Frisian and I want Autonomy for East Frisia, not necessarily Greater Frisia. But, if a real, relevant movement existed that had the reunification of Frisia as a stated goal, I would support this hypothetical movement. I would not go out of my way to drag people that are not interested in Unity into it, but I would always support a request for unity from them.
I also see myself as a Frisian in terms of Culture and Ethnicity, not an East Frisian, since that is not an ethnicity that even exists.

On Gradualism

On Quotas

The Galli Market - A personal anecdote

But hasn't Socialism always failed?

User Alignment Test of Ultimate Destiny

Civic Axis
- (Deliberate) Chaosist (+5)
- Egoist (-15)
- Anarchist (0)
- Minarchist (-10)
- Libertarian (-5)
- Moderate/Mixed (+10)
- Statist (+20)
- Dictablanda (+10)
- Authoritarian (-10)
- Totalitarian (-15)
- Orwellian (-20)
Type of Rule Axis
- (Anarchist) Anti-Democracy (+5)
- Direct Democracy (-20)
- Semi-Direct Democracy (-10)
- Representative Democracy (+20)
- Authoritarian Democracy (+10)
- Totalitarian Democracy (-15)
- (Authoritarian) Anti-Democracy (+10)
If none above apply...
- Organic Centralism (-10)
- Kultokratic System (-5)
Economic Axis
- Marxist Communist (+5)
- Socialist (+20)
- Welfarist/Gift Economy (+15)
- Moderate/Mixed (+10)
- Liberal Economics (-5)
- Capitalist (-15)
If none above apply...
- Third Positionism (-10)
- Anti-Economy (-5)
- Non-Marxist Communist (+15)
- Fiscal Federalism (+5)

Economic Freedom
- Anti-Economy (-5)
- Dirigisme (-10)
- Regulationism (+20)
- Moderate/Mixed (+15)
- Liberal Economics (0)
- Free Market (-10)
- Laissez-Faire (-20)
If none above apply...
- Central Planned (-15)
- Decentral Planned (+5)

Diplomatic Axis
- Autarchy (-15)
- Autarky (+5)
- (Alter-) Globalist (0)
- World Federalist (-20)
- Cosmopolitan (-15)
- Internationalist (-10)
- Moderate (+5)
- Patriotic (+10)
- Nationalist (+15)
- Chauvinist (-15)
- Racial Nationalist (or similar broad category) (-20)
- Ethno-Nationalist (or similar narrow category) (-10)
- Universal Nationalist (+20)
Geopolitics
- Western (-15)
- Western Adjacent (-5)
- Non-Aligned (+20)
- East Adjacent (-15)
- Eastern (-20)
Cultural Axis
- Revolutionary (-10)
- Progressive (+10)
- Reformist (+20)
- Moderate/Mixed (+10)
- Conservative (-10)
- Traditionalist (-15)
- Reactionary (-20)
Technological Axis
- Primal (-20)
- Primitivist (-15)
- Pre-Industrial (-5)
- Deceleration (+10)
- Moderate (+20)
- Acceleration (+5)
- Automated (0)
- Transhumanist (+5)
- Posthumanist (-20)
If none of the above apply...
- Post-Civilization (-20)
- Archeofuturism (0)
Environmental Axis
- Human Extinction (-20)
- Radical Environmentalism (+20)
- Eco-Fascism (+5)
- Ecocentrism (+5)
- Environmentalist (+10)
- Moderate (0)
- Post-Industrialism (-5)
- Industrialist (-10)
- Anthropocentric (-15)
- Anti-Environmentalism (-20)
Neurological Axis
- Anti-Praxis (-20)
- Utopian (-5)
- Dogmatic (-15)
- Idealist (0)
- In Between (+10)
- Realist (+15)
- Pragmatic (+20)
- Rational (+10)
- Dystopian (-20)
- Anti-Theory (0)
War Axis
- Pacifism (+15)
- Non-engagement (+20)
- De-escalation (+10)
- Intervention (-15)
- Irredentism (+5)
- Revanchism (-15)
- Jingoism (-20)
If none above apply...
- (International) Class Warfare (-15)
Praxis
- Insurrectionism (-10)
- Revolutionism (-5)
- Moderatism/Mixed (+20)
- Reformism (+10)
- Stagnationism (-10)

Post your results here:

Dr. Occo - 240/240
Killer Kitty - 65/240
Voidvill Rajandeep - 195/240
Borker - 5/240
- 75/240
Spek - 115/240
Grugoidism - 20/240

Relations

Heel wat besünners

Communitarianism - A politicians responsibility is first and foremost to the community.
Environmentalism - One of the core principles of my ideology. Nature is our friend!
Peasants' Republicanism - The German Peasant Uprisings failing was one of the most tragic events in history, in my humble opinion.
Eco-Socialism - We‘ve seen what Billionaires have done to our world, it is now time to fix that!
Eco-Nationalism - Two based things make one ultra-Based thing.

Mooi

Environmental Globalization - The only good kind of Globalization. Stopping something that could harm the whole world is a priority for the whole world.
Meritocracy - A very worthwhile way to determine who is fit to govern. Though I did not forget what the ancient Chinese Emperors did while this system was in place there, and I also maintain that the name „Meritocracy“ sounds ridiculous.
Technogaianism - ~~Oh shit, It’s GAIA! Quick people, destroy all the robots! Otherwise the Faro plague will get us!~~ So, this is pretty much as good as Transhumanism gets. My Autism still makes me a bit sceptical of big changes, so Transhumanism scares me, but I logically know it‘s a good thing, especially for the medical sector. And this is, as I said, the absolute best form of Transhumanism.
Agrarianism - The Great Tradition of my homeland, my people and even my family. Some Agrarians can be annoyingly conservative, and big rich farmers are bad for almost everything, but all in all this is based.
Agrarian Socialism - Land Reform! Land Reform! Land Reform! This is the best type of Agrarianism.
Progressive Conservatism - Based cultural compromise.
Liberal Socialism and Capitalist Communism - Based economic compromise.

Up Stee

Nationalism - Nationalist policy is important, the state is the nation after all, but this can quickly change into more sinister stuff.
Cultural Nationalism - Preserving National and local culture is important, as is preventing dangerous parallel cultures from forming. But suppressing other cultures is ultranationalist garbage, and this ideology sadly often leads to exactly that happening.
National Agrarianism - Nationalism? Quite Based! Agrarianism? An important part of Frisian Culture and Economy! Extremely xenophobic sentiments due to rural areas being generally more conservative? Uhm. Okay that should maybe be looked into.
Civic Nationalism - Definitely a better qualifier than race or ethnicity, but not as good of one as culture and language. I believe that citizenship is the only true requirement for nationality, but I also believe that Immigrants must be pressured to integrate, lest they form a subculture that breeds crime or radicalism, and you can‘t do that without a good signifier for true nationality.
Noocracy - It is broadly agreeable to say that the wisest people should rule. Though this ideology tends to focus too much on philosophy, and it is often used by Autocrats and Monarchists, so it‘s not a completely unproblematic proposal.
Civil Libertarianism - Do Civil Liberties include the Liberty to own a Private Jet? Or go on a Cruise Ship? Because that is a hard no from me.
Interculturalism - Cultures coexisting while interaction between them is encouraged, that's exactly my ideal. But the melting pot model is even worse than Multiculturalism. Since it originated in the US which did not have a native culture (that wasn't exterminated), it's not shocking that it leads to multiple cultures fusing together into one distinct new culture, and it's fine when applied to the US and other colonial nations, but in nations that have an indigenous culture, it is a catastrophic practice.
Hydrarchy - The Victual Brothers and Likedeelers did some epic trolling, and I love stories about when Pirates annoyed the British Empire, but of course they were still criminals, and often not very nice people at all.

Heel egal

Left-Wing Populism - Makes generally good points against the Right, but can be extremely hyperbolic. Also, this ideology is very broad, which often makes parties with it as their main ideology fall into leftist infighting, like we saw with Die Linke.
Agorism - Black Markets are an important method to counteract unfair corporate and government practices in times of crisis, but are of course still a type of illegal, highly capitalist system that must be counteracted when the economy of the country is doing well, as well as a breeding ground for more destructive crime, an example being murder to prevent the toppling of a well-functioning black market crime empire.
Reactionary Socialism - My exact economic system, but Monarchist and pro-serfdom. Considering this is also Anti-Enlightenment, I really doubt that the king will treat the workers very well. And of course this ideology is socially reactionary as well…
Eco-Conservatism - Quite based for a conservative. Kretschmann is a complete hypocrite, and most Conservatives are too corrupt to give a shit about the environment, but in general it would be good if this very logically consistent ideology would become more widespread.
Homoconservatism - ~~Literally me fr fr~~ The Anti-Trans hategroups that have this ideology are stupid and hateful, and I hate Alice Weidel, but the general idea of Queer-friendly conservatism is good.
Conservative Socialism - Conservative on the wrong aspects, and most Consocs are Orthodox Marxists. But I could myself be described as a conservative socialist, so… give or take, 5/10.

Har leper kunt

Marxism - Reading Marx in process, please stand by…
Revolutionary Progressivism - Overzealous culture destroyers who enthusiastically fight the culture war, but they are necessary as allies when the alternative are social conservatives and worse.
Green Liberalism - DiE gRüNeN!!!!!!11!1! No, but seriously, this is pretty terrible. I understand that Die Grünen are being hamstrung pretty terribly by their coalition partners in the FDP, but that still doesn‘t mean I have to be over the moon for those spineless liberals. And the worst thing? I have to be on their side because the alternative are corrupt, Planet destroying idiots!
Religious Nationalism - Not quite as bad as Ethnonationalism, but still pretty unbased. Religion is not part of the National Cultural Identity. It is, instead, an International Institution and a part of a person's personal identity that they should be able to live out however they want.
State Socialism - This doesn't have the best track record in history, to say it lightly. I prefer Guild Socialism and Classical Social Democracy. The State controlling the economy just lends itself too much to tyranny.
Multiculturalism - Yes, all cultures should coexist. But not in this way! Parallel Societies in the same country are a stupid and dangerous idea, instead we should respect the cultural integrity of every nation.
Industrialism - DAMN BIG BUSINESS POLLUTING THE PLANET AND DESTROYING LOCAL ECONOMIES! THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION AND ITS CONSEQUENCES! …Unfortunately, Industry is necessary for our society, and made the lives of many people better in the past.

Blixen

Kakistocracy - I hate idiots!
Liberalism and Third Way - „Why are so many Nationalist parties getting so much support? It‘s a mystery! I mean, all we‘re doing is constantly doing big business‘ bidding and bringing in cheap Labour from abroad to replace the upper/middle class, while running on issues of climate change (which this practice is heavily contributing to, making us seem hypocritical) and Minority Rights (which don‘t matter at all to the blue-collar workers who are being replaced and losing their income, while normally living in a conservative environment)! What we should do now is antagonize those workers, while changing absolutely nothing about our goals. All hail the mighty status quo!“
European Federalism - The current EU is enough. We do not need such Neo-Imperialist ideas for Europe.
Ultranationalism - Yes, I like my Nation. And so do others with their nations. That is precisely why nation supremacy is a harmful and frankly terrible ideology. Why can‘t you just accept that your nation is not so important that you have to kill for it?
Neoreactionaryism - The rightist counterpart of my ideology. I have some respect for it, but I really don‘t agree with anything except the vague notion of Economic Reactionaryism.
Liberal Feminism - Simply not the right answer. I don't think the endgoal of feminism should be to integrate women into the male-dominated system, effectively just feminizing the patriarchy, instead of building a system that has no patriarchy. Also, Hillary Clinton was weapons grade cringe and needs to be blamed for Trumps victory, Kathleen Kennedy defiled Star Wars, and JK Rowling is a genocide supporter.
Aristocracy - It had its time and place, and Aristocrats were often important to balance out the power a king held, but when the nobles got too much power in Frisia they turned it into just another Feudal State. The fact that I am named after one of those nobles does not make it better at all.
National Liberalism - How‘s Brexit working out for ya? Also, I think Nationalism and Liberalism are contradictory, seen how Liberalism is culturally left (so pro-immigration) and supports the free market.

De Düvel van Kaar offallen

Fascism - Fascism is a system that places all the power there is (power over the economy, power over the government itself, and power over ground morality) in the hand of the government, while usually requiring a belief in ingroups and outgroups and a "natural hierarchy" of people, where there are people who are "undesirable" simply for existing in a certain demographic. This means that Fascism does not simply enable genocide, genocide is almost a natural endpoint of fascism.
Nazism - May you suffer eternally in the darkness of the infinity, you wretched, vile, monstrous piece of garbage.
National Capitalism - „Nooooo I can‘t be a Nazi the Nazis were third position!“ About that.
Racial Nationalism - The Even more retarded version of Ethnonationalism. Builds on the worthless concept of „Race“ instead of Ethnicity, and is also the go-to ideology for murderers, terrorists and cultists.
Eugenicism - Gien en hau sien Kinner dood!
Imperialism - LEWER DUAD AS SKLAV! 1744 never forget!
World Federalism - NEVER! KILL IT WITH FIRE! Also, the amount of Red tape would be insane.
Neoliberalism - I think I have made my position on this quite clear.
Neoconservatism - „Howdy Pardner. We, the USA, have decided that your nation is too leftist to exist, and we have also decided that we are the ultimate authority on this world. Now we will bomb your country and install a Fascist Military Dictatorship in your country so we can easily extract your valuable resources through the Neoliberal World Market.“
State Liberalism - An extremely unfunny strawman of everyone who is not culturally conservative, made by the rightist side of the dreaded culture war. And for the real-life ideologies that come closest to this: They are imperialist, corrupt scum. No, it‘s not legitimate to bomb a country because the people there are bigoted.
Radical Feminism - Geez, no wonder nobody likes you. I recognize Patriarchal structures in Society, but The Patriarchy isn't a secretive club of evil men that sends Trans women to sexually assault """real""" women. You're just misandry with a mask. And some of your acolytes are straight-up genocidal. For more information, see this video.
Islamic Fascism, Jihadism and Islamic Theocracy - Looks like someone needs to be sent to reeducation.

Brilliant

Good

File:NNGM.png New North German Model - More extreme than me, but generally shares most of my ideas, now even more than when my ideology was National Fracturism. He was also the one who truly introduced me to the PCB community, so thanks for that. The only real problem I have with you is the Ethnonationalism, that one is a bit icky.
Neoteric Communization - While I can‘t really make much of your philosophy, first because I‘m not a philosophical guy and second because it‘s really weird, your politics seem mostly good. Regulatory and Explicitly Anti-Neoliberal economic policy is something that will always get me onto your side, and while I wouldn‘t go so far as to ban all pornography, your social policy is alright too.
Great British New Left - A mainline socialist, and Labour nostalgic. From what I can tell, you're pretty cool, the only thing that I don't like is it seems like you're opposed to nationalism and separatism. Though your article doesn't really have much actual political stance, just people you support, so I probably need to revise this relation in the future.

Alright

Meridionalism - Generally based ideology, Separatism are great, as is the segment „Why I believe in Socialism“ where you make clear that you do not strive for power, but simply want all people to be well and happy. Although I fear that the US South is one of the worst places for progressive socialist ideas, so your ideology would not be easy to implement in the real world. Then again, you are definitely not the one at fault there. Why are you so indifferent to slavery though?
Pantheonism - Almost all of our policies align, except for one, but that one is a dealbreaker. Yep, it‘s the World Federalism vs. Nationalism. We‘ll probably never change our respective positions on that issue, so I‘ll not belabor the point any more ( Would still prefer your system to the Neoliberal Status Quo though ).

Middling

Inadequate

Brazilian Liberalism - LiberalTM. As if the world needed more of those.
Rigby Thought - A conservative that is not a populist and xenophobic piece of shit? That is becoming rare these days, and I respect you for not going with the flow. LGBT Conservatism, Patcon and Ecocon are all based. The problem is, of course, that our economic policies do not align (I am fond of socialism, you are not), and while your hatred of communism is understandable, using Cold War methods in the modern day is not. You also seem to support authoritarian methods used by the military dictatorship, and that worries me. You‘re still better than your libtard countryman because your ideology is at least distinct.
Mordecaism - Look out people, le Socialism Understander has arrived! Delivering powerful and not at all overdone points like "If Socialism good, then why Venezuela?", "You claim to hate Capitalism, yet you live in a rich capitalist nation", "Rich People can't be legitimate socialists" and of course "Socialism is when the government does stuff". Your ideology isn't THAT bad, because you at least support Social Justice and some Welfare, but your argument against socialism is terrible. The only way it could be worse is if you just used a soy wojak.
National 16384ism - While you are quite nice to chat with online, and we share some beliefs, namely environmentalism and Nationalism, I have to heavily disagree with Religious influence in politics and all that comes from that, namely most of your cultural policy. Also, your strawman of the Cultural Left is quite infuriating to me.

Bad

TIIKKETMASTER Thought - I am Ticket Master, Tickets to the Pain Train! On a more serious note, I find your ideology to be pretty unbased. I don‘t like global revolution for many reasons, and poorly evidenced conspiracy theories are not legitimate grievances to have in my opinion. I obviously disagree with Neoluddism and Free Market Capitalism, and your critique of Progressivism is very weird. However your opinion that the Government should be environmentalist is good, as is your somewhat nuanced reactionary outlook.
Messardism - Nazi-Maoism? Really? And that bullshit of a „Male-Centered society“ is completely arbitrary nonsense and spits in the face of human diversity. At least you want a strong social state, but those views are a dime a dozen, and there are loads of people that have the same ideas without being Odalist weirdos.
National Wodenism - Benevolent Fascism is still Fascism.
Alstūdism - Benevolent Fascism 2: Norwegian Boogaloo.