×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,529 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Revision as of 17:11, 27 January 2024 by Cyb3rklev (talk | contribs) (Cyb3rklev moved page Neo-Vilfredoism to Cyber Thought)






Hello, i'm Cyb3rklev, and this is my ideology.


Organization

  • Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Formalism: Democracy (and republican dictatorship) doesn't work. The disconnect between actual power and recognised power (i.e. people in government don't have a stake in the country) leads to demagogic crooks taking power by promising to help people, only for them to use their power to sack the wealth of productive citizens and/or give special privileges to lobbyists in exchange for large sums of money in the form of "campaign donations" and/or a high ranking position in one of the lobbyist companies, precisely because they have no stake in the country and are accountable to no one, unlike a board of directors and its appointees (CEOs, CFOs, CTOs etc.), who are accountable to the shareholders that elected them. As such, i support the establishment of city-states ruled by timocratically elected for-profit corporate governments elected by citizen-shareholders. Citizenship (and therefore the right to elect and be elected) would be tied to ownership of stock in the company and residence within its jurisdiction. A Board of Directors (or BoD for short) elected by shareholders would supervise the activities of the corporation and appoint a CEO, who would be in charge of the activities that the BoD supervises. Due to the predominance of the executive branch, one could say that my system of governance is presidentialist, almost dictatorial, even.





Law







Economics

  • Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Regulation: Minimal regulation is the key to a prosperous economy and wealthy populous; which is why i support very limited government regulation of the economy, stuff like anti-trust, product safety standards, consumers' rights protection laws, union protection laws, as well as special provisions aimed at public utility and infrastructure companies (Public utilities and infrstructure are companies that are allowed to operate at monopoly scale because they offer essential services that you can’t function in modern society without) .


  • Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Georgism: I support Georgism, as it is unfair that people profit off things they didn't create, like land, the commons (natural materials such as air, water, and a habitable Earth) and natural resources, often times only being able to do so through improvements created by other people, and thus profits from these should be "taxed" (though it could be argued that LVT and Pigouvian Taxes are not actually taxes, but rather reappropriation of stolen investment value and compensation for damages to the commons and extraction of resources which belong to us all, respectively). The advantages to these are the following:
    • Incentivizing efficient land usage.
    • Turning rent from a form of extortion into just another race to the bottom to provide a service for the lowest price while still turning a profit, as well as incentivize landlords to make money through additional services like protection, cleaning and repairs.
    • Increasing urban density, which has a large slew of benefits such as reduced urban sprawl (which protects the environment), less obesity, lower crime rates, shorter commutes and stronger local businesses.
    • Lowering the tax burden on improved property and agricultural soil, and increasing it on unused land, thereby making land speculation unprofitable.
    • Giving back to the productive members of society who made the land valuable in the first place, and compensating them for pollution of the commons and resource exploitation, through a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Citizen's Dividend.



  • Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Neomercantilism: Tariffs and protectionism are a double-edged sword, it protects local industries, but also makes them less competitive, and the price increase the tariffs cause to imports has negative effects on domestic prices. The solution? Neomercantilism, reduce barriers to entry and increase incentives as much as possible, that will make domestic industries stay and attract foreign investment.




Foreign Policy




Culture



  • Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Peri-urbanism: As Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination TIIKKETMASTER has pointed out, the worst-off poors are the ones in urban areas, because you can't hunt, forage or farm in those areas, which means your survival is inevitably going to depend upon precarious jobs/government handouts/goodwill of passerbys. I support deurbanization, and the scattering of the population into peri-urban settlements (small town/village-sized settlements with urban infrastructure and amenities), because having the local clinic, grocery shop, bar, train station, countryside and wilderness all within the same walking distance from your house is pretty fucking cool, and so is being able to have a vegetable garden in your backyard.




Philosophy



Recent changes

  • MarketLiberal • 02:27
  • MarketLiberal • 02:25
  • Itapi • Yesterday at 23:46
  • Itapi • Yesterday at 23:45