Decided to stop using user page, and came up with a really fucking larpy name whilst I was at it. Oh yeah I'm moreso gonna be using this as a reading list than putting content on it so uhh yeah expect limited amounts of changes in terms of content. My template is {{Eleuth}} which looks like this: 
Eleutherianism
Summary (WIP)
Methods which are fully in the bounds of the law such as peaceful protest and trade unionism are absolutely useless; falling to the idea that today's society can be destroyed by today's apparatus is blindness. We must throw away the old apparatus during our upheaval.- What appears voluntary may not be so voluntary afterall. There are many things the individual may worship; gods, traditions, cultures, a false sense of justice, but worships are often environmental, structured into us from our entry into civilization. The superstructure of capitalist society is, in some ways, homogenizing when it comes to culture, though what it sets as the standard is not unchangeable.
In capitalist societies, the ontology of the general populous is 
one of business. This is a substantial contributor to capitalist realism, which is in effect the outright rejection of self-liberation, and a failure of the human to rule over themselves. The molding of ontology by dominant ideology makes me believe in ontological relativism. Overall, business ontology is a false ontology where we see that our oppression is normalcy or even clemency and in doing so oppress ourselves.
Capitalist realism is something which makes people justify their own oppression; they put upon themselves the right to be oppressed. Capitalist realism in this sense is comparable to a religion, where capital has become the supernatural entity which is worshiped by those under this realism.
Communism (WIP)
Communism, in the modern world, has become a misnomer. Communism is something that people do not understand, attach to different things, and really just rub off on anything that doesn’t flow their way. Transgender people have become “communism“, Kamala Harris has become ”communism“, anything which demands the subjective idea of ”progress“ (which is much tied to the much uncommunist American liberal ideal) we have in this modern world is given this not so flattering label. This is why I choose to write this segment to answer, from my perspective, some ideas about what communism is. First of all, what Marx and Engels wrote were not step by step, infallible guides - Marx and Engels were historical materialists and so saw history as dynamic i.e. shaped by material (such as economic and social) conditions. Marx and Engels did not write blueprints but rather gave analysis which could be used for devising methods of organisation later. The living conditions of Alpine dwellers will always be different from those of the plainsmen, and so the method of the former will differ to the method of the latter. A mistake of the Bolshevik Lenin was to attempt to apply a form of praxis born from Russian material conditions to the rest of Europe; this partly led to the defeat of revolutions in Germany (for example, the contact of trade unions which whilst revolutionary in Russia due to their recent development, had in Germany merely became a tool of the bourgeoisie and therefore useful only for small amounts of class consciousness; their image would merely hold a single piece in a larger, thousand-brick puzzle.) Marxism is a philosophy of constant evolution; it is the doctrine of the liberation of the proletariat, and so it is largely dependent on the root cause and shaping of oppression, which have changed in the modern world; things that were once revolutionary can become reactionary (see previous thing on trade unions in Russia vs Germany, this was early 1900s.)
Higher-stage communism is not a stage of total equality as it is presented in your little Western history books; it is not a Utopia; the Marxian doctrine of scientific socialism was a synthesis of socialism and materialism in the face of utopian socialism, which had only looked forward. Marxism looks at the present, as well as the past, though the now anachronistic doctrine of Marxism-Leninism can struggle to do the former. It is also based off of Marxism for an Agrarian Russia which is long gone to history - the modern Russian Federation and the Russian Empire as well as Russian DFR are miles apart. While Leninist tactics may prove helpful elsewhere (we cannot say they are completely dead, this would be absolutely pessimistic. Empirical evidence suggests their effectiveness. Adapted tactics such as the guerilla warfare of Maoist doctrines also continue to work in the Philippines despite Leninism being a back Maoism praxeologically leans on.), they must not become a religious doctrine; they must not become something which overrides the science of scientific socialism, lest we fail, and failure must be avoided in the struggle for liberation.
Opinions
Schaberism (
/
/
/
) - Absolutely terrible. Actual strawman communism, it's so bad. Communism is a doctrine of liberating yourself from the boot, not putting yourself under a new, red boot.
Venatrixism (
/
/
/
) - A lot I don't understand of this, like accelerationism, but what I do understand I do like a lot. I too think communism is the only way for freedom of all. I love a lot of what I'm reading of Stirner so far, and taking a read of this page definitely clears up what your interpretation of that is (well...obviously...thats what a page is for, i'm very 
.) I love your paragraph on philosophy; letting higher powers shape your life is simply giving yourself the right of tyranny, and I know, at least for me, that I disdain this tyranny, so rejection of these higher powers, no matter what they may be, or how they present themselves, is important. The people who see these higher powers as ways to cushion their fall don't realize that they are the one's pushing them down in the first place; they grant that right to be pushed when they embrace anything but their own will. I would write about the other stuff like councils, Bataille, etc., but I probably would have a mediocre understanding of them, which would make nothing worthy of writing. Overall, very incredible thought. I am excited to read more.
Juche - The natural conclusion of Bolshevism in an age of globalization. Disgusting like 
its predecessor.
Reading List
Read
Karl Marx
Theses On Feuerbach
Karl Marx and 
Friedrich Engels
The Communist Manifesto
Friedrich Engels
On Authority- Principles of Communism
Socialism: Utopian and Scientific- Synopsis of Capital
Mikhail Bakunin
What is Authority?
Vladimir Lenin
The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism- Marxism and Reformism
Vikky Storm
The Gender Accelerationist Manifesto
Egoist Agorism
It’s Time For “Mad Anarchism”
Oswald Mosley
Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered
Daniel De Leon
Syndicalism
TripleAmpersand
The Alt-Woke Manifesto
Murray Rothbard
Anatomy of the State
Mark Fisher
- Capitalist Realism: Is there no alternative?
Left Hyperstition 1: The Fictions of Capital- Left Hyperstition 2: Be Unrealistic, Change What's Possible
- Terminator vs Avatar: Notes On Accelerationism
- Exiting the Vampire Castle
Robert P. Murphy
- Chaos Theory: Two Essays on Market Anarchy
D. Z. Rowan
- A Brief Description Of Egoist Communism
Nick Land
- A Quick and Dirty Introduction to Accelerationism
Alex Williams and 
Nick Srnicek
- Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics
xenogothic
A U/Acc Primer
Bobby Whittenberg-James
Economic Nihilism
smartistone
Ads are everything, not AI
Vincent Garton
- Unconditional accelerationism as antipraxis
Edmund Berger
- Unconditional Acceleration and the Question of Praxis: Some Preliminary Thoughts
Otto Rühle
The Revolution Is Not A Party Affair
The Struggle Against Fascism Begins with the Struggle Against Bolshevism
Ian Wright
Venture Capitalism versus Venture Communism
Dr. Bones
The "Stirner wasn't a Capitalist you Fucking Idiot" Cheat Sheet- Egoist-Communism: What It Is and What It Isn’t
Alfredo M. Bonanno
Insurrection- Why Insurrection?
Kristian Lamprecht
- A Critique of Capitalism and other Established Systems: An Introduction to Stirnerite Marxism
Joseph Stalin
Dialectical and Historical Materialism
Jay Fraser
The Transcendence of Death is Political
Sergey Nechayev
Catechism of a Revolutionary
Plan C
- Building Acid Communism
Franco “Bifo” Berardi
The Post-Futurist Manifesto
Mencius Moldbug (Curtis Yarvin)
A formalist manifesto- Democracy as an adaptive fiction
Mao Zedong
On Contradiction
Communist Party of India (Maoist)
Marxism Leninism Maoism Basic Course
Hans-Hermann Hoppe
Marxist and Austrian Class Analysis
Wolfi Landstreicher
Why I am not a Communist
Max Stirner
- The Unique and its Property
Unknown
Bible of Avarice
Currently Reading
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
- Current Segment: Crumbling Walls
- Worker's Councils
- Current Segment: The Task
Want to Read
Acid Capitalism (Article)
The Revolution of Everyday Life
The Right to be Greedy
Society of the Spectacle- Comments on the Society of the Spectacle
On the Genealogy of Morality- Nietzsche and Philosophy
- Thus Spoke Zarathustra
- Stirner's Critics
- Fundamental Principles of Communist Production and Distribution
- The Party and Class (Pannekoek)
A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy- Wage Labour and Capital
- Value, Price and Profit
- The German Ideology
- The Civil War in France
- Grundrisse
- Contribution to a Critique of Political Economy
Anti-Dühring- The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State
- Outlines of a Critique of Political Economy
- Ghosts of My Life: Writings on Depression, Hauntology and Lost Futures
The Myth of Sisyphus- The Rebel
- The Stranger
- The Plague
Origin and Function of the Party Form- The Wandering of Humanity
Suggestions
(Suggest books here)
Templars of the Proletariat by Alexander Dugin
The Guattari Reader by Gary Genosko
The Other Russia by Eduard Limonov- Major books from Lenin
Relationships
Comments
- Ask me things here
Moxogenism - Insanely based ideology.
- - Thanks; I'm not the primitivist kaczynskist though btw; I'm just influenced by some of his concepts (some call it pseudo-sociology but ehhhh i found it interesting so fuck dem.).....i love being influenced by domestic terrorists, truly shows the greatness of life.
Notes
? = I would say I do not fully grasp his views enough yet; I need to read more. And no I'm not shopping specifically for this guy's views; I've been reading small bits of his works (though not put onto the reading list just yet because I haven't actually finished things) and feel they have shaped some of my ideas. In case you're wondering (I know you're not), I'm currently reading his "Marx on Capital as a Real God"