The best way to summarize my political and philosophical ideology is to think of it as what if Žižek was not a communist, Stirner was anti-egoist, Land didn't believe in technocapital but technocommunism and didn't advocate for statism but for anarchism, some Baudrillard's theory of simulacra in perspective of AI creation of cyberspace and the subsequent hyperwar between humans evacuated on Mars and an alliance of AI and genetically engineered apes on Earth that will lead - i.e. accelerate total communist revolution on Earth, and Nietzschean idea of Ubermensch analyzed through Darwinian lense, everything in a purely satirical manner and worked through post-logical framework I called postlogical dialecticism. It is also heavily influenced by Netflix film theory.
Opinions
Initially it rambled about how reality is false and rather everyone sees reality different due to philosophical darwinism, language is false, existing is an illusion and a hoax promulgated by society and about the failures of continental philosophy and the goal of creating a universal axiomatycal system that will be universal language (not in usual sense as a language, but rather a mathematical symbolization) through post-post analytic philosophy. Then it also developed its 'least-energy use principle' as one of the main key philosophical points. It mostly argues for the mathematization of metaphysics and philosophy as a discipline. Besides that it's heavily into mbti and psychology to the point it's considered annoying and kakistocratic, and also likes subtly using 'your mama jokes' and bullying lads that think politics is superior to philosophy.
It is characterized by an extensive use of chaotic nature of postlogical dialectics, satire and heavy analogies from popular culture, mostly film theory. It sometimes resorts to ridiculing modern continental philosophy for its obscurity.
Liberatory Science
A simple criterion for science to qualify as postmodern is that it be free from any dependence on the concept of objective truth. However, these criteria, admirable as they are, are insufficient for a liberatory postmodern science: they liberate human beings from the tyranny of absolute truth and objective reality, but not necessarily from the tyranny of other human beings. Based on Sokal's analysis I propose creating emancipatory mathematics free of hegemonic Zermelo-Fraenkel framework (which, reflecting its nineteenth-century liberal origins, already incorporates the axiom of equality) supplemented only by the axiom of choice.