CommentStreams:720f1aefa8ea3aad8f8bf9d433dd9653

It seems to me that this concept is somewhat burdened, because it is actually difficult for us to understand something that is part of the hypothetical, so we cannot fully understand omnipotence, recognizing that it does not exist, because this concept is full of contradictory qualities that prevent its complete absorption. Therefore, my attention is focused not on the idea of an omnipotent deity or essence, but on the nature of reality as a complex retype, creativity, etc., in this regard, omnipotence implies a single, all-encompassing force standing above the level of Deleuze immanencies, above everything that cannot fit into personal pluralism in principle. Touching upon areas that could be relevant to concepts such as omnipotence, I criticize the traditional Freudian model of the psyche, which may include discussions about omnipotent figures in family structures or mythical structures in the human psyche, as well as criticize omnipotence within the framework of non-geographic power (political or economic).