×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,528 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Revision as of 12:22, 15 January 2024 by Kalivyah (talk | contribs) (creature)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent piss's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

LARP Self-Insert
"I am definitely a Bible believing Christian and not an occult pagan." - Christian Identity

This self-insert is a LARP made by Kalivyah and their actual ideology is piss. It's probably best if you take this with a grain of salt, and this page most likely does not represent the actual political views of the user.

if you're looking for any semblance of effort in this too bad. weep.

theory

theory 1

Our end goal has always been the same; the destruction of the commodity form, the abolition of the present state of things... of classes and hence the state, and the acceleration of the development of the forces of production. Why is it then that we cling on so dearly to the methods of the old order?
The "Dictatorship of the Proletariat" as it is so-called has failed. It has failed because in its very existence- that being of domination of one class over others, it can not destroy the state form but simply strengthens it, often to the detriment of the construction of socialism. We cannot be communists if we support the very class and state form which has gotten us into this mess.
Any gains made by the Dictatorship of the Proletariat have not been because of the domination of one class over another, but because of the explicit destruction of class relations and the socialization of all property.
The goal of the communists, nay, should not be to socialize property- or even to "communize it". It should be the abolition of property as a whole; it is the abolition of the property form and the destruction of the idea of "ownership" in of itself, subject immediately. The proles should not "own"- nor should anyone, for the idea of 'ownership' is what we must abolish itself.

theory 2

The proles should also abolish themselves

theory 3

actually just abolish everything

theory 4

abolish yourself as well

relationships

request i dee cee

good

OK

bad fuck off

Recent changes

  • Javi Coelho • 49 minutes ago
  • Javi Coelho • 55 minutes ago
  • SocialistWorldRepublic • Yesterday at 22:18
  • NewMaritimeVistula • Yesterday at 19:22