"We oppose morality because we refuse to follow laws, codes, and order. We oppose morality because we refuse to let something external to us dictate our actions. We oppose morality because we refuse to allow a set of rules to say what is right and wrong, rather than our own will. In our view, the child rapist is just as moral as their killer, because there is no morality. We hate the child-rapist nonetheless because they disgust us and infringe upon our will. Ultimately, what is right and wrong is up to whoever has the most force and numbers at their disposal. Our order of amorality can only be created when we have sufficient force and numbers, sufficient violence. Perhaps it will fall to some movement that has greater violence at its disposal. Perhaps it will never amount to anything at all. The child-rapist may as well attempt to bash in the skulls of their opponents. I don't see why not. This doesn't mean they won't have opponents, this doesn't mean they won't have enemies. It just means they can try to do as they like."
You just want to impose a moral system lmao. You deem Child-Raping as wrong and want it's practitioners hunted down and killed, presumably with those force and numbers. This simply isn't amoral. Not that's a bad thing - but it 's contradictory for sure.
"If someone chooses to violate someone else, I cannot strictly say their action was wrong. What I can say is that it causes me great displeasure and so I will seek to prevent it and punish it." is literally a moral code lmao. "I'm not saying it's wrong, I'm just saying it should be looked down upon and punished!!!" laughable.